Affinity 110 here, he mentions both KY and SP. For his attack on Kanako, says he's not being pro-active which is more of a cop tell than a scumtell. Cops have more direct means of telling who's scum and who's not, so they can afford to be conservative on day one. Contrast Scum who have to root out Townies almost every day in place of themselves (Hi, Affinity's vote.)
...Okay, what the hell is this?
This is like saying that lurking is more of a doctell than a scumtell because the Doc doesn't want to get NK'd. Contrast scum who want to AVOID lurking because that'll give people reasons to vote for them.
I'm having trouble with this post. He appears to have directly targeted SP and KY based on his question for donut. His next post later (162) Flips on Roukanken from when he asked donut "why Rou?"
I don't see why Affinity is apparently targeting SP and KY here, and saying that and then adding 'but then he flips on Rou later' makes no sense. How can he be tunneling several people at once?
309, First post of day two, votes Edible based on use of meta. Next post responds to Donut Vs. Rou with suspecting donut after telling Rou he's obviously wrong.
Okay, what're you saying here? I'm failing to see what this contributes besides stating the obvious.
And you seem to be trying to make Affinity look bad for attacking Donut/You in particular. As bad as my points were, no-one else seems to be labelling them as scummy like Donut did, and it's hardly like Affinity was alone in turning on him.
UK's strong feeling on Wrathie is a plus in my book.
I don't get it. You say that Wrathie looks Town, but UK suspecting him is a good thing? :/
The biggest tell however was that she was pushing for Donut's Lynch even after analyzing and Agreeing that Pesco should be voted off the Island.
I would probably vote pesco if donut hadn't been completely useless.
This is not 'agreeing that Pesco should be voted', this is 'agreeing that Pesco is a viable candidate for voting'. Donut was being totally and utterly close-minded on the possibility of a fake doc claim, turning on me for raising the possibility which is easily overdoing it. His subsequent breakdown did little to help.
This mostly strikes as wanting to avoid the same fate I've been put up to due to her recent bout of inactivity.
She explained the problem several days in advance. It's not like she said 'hey I'm gone for two days bye' and never showed up.
On the bright side, at least I'm not a survivor, UK.
?_?
Mind explaining where
this came from?
Decide which is scummier. Defending the actions I'm responsible for or not defending the actions I'm responsible for.
The fact you make an effort to go back and validate every scummy action Donut made without anyone accusing you for it feels a little paranoid.
Yes, that's how experts would do it. Would you define Kanako as an Expert? I know that my first time as cop, I was much more lax in my hunt - looking at what people said that give me a bad feeling and checking them out.
Still, you seem to be trying to make the point that we had no reason to suspect Kanako's behaviour at the time because he was obvcop. I don't get where you're coming from here.
That's how my reports usually look like. It may seem vague to you, but I am analyzing these points, as my results at the bottom of the post reflect. My results were this: Wrathie hasn't made an honest scumtell, you've fully explained your thought process and look townie as a result, and UK has made visible scumtells, who I am voting for.
Where exactly are UK's scumtells? You praise her for having a unique opinion on Wrathie in one comment, then reprimand her for not going with the majority in another.
Not seeing much reason to change my vote right now.
---
first off, the very task of pulling off a successful protect is a bit of a WIFOM in itsself, as you have to guess who scum will target each night.
Let's think, we have a confirmed cop and doc in the setup. Who should our priorities be? It's like knowing there's a serial killer in the room and having to choose between protecting a civilian and the president - both are equally likely, but one loss is worse than the other.
It's not that unusual for a given game to have only one successful doc protect, and we've only had 3 nights so far, so one protect across 3 nights really isn't that bad.
I'd be more willing to accept this if said protect wasn't yourself.
Why do you think the Mafia hit Kiro last night? Kiro was someone who was not going to be protected.
Like I said, the Nietz search/lynch was pretty much inevitable anyway after the Pesco/Nietz link was brought up. As a result the Mafia basically don't have any reason to worry about the cop that night.
So in the other argumentary direction, they're basically waiting for Alice to run out of charges.
You're saying this to the former doc who used both his charges on consecutive night phases protecting the Master of the Lie Detector. So I'm not seeing why this risk would be worth it to conserve a charge for later at the risk of getting the cop killed.
@Rou: There's another possible explanation, but it's not worth pursuing today. Alice really should be considered as good as town.
'Oh hey, I have an idea about what happened, but I'm not telling you.'
>_>
Doesn't help saying you have a theory and then never bringing it up. Can't hurt to enlighten us, surely?
