Maidens of the Kaleidoscope

~Beyond the Border~ => Rumia's Party Games => Mystia's Stored Games => Topic started by: Conqueror on March 15, 2012, 11:02:27 PM

Title: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Conqueror on March 15, 2012, 11:02:27 PM
So a bunch of swordswomen got together and decided to beat the living daylights out of each other.

Co-Mods: Pesco, capt. h

Rules:
-The mods reserve the right to change this ruleset at any time.
-72 hour days, 24 hour nights
-You must post at least once every 24 hours of in-game time or you will receive a prod. Multiple prods may result in replacement or modkill. You may be prodded earlier than 24 hours at mod discretion.
-Use ##Vote to vote and ##Unvote to unvote. Votes/unvotes will still be counted if the intent is clear. Leave your voting gambits at home.
-No majority = no lynch.
-No quoting private communications with the mod (role PMs, direct questions). You may paraphrase though.
-No editing posts.
-No posting in the game at night unless otherwise specified by your role.
-No talking after the hammer.
-Bah posts are banned.
-No game talk outside the game. This goes for dead players as well.
-Roles with private communication may communicate at any time.
-Send in all actions to all three mods for easier processing.
-Please post only with your anon account in this thread. Feel free to privately send in player guesses to the mod for fun.
-Play to win, and have fun.

Alive:
3) Yuno Gasai (Mirai Nikki)
4) Quicksword Irene (Claymore)
8) Tenshi Hinanawi (Touhou Project)
9) Uesugi Kenshin (Sengoku Rance)
10 Maka Albarn (Soul Eater)
11) Esuna Busy (The 7th Saga)
12) Kaori Kanzaki (To Aru Majutsu no Index)

Suffering from a case of the dead: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1VzOeGetkI)
13) Sayaka Miki (Puella Magi Madoka Magica) - Town Paranoid Cop, Lynched Day 1
7) Shana (Shakugan no Shana) - Town Superstar, Died Night 1
5) BlackRose (.hack//Infection) - Town Bodyguard, Lynched Day 2
1) Farina (Fire Emblem) - Town Framer, Died Night 2
2) Meiya Mitsurugi (Muv-Luv) - Town Godmother, Lynched Day 3
6) Eclair Martinozzi (Dog Days) - Town Mirror Knight, Died Night 3

Useful links:
End of Day 1 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805615.html#msg805615)
End of Day 2 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807535.html#msg807535)
End of Day 3 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg808682.html#msg808682)


Sample Role PM:
Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Pesco! You are Saeko Busujima, Town Swordswoman.
After carrying your little group through the zombie apocalypse, you're tired of all the fighting and you just want to keep things simple.
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Pre-Confirmation
Post by: Conqueror on March 16, 2012, 02:39:37 AM
Role PMs are complete and will be sent out shortly. Don't confirm yet.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Pre-Confirmation
Post by: Conqueror on March 16, 2012, 03:14:07 AM
Role PMs have all been sent! Confirm in the thread. Game will start when enough players have confirmed.

10/13 so far
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: DiEnd on March 16, 2012, 03:15:10 AM
Let's rock!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Kabuto on March 16, 2012, 03:19:42 AM
Well, this should be better then searching for runes!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Faiz on March 16, 2012, 03:22:43 AM
I am really... such a fool.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Kiva-la on March 16, 2012, 03:22:47 AM
Bishamonten, grant me your divine protection! (http://youtuberepeater.com/watch?v=01omDpo8Fmk)

/confirmed
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 16, 2012, 03:23:22 AM
So I am to understand that this is a game designed to raise one's ability to judge the characters of others and that I have been invited to participate. Very well. I shall partake in this game of yours.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Skull on March 16, 2012, 03:25:19 AM
Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Den-O on March 16, 2012, 03:28:06 AM
FUCK

it never felt so good to awaken
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 16, 2012, 03:39:39 AM
Don't worry everyone, I will (ry
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Decade on March 16, 2012, 04:19:42 AM
./confirm
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: W on March 16, 2012, 04:45:42 AM
Wow, we've already started! Well, pleasure to partake in business with you all.

Let's see, here... as one of Ilia's finest mercenaries, I'm willing to lend myself and my sword toward Town's win condition for only 20,000 gold. Or myself and my lance, rather. I haven't actually promoted yet, but don't tell the guy in charge, he might dock my pay!
Title: Re: Kite
Post by: OOO on March 16, 2012, 06:24:25 AM
? Sender: BlackRose ?
I have seen ur request and decided 2 join up with u 2 fight the monster with a red cross. Plz rspnd and invite please =)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 06:30:48 AM
Your soul is mine!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Confirmation Phase
Post by: Conqueror on March 16, 2012, 06:32:15 AM
12/13 good enough for me.

Day 1 has begun! You have 72 hours.
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Countdown timer. (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 06:34:48 AM
##Vote: Sayaka Miki
Policy lynch for all witches.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 16, 2012, 06:48:26 AM
So the action begins? Excellent! Hey there, light blue-haired girl! Excuse me!

##Vote Sayaka Miki

I'm already receiving income from Lord Hector, but I'm not opposed to making some extra on the side. As I said, 20,000 gold for me to support your win condition. I'd say it's quite the bargain given my level of skill! So, how about it? Make a contract with me!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 16, 2012, 06:49:43 AM
##Vote: Yuno Gasai

All murderers must die in the name of justice.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 16, 2012, 07:25:27 AM
##Vote: Uesugi Kenshin
You dare to call yourself a woman of honour after your shameful display? I cannot allow such a disgrace to be breathing the same air as I.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Den-O on March 16, 2012, 09:06:57 AM
##Vote: Shana

do I even need a reason?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 16, 2012, 10:38:17 AM
Ah, playing with surface-dwellers is always so much fun~

##Vote: Maka Albarn

Except for you. You don't even have a sword! I know why you're really here. You're not getting my soul that easily!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Decade on March 16, 2012, 10:42:12 AM
##Vote Eclair Martinozzi

Be ashamed of yourself for being the last to confirm...If you ever.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 16, 2012, 11:01:29 AM
Aha~ If it's for Yukkii it's not murder, it's justice~

[8:42:12 ] Yukkii and I talked about a very important issue and decided to tell the others. Lots of people who DON'T UNDERSTAND how Yukkii and I are destined to be together are suspicious of everything I do! So when they go investigating Yuno shows up as Anti-town no matter what they're looking for. Yukkii says it's like I'm a miller of all trades! Yukkii thinks of the best names.

[10:42:12 ] Yukkii supported me! He agrees that Eclair's confirm feels funny. Is he trying too hard to fit in?
##Vote: Eclair Martinozzi
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 16, 2012, 01:20:11 PM
I still wonder if I should have used this child's representation of myself instead. (http://puu.sh/kXNa) But I digress.

[10:42:12 ] Yukkii supported me! He agrees that Eclair's confirm feels funny. Is he trying too hard to fit in?
##Vote: Eclair Martinozzi
...what confirm? Eclair -hasn't- confirmed yet.

##Vote Yuno Gasai

ED1 STRONG!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 16, 2012, 01:31:47 PM
[3:20:11] Yukkii was disapointed today. Apparently I mistook the name of the person he wanted to vote for with the person they were voting for. How embarrassing! Don't worry Yukkii! Yuno will fix it for us!
##Unvote
##Vote: Kaori Kanzaki
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 16, 2012, 01:55:19 PM
##Unvote
##Vote: Farina

I have already paid my flesh and blood for all eternity, a price that you cannot ever hope to receive.  I don't need your help. 

I will fight my fight alone. 

##Unvote
##Vote: Yuno Gasai
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 16, 2012, 02:23:23 PM
Ugh, it took a while for that stupid summoning spell to work... Hey! Did you guys start without me?! Fine, in the absence of the hero I'll stand tall and defend Millhiore's honor!

##Vote: Yuno Gasai
Even your new vote doesn't have any 'trying too hard to fit in.' Also compulsory vote for claimed miller.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 16, 2012, 03:36:17 PM
One is the loneliest Votecount


Sayaka Miki: Maka Albarn, Farina,
Yuno Gasai: Esuna Busy, Sayaka Miki, Eclair Martinozzi
Uesugi Kenshin: Meiya Mitsurugi
Shana: Quicksword Irene
Maka Albarn: Tenshi Hinanawi
Eclair Martinozzi: Kaori Kanzaki
Kaori Kanzaki: Yuno Gasai

There is around 63 hours remaining.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 16, 2012, 03:47:17 PM
##Unvote
##Vote: Farina

I have already paid my flesh and blood for all eternity, a price that you cannot ever hope to receive.  I don't need your help. 
Oh, so that's the way it is?? ...Not like a second-rate swordfighter such as yourself would know a good deal. Still, battles like these are pretty tiring to fight alone. I'll be around if you change your mind!

[8:42:12 ] Yukkii and I talked about a very important issue and decided to tell the others. Lots of people who DON'T UNDERSTAND how Yukkii and I are destined to be together are suspicious of everything I do! So when they go investigating Yuno shows up as Anti-town no matter what they're looking for. Yukkii says it's like I'm a miller of all trades! Yukkii thinks of the best names.
Hey there! Pink-haired lady! Your claim sounds interesting, but it's pretty vague. Now, I don't know what investigative classes the town has in service here, but does this directly give incriminating results to every sort of investigative role in the game, or does it just tell any investigators that you're anti-town?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Den-O on March 16, 2012, 05:52:34 PM
[8:42:12 ] Yukkii and I talked about a very important issue and decided to tell the others. Lots of people who DON'T UNDERSTAND how Yukkii and I are destined to be together are suspicious of everything I do! So when they go investigating Yuno shows up as Anti-town no matter what they're looking for. Yukkii says it's like I'm a miller of all trades! Yukkii thinks of the best names.

I am considering claiming as well, but I won't.  I can wait.  My claim is 50% scummy 50% anti-townie.  Also my Youkai intuition tells me that this claim makes a good deal of sense, knowing what I know.

Sayaka why Yuno?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 06:01:58 PM
Please no more claims early Day 1. It isn't helpful to town to blow all our surprises and out people as potential nightkill targets this early on.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 08:14:41 PM
Alright since there is no discussion or talk, I'll start it off myself I guess.

Yuno seems to be the popular thing right now, first with the mixed up jokevote and then with the miller soft(?)claim. The claim itself is uninteresting to me right now because judging people by their role and claim with no supporting actions to determine their alignment is "silly." As for millers, I don't really care about them being a miller if they catch scum and act town. If she goes on to do really scummy stuff then I would look into it deeper, but it's a null thing right now to me since there is no supporting evidence either way, being early Day 1.

This leads into the people voting for her. To note, I'm not trying defending Yuno by questioning her voters, but rather, I'm trying to gain insight as to why by asking questions. Cause questions are wonderful things here.

The first question goes to Esuna, who voted due to the mix up and could be considered the first semi-serious  vote of the game. You made a note on the mix-up, but decided to ignore the miller claim entirely in your post, why? It seems like you are punishing a mistake rather than something that could begin discussion instead of something that could be considered serious.

Next is for Sayaka. Roleplaying is fine, but I don't like it when someone bandwagons with no explanation or thought process. Could you offer your insight as to why you chose Yuno to be your vote? Also, this is more minor, but why did you unvote Farina in #26 when you never voted her in the first place?

I'm basically going down each post at this point.

Eclair, basically just jumping in with a Yuno vote. It may just be me, but what did you mean by the new vote not having any "trying too hard to fit in"? This is worded funny, and I really like knowing people's thought processes so clarification would be appreciated. Going along the same reasoning, can you explain why a miller is a compulsory vote? Do you not believe it or would rather get rid of all millers because of the WIFOM or what?

Farina's next post generally uninteresting except for asking more claitfication on the claim, which I don't really care about. I would prefer more talking about people rather than roles, but since there wasn't much to go on at the time, I digress.

Lastly, Irene with a sort of hint to a role, which I do still suggest be kept under wraps for now at least. I also echo the question to Sayaka.

Sorry the last two were a bit reportery, but that's all I have for now. I would also enjoy it if other people chimed in, especially those who haven't posted since the Yuno mixup.

As for my vote, Sayaka, Esuna, and Eclair are the ones I want to talk most right now. Not sold on the scumminess, but pressure is indeed good to have. So I'll go with

##Unvote
##Vote: Esuna
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 09:04:42 PM
Oh come now, anyone? Hello?

Scum like it when town doesn't talk. I want a coherent lynch at the end of the day rather than just a mess of scrambling around trying to get everything together.

Talkkkkkkkkk to meeeeeeeeeeee.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 09:44:33 PM
I guess since I'm the only one talking I better talk some more to try and drum up more discussion.

Yuno, you claimed miller and then backed off and dissappeared while others voted you. What I want to know now is what do you think of these people? I want to see your opinions of those attacking you and whether you think valid for doing so. Coming up to claim something and create noise before popping out is not something I am fond of.

And this goes out to others in general, please talk about something besides or along with the miller because collaborative tunnel vision is bad. It would make me happy if everyone talked about at least two other people in their posts. People with the names Tenshi, Kaori, and Meiya get in hereeeeeeeeeeee.

Tick tock the day is slowly sailing byyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 16, 2012, 09:46:27 PM
Maka, the reason I ignored the miller claim is because I feel about the same way about the claim that you do. I could pretty much copypaste your first paragraph here. The one thing I could add is that I think it'd be weird for scum to go out and commit themselves to some sort of claim the moment the game starts, but I'd much rather not get into WIFOM here.

That being said I'm not particularly in interested Yuno today, anymore. Unless she actually does something to look bad. Making a vote mixup isn't that weird of a thing in ED1 anonymafia where everyone still barely recognizes the names.

##Unvote

Quote from: Eclair
Even your new vote doesn't have any 'trying too hard to fit in.'
What is this, it doesn't even make sense. Trying too hard to fit in would be implying the person is not-town, anyway.

##Vote Eclair

...I have this sort of sinking feeling from making a post and vote like this after Maka's big post, but then I remember that it still really is just ED1, regardless, soooo... yeah.

cut but I'll read it later
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 09:51:37 PM
Yo Spock, mind to share a few blurbs about other people?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 16, 2012, 10:00:53 PM
Yo Ms.Tryhard, almost nothing has happened. Sure, I could probably make something else to say, but it probably would not be anything worth saying in the first place. I'm not about to attempt to force information out of jokevotes where I don't see anything interesting. And claims ed1 are ridiculous "I don't even"s unless it's something, like... well, I can understand someone just wanting to get it out there that they're a miller, instead of waiting for it to become an issue. But whatever. Other people are the ones who need to be talking instead of me blabbering my jaws.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: OOO on March 16, 2012, 10:08:16 PM
Okay, I was gonna try roleplaying but I give up

##Vote: Eclair

Compulsory vote for compulsory vote for miller claim.

Miller claim means nothing, it's just making herself a target later on

Maka: Trying too hard
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 16, 2012, 10:11:41 PM
Maka, I do have somewhat good news for you I suppose, because my lovely assistant feels like responding where I didn't!

Sayaka is a hipster trying to be cool and Farina a "free rider" using pressure from other peoples votes, both is null. And everyone else is even more boring.^^;
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 16, 2012, 10:15:35 PM
Calm down, miss Albarn. It is rather unbecoming for one to whine like that. In addition, I must mirror miss Alburn and miss Busy's sentiments regarding miss Martinozzi's strange reasoning for voting for miss Gasai. I must also question miss Irene's ability to make decisions.
##Unvote
##Vote Eclair Martinozzi
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 16, 2012, 10:31:44 PM
##Unvote, re##Vote: Maka Albarn

Tryhard is right, yeesh. I know this is all fun and exciting, but pushing people to post because there's four or five hours of silence in ED1? Don't give me your "get in here" nonsense, we celestials lead busy lives. I have family to attend to and rituals to perform and parties to attend! The path to enlightenment isn't so easy that I can spend every waking moment gracing you with my presence. Maybe someday, if you work hard enough for it, you'll follow the path of enlightenment to Heaven, but empty town-posturing about deadlines and activity and 'scum love silence we must galvanize into action' aren't going to start you on that road, especially during ED1. Post #32 is way too early for walls, too.

I don't find either of Gasai or Martinozzi particularly interesting. The former's claim been addressed by other people and latter seems to be getting votes for what I read is a tongue-in-cheek jokevote. The first half of it appears to be a possible syntax error combined with a tongue-in-cheek response to the last non-vote thing Gasai said in #23, neither of which is ireworthy as far as I'm concerned.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 16, 2012, 11:02:02 PM
Votecount 2: the Sequel

Sayaka Miki: Farina
Yuno Gasai: Sayaka Miki, Eclair Martinozzi
Shana: Quicksword Irene
Maka Albarn: Tenshi Hinanawi
Eclair Martinozzi: Kaori Kanzaki, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Meiya Mitsurugi
Kaori Kanzaki: Yuno Gasai
Esuna Busy: Maka Albarn

55.5 hours remaining.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 16, 2012, 11:12:25 PM
Quote
Eclair, basically just jumping in with a Yuno vote. It may just be me, but what did you mean by the new vote not having any "trying too hard to fit in"? This is worded funny, and I really like knowing people's thought processes so clarification would be appreciated. Going along the same reasoning, can you explain why a miller is a compulsory vote? Do you not believe it or would rather get rid of all millers because of the WIFOM or what?

Quote
[10:42:12 ] Yukkii supported me! He agrees that Eclair's confirm feels funny. Is he trying too hard to fit in?

This is the first serious post in the game: it has a miller claim and it has an attempt at a serious reason to justify a vote. The only vote before that time that held any sort of reason that is game-related is Kaori's vote on me for not confirming. Kaori's confirmation post is this:
./confirm


I don't see any reason to complain anyone is trying 'too hard to fit in,' and I decided it was the best thing to vote on at that point. Since people usually vote millers where I come from (why does 'miller' sound too much like 'Millhiore'?!) I was going to get on that compulsory train early on and then we'd break off the train and turn on each other like a bunch of Galette dogs.

