Conq's vote on Murrin doesn't actually feel like he's engaging with him and trying to work out his alignment. It feels more like he slapped together a case that he thought was fine and voted without really trying to get anything out of it. He also doesn't really try to get Zak to post more content either, despite calling him out on it, just saying that we can kill lurker slots whenever which feels kind of off. Admittedly this is heavily meta based but yeah.
I wouldn't say Conq is staying on the sidelines or anything like that, but I don't feel like he's trying to engage with the game or anything like that. Compare his vote on me here to his Zak vote in NotV2 (I know he was ITP but he was basically a townie with an easier wincon ;_;) which were both lurker votes, he actually seemed to try and get something out of his Zak vote so he could read Zak better, whereas here he just drops the vote because he decided I was scum despite having very little material to read me off of.
If people think I'm scum because I'm not posting content, it's not like I'm incapable of bullshitting and I don't like how fast the wagon formed on me at all. Serela's vote is basically pressure which is like... okay I guess but Conq's is basically trying to make my disappearance into a massive thing, and his cases have been really weak aside from that (considering Serela was voted just because he wasn't townreading the slot.)
Okay, reading this actually made me pretty mad. If you read that post again I'm pretty sure I made several attempts to engage with Murrin in my vote (not that I always engage with people in my votes anyway, but I do try most of the time), so I'd like to see you get off with the claim what I'm not trying to engage with people before I lynch them! As for Zak, I wasn't going to vote him at the time, so I wasn't going to say "go post more Zak" and the same to the x other people with few posts. Killing lurkers was a response to (I think) darkninja talking about "powerlurkers" when the day just started so I really dislike the way you're taking everything out of context.
My vote on you is a "lurker vote" yes, but it's also a vote because I think you're scum. I went back and looked at my NotV2 Zak vote and the difference there is conviction since Zak was pulling some obvious bullshit, even if he was town, so I could call him out on it. Here you barely posted anything outside of RVS and kept promising a big post that never came. I can't get any "clarifications" out of you because you don't have any posts to clarify!
I dislike you saying "oh my disappearance isn't such a big thing" because it is. I've caught multiple scum in the past trying to put off posts with bullshit excuses like JOB's "I'm washing the dishes but still have time to post about my washing the dishes in mafia." It's fine if people don't have the time to post or don't want to post, but talking about making a post and then repeatedly delaying it to do other stuff is something I see more from mafia than town.
My Serela vote was weak but the main reason I moved it to Serela was because I didn't want to keep it on Murrin anymore and decided trying to get a Serela wagon going would be a good idea until I caught up.
Anyway, was your vote on me the crux of the post you were promising? Why didn't you just post this before you went to bed, or at least the vote?
Will not be switching to Dormio, I've done this too many times and in the end the reason he turbolurks is because he's just too busy. And his few posts don't swing me either way.
Catching up with the rest now.