An oversight on your part, you forgot your own claim.
What is this?
"Your ability is scum"
"Why is it scum?"
"Because scum would use it this way."
"Then why does that make me scum if I'm not using it in a scum way"
"Because you forgot to be scum."
I suppose thinking about it, the fact that you're pulling this doesn't really indicate that you're scum, but if you're wondering why nobody is following along with you, here it is.
I could vote for [the lurkers] if we don't reach an agreement on who to vote by the end of the day.
Serela always pointed out that it's too early for lurker hunts, but why does putting a vote on a lurker now make it harder to consolidate lynch at the end of the day?
>"BT can be explained"
>votes BT
This actually isn't that bad of a point against CF7. It's just an observation of the unfortunate Debater's Paradox. basically, because BT put the most effort into his case, He's the one that's getting the rep for it's existence. This is why people should be more weary of sheepers.
Re:Voting block/Lynching Dormio:
Well, due to how signups happened, I'm Dormio, so if you really wanted to.
I'm already getting to the part where I don't feel good about the major wagons
CF7 needs an update before I change my mind on him though.
Ninja is hard to parse, but after reading a few times, I don't think he called Conq scummy, I think he's just respond /to/ conq. I remember conqueror asking who his other scum reads are and "Raikaria" was his answer to that.
Aside from the insistance that CF7 is scum, there's nothing really suspicious about Ninja, so I'm not comfortable with the wagon on him.
Also, I'm willfully ignorant of the case on Raikaria because it seems like another case of can't please anybody. I feel he's been self-concious enough about getting wagoned on day one that appeasment isn't the hard scumtell that Conq is painting it as.