Quote
My claim is 50% scummy 50% anti-townie.

Irene claiming scum.

##Unvote
##Vote: Quicksword Irene


Farina shouldn't rolefish and Maka shouldn't act like the game's been going on for weeks with no one talking. Meiya's just bandwagon hopping: I'm being voted for voting the claimed miller and for something I should've worded better, not some kind of puzzling strange mystery... wait, you people can read Flonyardian, right?

Riccotta!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 16, 2012, 11:20:10 PM
Hey you, celestial lady! So... You have a lot of reasons to scold Maka, but you see, that's not the kind of stuff you vote people over, is it? Maka's pretty silly, but she did take and explain her stances, so it wasn't just pro-town fluff. Hey, let me guess, you're understating her worth so you can lynch her under the pretense of her "being noisy", aren't you? I just know it!

##Unvote
##Vote Meiya Mitsurugi
L-listen here! What's up with that uptight posture? You don't seem like very much fun to get along with! I see comments from you on multiple people, but can only make heads or tails out of your vote on Eclair. What're you really thinking about Irene and Albarn?  Why'd you even buy into the rather unprofessional Eclair wagon over anything else, anyway? From your serious tone, you haven't sounded like the kind of person who would act so... dependent on the opinions of others, you know?

The Eclair wagon itself is the sort of minimum-wage garbage I'd expect from this point in the battle. Well, whatever! I have standards! Eclair's post looked to be early-chapter silliness, I don't think she deserved a triangle attack of votes over that. More the reason to question Meiya, I would say!

Farina shouldn't rolefish
Hey, did you really read my question? The good guys benifit from an answer to it, but the reds certainly don't. No need to be so shallow!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Skull on March 16, 2012, 11:46:59 PM
How exactly does your question benefit town and not scum again?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 16, 2012, 11:48:19 PM
Regarding Tenshi's vote:
Flavor fluff, disencouraging discussion, I'm bad for talking, starting discussion, and saying that scum like silent towns.
Yawn.
Reads more as misguided town focusing on the loud noise in front of them.

BlackRose, Meiya, and Eclair with one-line snippets on their vote. Makes me wary as I find it hard to see the reasoning as to the why. Meiya's being the most blatant with a clear bandwagon. BlackRose, I would really really like it if you expounded on your reasoning as to why your suspect's actions are scummy or anti-town. Thought processes make me happy. Also, may I have some opinions on something other than miller shenanigans?

Farina, appreciated, but please back off. I can defend myself.

Eclair's vote just looks like a relatively calm place to park it for now. Instead of a near wordless vote, what do you want to know from her? Asking questions to your suspects is much more preferable to outright condemnation.

Esuna's answered my questions, and I don't see anything else interesting from her.

##Unvote
##Vote: BlackRose

Meiya is the most textbook scummy with the blatant parrot and bandwagon, so I'd readily be willing to switch to her. But she's uninteresting until more content is made. As for now, I would like to put pressure onto getting answers and opinions out there.

Also, Try Hard, Try Hard 2: Try Harder, Live Free or Try Hard (>^_^)>
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 16, 2012, 11:57:48 PM
Ah, Shana, I'm sure you know there are more investigative classes than just Cop. Those who ride tracker pegasi would want to know if their results would be accurate, would they not?

Even then, the main reason I asked the question relates to my personal class of role. Yuno's claim is odd according to what I know about how Millers work in this game, and I know a surprising amount of information from spending my years as a mercenary.

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Den-O on March 17, 2012, 12:09:40 AM
You're cute when you're angry.  edit: @Eclair

##Unvote
##Vote: Meiya Mitsurugi

Meiya Mitsurugi blithely waltzes in... oops wrong game!

your reason for the vote is lackluster.  It's as if you decided not to look past "stange post by Eclair" ---> "that could be scummy."  i.e. you don't care enough to decide whether Eclair's vote and reasoning was really scummy or just "townies are weird".

Btw, this is a clear case of the latter.

Maka is coming off a bit too strong but is otherwise townie.  As such I'm not liking Tenshi's vote.  However, Tenshi seems to be in earnest about believeing what she's saying so, I'll give her time.

Busy seems more town than not.  (also I'm using town meta on someone who has never been scum ^_^b)

Farina is also cool-beans. 

BlackRose would be my 2nd choice for scum.  It's these two lines that bug me

Quote
Miller claim means nothing, it's just making herself a target later on

Maka: Trying too hard

first feels fake.  the second admonishes without giving any insight into what Rose thinks of Maka's alignment.

I kind of realized Sakaya's original RVS vote was Yuno so  :blush: ignore my previous question to you!

It would be nice if you existed along with Shana and Kaori and Kenshin
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 17, 2012, 12:17:03 AM
Because her sense of justice is perverted and wrong.  And despite that, she still manages to have someone by her side to cheer her on just because fate had cast them both in the same boat.  I cannot help but feel envious for them when Kyosuke doesn't even deign to thank me for what I have done for him, but...

##Unvote

But I guess I should not let my feelings get the better of me.  In any case, I more or less echo the above posters on Tenshi (that her hedonistic laziness is infuriating), and BlackRose and Meiya (for standing back and laughing at the mistakes of others).  I also question as to why Eclair would rather go for what amounts to a useless vote rather than Meiya, whom she acknowledges as bandwagon hopping.

##Vote: Meiya
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 17, 2012, 12:32:34 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/125UU.jpg)
Sayaka, no. Roleplaying is fine but don't use it as a pretense to kite questions. I reiterate my previous questions regarding your wagon on Yuno and your strange unvote.

Also, your vote is pretty parrot-y and your reason for voting Meiya is arguablythe same as what you say she did. Your opinions are not original at all, except for the Eclair blurb, and I would like to see more of those.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 17, 2012, 12:40:44 AM
Maka, why's parroting scummy here? Not everybody is the same sort of first-class mercenary that I am, so not everybody is going to have high enough speed to post about a point first. I think there's a difference between coasting on the content of others and simply sharing the opinions of fellow players, otherwise every vote on a player past the second or third would be assumed to come from the enemy phase.

Sayaka wouldn't know a good offer if its pegasus bit her in the nose, but her actual priorities are clear. The only swordfighter here who falls into the first category right now would be Meiya, for her lack of thought process regarding a weak wagon. Maybe she's just so utterly straightforward she couldn't explain herself! I don't get uptight people like her.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 17, 2012, 12:47:56 AM
I find this rapid formation of "bandwagons", as you call them, to be highly suspect. Is such behaviour normal in this type of game? I must still have much to learn.

As for my own actions in voting for miss Martinozzi, my inattentiveness caused me to fail to realize that she had already accumulated three votes by the time that I had added my own to her wagon. For those of you attacking me, may inquire so as to how my actions would indicate that I am not working towards the greater good that is town's win condition?

Whilst I await an answer to the previous question, allow me to state my suspicion of miss Farena. One who's loyalties lie not with what they believe to be just but rather with the largest source of income cannot be trusted. It may be rather presumptuous of myself to say so but I believe that miss Farena's first post is indicative of her being aligned with herself, rather than with any other group. Within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804534.html#msg804534) miss Farena states that she suspects miss Hinanawi of attempting to mislynch miss Alburn, yet does not press this point. If I may ask another question; Why? As for why I joined the wagon on miss Martinozzi, as stated before, that  was due entirely to my own carelessness and inability to realize that there had been three votes preceding mine.

I have been interrupted whilst making my post by this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804594.html#msg804594) and I wish to ask a question in regards to it. Miss Farena, you ask why "parroting" is behaviour that ill-befits town, yet you have placed your vote upon me for the same reason. Is this not contradictory?

Now, to sate my own curiousity, miss Farena, you say that your services can be bought. I have near unlimited resources at my disposal. What exactly would your contract entail?

Miss Hinanawi, if I am understanding correctly, your current vote is placed on somebody that you believe to be putting their best efforts into this game solely for that reason? Do you have any other reasoning for voting for miss Alburn?

I also cannot find myself embracing miss Irene's ideologies. As mentioned before, the nature of her statement in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804373.html#msg804373) is highly questionable to myself. I do not understand her reasoning in placing her vote upon myself and I question her need to provide a general list of reads this early into the game.

##Unvote
##Vote: Hinanawi Tenshi
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Conqueror on March 17, 2012, 12:57:28 AM
Stop Asking Me For Votecounts

Maka Albarn: (1) Tenshi Hinanawi
Eclair Martinozzi: (3) Kaori Kanzaki, Esuna Busy, BlackRose
Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Yuno Gasai
Quicksword Irene: (1) Eclair Martinozzi
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Farina, Quicksword Irene, Sayaka Miki
BlackRose: (1) Maka Albarn
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Not voting: Shana, Uesugi Kenshin

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
~53 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kiva-la on March 17, 2012, 01:10:31 AM
Bishamonten, grant me your divine protection! (http://youtuberepeater.com/watch?v=01omDpo8Fmk)

Nothing like a little intrigue to relax the body and sharpen the mind after a long day filled with kicking the crap out of the Takeda clan.


Miller claims are null tells at best and stupid gambits at worst.  Irene's psuedoclaim is more interesting to me even though it's as irrelevant as Yuno's in ED1, but mostly because I seriously question why she even brought it up.

Maka put way too much effort into an ED1 post but it seems more chatterbox-y than anything else.  Null read.

The early train on Eclair reeks of bandwagon-it-easy.

The Eclair wagon itself is the sort of minimum-wage garbage I'd expect from this point in the battle. Well, whatever! I have standards! Eclair's post looked to be early-chapter silliness, I don't think she deserved a triangle attack of votes over that.

+1.  Meiya certainly seems like the biggest offender here but I'm not too happy with BlackRose's involvement either.  On the other hand, the Meiya wagon appears to be building speed even faster than the Eclair wagon, and for not much better of a reason.

But I guess I should not let my feelings get the better of me.  In any case, I more or less echo the above posters on Tenshi (that her hedonistic laziness is infuriating), and BlackRose and Meiya (for standing back and laughing at the mistakes of others).  I also question as to why Eclair would rather go for what amounts to a useless vote rather than Meiya, whom she acknowledges as bandwagon hopping.

This statement seems rather jumbled and strikes me as odd.  As a pretense for a vote, it's pretty weak too - you casually voice suspicion of four players and vote the person with the current wagon building steam, but fail to indicate why you chose her over the other three.

##vote Sayaka

@Irene: Why such free volunteering of information this early?  Your intent here is far more relevant than your actual role, so I would appreciate if you elaborated upon the former (and not the latter).

@Mod: Votecount please. :3c

I'm pretty sure anybody I didn't mention needs to post more (she said, firmly establishing that the kettle is black).

(Side note: Please tone down the RP unless you can do it in a fashion that doesn't obfuscate your statements.  That said, whoever is behind Farina is cracking me up, ilu <3.)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 17, 2012, 01:22:51 AM
@Farina

Parroting has generally always been scummy here. This is my own view on it and just general theory, which some may disagree with.
Parroting denotes a lack of original opinion, insight, or input. It is an indication of someone trying to coast along with a popular opinion while not risking the threat of standing out. Any flaws in the theory or questions can't be specifically directed to the single person. It also gives a reason to get off the person if others do so. To me, its a way to blend into the crowd with the goal of avoiding attention, which is very scum-motivated. For example, Esuna's response in #35 about the miller opinion is not a parrot because new input her own opinion was given. Saying, "I agree with the people before me" is indeed parroting to me and an indication of scum-motivated behavior.

As for Meiya, I'm so glad you posted. <3

I have a better understanding now, but I have an issue with a little disconnect. You make the main focus of your post Farina, noting your suspicions and asking questions. But you vote Tenshi, who you say little on. Do you see her actions as a whole scummier? I'm curious to the way you prioritized the vote when compared to the focus of the post.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 17, 2012, 01:30:13 AM
Quote
my inattentiveness caused me to fail to realize that she had already accumulated three votes by the time that I had added my own to her wagon.

You agreed with two people who voted me! How'd you fail to notice they voted me?! And... how would me having votes on me be any reason not to vote me?

Quote
As mentioned before, the nature of her statement in this post is highly questionable to myself.

You only said you 'questioned miss Irene's ability to make decisions,' and you have not told us what is questionable about it exactly.

##Unvote
##Vote: Meiya Mitsurugi

You are voting Tenshi Hinanawi. You stated suspicion on Farina and dedicate most your post to her. Why Tenshi over Farina?
Quote
I find this rapid formation of "bandwagons", as you call them, to be highly suspect.
I find this funny when you say it right after you hopped on a bandwagon yourself!

@Those who say my vote is useless: Anyone who claims equal parts anti-Town and Scum is Scum to me.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 17, 2012, 02:43:03 AM
I didn't disappear. No one said anything for a few hours and I went to sleep. Sneaking into Yukkii's house at night and watching him sleep can be tiring.
Hey there! Pink-haired lady! Your claim sounds interesting, but it's pretty vague. Now, I don't know what investigative classes the town has in service here, but does this directly give incriminating results to every sort of investigative role in the game, or does it just tell any investigators that you're anti-town?
[12:57:28] Yukkii was puzzled why Farina thought our claim was vague. He knows we can't use exact wording, so he suggested we just say it's closer to the first one. If there's some way Yuno can look guilty to any role, it will happen. As long as I'm with Yukki it doesn't matter if everyone else thinks I'm guilty. Yukkii is against anyone claiming something about their role besides being a miller. If you show up guilty to something Irene mention that and only that. Otherwise shoosh.

[1:05:23] Yukkii said Maka is adorable! I will kill her in her sleep later tonight. She is very clearly town. Yuno questions why two out of three voters skirted around the miller claim. I can't peak into their diaries so I would have needed to ask them. Esuna already answered. Sayaka hasn't other then saying she's jealous I have Yukkii. As she should be. But I get decent feelings from Sayaka's post with serious opinions on Tenshi and BR/Meiya and the subject has been broached enough.

[1:30:45] Yukkii thinks Tenshi is a silly goose. Tenshi's vote comes off less as a scum case and more as someone complaining about being pushed to post. Try reading over your own case and seeing how little sense it makes as a followup to accusing someone of being scum.

How exactly does your question benefit town and not scum again?
This barely counts as posting. More please.

[1:56:12] BlackRose is making Yukkii's cheeks all puffy by not roleplaying. Her opinions don't make any sense. Is Maka a scum read? Trying too hard doesn't mean anything. Explain yourself.

[2:12:23] My diary entries keep getting cut. I'm posting my blog now and continuing later! But I'll leave a vote for my darling Yukkii~
##Vote: BlackRose
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 17, 2012, 03:24:55 AM
All right, now this is what I want to see! Fights are so boring when you're nothing but offense, after all!

Hey you, celestial lady! So... You have a lot of reasons to scold Maka, but you see, that's not the kind of stuff you vote people over, is it? Maka's pretty silly, but she did take and explain her stances, so it wasn't just pro-town fluff.

You damn right it's the stuff you vote people over! (Hi Gasai!) The large post had some opinions in it, I get that, but they're ED1 opinions, and scum can form ED1 opinions too, so guess how much weight I put in them overall. (Also go read Busy's #37.) More important to me was the pointless chaff. Complaining about activity twice in the span of four hours of presence (and then worrying over a "coherent lynch at the end of the day" when there's still about 60 hours to go) is cluttering up the thread. Period. So is prodding "lurkers" less than 24 hours into the game. One faction is hindered by a cluttered-up thread, one faction benefits from a cluttered-up thread. Guess which faction is which?

I didn't see anything more worthy of my vote at the time, so there it went. Stayed. Whatever. Hopefully this clears up for the rest of you why the vote was laid down, since people seem to think I voted because Albarn talked about anything or something? I don't really get the nature of most of the rest of the accusations against me, since I thought I made it pretty clear in my voting post which part of Albarn's combo I was focusing on.

(If, on the other hand, the hedonism is actually bothering people/coloring their views of me, I can drop the RP entirely, though I will be a sad little celestial because RPing was 90% of the reason I picked Tenshi.)

With all that said, ##Unvote since I'm satisfied with where she has gone since and it was an ED1 case anyway. I don't entirely agree with the blanket assessment of "parroting", but if "parroting" is taken to mean "agreeing with existing opinions and not providing any of your own" rather than only "agreeing with existing opinions" then I don't have a huge problem with it. Just remember that some of us can't be here as often as others. (Do you really think I'd miss out on a good rumble if one was available to me?)

I am disappointed in Shana's lone in-game post being a one-liner question to which the answer was fairly obvious. I was also mildly dissapointed to see Martinozzi bring it up in the first place but at least she (seems to have) dropped it immediately since #43 makes no mention of it, so she gets some redemption points for that. Acknowleging one's worldly mistakes is an important step on the path to enlightenment! I'm curious about the dropped Irene vote, though, since she didn't really address you at all, and you didn't really address her at all in your vote-switch post.

##Vote: Meiya Mitsurugi's vote for me (in before cries of OMGUS) I don't feel the need to address at length - there's nothing meaningful I would ask about it that hasn't already been asked (focusing on Farina then voting for me). Incidentally, the Farina suspicions are rather suspect themselves; I am sure Farina is more than capable of defending herself from the specifics, but I have to question a couple of general thought process things regardless.

* Are you really basing at least some suspicion on thinking Farina softclaimed third party in her first post, especially given that it was pretty blatant RPing (she's mentioned being a mercenary how many times now?)?
* Martinozzi's second quote of you makes me wonder what your standards are for "not pressing the point". Was Farina talking about me really that different from you talking about Irene?

