You're not questioning. You're just blatantly making him look bad, without advancing your read on him to boot. Defacing someone's reputation like that while claiming "no I think they're town" is downright malicious and scummy. That post didn't look like "man DNA should stop doing X because it doesn't help town at all", it looked like "guys look how terrible DNA is for doing X".
What, you can think someone is dumb and wrong and still think they are town, I've questioned DNA more then enough to know it's like talking to a brick wall.
Do you not think DNA is wasting his time tunnel visioning?
Yes I did. In the same post I said "guess it's a community difference where we're fine with occasionally policy lynching, but you guys view it as scummy". Which translates to yes, we do tolerate policy lynches at times.
Clearly if the post is afters you didn't answer it?
The points you just brought up against Serela and Shadoweh are also very unsatisfying.
Almost like I said earlier they are mild scum reads blurred toghether.
What about Shadoweh not taking into account Murrin's earlier angry reactions make her scummy?
Because the thing she was attacking Murrin for not doing Murrin HAD been doing?
Why is Shadoweh not being here to claim after telling other people to claim in D1 scummy?
Because she attacked people for not claiming then I thought she was gonna disappear until Deadline.
Serela wasn't the only one to vote Dormio, and not even the first one to, so how does that make her scummier than me and Bard (especially Bard, who started that wagon in the first place)?
Serela and you were just sheeping Bard because of the deadline. You I have a town read on and Serela I didn't.
Bards Post where he clears Sel for simply putting effort into the game while Town and Mafia could both put effort into the game.
For clarification, effort equals Town. I think DNA, Shalako and Serela are town-looking at the moment due to the effort they invest
I also disagree with Bards statement that Dormio was mudslinging DNA instead of just voicing his thought process and stating his reasons in thread for rejecting them as too nutty and I like Dan's posts so far so I think Bard was making up a reason to attack Dormio.
Even more so considering Bard lurks until deadline thows out a case and people follow it.
##TargetBardHonestly, it feels like you are only digging up these things just because I asked about Serela/Shadoweh and you deem it risky to back off these suspects because you already listed them as scumreads earlier.
Naw, thanks for making me question my reads, I'd not have know I was wrong about thinking Serela was you because of it.
Without you questioning me i'd have forgotten about Bard too.
'd still love an actual Dormio post and I still think it's questionable to lynch him as it is but... considering the ~*~riveting~*~ competition? Sure, I'm for it.
This is one of my reasons for doubting Selery as it's very back tracky after sheeping Bard.
You still haven't answered what about Serela's recent case against Shadoweh you disliked
Yea I did, I said it was desperate to find a reason to lynch Shadow over themselfs.
Look at the bad witch with the scummy posts we should lynch the her instead of me!
If you can't explain it, then I'd have to conclude that you also handwaved it only because it came from one of your announced scumreads, so you don't want to be caught agreeing with them.
Well man, if you want to twist yourself into knots to think I'm Mafia not much I can do about it but clearly you can see why one lynchee generating reasons to lynch the other big wagon shouldn't be taken at face value?
