Wrathie:
116 - Admits to inactive lurking - points out Alice is lurking. Gives lurking a null-tell.
120 - I don't get the vote and comment on Kanako at all. Seems to scold UK for the L-3 business, but otherwise offers stock opinion. Not much can be expected at this stage though, which makes the obv.scum statement wierd, but the rest of the post normal.
129 - Mentions his case on Kanako is the same as Pesco's case.
134 - More unwarrented concern about his activity levels. explains his vote on Kanako in more detail, and justifies it as pressure for Edible's question. Puts up against Umu's case on UK. Umu's case sounded weak at that point, so it's understandible the defense is.
He switches to Roukanken later in the post for not presenting his Case on UK-Ri and sticking to Alice prodding. I looks around and didn't see Roukan saying anything about UK-Ri though, so this makes it more worrying.
141 - Unvotes after realizing he didn't have a case on Rou.Doesn't vote for Kanako, who answered Edible's question by then anyway. Logs off without looking any further.
147 - Complains about work getting in the way of his ability to be active and post coherrent cases on others. I'm trying not to draw paralelles to Donut's actions, but I find that hard to see that Wrathie is getting away with something Donut got voted to L-1 for.
Mentions he was trying to target Umu for his case on UK, and not UK herself. I realize that it was easy enough to tell that from where I stand, so I don't know why UK said what she did in responce.
Admits the vote on Rou results from a break in concentraition, which I already noted.
171 - Again starts off with apologizing for targeting Rou. Does a coverall post which is usually bad on day one. Especially since the ones that we know are noticably wrong. I'm not going to use being wrong as a scumtell since the three lynches of the day were all pro-town power roles.
Most notable is the fact that he gave an excuse to not post a vote, which Pesco jumped on. This could and would be a good chance to bus someone who hasn't provided anything besides excuses and false cases. UK votes Wrathie before the wagon followed up on the third power role. Pesco then votes Wrathie at the start of Day 2 without a change in reasoning.
369 - Again not much to say here except for the case on Edible, which Edible blew away in responding posts. Again, another case of a failed case.
As a note, I'm ignoring the Roleplay with Pesco, since it's just Flavor.
also, in regards to UK, the point about UK going straight to Wrathie after Kanako's claim while Pesco was targeting him is another notch I'd like to add on the case against Her. I also take back my Wrathie is likely scum claim at the end of my first analysis, since all of Wrathie's contributions have been what you guys are voting me for. I originally gave Wrathie a pass because it was the same as the case on donut,
just worse.