And then there's the inattentiveness thing that Martinozzi pointed out. Inattentiveness in regards to the circumstances surrounding your vote target isn't a particularly town trait.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 17, 2012, 04:40:11 AM
Hmph. For those of you that wish for clarification in regards to why my vote has been placed on miss Hinanawi rather than miss Farena I shall attempt to explain my line of thought. As many of you have felt the need to point out, I did indeed make miss Farena the focus of my post whilst voting for miss Hinanawi. This is because I believe that, depending on how miss Farena answers, she can be redeemed in contrast to miss Hinanawi who has done little but throw her vote wildly with very weak reasoning. Having said that, I would like to direct your attention to miss Hinanawi once more and point out that she has failed to answer my question in regards to her reasons for voting miss Alburn. Miss Hinanawi, a sizeable portion of your vote on me stems from myself being inattentive, does it not? Sure you would have noticed that the person you have voted for had a question for you. Why did you refuse to answer?

Continuing with miss Hinanawi's weak reasons for placing her votes, her reasoning for voting me is equally as weak as her reasoning for voting for miss Alburn earlier. Allow me to sum up your case upon myself and feel free to correct and errors that I may have made. 1) My suspicion of miss Farena comes from a post that may or may not have been made in jest and is, therefore, suspect. Perhaps miss Hinanawi has not noticed that I did not emphasize this point for that very reason. I am unsure of whether or not the comment was made in jest and am, therefore, reserving my judgement. Would you care to explain how this behaviour espouses my desire to see the rest of you die before my eyes, miss Hinanawi? 2) How is miss Farena dropping a rather astute comment about miss Hinanawi different from myself stating that I found miss Irene's actions to be questionable at best? They are, in fact, very different. Miss Farena stated that miss Hinanawi engaged in behaviours that caused miss Farena to believe that miss Hinanawi was attempting to push a mislynch on miss Alburn. Attempting to push a mislynch is, undoubtedly, a behaviour displayed by those that work against the town. I am awaiting an answer from miss Farena on why she did not press this point when I believe that it showcases anti-town behaviour much more than her reason for voting for myself. This is in contrast to myself questioning miss Irena's ability to make the decision that will lead to the best future as miss Irena felt the need to claim the fact that she had a role, that it could be seen as a role that could be aligned with either faction, and that claiming this role could have its own benefits, yet does not claim this role. I am not faulting miss Irene for refusing to claim the role, I am faulting her for mentioning its existence. I do not understand what purpose miss Irena's incomplete claim serves other than to distract everyone that is gathered here. This is different from miss Farena accusing miss Hinanawi of attempting to mislynch miss Alburn in that, whereas miss Hinanawi's purported behaviour is unambiguously anti-town behaviour, miss Irena's behaviour could be seen as multiple things. 3) Stating that I was careless within the early hours of the day and failing to notice the votes upon my target at the time. All I can and will say about this matter is that I care not about the early hours of the first day and therefore do not direct my full attention to its happenings.

Now whilst I pray that the above resolves your doubts about myself, allow me to state my own in regards to miss Hinanawi. As mentioned at the beginning of this post I find her reasoning for voting for myself to be highly contradictory. To state it simply, she votes for myself giving the reasoning that I am being inattentive when she is the same way. Miss Hinanawi's vote on miss Alburn, as well as the following unvote are both weak. Neither the vote nor the unvote contain any spirit. Would you care to explain exactly how miss Alburn has satisfied you to the point where you no longer wish to vote for her? Alternatively, would you care to explain your reasoning for voting for miss Alburn in the first place? How did miss Alburn putting effort into the game make her seem as though she was working against the town win condition? You said naught about what miss Alburn actually posted, how did you determine it to be anti-town?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 17, 2012, 05:15:48 AM
The accusations of me claiming third party are silly. Obviously, it was the confirmation phase and nobody had Talked to me to convert me from NPC to Town yet. But... yeah, my allegiences are currently with Lord Hector and the town. I just wanted to see if I could make a little profit off to the side, you know? If Sayaka was town, I'd be receiving extra pay for my townie services. It's too bad she most infuriatingly has no ability to recognize a good offer. Oh well! I bet I can go negotiate with Lord Hector about my pay after posting this if I stand adjacent to him for long enough.

Within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804534.html#msg804534) miss Farena states that she suspects miss Hinanawi of attempting to mislynch miss Alburn, yet does not press this point. If I may ask another question; Why? As for why I joined the wagon on miss Martinozzi, as stated before, that  was due entirely to my own carelessness and inability to realize that there had been three votes preceding mine.
Since I can't attack two enemies with my vote in one allied phase, I tossed the two voting possibilities back and forth and decided you were more likely to be an enemy for an early wagon jump which I thought showed a lack of independent thinking, and also for having 0 luck. I didn't agree with Tenshi's vote, but hey, it'd be totally reasonable for a townie to make if they were just really irritated with Maka or something. Tenshi's response would've affected my read on her a lot, so I didn't put her in front of you when picking my target, and as it turns out, she cleaned up just fine. So... I still disagree with her Maka vote, but now I can understand it.

I have been interrupted whilst making my post by this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804594.html#msg804594) and I wish to ask a question in regards to it. Miss Farena, you ask why "parroting" is behaviour that ill-befits town, yet you have placed your vote upon me for the same reason. Is this not contradictory?
Your jump on Eclair made me think you were agreeing with a new wagon without putting thought into why Eclair was worth voting, which isn't parroting so much as letting others think for you like a creepy morph hivemind. I don't think Sayaka having the same opinions as others is indicative of her being red-colored like Maka implied, since it was clear what made her think what she thought, even if others thought it first.

So, Eclair, you said that you had a personal policy of "Anyone who claims equal parts anti-Town and Scum is Scum to me", right? I can buy that! But I have a bit more trouble buying that your vote on Irene was ever valid if you're just going to otherwise ignore her completely now that you're off doing business on a different wagon. Hey, were you just voting her while you waited for a good target to pop up? You don't ordinarily brush off people who are Scum to you like that if you're bent on fighting them and reaping the benefits! How little are you getting paid if you don't even have the strength to connect your opinions? Your jump has even less monetary value than Meiya's!!

##Unvote
##Vote Eclair Martinozzi

Also, Meiya's priorities don't irk me as much as they seem to irk everybody else, because... well, she sounded like she's the guarded, paranoid sort who probably believes that I'm a third party while Tenshi is a red who she needs to lynch, and she doesn't seem to be experienced enough of a swordswoman to be wary of unaligned players wasting potential EXP. I don't appreciate being patronized as an incompetent sellsword who can be bought cheap, though! I'm more than worth my fee of 20,000 gold!

(also, Tenshi, I'm enjoying the rp for whatever that's worth. on a related note, I'm not familiar with BlackRose's source, but she makes me sad because her confirm made me think she was going to be entertaining and also what the hell man who drops rp after only one post)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 17, 2012, 05:57:17 AM
I guess I need to specifically highlight the parts of my posts where I describe why I thought Albarn was acting scummy? All right, then. Hopefully all the innocents in this thread can weather the storm of this wall of text.

I know this is all fun and exciting, but pushing people to post because there's four or five hours of silence in ED1? Don't give me your "get in here" nonsense, we celestials lead busy lives. I have family to attend to and rituals to perform and parties to attend! The path to enlightenment isn't so easy that I can spend every waking moment gracing you with my presence. Maybe someday, if you work hard enough for it, you'll follow the path of enlightenment to Heaven, but empty town-posturing about deadlines and activity and 'scum love silence we must galvanize into action' aren't going to start you on that road, especially during ED1. Post #32 is way too early for walls, too.

This was specifically in reference to #33 and generically in reference to Albarn's prevaling attitude at the time (#32 and #34 also had commentary on the alleged lack of activity). Posts like #33 are the exact opposite of effort, by the way, since you kept using that word in regards to your perceptions of my voting reasons.

The large post had some opinions in it, I get that, but they're ED1 opinions, and scum can form ED1 opinions too, so guess how much weight I put in them overall. (Also go read Busy's #37.) More important to me was the pointless chaff. Complaining about activity twice in the span of four hours of presence (and then worrying over a "coherent lynch at the end of the day" when there's still about 60 hours to go) is cluttering up the thread. Period. So is prodding "lurkers" less than 24 hours into the game. One faction is hindered by a cluttered-up thread, one faction benefits from a cluttered-up thread. Guess which faction is which?

I didn't see anything more worthy of my vote at the time, so there it went. Stayed. Whatever.

Bold for emphasis is new, as much as I don't think it should be necessary. Also noteworthy is that "coherent lynch at the end of the day" is pulled straight from one of Albarn's posts (#33, in fact!), which is why it was in quotes, so if anyone still wasn't quite sure what I was trying to reference they could have at least found the Albarn post that contained it to help themselves on their way.

There is also this piece that came right after the end of the last quote.

Hopefully this clears up for the rest of you why the vote was laid down, since people seem to think I voted because Albarn talked about anything or something? I don't really get the nature of most of the rest of the accusations against me, since I thought I made it pretty clear in my voting post which part of Albarn's combo I was focusing on.

This was written partly due to the question(s) you posed and partly due to similar questions from other people, which I will also post here so the comparison is easy to see.

Miss Hinanawi, if I am understanding correctly, your current vote is placed on somebody that you believe to be putting their best efforts into this game solely for that reason? Do you have any other reasoning for voting for miss Alburn?

If you're upset that I didn't include things like "You are not understanding correctly, because that was not the reason for my vote" or "Yes, I have a different reason for voting Albarn", then I don't know what to tell you. I figured me (re)providing my reason for voting for Albarn would have answered your questions enough since it was not the reason you posited.

Why's Albarn peachy now? Because the chaff stopped and I haven't seen Albarn say anything new that I strongly disagree with from an in-game standpoint.

This post is already wider than the gap between Heaven and Gensokyo's surface dwellers, so I'll try to be concise with what I feel are the remaining important points.

* If by "a sizeable portion" you mean "it was the last of four things I listed, the first three of which were, in order, discussing Farina at length and then voting for someone that wasn't Farina with far less explanation, suspecting Farina over what was pretty obviously RP to the point of thinking it was a third party softclaim, and finding Farina suspicious for not pursuing a point against me when you didn't pursue a point against Irene", then yes, "a sizeable portion" of my vote was on you for being inattentive.
* With that said, I will concede the difference in Farina's comments about me and your comments about Irene. I had parsed "questionable" as you finding something suspect with Irene's methods and then simply not following up on it.
* With that said, I'm not happy that I had to requote a large part of my case here, especially given the existing "inattentiveness" accusation. I still don't understand where the multiple misconceptions of my voting reasons came from, and seeing them come from you a second time after I had tried to clear things up really makes me wonder how much of my post you're reading. Nor can I see where you gathered that the inattentiveness was "a sizeable portion" of my original case, as much as your continued behavior has spiked it up.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 17, 2012, 05:58:42 AM
All of the above was in response to Meiya's most recent post, by the way.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 17, 2012, 06:01:59 AM
Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (4) Kaori Kanzaki, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Farina
Meiya Mitsurugi: (4) Quicksword Irene, Sayaka Miki, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
BlackRose: (2) Maka Albarn,  Yuno Gasai
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Sayaka Miki: (1) Uesugi Kenshin

Not voting: Shana

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
~48.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Kaori Kanzaki received a prod.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 17, 2012, 06:40:54 AM
[6:10:12] Yukkii ran in horror from the computer. D: Don't hide Yukkii! We can tackle these walls of text together!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 17, 2012, 07:06:09 AM
Miss Hinanawi, I will apologize in regards to the first point. When I had come across those words, I had thought them to be directed towards another. Allow me some time to review and rethink my thoughts.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 17, 2012, 09:42:27 AM
@Maka Albarn: But I was the first one to vote Yuno in RVS, and the resulting unvote/vote was really due to flavour.  If you really can't understand my feelings, then I guess I'll have to go at it alone.  Do what you want.

Whether or not one person parrots or not is dependent on whether he happens to post first.  I could argue that Maka and Irene 'parroted' Farina in her scumread for Meiya and merely reworded the main point in a roundabout way (which is that she jumped on the Eclair wagon for a miswording without much deliberation), but that's certainly not scummy.  The difference is that Esuna pointed out a small miswording on Eclair's part (which is an RVS point and not as inherently scummy as compared to, say, a bandwagon jump) and Meiya and BlackRose went headlong into it.  Such hopping was more inherently scummier than Tenshi's misguided (in my opinion) vote on Maka and an interesting vote choice by Eclair.  However...

##Unvote
##Vote: Tenshi Hinanawi

Everything's changed now. It's almost like entering a witch's barrier, and I smell scum within this labyrinth of words.  Tenshi spends far more words in defending her now-defunct case on Maka than playing the game, to the point where she does not even comment on the movements regarding the main wagons and the wagons involved, instead going after Meiya for what she feels are wrongful accusations against her (localized scumhunting) and Shana for not posting (token comment, strange in that she even avoids talking about BlackRose who said more or less nothing to).  I'm not feeling too well about her exclusions and her dancing around the main issues.

I also think Yuno is looking too peachy in her evaluations of others; the only real pressure she seems to be giving is on BlackRose, which is an easy target by any means.  Seems like a sideliner, befitting of her wayward morals.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Decade on March 17, 2012, 01:20:22 PM
Just from role implications I would be willing to support a lynch against Yuuno and Irene,
However Yuuno stating she is a miller does not exactly compute as a scum action, considering how early in the game it was said.
On that note, Irene stated that her whole role is anti-town, considering 50% scummy and 50% anti-town, but I shall put this aside for now. Afterall its too early to judge.

@Meiya: Post 59 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804670.html#msg804670) is hard on the eyes to read.

Running out of time, be back later.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 17, 2012, 02:31:01 PM
Kaori, I do hope you can pull off a post that's better then active lurking sometime in the near future.

...to elaborate, it's fine if she really does have to go now and didn't have time for more and makes up later, but if her later posts are lackluster then she's pretty scummy. And I just woke up so this is about all I can pull out of the game for the moment, but I'll be reading through all these text walls more thoroughly soon!

...dear goodness, on that matter. So many walls, in so little time.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Pesco on March 17, 2012, 04:35:58 PM
Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (4) Kaori Kanzaki, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Farina
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
BlackRose: (2) Maka Albarn,  Yuno Gasai
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) Meiya Mitsurugi, Sayaka Miki
Sayaka Miki: (1) Uesugi Kenshin

Not voting: Shana

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
~38 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Skull on March 17, 2012, 04:53:07 PM
Quote
My claim is 50% scummy 50% anti-townie.
ಠ_ಠ ##Vote: Irene

Jeez also these walls of text, let me try to get a tl;dr version so i dont misunderstand something.
@Tonshi why are you voting Meiya?
@Meiya why are you voting Tenshi?

##unvote
##Vote: Black Rose

I dont like how shes voting someone because eclair is voting someone else. If anything this easily allows black rose to hop onto anyones wagon and count her vote on eclair as a joke vote.

Also ok with lynching kaori, leaving the vote on eclair and saying that shes ok with lynching yuuno and irene. Fence sitting on yuuno even though of the miller claim and said she was ok with the lynch. Basing her reads on peoples roles d1.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 17, 2012, 05:54:31 PM
1.What Irene did (As in, the role-related stuff) was likely bad play, yes. (I don't know what her role actually is so I'll leave it at that.)
2.Bad play does not always equal scummy play
Anyone who seriously proposes Irene is scummy for that reason is being scummier then Irene is. If you explain why it's actually scummy, I can almost guarantee that I'll be able rip your logic to shreds because it's wrong. (Hello, Eclair. Are you having a nice day today? The weather here is lovely.)

Further on the topic of Eclair, some things were pointed out to me by my partner, with a few parenthesis comments by myself; her explanation of her Yuno vote was good enough for an ED1 case, but letting it fall to jump on a supposed ?scum claim? (Irene) looks odd to me. (And it's even weaker when you consider that interpreting what Irene said as a scum claim is terrible, if you really think about it.) But more important is that she let this also fall to vote Meiya. I may be mistaken but it looks like a ?not me over me? thing to me; her case is just some disjointed odd points, and isn't that much stronger than her Yuno case, either.

So how do you explain yourself, Eclair?

Shana:The main thing about BlackRose's vote on Eclair is that it -is- a serious reason. That ain't no jokevote-grade material. I would like her to post more opinions or somesuch soon, however, as her current participation level in the game is admittedly very small.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 17, 2012, 08:23:29 PM
Hey, Sayaka! I'm starting to think it's a good thing you didn't pay me to support your win condition. If Yuno looks bad for attacking BlackRose the easy target from the side, then what does that make you for attacking both BlackRose and Meiya? I wanted to see how you'd respond to Kenshin's pressure... but ignoring her entirely just makes you look spineless. I bet you just switched up your opinions to get her off your back without directly explaining your priorities, huh? Hah! I'm not fooled.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 17, 2012, 08:50:12 PM
Quote
So, Eclair, you said that you had a personal policy of "Anyone who claims equal parts anti-Town and Scum is Scum to me", right? I can buy that! But I have a bit more trouble buying that your vote on Irene was ever valid if you're just going to otherwise ignore her completely now that you're off doing business on a different wagon. Hey, were you just voting her while you waited for a good target to pop up? You don't ordinarily brush off people who are Scum to you like that if you're bent on fighting them and reaping the benefits! How little are you getting paid if you don't even have the strength to connect your opinions? Your jump has even less monetary value than Meiya's!!

I'm putting my vote where it has more use: if multiple people don't think someone claiming their role is equal parts anti-Town and Scum is valid enough reason to lynch her, I'd be an idiot to let my vote sit there uselessly. Irina hasn't posted enough to indicate one way or the other, and I for one do not intend to fruitlessly keep my vote on her or lurk out until she's posted enough. No true knight would pay attention to a possible saboteur when a more clear one is dancing in the open!

Irene's first real post is nothing but a wall of reads, at this point in the game entirely useless. But I'd be a fool to press someone's ineptness as some sign that they are scum. It is their own claim to be anti-Town and Scummy (as far as role is concerned) in equal parts that I would cry for her death, but if people find that a useless venture to vote I'm powerless.

Quote
Anyone who seriously proposes Irene is scummy for that reason is being scummier then Irene is. If you explain why it's actually scummy, I can almost guarantee that I'll be able rip your logic to shreds because it's wrong.

Do you want some chain with that saw? I have seen Galette spies brazenly claim they are Galette spies and then refuge in audacity. Why is this not the case this time? Why is Irene playing badly by claiming equal parts anti-Town and Scum, rather than Scum?

Quote
Further on the topic of Eclair, some things were pointed out to me by my partner, with a few parenthesis comments by myself; her explanation of her Yuno vote was good enough for an ED1 case, but letting it fall to jump on a supposed ?scum claim? (Irene) looks odd to me.
(And it's even weaker when you consider that interpreting what Irene said as a scum claim is terrible, if you really think about it.) But more important is that she let this also fall to vote Meiya. I may be mistaken but it looks like a ?not me over me? thing to me; her case is just some disjointed odd points, and isn't that much stronger than her Yuno case, either.[/quote]

'Not me over me' only works if you're in a serious case of getting lynched, and I don't see the current wagon on me as anything that threatens me and is liable to ride out until end of day and lynch me. If you are seriously going to say my vote on Meiya is only because 'not me over me' (which isn't even anti-Town to begin with) I need to start worrying if Riccotta hasn't been testing her experiments on you!

Quote
So how do you explain yourself, Eclair?

Meiya is scummy because she's posturing about how scummy Farina is, then goes off and votes someone she's questioning.
Quote
Miss Hinanawi, if I am understanding correctly, your current vote is placed on somebody that you believe to be putting their best efforts into this game solely for that reason? Do you have any other reasoning for voting for miss Alburn?
This isn't enough reason to vote Tenshi over Farina for me and I want her to make that abundantly clear.
Quote
This is because I believe that, depending on how miss Farena answers, she can be redeemed in contrast to miss Hinanawi who has done little but throw her vote wildly with very weak reasoning. Having said that, I would like to direct your attention to miss Hinanawi once more and point out that she has failed to answer my question in regards to her reasons for voting miss Alburn. Miss Hinanawi, a sizeable portion of your vote on me stems from myself being inattentive, does it not? Sure you would have noticed that the person you have voted for had a question for you. Why did you refuse to answer?
And I will keep my vote on Meiya, because this paragraph alone makes me want to blast her out of the war! 'Don't look at me look at Tenshi' followed by deflection. She isn't excusing her own behavior, she's trying to say Tenshi is worse than she is. The most hypocritical parts of this were her earlier bandwagon jump and then having the gall to complain Tenshi 'threw her vote wildly' and ignoring my question on why me having a bandwagon would somehow make me not vote-worthy. Her real beef with Tenshi didn't even surface until after she was voted!

Meiya was clearly not voting Galette spies when she voted me, and it feels more like a blatant votepark considering how she says she never would have voted me if she had noticed there was a wagon on me. Saying I'm voting her because 'not me over me' is ridiculous scaremongering and ignorance, we're not even close to a lynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 17, 2012, 08:56:34 PM
Hey Esuna, I know you're Busy but how about you say why you think I'm a Galette spy?! We've gone quite a way and I don't know what you think about anyone but me. You first voted me because I wasn't entirely clear what I meant with my Gasai vote, why are you still voting me now? Because you think I'm voting Meiya as 'not me over me' or what?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 17, 2012, 09:19:05 PM
I'm putting my vote where it has more use: if multiple people don't think someone claiming their role is equal parts anti-Town and Scum is valid enough reason to lynch her, I'd be an idiot to let my vote sit there uselessly. Irina hasn't posted enough to indicate one way or the other, and I for one do not intend to fruitlessly keep my vote on her or lurk out until she's posted enough. No true knight would pay attention to a possible saboteur when a more clear one is dancing in the open!

Irene's first real post is nothing but a wall of reads, at this point in the game entirely useless. But I'd be a fool to press someone's ineptness as some sign that they are scum. It is their own claim to be anti-Town and Scummy (as far as role is concerned) in equal parts that I would cry for her death, but if people find that a useless venture to vote I'm powerless.
So... how does this excuse just leaving Irene alone? It's not pro-town to just ignore the player you think is an enemy. Well, I guess you have low movement on account of being a Knight, but if you think she's scummy, you still should be trying to get out there and show her a good fight! If her post was lackluster, why aren't you pressing her for more in her lackluster areas? That's like letting a chance to get a raise slip through your fingers. Enemies are less likely to mess up if nobody's attacking them.

Your Irene and JYuno votes have been more policy voteparks than anything else, and I know your type! You're acting concerned with policy out of hopes you can blend in with other policy voters, but not pursuing beyond this because you're short-sighted. Why else would you want to contribute to an expected miller wagon, huh?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 17, 2012, 11:02:37 PM
 Counting Votes Like a Boss (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NisCkxU544c)

Eclair Martinozzi: (4) Kaori Kanzaki, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Farina
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
BlackRose: (3) Maka Albarn,  Yuno Gasai, Shana
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) Meiya Mitsurugi, Sayaka Miki
Sayaka Miki: (1) Uesugi Kenshin

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
~31.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

BlackRose received a prod.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 17, 2012, 11:06:37 PM
Can we get a prod on BlackRose?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 18, 2012, 12:20:02 AM
Hellooo again everyone! ^-^
##Unvote

BlackRose isn't going anywhere and there are more constructive places for me to put my vote.
I'm going to need to take away some toys if people won't play with us. ;_;
Shana and Kaori are hardly worth a mention. The latter being head-boggling flaky in any conviction. It looks more like bad play, but I will look her over with greater scrutiny in the future.

Uesugi, I glazed over as uninteresting yesterday, but a new look at her only post shows me that her stances are rather weak and even possibly has some scum motivation behind them. Her tidbit on Meiya and BlackRose is fencesitting-y and she does no follow up on them at all. It's basically saying they are bad and giving her room to switch onto them in the future, which I don't like due to the wishywashyness. Even her vote onto Sayaka is weak as it is only saying that she seems "odd" and that her vote is weak or bad. It's not true hunting, it's condemning for weird wording and wondering why she chose the person she did. The whole post is weak and doesn't show active hunting for scum, but rather a place to put her vote for a single reason. Your actions and vote seem scummy to me and I would like it if you got in here again.

I would like to see you hunt and give definitive statements instead of the wishy washy "on the other hand" blurbs on people.

Yuno's vote on BlackRose is weak and she doesn't give any opinions on people that are actively posting and it reads as a votepark for now on an easy target. I want to know who is scum by virtue of their scumminess. Again, it looks like condemnation for one line when there are many other people in the game that are just ignored. Yuno, who else is scum for doing scummy things and why? My stance on you right now is teetering towards negative since I hardly know what you think of other people.

Eclair, oh boy this is kinda weird. I can say I understand her thought processes, which I really like. But the scope is very limited to Irene and Meiya, who she's voted and voting. I would hazard to say that it's a case of minor tunnel vision as she mostly only talks about those who she's voting. I am pleased seeing scumhunting in her posts, its just that it's only about one person at a time and I would like for her to talk about others, if only for a general opinion of them.

Tenshi and Meiya got really wordy really fast. The latter needing to break up paragraphs more. @_@
As far as I can tell, it just looks like some headbutting which I'm not very interested in. What I would like are words on other people instead of this intense 1v1.

Finally Sayaka, who is uninteresting, if not a bit quiet in her hunting. I guess my main concern is wanting to see more words since her cases are a little short, if not brief. I see thought processes, which is nice, but I want a little more presence and conviction from her I guess. I get the fly on the wall, in the background feel.


Out of all of these, I see scum intent more in Uesugi right now and am confident in putting my vote on her. I would gladly like to see her lynched today.
##Vote Uesugi
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kiva-la on March 18, 2012, 12:35:28 AM
Hrm.  The Meiya VS Tenshi stuff smacks of town beating up on town.  We do not benefit from singleminded duels - only as a unit can we crush our enemies.

I'm not satisfied with Irene's absence and lack of response to my query.  I'm even less satisfied with Sayaka's flip-flop off Meiya's wagon as soon as she's called out on her weak vote, and then piggybacking onto Meiya's case on Tenshi for little discernable reason.  This blade named "vote" will remain pointed in her direction, as opportunistic actions are rarely those of town.

It would be fantastic if Kaori and BlackRose would show up, and Shana/Yuno to exist more (she said, again confirming that the kettle is black).  I dislike the case on Eclair, but I think both her and Farina are looking good (despite the latter voting the former).


Cut by a scythe-mistress.  Maka, my original vote on Sayaka was for my stated reasons at the time - namely, a convenient jump onto a wagon building steam with no reasoning behind it.  If you look at the Sayaka quote I posted, she only mentioned Meiya offhandedly and had more to say about Tenshi and Eclair, but wound up voting Meiya instead.  As you can see, I plan on standing by my findings.

That said, thank you for at least acknowledging my existence.  It appears that you and Farina are the only ones to do so. :|  If you have any specific questions for me, please let me know and I will address them.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 12:41:27 AM
@Farina: It is indeed fine to go attack the likes of Shana and BlackRose, but her post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804649.html#msg804649) seems to pat Tenshi on the back for having a silly case rather than for doing something scummy.  I guess it comes down to her not playing an active part in the pressure against others and being content with going after the easy ones which casts ill dread upon me, despite the abundance of content to pick out (unlike my case before).  Also, with Meiya's original two-pronged attacks against you and Tenshi (the latter of which I agree with), Tenshi's OMGUS-like (in my opinion) Meiya vote, and Eclair's pressure on Meiya, the battlefield has really changed.  Harping on what my priorities were before these events beyond my explanation above amounts to nothing but a foolish attachment to the past, which has done me in many times.  But I'm stronger now.

For Eclair, are you implying that Farina and Meiya are somehow scumbuddies?  I understand the 'posturing' point but I can't seem to put it in the context of why it is scummy unless the above condition is fulfilled.  And Tenshi, are you seriously saying that you now find Meiya scummy here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804692.html#msg804692) solely because you did not understand how she could have misconceptions about your posts?

Uesugi, what about my Tenshi vote is 'indiscernable' to you?  Meiya had put forward cases which exceeded the scope of my accusations back then, which I had agreed with no less, rendering my earlier vote for her invalid.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Conqueror on March 18, 2012, 01:02:18 AM
Quicksword Irene has been prodded
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kiva-la on March 18, 2012, 01:23:11 AM
Uesugi, what about my Tenshi vote is 'indiscernable' to you?  Meiya had put forward cases which exceeded the scope of my accusations back then, which I had agreed with no less, rendering my earlier vote for her invalid.

The "scope of your accusations" didn't exist with your Meiya vote, that was my issue - one you still have not addressed.  Your response to Farina earlier in that same post is outright handwaving the issue.  I will rephrase and ask again - why did you initially vote Meiya when her wagon was building steam, despite only mentioning her in passing alongside opinions on Tenshi/Eclair?

As for the discernability of your Tenshi vote, I will happily elaborate.

Tenshi spends far more words in defending her now-defunct case on Maka than playing the game, to the point where she does not even comment on the movements regarding the main wagons and the wagons involved, instead going after Meiya for what she feels are wrongful accusations against her

Problem - how is Tenshi "not commenting" on the "main wagons" when Meiya is/was one of, if not the, main wagon at the time?  She had a vote on Meiya at the time of your post.

and Shana for not posting (token comment, strange in that she even avoids talking about BlackRose who said more or less nothing to).

BlackRose had posted her thoughts (brief though they were) only a few hours before Tenshi's mention of Shana.  At this time, Shana had only posted a one-liner that didn't even have any opinions attached.  A cursory glance at the timestamps reveals this information.


In short, a quick look at the reasons behind your vote reveal that there is nothing to it whatsoever.  This is what I meant by "little discernable reason"; your flimsy logic is like air upon even a token examination.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Skull on March 18, 2012, 01:31:46 AM
Sayaka it isnt cool to tell other people to go after 3 other targets when shes already on eclair. Why should farina go after me black rose and yuno and not yourself? Your @Farina seems to be nothing but what has gone on in mafia.
Quote
instead going after Meiya for what she feels are wrongful accusations against her (localized scumhunting) and Shana for not posting (token comment, strange in that she even avoids talking about BlackRose who said more or less nothing to)
Also what changed between your two posts that made it ok for farina to go after me and black rose? You seem to want to lead other people into your targets rather then yourself.
##Unvote
##Vote: Sayaka

Black rose and kaori are still on my scum list but sayaka just upped herself on her recent post.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 01:42:50 AM
@Kenshin: Not quite getting you; you accused me of parroting others for my vote on Meiya, and I plainly did say at that time that I voted her for jumping on the Eclair bandwagon.  She has since went more admirably for Farina and Tenshi; how does this not exceed the scope of my previous accusations?

Quote
Problem - how is Tenshi "not commenting" on the "main wagons" when Meiya is/was one of, if not the, main wagon at the time?  She had a vote on Meiya at the time of your post.

I said movements regarding the main wagons; the majority of votes on Meiya at the time was due to the fact that she went onto Eclair.  Tenshi's vote on Meiya seems to be independent of these accusations, at the moment of her latest post is seemingly more focused on the fact that Meiya had misconceptions regarding her case on Tenshi, which are far weaker.  I need elaboration from her to confirm.  You seem to be avoiding the main point of my case.

For BlackRose, I would not think that voting people voting for claimed millers counts as an opinion.  You should not be answering points directed to others, in any case.

@Shana: I was responding to Farina's post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804883.html#msg804883) on me.  I certainly think that her accusations against me are fair, and I don't claim to want to influence people not to look at me or anything like that.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Skull on March 18, 2012, 02:05:02 AM
Quote
Everything's changed now. It's almost like entering a witch's barrier, and I smell scum within this labyrinth of words.  Tenshi spends far more words in defending her now-defunct case on Maka than playing the game, to the point where she does not even comment on the movements regarding the main wagons and the wagons involved, instead going after Meiya for what she feels are wrongful accusations against her (localized scumhunting) and Shana for not posting (token comment, strange in that she even avoids talking about BlackRose who said more or less nothing to).  I'm not feeling too well about her exclusions and her dancing around the main issues.

I also think Yuno is looking too peachy in her evaluations of others; the only real pressure she seems to be giving is on BlackRose, which is an easy target by any means.  Seems like a sideliner, befitting of her wayward morals.
Quote
@Farina: It is indeed fine to go attack the likes of Shana and BlackRose, but her post seems to pat Tenshi on the back for having a silly case rather than for doing something scummy.  I guess it comes down to her not playing an active part in the pressure against others and being content with going after the easy ones which casts ill dread upon me, despite the abundance of content to pick out (unlike my case before).  Also, with Meiya's original two-pronged attacks against you and Tenshi (the latter of which I agree with), Tenshi's OMGUS-like (in my opinion) Meiya vote, and Eclair's pressure on Meiya, the battlefield has really changed.  Harping on what my priorities were before these events beyond my explanation above amounts to nothing but a foolish attachment to the past, which has done me in many times.  But I'm stronger now.

Makes no sense then, you seem to have flip flopped both me black rose and yuno. You vote tenshi for not actually going after me and black rose but instead mentioning us. You do the exact same thing in your post. explain how mine black roses and yunos status changed between your two post? If anything id like you to give reads on everyone since your reads seem to change quickly.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 02:56:30 AM
I'm not able to parse your above post.  How I have I flipped-flopped on Yuno?  Also, I never voted tenshi for not going after you and black rose; where in the quotes did I ever suggest that?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 18, 2012, 03:07:10 AM
Gonna try to keep this shorter than the last thing, since I've already exceeded my Day 1 Wall quota. (Post-writeup edit: Not gonna succeed, it seems. I'll at least label each half of the post so people can choose how to prioritize reading it.)

Responses to things directed at me

Shana: Read the bullet points at the bottom of #61 for my Mitsurugi case. They summarize the original reasoning from #58 and show how the case evolved after Mitsurugi's response in #59.

Miki: I had nothing worth saying about Blackrose at the time, so I didn't say anything. I don't like talking for the sake of talking. I mentioned Shana because I was specifically annoyed at her saying one thing when that one thing was a question with a pretty easy answer (at a point where there was slightly more to work with than the point at which BlackRose's last post was made, to boot). Also it made for a neat little segue into my Martinozzi question.

In regards to the "mutliple misconceptions" thing, that was said in regard to multiple people missing the reasons for my vote. Mitsurugi continuing to posit incorrect reasons for my vote after I explained it again is, as far as I'm concerned, either inattentiveness or intentional misrepresentation, both of which are scummy. This also isn't the "sole" reason I find her scummy and you'd do well to read the first bullet point in #61 again since I only concede one of those things in the second bullet point. Especially since one of the things I didn't concede, the first thing I listed regarding the incongruity with her post focus and her vote, was something other people brought up about her, most notably Albarn in #55 and Martinozzi in #56. So there you go, not all my ideas on the case were original. Which is something I never thought I'd say in my defense in a Mafia game.

This is all ignoring the fact that I spent time discussing my Albarn vote because someone was voting for me based on a pretty blatantly incorrect interpretation of my reasons for that vote. Taking marks off me for that is just plain rude. What was I supposed to do, sit there and let Mitsurugi make stuff up about my intentions?

Ultimately I don't begrudge you irritation with my previous wordiness, but that's about it.

Opinions on other immediate or semi-immediate issues

I have no interest in the Martinozzi wagon as I have no immediate problem with her votes or other opinions. I am disappointed in Farina for the follow-up response (how is Martinozzi supposed to further pressure someone that flat-out isn't here?), especially given Farina knows all too well the limits of only having one vote. I am only disappointed and not anything worse because I, like (I imagine) many others, am otherwise happy with her game so far.

I have no interest in a BlackRose wagon because any case on her would be a case on an ED1 vote and surely there are more important things to be focusing on now. Voting BlackRose is probably the laziest action possible at this point in the game.

I could probably get behind a Miki wagon but that opinion may be colored by personal irritance. I would like to see her response to this post before I cast proper judgment here.

I have no immediate problem with Albarn but I don't buy her case on Kenshin. In general terms, "Meiya and BlackRose are bad" is not fencesitting. "Meiya and BlackRose did this bad thing and that bad thing but maybe they were just newbie mistakes but I'm going to keep an eye on them for the time being anyway" would be fencesitting. (Or just look at Kanzaki's most recent/only meaningful post for another example.) Making up a convenient opinion on the two of them is a lot easier after saying the second thing than it is after saying the first. I think Kenshin has adequately defended herself from the rest of the case.

Since that's all a bunch of "not interested/want to see more", one non-Mitsurugi wagon I could get behind, should one pick up, is one on Kanzaki. Low volume is ignorable when the content is good, but that's very much not the case here. The fencesitting's been mentioned, and you couldn't even be bothered to switch your joke vote onto one of the two people whose lynches you said you'd be willing to support (however fencesitty the rest of your post may have been)?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Den-O on March 18, 2012, 03:10:02 AM
Sorry guys I'm in a bit of a funk. 

I'm weak to walls... and holy-shit that's a lot of them O_O. 

Well I'll get too it then!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 03:29:58 AM
@Tenshi:

Alright on the BlackRose thing.  The only opinions you seemed to have on who were scum as of #58 was a vote on Meiya and what I saw as an ineffectual prod on Eclair and Shana, which worried me.

I am certainly fine with you pointing out the flaws in Meiya's case against you (though I don't think they were blatantly incorrect), but labelling her as scum for a flawed case alone through your defence is insufficient, since town is capable of making mistakes too.  What in Meiya's 'multiple misconceptions' makes her look scum to you, really?  That's why I thought your vote looked like an OMGUS

Also, if you are feeling a kindred spirit in Eclair regarding Meiya's incongruity of voting priorities, are you suggesting that Farina and Meiya are somehow scum together?  Sure, it's there, but how does it point towards scum intent, exactly?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 18, 2012, 03:52:27 AM
Quote
For Eclair, are you implying that Farina and Meiya are somehow scumbuddies?  I understand the 'posturing' point but I can't seem to put it in the context of why it is scummy unless the above condition is fulfilled.

Meiya is scummy for posturing about how Farina is scummy, and then goes off and votes someone else. What exactly makes you think I am implying Farina is a traitor? I don't have any interest in lynching Farina right now, she's a fairly uninteresting individual and I don't think she's in the Galette camp.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 18, 2012, 04:12:47 AM
This votecount brought to you by cats. The cats rule the world.

Eclair Martinozzi: (4) Kaori Kanzaki, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Farina
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
BlackRose: (1) Yuno Gasai
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) Meiya Mitsurugi, Sayaka Miki
Sayaka Miki: (2) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
~26.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

O_O
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 18, 2012, 04:15:31 AM
Just to make sure this is clear.

In regards to the "mutliple misconceptions" thing, that was said in regard to multiple people missing the reasons for my vote. Mitsurugi continuing to posit incorrect reasons for my vote after I explained it again is, as far as I'm concerned, either inattentiveness or intentional misrepresentation, both of which are scummy.

Bolding new and for emphasis. This is a relatively minor thing but I'm tired of writing walls explaining why what people say I said is wrong so I want ot nip it in the bud now.

On to more important matters. Inattentiveness in regards to the circumstances surrounding your vote target is scummy because it implies you don't care enough about your case to at least double-check it to make sure it's factually correct and has covered all of the important issues. Townies care far more about which specific individuals get lynched; scum don't care who gets lynched so long as it isn't one of their number. Scum also aren't interested in making solid cases so much as they are interested in making cases that get them a pass from town. This is why not caring about your case is scummy.

Assuming the issue is still relevant even though Martinozzi has posted, I can see why you'd think Martinozzi is proposing that Mitsurugi and Farina are scum together, but I think that thinking Mitsurugi is scum and Farina is town is far from unreasonable given what Martinozzi has brought to bear against Mitsurugi, and as such I didn't think Martinozzi felt they were a scumpair even before Martinozzi's most recent post. A scum voicing suspicions of someone before voting someone else for weaker reasons does not necessarily make the first person their partner. The scum could simply be trying to discredit a townie, or they could be trying to set up a later voteswitch, or a number of other things.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 04:23:38 AM
[9:23:45] Yukkii and I have finished reviewing the game together. I wonder if he'll make a speech?
Hellooo again everyone! ^-^
##Unvote

BlackRose isn't going anywhere and there are more constructive places for me to put my vote.
Actually this wagon was three strong by this point. Blackrose isn't posting anywhere either. In my opinion you changed a good vote to go after someone uninteresting before the person you'd voted had been called upon to make a real opinion known. Going after someone for not following up on stuff when they haven't made another post is silly. Yukkii and I are better at finding the good in people then abject scuminess. You aren't going to get a huge list of scum reads. The active posters all look pretty town, so all this town fighting means scum can hang back, therefore lurking is more pro-scum than usual. It also means in my opinion, that you should make a few less text walls and just punish the people who aren't contributing.

[10:33:56] Yukkii wants to comment on the wagons. Why do we care about these other girls, Yukkii? >:T

Eclair's posts are slightly worrying, in that they seem like snipes at players without saying much themselves. I'm hesitant to join the wagon though simply because 2/4 voters are scum reads.
Meiya is extremely townie and I don't get why there was such a quick wagon on her. She sounds confused and people are attacking her for confusion rather then scumminess.

[10:40:34] Yukkii found some suspicious people hanging around his house. Don't worry Yukkii. I'll take care of them. Permenantly.

Shana is lurky, but has pretty much the same reads as Yukkii. Maybe Yukkii is a ShanaFan? I have a slight town read on her so far, but she's under watch. Uesugi is being watched for similar reasons. I don't find either bad enough to vote over it. Their target has also picked up on my suspicions so it makes me feel better about them.

Kaori is scum is because she's persuing policy lynches as serious against people she seems to think is town. Seriously, she outright called our claim "not a scum action". Lurking is what I expect scum to be doing at this stage and this fits it to a T.

Blackrose is still scum from earlier. Not posting makes it worse, not better. This place looks crowded with town walls of text and in my opinion a scum lurker would be intimidated away from posting more of their shoddy content.

Sayaka is the weakest of our scum reads, and I think it's because her reasoning is hard to follow.  In my opinion going after lurkers is actually harder on Day 1. Going after someone like Tenshi is easy. The more words someone puts out the better a case people feel like they can put out. Tenshi explained her case on Maya because she was asked to. Responding to the queries of others isn't scummy. Focusing on your suspect isn't scummy. I think you're just taking one suspect and riding them for not being capable of answering you 'correctly', and never changing your opinions is scummy. I don't think Tenshi is any more viable a suspect right now then you think Blackrose is, and despite all your 'content' I don't know who you would vote as an alternative.

I also have no idea what you're accusing me of when you mention me patting Tenshi on the back for being silly (and thinking she's town), but imply I was attacking Tenshi for this. The second part about pursuing easy suspects has nothing to do with the first about her.

(Actually I think I just figured out who Sayaka is and I would find them suspicious just for being them.)

Unfortunately it looks like everyone would rather attack the people who are here and ignore the lurkers like a typical Day 1. The people I would not wagon under any circumstances are Farina, Irene, Maka, Meiya, Tenshi or Esuna. I feel like the wagons are spread out enough that trying to start new ones at this point is just going to have us scrambling for votes later. I prefer Sayaka over Eclair and Blackrose or Kaori over either.

##Unvote
##Vote: Sayaka


I also refuse to post any more walls of text. Yukkii is a big boy, he can do it himself.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 18, 2012, 04:39:27 AM
May I say that I find miss Martinozzi's comments within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804894.html#msg804894) to be rather unexemplary? In regards to the point that I was, in your words, "posturing about how scummy Farina is, then goes off and votes someone she's questioning." I feel that this is a grave misrepresentation of the events that actually transpired. Miss Martinozzi also states that: "This isn't enough reason to vote Tenshi over Farina for me and I want her to make that abundantly clear." I also find the notion that miss Martinozzi feels that she has the authority to determine what appears to be ill-motivated behaviour to others to be laughable. Especially when one considers the fact that miss Martinozzi complains within the very same post about how she cannot do anything if others do not agree with her viewpoints in regards to miss Irene's behaviours. There is also the following audacious statement from miss Martinozzi: "She isn't excusing her own behavior,". I do not know where your values lie, but I take full responsibility for my actions and therefore will not do more than provide an explanation so that others may make their own judgements about my behaviour. If others believe that I have taken measures that appear not to be aimed towards achieving the town's win condition, so be it. That is their decision to make, not mine. As for why I would not have placed my vote upon you if I had noticed that there were more votes than I had originally anticipated on you, it is because I believed that miss Alburn and miss Busy had made valid arguments which I wished to display my support towards. As stated before, I had not noticed that miss Rose had already performed this action and made my own to be redundant. How exactly does this behaviour demonstrate my unwillingness to work towards the town win condition?

I must apologize once more to miss Hinanawi for the grave transgression I have made in not realizing that one of the major qualms I had in regards to her behaviours had, in fact, already been addressed.
##Unvote

I cannot help but feel that miss Busy is tunnelling on miss Martinozzi. It is true that miss Busy has made comments about miss Alburn, miss Miki, and miss Kanzaki but these are all superficial. Miss Miki is also of interest, however I will need more time to read the topic more thoroughly. I have dawdled whilst writing this post for far too long, and will therefore post what I have so far for the time being.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 05:55:39 AM
Regarding Eclair's and Tenshi's reasoning for voting Meiya, I regard both their explanations as either scummy or misguided.  While I suppose logical mistakes in reasoning counts as a relatively popular scumread, I don't think they have addressed the possibility that townies could occasionally overlook something in their construction of cases (personal experience would tell me that I have made these mistakes before), or that scum could care about which townie they want lynched as much as other townies (personal experience counts as well).  Tenshi's vision of a playerbase in this meta consisting only of smart and conscientious heroes and dumb villains strikes me as hopelessly naive to the point of disbelief even to a person such as me, especially when she is supposedly a 1000 year-old celestial.

As for Meiya's Farina over Tenshi thing being implicitly scummy, Eclair's explanation is rhetoric, while I'm slightly more satisfied with Tenshi's explanation.  I am still in disagreement, however, as to what conditions related to alignment would cause scum!Meiya to vote for Tenshi and town!Meiya to vote for Farina, given that both targets had no votes to them at that point.

That said, I suppose my questioning of Tenshi has run its course, given that I got all the answers I required from her. 

As a side note, on a reread, I feel that Eclair's pressing on Meiya in posts such as her deflection point here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804894.html#msg804894) are more townie than Tenshi's, though I still disagree with her reasoning.

##Unvote
##Vote: Gasai Yuno

I suppose murderers will stay as murderers.  First, Yuno's reasons for voting me here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805110.html#msg805110) could easily apply to Tenshi herself as well; she has also been 'taking only one suspect and riding her for not being capable of answering her correctly'.  Conversely, her thinking that Tenshi is town 'due to focusing on one suspect' could easily apply to me as well, which strikes me as hypocritical.  There's also the issue where she says that she thinks that the wagon against Meiya is misguided, but does not seem to even tangentially explore the votes behind it (e.g Tenshi)  and the related reasoning; her scumhunting hierarchy (especially regarding Eclair's 'snipes' on others, which feels like a throwaway accusation), doesn't seem to match her words.

These above two issues need to be answered.  Also her history involving her last post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804649.html#msg804649), in which BlackRose was her sole scumread, feels lackluster.  The townread on Meiya and her new scumreads not on BlackRose and Kaori feels as if it was pulled out of a bag made of wait-and-see, a hop, skip and a jump, and they have neither the telegraphing nor the detail behind them to suggest to me otherwise.  She is my preferred lynch for today, followed by Tenshi, Eclair, and the lurkers like BlackRose and Kaori.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 18, 2012, 06:22:03 AM
I have no interest in the Martinozzi wagon as I have no immediate problem with her votes or other opinions. I am disappointed in Farina for the follow-up response (how is Martinozzi supposed to further pressure someone that flat-out isn't here?), especially given Farina knows all too well the limits of only having one vote. I am only disappointed and not anything worse because I, like (I imagine) many others, am otherwise happy with her game so far.
Well, when Eclair switched to the Meiya wagon, Irene had already made the post that Eclair thought was showed "ineptness", so it couldn't really be said that Irene "flat-out wasn't there", could it? If she thought Irene's post was useless like she said, she could have poked Irene for elaborations and more content to help acheive a read. Completely ignoring Irene when switching the vote made her look non-commital and gave the impression her Irene vote was a votepark for weak policy reasons, much like her Yuno vote. I don't think this looks like a matter of Eclair not being able to vote two players at once, it comes off more as disconnect, like she doesn't care about reading players aside from her main case.

@Farina: It is indeed fine to go attack the likes of Shana and BlackRose, but her post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804649.html#msg804649) seems to pat Tenshi on the back for having a silly case rather than for doing something scummy.  I guess it comes down to her not playing an active part in the pressure against others and being content with going after the easy ones which casts ill dread upon me, despite the abundance of content to pick out (unlike my case before). 
Ha. Really? 'cause if your post had been made right before Yuno's instead of when you initially posted it, the only other posts of note to analyze would be Meiya's #52, Kenshin's first post, Maka's #55 and Eclair's #56 - none of which notably impacted your opinions when you switched to Tenshi. If there was an "abundance of content to pick out" when Yuno posted, then the situation wasn't much different from when you first voted Meiya. In fact, the only major change would have been that if your post where you switched to Tenshi is to be believed, your Meiya case would have been invalid.

I've considered your points on Yuno and Tenshi, and I think your accusations of players being narrow-sighted are hogwash. Aside from what I said about Yuno, the only real active wagons when Tenshi voted Meiya were on Meiya and Eclair, and Tenshi had already addressed Eclair's wagon early on. Tenshi not attacking Meiya over Meiya's Eclair vote is a rubbish point when it doesn't affect the quality of Tenshi's case and Eclair's vote on Meiya was similiar. You seem to have rather unrealistic expectations for other people, and it makes your points look like they're being contrived as people squeeze out the problems with your arguments.

I must apologize once more to miss Hinanawi for the grave transgression I have made in not realizing that one of the major qualms I had in regards to her behaviours had, in fact, already been addressed.
##Unvote
Meiya! What kind of woman are you if you don't even have a solid case this far into the day? I'm gonna second Yuno that you seem totally confused and incapable; that was the impression I was getting when I ditched your wagon. You had lots of time to review the thread, how're you gonna get an income if you're not hunting your targets? If you take issue with Eclair, why're you not willing to put what little money you've earned where your mouth is and vote her? This isn't an ordinary battlefield, so you can't do work and slay your enemies without voting them!

Anyway, uh... I admittably don't have anything strong on Meiya aside from her ED1 wagon jump on Eclair, and given that I definitely don't trust Eclair right now, consider my negotiations with Meiya's wagon to be over. ...Still, she should definitely start standing up for herself better if she wants to rake in any gold. Again, I'm agreeing with Yuno that she looks more like clueless town right now, but if she abuses the extra time she requested and waits until the last possible minute to vote like Kaori and BlackRose seem to be doing, then I'm not gonna be happy.

Right now, I'm creeped out by how I'm the only person on Eclair with some sort of consistent pressure on her! Esuna's alright, but BlackRose and Kaori have just been sniping from the background with an outdated vote, and my pegasus Murphy and I aren't very fond of bow users. I wouldn't be surprised if they ended up switched over to some other to some other wagon when they return, like they were never aiming at Eclair in the first place. There's little pay in working with the kind of irresponsible clients who can't even be bothered to keep their mercenaries up-to-date, so... I think an ##Unvote, ##Vote Sayaka Miki is in order. Sayaka's points have been exposed as inaccurate as she's responded to Kenshin and I, and her priorities look more contrived and worrying than Eclair's at this point. It helps that I feel pretty good about most of the people voting Sayaka. Support bonuses aren't bad to have, as opposed to the votes on Eclair's wagon, which barely qualify as assistance.

The rest of the possible lynches, though... eh... are there even any of a worthy value?! I haven't bought into any vote on Tenshi so far. I thought Kenshin's points on Sayaka have been solid and agreeable, she didn't look waffly to me at all. Not feeling where Maka is coming from there, sorry!

(cut by sayaka but this wall is already huge, so yeah i'm Gonna Get This Post Out Here)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Pesco on March 18, 2012, 08:16:55 AM
Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (3) Kaori Kanzaki, Esuna Busy, BlackRose,
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Yuno Gasai: (1) , Sayaka Miki
Sayaka Miki: (4) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Yuno Gasai, Farina
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn

Not voting: Meiya Mitsurugi

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
~22 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

If the deadline hits and Conq is not here or the thread isn't locked, NO MORE POSTING. No ifs, buts or just-getting-this-post-out-there nonsense.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 08:29:52 AM
[3:46:21] Yukkii is fast asleep again. I'll catch everyone before he wakes up.
May I say that I find miss Martinozzi's comments within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804894.html#msg804894) to be rather unexemplary? In regards to the point that I was, in your words, "posturing about how scummy Farina is, then goes off and votes someone she's questioning." I feel that this is a grave misrepresentation of the events that actually transpired.
Meiya, the paragraph you presented looks like an excellent case on Eclair. Why did you blank unvote and leave?

Regarding Eclair's and Tenshi's reasoning for voting Meiya, I regard both their explanations as either scummy or misguided.  While I suppose logical mistakes in reasoning counts as a relatively popular scumread, I don't think they have addressed the possibility that townies could occasionally overlook something in their construction of cases (personal experience would tell me that I have made these mistakes before), or that scum could care about which townie they want lynched as much as other townies (personal experience counts as well).  Tenshi's vision of a playerbase in this meta consisting only of smart and conscientious heroes and dumb villains strikes me as hopelessly naive to the point of disbelief even to a person such as me, especially when she is supposedly a 1000 year-old celestial.
This applies equally to your persual of Tenshi. You admit that she could be misguided, you haven't addressed that she could have overlooked something in the construction of her case, and she's hopelessly naive. These are reasons she is confused town.
Your unvote of her is simply you realizing the wagon isn't going anywhere.

Quote
I suppose murderers will stay as murderers.  First, Yuno's reasons for voting me here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805110.html#msg805110) could easily apply to Tenshi herself as well; she has also been 'taking only one suspect and riding her for not being capable of answering her correctly'.
No. Tenshi has been trying to be as forthright as possible explaining every detail of what she's doing. There is no reason that could be applicable to voting her because she is town.
Quote
Conversely, her thinking that Tenshi is town 'due to focusing on one suspect' could easily apply to me as well, which strikes me as hypocritical. 
That's weird because that's not why I said I think Tenshi is town.
Quote
There's also the issue where she says that she thinks that the wagon against Meiya is misguided, but does not seem to even tangentially explore the votes behind it (e.g Tenshi)
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Farina, Quicksword Irene, Sayaka Miki

As for the lack of telegraphing sorry for not giving you my day planner. My scum read on 'not Blackrose or Kaori' is you. It's sneaky to avoid saying that when you argue my new scum read feels wrong. Your attempt to start a new wagon right now also isn't going to work, so I suggest you take your vote and put it somewhere besides where you've carefully telegraphed. Your thoughts shouldn't be locked into a pattern on day frigging one.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 18, 2012, 08:36:44 AM
If I may add my own thoughts in regards to miss Miki in regards to her latest post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805135.html#msg805135). I believe that miss Miki is placing a strange amount on emphasis on how miss Miki feels that miss Gasai's actions were not telegraphed. For one, considering the stage of the game that we are currently in, I believe that to perform untelegraphed actions would be a somewhat common occurrence and wonder how this explicitly espouses the anti-town nature of miss Gasai. Although miss Miki accuses miss Hinanawi of being hypocritical, is miss Miki not much the same way? Miss Miki's argument on how miss Gasai is aligned with forces that wish to bring doom to the town has not been telegraphed either. Miss Miki may attempt to argue otherwise, saying that miss Miki voted for miss Gasai twice during the early stages of the game. However, both of these votes were due to, not to miss Miki's belief that miss Gasai was acting in the best interests of forces that are not town but, her own feelings of jealousy towards the fact that her love is unrequited in contrast to miss Gasai's relationship with her "Yukkie". Much else of what I could say about miss Miki has already been spoken by others and so I shall leave it at that.

##Vote Eclair Martinozzi
I also find miss Martinozzi to be suspicious. I have already stated that I believe miss Martinozzi's arguments against myself to be contradictory and will proceed to say a few more words on the matter. Firstly, I must ask how miss Martinozzi's thoughts on both miss Gasai and miss Irene have changed. Miss Martinozzi first voted for miss Gasai within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804321.html#msg804321) due to miss Gasai's miller claim. The fact that miss Gasai has claimed to be a miller has not changed. Does this mean that your attitude towards miss Gasai has also failed to change? The same can be said of miss Irene who has, from miss Martinozzi's perspective, claimed to be aligned with anti-town forces in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804529.html#msg804529). There have been no actions to change this fact so this leaves me to wonder why miss Martinozzi would not be voting for one that she believes to have outright claimed to be aligned with forces that work against the town. Miss Martinozzi claims in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804894.html#msg804894) that she wishes not to leave her vote in a place that will serve no purpose however if miss Martinozzi truly believed miss Irene to be aligned with those that are not working towards town's win condition then would the vote not be serving a purpose simply by being upon miss Gasai? I ask why miss Martinozzi was so quick to give up on her vote on miss Gasai.

I have, again, spent too much time idling as I attempted to make this post and have been asked questions by miss Gasai, the answers to which I shall now append to this post. Why did I not place another vote at the time that I removed my vote from miss Hinanawi? This is because I was uncertain of my thoughts in regards to miss Miki and wished to review the evidence available to me once more before deciding to place my vote on either miss Martinozzi or miss Miki.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 08:50:27 AM
That last paragraph was nice and concise. Yukkii would like it the most. (It is spelled Yukkii by the way. Don't make the same mistake again.) I suggest you try to put all your suspicions consisely like that. Your second paragraph is just saying that Eclair is suspicious for not pushing policy lynches when she seems to believe in them. The way you put it is dragging one sentence over way too many sentences. It's also more of a null-tell. Try to explain the misrepping you think she did instead of wondering why she's not pushing policy lynches that no one else is supporting.
Title: To whom it may concern
Post by: OOO on March 18, 2012, 10:30:54 AM
Alright, let's actually get down to this post. I suppose I'll just post a reaction to posts as I read them.

43: Post is alright, just slightly dislike the vote

44: Good posting :D

45: No. Just no. If you have an anti-town role and you are town (miller), you should fully claim when asked so that you do not accidentally disrupt Town's ability to function. Being vague in this situation is anti-town because it's going to distract town

46: Sorry, but you're trying to make everything out of nothing. Seriously, I vote someone ED1 because I vote someone ED1 for whatever reason I want. Seriously, asking me why the person I'm voting is scum at that early stage is just a pointless question that will get nowhere. Just like your 32, trying to force things isn't going to help much, things will progress by themselves. Also, comment on something that's not miller claim. When absolutely nothing else has happened. I voted someone for voting someone for miller claim anyways.

48: Sorry, but what?
Quote
first feels fake.
What the hell does that even mean? Miller claim means absolutely nothing, it doesn't excuse them from being scummy and it only makes them a target for standing out. That is all to get from a miller claim.
Quote
the second admonishes without giving any insight into what Rose thinks of Maka's alignment.
Because I'm supposed to suddenly get a clear cut decision on if someone is town/scum based on their first post. Oh right, because everyone needs to know how you think of people every single moment? No, filling a post with opinions is just noise. Which means
FoS: Irene

49:
Quote
and BlackRose and Meiya (for standing back and laughing at the mistakes of others)
Okay, what? The. Hell. This is just ridiculous. This is overblowing nothing and making it look like something huge and obvious. Basically like Fox News. The only thing I like is the Eclair point but you still earn a FoS Sayaka

51: *Slow clap* That first paragraph mirrors exactly what I think. Seriously, why do you people call "having the same opinion but not being the first one to post it" parroting?!

52: Don't like the appeasement at the start apologizing for voting. Your post reeks of attack one vote another, and your attacks on Farena, well they don't sit well with me.

53: I just realized. Why are people lumping me together with the rest of the Eclair voters considering my reason for voting is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM EVERYONE ELSE. I also take notice how nobody has said exactly how I'm scummy >:|

57: This post looks lazy and doesn't accomplish much. Is Maka a scum read? To put it quite simply: No. If she were, I would have said something. Trying to hard meant to slow down, as trying too hard can be counterproductive. FoS Yuno

60: Fine post. And just for you, I will attempt what I was going to do with my next read.

                                                                                                                                                               
(http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm203/PX_Timefordeath/Mail.png)| Sender: BlackRose              |Re: Post 64|

Dis post luks like very pointless noise. i hope u srsly talk about stuff soon.

So yeah, that was gonna get very annoying. On the other hand, I could just slab my post into AoL translator for shits and giggles.

70: ಠ_ಠ
Yet you're voting me for voting someone else. You see how stupid your reason for voting me is? Because that's basically every vote. Ever. And you're very out of the game right now.

Alright, these giant walls of texts on these quest logs are making me sleepy. One cannot stay awake all day playing MMOs! I shall stop off here and finish the quest chain after waking up (provided I'm still not busy IRL).

##Unvote
Vote: Yuno

for now from what I've read so far basically staying away from the main arguements and basically providing nothing so far.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 11:26:44 AM
Hey look the scummy lurking FOE is back at the last minute.
A horrendously rendered Post by Post Analysis.
What did I say about text walls? I can't tell who you're talking about unless I go to every single post you name. Most of the comments don't explain anything. Why is 43 alright? Why is 44 good posting? Why is 45 such a big deal when it's a one line question by Shana asking why a question benefits town? 46 is restating what everyone has said to death, that Maka made alot about nothing, along with saying asking why someone you're voting is scum is a pointless question. 
Quote
Quote
the second admonishes without giving any insight into what Rose thinks of Maka's alignment.
Because I'm supposed to suddenly get a clear cut decision on if someone is town/scum based on their first post. Oh right, because everyone needs to know how you think of people every single moment? No, filling a post with opinions is just noise. Which means
FoS: Irene
Filling a post with statements like 'trying too hard' which don't give an opinion either way is far worse then what you consider noise. You're FoS'ing someone for the main reason everyone who looked at your post thinks you're scummy. You're going to need more fingers.

In point of fact I could just stop here and say 90% of your reactions to posts are filling a post with pointless opinions to tell people how you think every single moment.

49 doesn't give me the impression you actually read what Sayaka was overblowing. You even take the time to say they made a point you like but you suspect them anyways. This is a throwaway suspicion clustered between your 'real' suspects. Are you scum with Sayaka? 51 doesn't add to any scum hunting.  52 didn't earn an FoS on Meiya, why not, you think her post reaks! I know you're not out of fingers because you pointed one at me later.
Quote
53: I just realized. Why are people lumping me together with the rest of the Eclair voters considering my reason for voting is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM EVERYONE ELSE. I also take notice how nobody has said exactly how I'm scummy >:|
What was your reasoning again? Do you still think it was valid? Do you still think Eclair is scummy?
Quote
57: This post looks lazy and doesn't accomplish much. Is Maka a scum read? To put it quite simply: No. If she were, I would have said something. Trying to hard meant to slow down, as trying too hard can be counterproductive. FoS Yuno
But you did say something. And we had to take that tiny morsel of information and assume things from it because you were on the fucking moon breeding those hideous fake chocobo things instead of talking about your reads in the mafia.

Quote
70: ಠ_ಠ
So is Shana scummy, did you run out of fingers again, is three FoS's the limit now?

I feel like I've been you. I've thought these thoughts and I wrote things that look exactly like that catchup that you just put down. A bunch of weak 'townie suspects' with one insignifigant FoS flung at someone who I couldn't bring myself to completely disagree with. You know why? Because I was scum when I made that post.

##Unvote
##Vote: BlackRose


Get out. I accept no substitiutes this time. Your post is 90% fluff, 10% suspicions with lack of reasoning and 0% you being clear about anything but how angry and offended you really want to sound. I know that if I wanted to vote someone I would just maybe check if they'd made a few more posts after the 70th, possibly ones that cut this mouth vomit that made my reason for voting an untruthful piece of trash.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Decade on March 18, 2012, 01:56:16 PM
@Eclair: You keep pushing the single reason of "she says this and then does that" as your main case for a very long time, and it is becoming stale.
Do you have any other reasons for tunneling a Meiya so heavily?
For having that as your main case and nothing new on that topic seems more like she is town that you're trying to dig dirt on.

Judging from what I've seen from Yuno so far, she is likely town.
Irene is still on the level of willing to lynch.

##Unvote
##Vote Eclair


Making another post.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 02:22:23 PM
I'm still getting the feeling that people are cherry-picking my arguments and finding the things they don't like in hating me for being me.  Farina's point of...

Quote
Tenshi not attacking Meiya over Meiya's Eclair vote is a rubbish point when it doesn't affect the quality of Tenshi's case and Eclair's vote on Meiya was similiar.

... strikes me as particularly strange since I don't actually remember saying this outright, just that I used it to accentuate what I feel is scummy about Tenshi's short-sightedness on Meiya; e.g case on her has blatant mistakes and Meiya voted for her weaker case and therefore she's scum.  I suppose I would indeed pay her 20,000 gold not to assist in killing me, as befitting of a mercenary, or at least comment directly on the validity of this case (and my current Yuno case) instead of using buzzwords like 'contrived' and what she perceives as me failing to answer Kenshin's queries adequately to fill in the gaps. 

As for his Yuno point, I don't think it has much currency now that I am focusing on her, but Meiya's #52 caused me to change my vote from Meiya to Tenshi.  At the very least, one has to admit that voting for BlackRose and not putting out any other notable scumread at that point in time is lackluster.

More on Yuno in the next post.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 02:54:26 PM
Your case on me is uninteresting and all but I'd prefer to hear what you think about Blackrose and her 'suspicion' of you right now.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 18, 2012, 03:28:10 PM
Farina: Whoops, I had it in my head that you wanted Eclair to pressure BlackRose for some reason. Consider the point cheerfully withdrawn, with additional foot-in-mouth given everything I've said about inattentiveness. :derp:

Gasai: Your vote for BlackRose seems fundamentally incongruous with your thoughts on starting new wagons in #93. Not that I begrudge your vote as a vote because BlackRose's post goes above and beyond failing to inspire (Even ignoring the wall of PBPA, you couldn't go beyond post 70 before stopping and voting? Really? How can you be so sure there's nothing in the next 30 posts afteward that would have made you change your mind on several issues?), but Blackrose qualifies as a "new wagon" as of your vote because every vote on her had vanished at that point. What's up with the disconnect?

Kanzaki: What's wrong with Martinozzi repeating a point that was not interpreted correctly? Why are you asking Martinozzi for other reasons for her Mitsurugi vote when she added onto the case at the bottom of #73?

I enjoy Mitsurugi's vote no longer being on me but the reasons for moving it to Martinozzi instead are just about as unimpressive as the reasons for the prior vote on me.

I think Martinozzi and I need to find a support group like "Our-Cases-Get-Misinterpreted-For-No-Good-Reason Anonymous" or something.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 18, 2012, 03:36:59 PM
EBWOP: Actually, "misinterpreted" may be the wrong word to use in the context of Martinozzi. Maybe "Parts-Of-Our-Posts-Get-Ignored-For-No-Good-Reason Anonymous" would be better. I get the feeling from Kanzaki's opinions on Martinozzi that Kanzaki hasn't actually read Martinozzi's posts at all (see me referencing the bottom of #73) and Mitsurugi asks a few questions of Martinozzi that I was able to answer in my head just from either basic Mafia theory knowledge or my recollections of Martinozzi's previous explanations.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 03:40:26 PM
Yuno, you still have not answered my questions.  If you think that the wagon on Meiya is misguided, then why have you not explored the votes behind the current wagon on her (e.g Eclair, Tenshi) and related reasoning?  Why is Eclair scummy merely for the snipes and not her actual vote?  How does playing my accusation against Tenshi back at me in cancrizan and telling me that she may or may not be misguided explain your town read on her?  Bringing up the fact that I was voting for her two pages ago when I currently have a townread on her is nothing but childish insolence.

Quote
This applies equally to your persual of Tenshi. You admit that she could be misguided, you haven't addressed that she could have overlooked something in the construction of her case, and she's hopelessly naive. These are reasons she is confused town.
Your unvote of her is simply you realizing the wagon isn't going anywhere.

Are you seriously suggesting that Tenshi has never made a blatant oversight in Mafia before as town, to the point where she is able to 'overlook' that town could make a mistake?  Fine if you believe that she's misguided and are willing to explain it, but 'oversight' is not sufficient enough a word.

Quote
No. Tenshi has been trying to be as forthright as possible explaining every detail of what she's doing. There is no reason that could be applicable to voting her because she is town.

I don't know; I think I have been pretty forthright in what I did not like about Tenshi.  Not sure how the above relates to Tenshi and Eclair's riding of Meiya's answers or their sole focus on her (besides token opinions on me and Kaori), items which you have accused me as being scummy for.

In any case, I'm still not understanding what the fundamental difference between me and Tenshi are in your view, and I believe this is something you must explain instead of dancing around the issue.  You have no need to fret over the placement of my vote however, given the outstanding issues I have with you.  There are still 13-14 hours left in the day and I will switch accordingly when needed to Tenshi (unlikely) or BlackRose/Kaori (active lurkers as of now; Shana's blurb on me in comparison is valid but unsound, enough for me to think him town).  While I can get behind the Eclair wagon due to her more or less sharing the same reasons as Tenshi in tunneling Meiya, I feel that her other points (such as that on Meiya's deflection) and questioning on others are marginally more townie.  I would also not want to lynch Meiya today.

Cut: BlackRose is at the very least anti-town by his own self-admission.  Elaborating much further is low-hanging fruit for self-conceited people.  As with all active lurkers, a viable lynch for today, but I wouldn't want to take his grief seed if he drops one.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 18, 2012, 03:44:11 PM
I never make blatant oversights in Mafia. Anytime it looks like I did is really just Yukari fooling around again.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 03:52:20 PM
EBWOP: "Not sure how the above relates to Tenshi's and Eclair's riding of Meiya's answers or their sole focus on her (besides token opinions on me and Kaori), items which you have accused me as being scummy for. "
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Conqueror on March 18, 2012, 04:17:16 PM
Omg My Internet is Dying Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (3) Esuna Busy, Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Yuno Gasai: (2) Sayaka Miki, BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (3) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
BlackRose: (1) Yuno Gasai


With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
~14 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Kaori Kanzaki receives a retroactive prod.
Esuna Busy has been prodded.
Remember; no majority = no lynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 18, 2012, 05:10:29 PM
Quote
In regards to the point that I was, in your words, "posturing about how scummy Farina is, then goes off and votes someone she's questioning." I feel that this is a grave misrepresentation of the events that actually transpired.

And yet it is not! You first dedicate a large portion of your post to Farina, and your only bit related to Tenshi is as follows (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804602.html#msg804602):

Quote
Miss Hinanawi, if I am understanding correctly, your current vote is placed on somebody that you believe to be putting their best efforts into this game solely for that reason? Do you have any other reasoning for voting for miss Alburn?

Will you insist that you are not voting someone you are merely questioning in light of your earlier assault on Farina?

[quote[Miss Martinozzi also states that: "This isn't enough reason to vote Tenshi over Farina for me and I want her to make that abundantly clear." I also find the notion that miss Martinozzi feels that she has the authority to determine what appears to be ill-motivated behaviour to others to be laughable. Especially when one considers the fact that miss Martinozzi complains within the very same post about how she cannot do anything if others do not agree with her viewpoints in regards to miss Irene's behaviours.[/quote]

I don't see how these follow each other. You still have not answered why Tenshi over Farina, and are deflecting and dancing around the point by saying I do not have authority to decide what is and is not Galette behaviour. I'm Captain of the Knights, and like any other individual here I am skilled enough to detect behaviour counter to our victory. I will assert people are Galette spies when I see them, and I am looking at one right now. That I say I cannot press a case on Irene based on a lack of support does not have anything to do with asserting that you are scum for voting Tenshi over Farina in spite of having more reason to vote Farina.

Quote
There is also the following audacious statement from miss Martinozzi: "She isn't excusing her own behavior,". I do not know where your values lie, but I take full responsibility for my actions and therefore will not do more than provide an explanation so that others may make their own judgements about my behaviour. If others believe that I have taken measures that appear not to be aimed towards achieving the town's win condition, so be it. That is their decision to make, not mine.

You are still not answering to it. You are not explaining why Tenshi was more scummy than Farina, you were flailing around pointing at others going 'but look, they are bad too.' That isn't taking responsibility for your actions, that's hiding behind someone else!

Quote
This is because I believe that, depending on how miss Farena answers, she can be redeemed in contrast to miss Hinanawi who has done little but throw her vote wildly with very weak reasoning. Having said that, I would like to direct your attention to miss Hinanawi once more and point out that she has failed to answer my question in regards to her reasons for voting miss Alburn.

There is no reason to believe Tenshi could not redeem herself, since your 'case' on her to that point was a clarification of her case on Irene. It is a blatant distortion of the true events that have transpired to claim your vote at the time was anything more than that, and quickly building on a case after the vote isn't something a real knight of Biscotti would do! Only Galette spies would brazenly leap in to accuse someone and only afterwards try to find evidence to support it. Or maybe the right word here is 'fabricate' evidence.

Quote
As for why I would not have placed my vote upon you if I had noticed that there were more votes than I had originally anticipated on you, it is because I believed that miss Alburn and miss Busy had made valid arguments which I wished to display my support towards. As stated before, I had not noticed that miss Rose had already performed this action and made my own to be redundant. How exactly does this behaviour demonstrate my unwillingness to work towards the town win condition?

Because you voted me to 'show support' for their arguments, not because you thought I was scum apparently. If you thought I was a Galette spy your vote would have been utterly valid in spite of the number of votes on me. Why didn't you use your vote to vote someone who you thought was Galette spy and wanted to quickly reach that threshold of 7 votes? Why would me being closer to 7 votes be some reason to shirk away? If I was really a Galette spy, as you now claim, you should have wanted to push me there immediately. Admitting your vote was only to 'show support' and wasn't at all a vote because you thought I was Galette scum is only indicative that you were not voting scum.

Noting for now that Gasai (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805161.html#msg805161) cheers on my bandwagon while staying off it herself. Strikes me as the thing cowardly spies would resort to.

Quote
Firstly, I must ask how miss Martinozzi's thoughts on both miss Gasai and miss Irene have changed. Miss Martinozzi first voted for miss Gasai within this post due to miss Gasai's miller claim. The fact that miss Gasai has claimed to be a miller has not changed. Does this mean that your attitude towards miss Gasai has also failed to change? The same can be said of miss Irene who has, from miss Martinozzi's perspective, claimed to be aligned with anti-town forces in this post. There have been no actions to change this fact so this leaves me to wonder why miss Martinozzi would not be voting for one that she believes to have outright claimed to be aligned with forces that work against the town. Miss Martinozzi claims in this post that she wishes not to leave her vote in a place that will serve no purpose however if miss Martinozzi truly believed miss Irene to be aligned with those that are not working towards town's win condition then would the vote not be serving a purpose simply by being upon miss Gasai? I ask why miss Martinozzi was so quick to give up on her vote on miss Gasai.

Your entire argument on why I'm a spy is bogus! Are you really going to say I'm a Galette spy because I didn't stick to ED1 cases? Gasai  is still a miller per her claim, but my vote on her was not for being a miller alone, and the fact people are twisting it into that strikes me as a convenient ignorance to the truth of matters. I clearly stated I voted Gasai for her contrived reason in voting whatsherface over the confirmation post, which struck me as a vote that held something related to the game in it and I took it serious as it deserved to be. I can talk about Gasai but I'd rather do so after I finish this retort, because it's lengthy as-is.

Voting someone without being able to convince people of why their vote belongs with yours is not at all helpful, and saying it would be so is extremely naive.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 18, 2012, 05:33:56 PM
In writing this I find it scummy of Meiya to actually be voting me over not pursuing my ED1 cases again, so I will mention it again.

If I didn't mention Gasai during any of my previous posts, it's because I didn't find anything in her posts that really felt scummy enough to talk about. Complaining I do not jump on every little bit and try to spin it into scum is naive and you need to pick up training again. That is not how you catch Galette spies.

I think Gasai is scummy for cheerleading my wagon and trying to push Meiya onto it, the former shown here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805110.html#msg805110) and the latter linked in my previous post. Saying you don't want to join a wagon because 2/4 are scum reads while simultaneously saying I'm suspicious for 'sniping' people strikes me as some spoony bard-esque maneuver where you add fuel to a wagon while staying off it yourself for some contrived reason.

Quote
She sounds confused and people are attacking her for confusion rather then scumminess.

I fiercely disagree that Meiya is only confused, and that anyone voting her is doing it because she is confused rather than scummy. Her actions do not put her at the forefront of warriors and she is cowardly hiding at the backrow, spewing off some weak nonsense at the end of her unvote about how outside of me Esuna is mention-worthy for tunneling on me and that Miki is 'of interest' but no explanation why. If Esuna is scummy for tunneling on me, why is Meiya herself not scummy? Why in fact is Esuna scummy for tunneling on me if Meiya thinks I am Galette scum?

Her stances do not mix with her observations. How is this 'confusion?'

Quote
Your second paragraph is just saying that Eclair is suspicious for not pushing policy lynches when she seems to believe in them. The way you put it is dragging one sentence over way too many sentences. It's also more of a null-tell. Try to explain the misrepping you think she did instead of wondering why she's not pushing policy lynches that no one else is supporting.

I don't really understand your motive in first telling Meiya her case on me is 'excellent', and then telling her how to better make that case while earlier saying you didn't want to jump my wagon because 2/4 were scumreads. Why are you assisting Meiya onto a wagon you yourself don't want to commit to?

I think Meiya is worse than Gasai but find myself increasingly drawn to the idea that Gasai is actually Galette scum trying to capitalize on Meiya here.

Quote
@Eclair: You keep pushing the single reason of "she says this and then does that" as your main case for a very long time, and it is becoming stale.
Do you have any other reasons for tunneling a Meiya so heavily?
For having that as your main case and nothing new on that topic seems more like she is town that you're trying to dig dirt on.

Pay attention (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804894.html#msg804894), I updated it long before your post. Your bandwagon hop over a blatant misrepresentation is weak. Did anyone here complete Knight Academy?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 18, 2012, 05:38:48 PM
EBWOP: Actually, "misinterpreted" may be the wrong word to use in the context of Martinozzi. Maybe "Parts-Of-Our-Posts-Get-Ignored-For-No-Good-Reason Anonymous" would be better. I get the feeling from Kanzaki's opinions on Martinozzi that Kanzaki hasn't actually read Martinozzi's posts at all (see me referencing the bottom of #73) and Mitsurugi asks a few questions of Martinozzi that I was able to answer in my head just from either basic Mafia theory knowledge or my recollections of Martinozzi's previous explanations.

I don't know if you're buddying up to me but hell, I need some sort of ally now that that good-for-nothing hero's returned to his own boring world. Let's make that squad.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 06:45:04 PM
@Tenshi: You're absolutely right, I shouldn't be trying to start another wagon this late in the day.  I just saw my top suspect post a terrible post and my vote reflex triggered.  With that said, can we lynch her?  Please...?  If people start going back in that direction I'll join back in.

##Unvote
##Vote Sayaka Miki


Quote from: Sayaka
If you think that the wagon on Meiya is misguided, then why have you not explored the votes behind the current wagon on her (e.g Eclair, Tenshi) and related reasoning?
I have looked at them.  I wish Irene would post more, but her reaction to my  claim still strikes me as town.  I think that scum would be less likely to defend a town claim with their own as well as limiting their fake claim options further down the line.  So I have not found her worth pursuing.  Tenshi looks townie because her scumhunting looks genuine and I think she's been asking good question and I can follow her flow of logic easily.  Eclair is getting a pass because the wagon on her is one of the worst things I have ever seen.  I agree with Farina that at the time she was really the only one with any reasoning (since then Meiya has joined it, and I don't have a problem with her vote either).  I don't see how I could look at this wagon anymore closely than I have.

Quote from: Sayaka
Why is Eclair scummy merely for the snipes and not her actual vote?
Are you really asking me this? :|  Yes, I didn't explicitly state that I didn't like her vote.  I thought that saying Meiya was town made that obvious.  When I decided that the active people looked really town I started looking at the people lurking and the people posting enough to not be called out for lurking, but still aren't doing anything interesting.  Eclair fit the latter category, which is the main reason I find her scummy.  I don't think voting someone I think is town is enough to declare someone scum, since town can do that too, so I focused on the other reasons.  Why is this scummy?

Quote from: Sayaka
How does playing my accusation against Tenshi back at me in cancrizan and telling me that she may or may not be misguided explain your town read on her?
I have no idea what you're asking here.  I explained why Tenshi is town above.  If you're referring to the patting on the head thing, yes, that's exactly what I was doing.  I was patting her on the head for being a silly townie making a silly vote.

Quote from: Sayaka
I currently have a townread on her
Then why are you chiding me for having a town read on her?  Seriously, the entire thing with Tenshi just feels like "why me."  You seem to be interpreting "focusing on her suspect" as "tunneling" or something.  Yes, Tenshi hasn't had that many suspects.  I'm okay with that.  She's pursuing her main one in a way I find townie (even if I think it's misguided) and she comments on all the other wagons and a lot of other people as well.  I know exactly where she stands on these wagons.  I don't feel the same way about you.  That is why you are scummy.

So yeah, still not liking Sayaka.

@Eclair: She reads as confused town to me because of her ridiculous paranoia regarding Farina, and she just generally reads like she has no idea what she's doing to me and doesn't seem to have any confidence in what she's doing.  She just doesn't read like someone that has scum buddies to me, and most of your case revolves around the things that read like townie paranoia and confusion to me.

I think that covers everything.  If I missed something let me know, I'm feeling a little out of it right now.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 07:11:57 PM
Hm...As hesitant as I am to start another wagon this late I really want BlackRose dead.  So if you're here could you say so and state whether or not you'd be willing to go for a Rose lynch?  And if you're not state why so I can convince you otherwise?  I feel like I'm letting her off the hook too easy just because the day is close to ending, but I don't want to risk a no lynch if I can't get enough support.

I think the  case on her is pretty clear, but if there are any parts that don't make sense ask and I'll elaborate.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 18, 2012, 07:36:36 PM
Omg Conq's Internet is Dying Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (3) Esuna Busy, Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Yuno Gasai: (2) Sayaka Miki, BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (4) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

~11 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Remember; no majority = no lynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 08:18:17 PM
Sorry if that wasn't specific enough. Could people answer NOW instead of 5 minutes before the night phase? Thanks.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 18, 2012, 08:58:18 PM
So I managed to find a very short break in between heavenly commitments. I haven't been able to properly go over Martinozzi's three-hit combo there, but I can at least weigh in on the prospect of a BlackRose lynch. As of right now, I wouldn't object to it and could be convinced to join, but I would really rather not pull off of Mitsurugi until I see something from her that actually satisfies me (or it becomes clear her lynch will not happen).
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 18, 2012, 09:05:03 PM
[5:15:09] Yukkii is wondering where all the people are. How dare they not tell him how amazing his posts are! I should answer the thing Yukkii asked me about.
I don't really understand your motive in first telling Meiya her case on me is 'excellent', and then telling her how to better make that case while earlier saying you didn't want to jump my wagon because 2/4 were scumreads. Why are you assisting Meiya onto a wagon you yourself don't want to commit to?
My motive is simple. I see a townie confused about their own thought processes and seek to help them clarify why they think the way they do. People should be able to commit to the reads they clearly have. I think if she can figure out how put how she feels into better words people will stop attacking her for sounding scummy.

[5:20:21] Tenshi is on Yukkii's side! I will kill her last.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Skull on March 18, 2012, 10:57:53 PM
Ok was totally under the influence of melonpan while posting. Going by your vote on tenshi your case is that shes being over defensive and is putting pressure on me. Your later post suggests that it is actually ok for people to go after me. So tell me again what is your case on tenshi? is she wrong for going after me? Is it only because shes being defensive? Your fence sitting on yuno doesnt mean much anymore seeing your OMGUS vote on her now.

Also why are we singling out only black rose? id be more satisfied with kaori lynch seeing as she makes no sense with her words and vote.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 18, 2012, 11:27:05 PM
I shall address a few points quickly before reading through the topic on a more thorough basis. Firstly, miss Martinozzi's words within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805252.html#msg805252) about the amount of content that I produced in terms of miss Farina and miss Hinanawi. Miss Martinozzi also states: "You still have not answered why Tenshi over Farina". I believe that I have provided an answer on multiple occasions throughout the course of the game so far. It is true that, if one looks purely at the number of words, I have said more about miss Farena however, as stated before, I placed more faith upon my thoughts of miss Hinanawi. To all those that continue to complain in regards to the placement of my vote I must ask: Is it so hard to fathom the idea that the length of the argument does not directly correlate to how likely I believe they are to be working against town? Why is it that you feel fit to mould my own judgements to match yours? Simply because you may have thought that I had a more convincing case on miss Farena does not mean that I was thinking the same thing.

"Are you really going to say I'm a Galette spy because I didn't stick to ED1 cases?" No. I am simply asking for reasoning so that I may understand your thought process. You have also ignored my question about miss Irene, instead focusing upon your interactions with miss Gasai so I shall ask once more for your thoughts on miss Irene.

"Because you voted me to 'show support' for their arguments, not because you thought I was scum apparently." May I say that I feel that you, miss Martinozzi, are misrepresenting myself once more? The arguments before mine stated suspicion of miss Martinozzi being aligned with forces that are against town. If I agree with these arguments does that not mean that I also find myself to be suspicious of you, miss Martinozzi? I had wished for you to respond and placing my vote upon you would have created further incentive for you to do so. However somebody else had already performed that action, making mine redundant. Since I am pressed for time, I shall leave this here and attempt to create more posts before we reach the deadline.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 18, 2012, 11:34:31 PM
I must mirror miss Gasai's sentiments within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805194.html#msg805194[/url) in regards to miss Rose's actions. None of the comments made within miss Rose's post contain any real depth and miss Rose's case in regards to miss Gasai with weak and superficial with no evidence to support miss Rose's claims. I am also eagerly anticipating miss Kanzaki's next post and hope that it contains more statements that resemble opinions.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 18, 2012, 11:42:21 PM
@Shana: What a blatant misrep on all counts.  I'm not fence-sitting on Yuno, nor is it an OMGUS, I want her lynched.  My case on Tenshi is not that she's over-defensive; it's that her sole case on Meiya has much scum intent behind it in that she can't understand how the latter could make a mistake.  It's times like this when I feel like bashing people's head in over and over and over and over again...  Shana, does BlackRose make particular sense to you in that case?  Because you don't.

@Yuno: These responses are much better, thank you from the bottom of my heart.  But from what I can glean on them, so Tenshi is town for her mystical clarity of line, with thought processes that you respect and follow?  The reason why I'm beating the issue of why you think Tenshi is town like a dead horse is that in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805110.html#msg805110), the reasons why you found me scummy could have applied to Tenshi as well, what with focusing down on one target in such a way that they are not able to answer you correctly etc.  Also...

Quote
She's pursuing her main one in a way I find townie (even if I think it's misguided) and she comments on all the other wagons and a lot of other people as well.  I know exactly where she stands on these wagons.  I don't feel the same way about you.  That is why you are scummy.

... am I right to say that you think that you are differentiating me from Tenshi, by saying that I'm pursuing Tenshi in a 'scummy' way and that you have no clear idea as to where I stand with' other wagons'? (Eclair? Meiya? Which other wagons?  What of others like Kenshin and Esuna who have only be focusing on their pet cases?).  What you are saying bothers on mafia metaphysics.  It saddens me that I still do not have a clear idea as to why you think I'm a witch and that even Shana seems to have a more airtight reasoning than yours, even if I have a clearer idea of your Tenshi townread now.

I am fine with moving to BlackRose if I cannot get your lynch (and it seems that way), since my questioning has more or less run its course.  Will continue this tomorrow.

##Unvote
##Vote: BlackRose

As said before, I am reluctant to switch to either Eclair or Meiya, and will only do so when needed to defend myself.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kiva-la on March 19, 2012, 12:18:04 AM
I'm around, but I'm working. (chopping up villains etc)

Let me catch up and review; I should be around before deadline as well.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 19, 2012, 12:33:59 AM
Never enough votecounts. Never.

Eclair Martinozzi: (3) Esuna Busy, Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (4) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
BlackRose: (1) Sayaka Miki

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

6 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Remember; no majority = no lynch.
Maka Albarn has been prodded.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 12:45:08 AM
Quote from: Shana
Also why are we singling out only black rose? id be more satisfied with kaori lynch seeing as she makes no sense with her words and vote.
I'd be cool with Kaori too.  I guess it comes down to which you think is worse: not bothering to read the game and voting someone for lack of content when you couldn't even be bothered to read the game and the rest of their posts, or saying absolutely nothing and trying to encourage miller votes when most people clearly had no interest in them anymore.  Both are absolutely awful, but we only have one lynch and I think Rose's behavior is worse than Kaori's.  Explaining why in detail would be rather difficult because both are pretty awful.  If it swung to Kaori instead of BlackRose I'd still vote on that, but I'll be pushing for Rose in the mean time.

Quote from: Sayaka
the reasons why you found me scummy could have applied to Tenshi as well
Except they can't.  Tenshi's behavior is not like yours and I still have no idea why you think it is.  It still feels like you're crying "why me," which I find more suspicious than anything else I've mentioned thus far.  I think I might just not be explaining things very well due to being heavily drugged up because I have no idea where you even get this from.  A lot of  your accusations towards her felt outright unfair.  The example I used in the first post was that she was defending her old case.  Of course she was, she was asked to do so.  A lot of your questioning feels like this. 

Your questioning towards me nitpicked at a part of my case that I didn't feel was as significant as the rest.  It's as though if people don't say EXACTLY THE RIGHT WORDS  you'll find them suspicious.  Saying that I feel like you're focusing on the words rather than the heart isn't quite right, but it's the best I can think of right now.

Quote from: Sayaka
you have no clear idea as to where I stand with' other wagons'? (Eclair? Meiya? Which other wagons?
Before this post I had no idea what you thought of Eclair (I still really don't, but that you don't want to vote for her makes it more clear) because most of what you said about her was something along the lines of "misguided or scummy."  Meiya was the only one of the current wagons I really know where you stood on, and I still don't know your opinions on most of the players in the game.  If I'm just missing them because I can't read feel free to point them out for me, but I read through your posts about four times before writing this.

Quote from: Sayaka
What of others like Kenshin and Esuna who have only be focusing on their pet cases?
And you keep asking "why me" as you respond.  I don't like it.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 19, 2012, 01:04:03 AM
Quote
"Because you voted me to 'show support' for their arguments, not because you thought I was scum apparently." May I say that I feel that you, miss Martinozzi, are misrepresenting myself once more? The arguments before mine stated suspicion of miss Martinozzi being aligned with forces that are against town. If I agree with these arguments does that not mean that I also find myself to be suspicious of you, miss Martinozzi?

But then you also state you would not have voted me if you had realized in time someone else had. Clearly a conundrum: if you thought I wasn't aligned with Biscotti, then why do you insist you would not have voted me if you'd realized I had three votes already? That doesn't really mix well with your suspicion. If you thought I was scum, why did you back off so readily when people accused you of bandwagon hopping (and rightly so)?

Quote
I had wished for you to respond and placing my vote upon you would have created further incentive for you to do so.

All that is saying is that you had a pressure vote. What made you think I would be unwilling to answer to two votes and required a third? I hadn't made any moves at that point that showed a refusal to acknowledge the questions on me, so I really don't see what you hoped to accomplish or, indeed, thought to accomplish by jumping on the bandwagon and now backpedaling hard. Which is it?

Quote
Firstly, miss Martinozzi's words within this post about the amount of content that I produced in terms of miss Farina and miss Hinanawi. Miss Martinozzi also states: "You still have not answered why Tenshi over Farina". I believe that I have provided an answer on multiple occasions throughout the course of the game so far. It is true that, if one looks purely at the number of words, I have said more about miss Farena however, as stated before, I placed more faith upon my thoughts of miss Hinanawi. To all those that continue to complain in regards to the placement of my vote I must ask: Is it so hard to fathom the idea that the length of the argument does not directly correlate to how likely I believe they are to be working against town? Why is it that you feel fit to mould my own judgements to match yours? Simply because you may have thought that I had a more convincing case on miss Farena does not mean that I was thinking the same thing.

I pointed out how you only had a two-liner to Tenshi with regards to 'suspicion,' and it consisted of asking her for clarification for her reasons of a vote. I do not think your rhetoric here answers the question any bit since you're countering with questions and you are still avoiding answering. You have not answered my question of 'why Farina over Tenshi' except by saying that you felt Farina's actions could be excused. You thought that Tenshi voting what you thought was someone she thought was Townie was inexcusable and did not once consider that you may be misunderstanding, as no one, not even Galette idiot trios, would try to get their own side killed?

You want me to believe that that is the crux of the reason you felt Tenshi was a more worthy target to pursue over Farina? Because if so, it was bogus and an extremely weak vote to assert after bandwagon hopping and decrying bandwagon formations. Hypocrisy isn't necessarily something Galette scum would partake in solely, but this particular kind reeks worse than the hero after a battle.

Quote
"Are you really going to say I'm a Galette spy because I didn't stick to ED1 cases?" No. I am simply asking for reasoning so that I may understand your thought process. You have also ignored my question about miss Irene, instead focusing upon your interactions with miss Gasai so I shall ask once more for your thoughts on miss Irene.

And yet your vote is mostly a blurb on my ED1 cases, with no regard for how I am actually acting like a Galette spy. Your vote reeks of OMGUS now that you continue to dance around actually compounding on why you believe I am a Galette spy, despite Gasai pointing this out as well. I do not have anything to say on Irene because she has not posted anything since my last time talking about her.

You had time to talk about Gasai's blurb on BlackRose, surely you have time to talk about why the person you're voting is a Galette spy.



Quote
My motive is simple. I see a townie confused about their own thought processes and seek to help them clarify why they think the way they do. People should be able to commit to the reads they clearly have. I think if she can figure out how put how she feels into better words people will stop attacking her for sounding scummy.

I don't think it's a problem of how she can't put her feelings into words, I think it's a problem of being terrible at faking interest.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 19, 2012, 01:46:09 AM
@Yuno: What do you know about the heart?  In any case, I have no interest in how people feel anymore, only how they think and what they say.  Why me is a valid question because if you are using reasons against me that could easily apply to someone else in the playerbase, without stating the difference in context, then you are selectively scumhunting, whether to avoid conflict with another person, or to avoid suspecting a fellow scumbuddy (e.g Tenshi).  I'm not sure why I am particularly suspicious for invoking this on you, or why this reason has suddenly crept in as your main reason against me in this round of exchange.

Whatever you may think of my initial accusations against Tenshi, the main germ of my case against her, that she is scummy for not considering that Meiya could have made an oversight in the case against her, and conversely, using it as her main reason in her sole case on her, something which you have not directly countered if you insist on defending Tenshi in her stead.  I would prefer if you would address this instead of nitpicking that 'most of my questioning feels unfair'.  Also, she has not commented much in depth regarding anyone else beyond indifference on other wagons, a willingness to lynch BlackRose and casual interest in my wagon, which she still hasn't really sorted her thoughts on, though she seemed to have the opportunity to do so.  I'm not sure why you think that she is especially town for 'commenting on others' in such a token way. 

All in all, I feel that you are downplaying the fact that your opinions on me and Tenshi are linked in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805110.html#msg805110); that in your view, we both pursued only one target without doing too much on others, and that we both questioned them.  The thing was that you labelled Tenshi as town and me as scum, and the reasoning as to why only came in subsequent posts, which highlights this ambiguity.  Saying that I am scum for asking bad questions and being hard to follow and that Tenshi is town for asking good questions and being easy to follow despite the fact that you disagree with both our reasoning is naive and false.

@All: Given the inactivity of most, I forsee an end-of-day rush.  Would like everyone to quickly state who they would choose to lynch among the main wagons, especially those who have not really posted like Irene and Esuna.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 19, 2012, 02:04:16 AM
Alright! I'm back... and a lot has happened since I was gone. Well then.

I sort of need to leave again soon though, to the magical land of dreams, if you know what I mean. So I'm going to try and cover the important bits fast here. This is probably going to turn into a quick summary of my reads along with a vote on Sayaka or Eclair but I'll just have to make up for this later.

Meiya is town. Why is there a wagon on her. Maka and Farina are also town (They're like, supertown) but it's less relevant because they're not viable lynch targets right now unlike Meiya. (Also, Meiya, as I reread your walls I realize the main reason they are walls is because you are inflating them to ridiculous proportions via the use of fancy language. You could say the exact same things in fraction of the space and make it far, FAR easier to read. It would be extremely appreciated because I'm having a hard time keeping my eyes from glazing over as I read your posts. )

Irene is lurky so iunno about her yet. Conversely Kaori is lurky but she's really bad because her posts are creatable with a bare minimum of thought put into playing. Shana is [REDACTED] and so I don't even know yet.

Eclair is... I wouldn't call her a town read, but I'm not getting super scum vibes from her anymore either. I don't know how I feel about her. Sort of waffly. Of course, either her or Sayaka would be my lynch choice, as Meiya is town and Kaori is super lurker not being wagoned; soooo... erm. Let me finish rereading the game.

I don't know about anyone else yet. Not interested in BlackRose as D1 lynch because :nonexistant:. Way more nonexistent then Kaori.

...if nothing else, I really don't like my company on the Eclair wagon. That doesn't make me feel good with a lynch on her at all. This leaves only one other option.
##unvote
##Vote Sayaka Miki

I would go for a Kaori lynch over Sayaka if enough people showed interest right now that we could realistically manage to actually get the lynch. I'm going to reread Meiya again to make sure I'm not just being blinded by her unnecessarily fancily worded walls.

Oh wait. No wait.

As I reread the recent events again I don't like voting Sayaka either what am I doing. It also reminded me that Blackrose had a post I forgot about.

##unvote

Errrrg I need to think more.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 19, 2012, 02:05:25 AM
tl;dr "Trying to interpret 3 pages of walls all at one sitting means I'm having issues getting this shit straight"
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 19, 2012, 02:11:31 AM
Okay.

The first thing I can decide on is that I do NOT want to lynch Eclair today. At all. I don't really want to lynch Sayaka either.

To be honest I still need to reread Meiya more. Gonna be doing that right now and stuff. But my preferred lynch is definitely Kaori. By, like, a lot.

##Vote Kaori

I can stay up for like two more hours I suppose. For voteswitching purposes if needed. Once I go to sleep I will not be back before deadline.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 19, 2012, 02:16:33 AM
Around, but distracted. Off the top of my head, my preferred lynch order is Mitsurugi > BlackRose (= Kanzaki if she becomes relevant) > Miki. I really don't see a reason to vote Martinozzi and would only do so to avoid No Lynch.

In about 45 minutes I should be able to direct more thought to this.

Fake Edit: Including making a decision on BlackRose and Kanzaki, now that the latter has a vote.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 19, 2012, 02:25:14 AM
Zzzz I'm still alive.
##Unvote
Mmrr, this isn't going anywhere today and I would prefer to make my stances on the wagons more well known so as to not be on the side watching the lynch. Best way to play the game is to be neckdeep in it I suppose.

Kaori, Shana, and BlackRose are still nearly useless. The latter being reportery and focusing on self-defense heavily, to the point where the vote just looks like a place to put it for a moment and doesn't gve off genuine indications of actively hunting for scum.

I will say right now that I'm not for an Eclair lynch and is the the wagon I want dead the least right now.

Regarding the big deals right now: Sayaka, Yuno, and Meira.
Meira is also not a preferred lynch to me right now because although I may disagree with the Eclair notion, she does it in such a way that looks like real hunting and conveys her thought process well enough that I understand it from her perspective. I don't plan on voting her for now and would like a lynch other than her.

And then there were two. Oh boy the toss up between them is so fine that deciding on either way is tough. I see that I have been prodded oops, so at the risk of sounding like a copout, I'm going to get this post out there and reread the two. I will be around for deadline, barring unexpected circumstances.

And regarding Esuna's vote on Kaori while I write this. That would be a waste of a lynch today and would tell us nothing since she has almost no interactions with others. To me, Kaori just reads as newbie/bad play.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 19, 2012, 02:34:55 AM
Quote
That would be a waste of a lynch today and would tell us nothing since she has almost no interactions with others. To me, Kaori just reads as newbie/bad play.
Iunno, her stances seem ridiculously easy and thoughtless, and her lurking is right on up there with Blackrose, her only post out of ed1 she just jumps on the Eclair wagon with a blurb, yet she at the same time seems capable of coherent thought and delivers empty promises of more posts that never happened.

I'm currently debating how I'd feel about the Blackrose lynch, for that matter. Honestly, I'd sooner attribute the bad play/newbie thing to her then Kaori.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 02:56:49 AM
[3:42:25] Yukkii, we have about this much time to kill someone! I hope it's someone I wanted dead. We can't be this choosey about which horrible lurker we go after. Pick one. Kaori is horrible. Blackrose is horrible. I don't care which one of Yukkii's scum reads we kill. As long as it's Blackrose. Just pick one.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 19, 2012, 03:03:17 AM
I'm still getting the feeling that people are cherry-picking my arguments and finding the things they don't like in hating me for being me.  Farina's point of...

(quote removed by forum software, rip ;_;)

... strikes me as particularly strange since I don't actually remember saying this outright, just that I used it to accentuate what I feel is scummy about Tenshi's short-sightedness on Meiya; e.g case on her has blatant mistakes and Meiya voted for her weaker case and therefore she's scum.  I suppose I would indeed pay her 20,000 gold not to assist in killing me, as befitting of a mercenary, or at least comment directly on the validity of this case (and my current Yuno case) instead of using buzzwords like 'contrived' and what she perceives as me failing to answer Kenshin's queries adequately to fill in the gaps.
Alright, I'll bite. What more is there for me to say about the Tenshi case that hasn't already been addressed by other people? Looking at your original vote (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.60.html), your main problem with Tenshi seemed to be "her exclusions and her dancing around the main issues", and I thought that was what I was talking about? Tenshi's case on Meiya didn't become part of your attack until she posted a defense of herself, so it looks pretty slimy to use that to discredit my attacks as incomplete! (Also, my scumread on you isn't related to meta, regardless of whether I actually know who you are or not.

Ah, also, I wouldn't really support a Yuno lynch. In short, I just don't see the case. I could elaborate more later, but for now I'd really like to post before people think I'm slacking off and not earning my pay! So anyway... Regarding the others, BlackRose is hard to fault when I've been having trouble finding the time to process everybody's thoughts as well. Her actual content is outdated, but otherwise, I don't see specific problems with it. Kaori, however, is scummy for supporting policy lynches and people she thinks are town or otherwise unjudgeable, although I guess that's nothing that hasn't already been mentioned, huh? I disagree with giving her the "newbie/bad play" pass when there's nothing about her bad play which points toward it not being scummy. Being deserving of only a low wage doesn't make somebody a good guy.

Now, if the day did somehow come down to the Eclair and Meiya wagons, I'd pick Eclair, 'cause like I already said, her early-chapter movements bug me more than Meiya's did. Nothing about the recent posts from either stands out as scummy, though.

Phew, this day has been utterly exhausting! I'm going to have to negotiate with Lord Hector for a raise after this. Maybe I'll be able to haul in enough money to buy Murphy a load of noble carrots. One more thing, though! Esuna, why don't you want to lynch Sayaka?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Ryuki on March 19, 2012, 03:15:31 AM
I still feel strongly about Meiya, who I feel has not been scumhunting much at all if any: her activities seem more focused now on self-defence and explanations, and her brief stint on me is nothing more than questioning rather than pointing towards me being scum.

Taking care of the lazy bums in our midst isn't an idea I'm entirely excited about, but I recognize the need. Kaori Kanzaki's inattentiveness is much worse than BlackRose, who has at least provided some semblance of participation in the war, however sparse. Kaori posts much too little much too late, with information that was valid at the start of the war. Her promise of another post isn't followed up on, and I hate people who promise to fight but then slack off.

I'd lynch Meiya over invoking LAL. I'm undecided on Sayaka VS LAL. At one side I can get behind the arguments raised against her, but on the other I feel she is validly venturing into the validity of votes. Her point of why a Scum!Meiya would vote Tenshi over Farina at least shows genuine concern with the case, although I would counter that talking about how scummy Farina is and then not committing to that wagon is liable to draw people to Farina. Once there is interest in the case, Scum!Meiya can jump back and gleefully declare how she saw the Galette idiot trio in Farina first. There are two ways this sword cuts, and I am prepared to drop that particular aspect as a null tell.

Still stands my concerns with Meiya outside of the Tenshi over Farina conundrum, and her stated reasons for choosing Tenshi over Farina. Saying someone is Scum but they could be redeemed is dandy and open, but at the same time it feels there was much stronger reason for Meiya to commit to a Farina vote than a Tenshi vote, given she didn't even call Tenshi scummy. An inquiry does not a case make.

I'm going off in a Meiya rant again which isn't the point of this post. I'd lynch Meiya over both lurkers, I'd lynch Kaori over BlackRose. I wouldn't lynch Shana as she has participated at least marginally. I'm undecided on Sayaka still, but I feel as if I'd rather lynch Kaori over her.

On Sayaka still, though, I must say the following.
I'm not fond of the strangeness where she says she'd lynch Gasai, Tenshi and Eclair, in that order, followed by the two lurkers. I say strangeness because she later says that she would not lynch me. The point where she backpedals and says I look marginally more townie than Tenshi isn't interrupted by any post of mine, and she then switches to say that 'as said before' she would not switch to either Meiya or me unless not me over me. I don't know why a Galette spy would subtly shift her stance in this way, and would like to ask Sayaka what changed in that she suddenly finds me marginally more Townie and why 'marginally more Townie' than 'Scum' (Tenshi IS scum, right?) is enough reason to make you reluctant to vote me.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Conqueror on March 19, 2012, 03:19:17 AM
Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (2) Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (4) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai
BlackRose: (1) Sayaka Miki
Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Esuna Busy

Not voting: Maka Albarn

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

~3 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Remember; no majority = no lynch.
Quicksword Irene has been prodded.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 19, 2012, 03:30:33 AM
Okay... the Kaori lynch is not happening today (There's not the time, and it's the middle of the night for a lot of people), and I'm going to bed reallly soon. My eyes unfocus if I try to read any more walls over again. But I'm trying to reread Sayaka and Meiya again. At some point I'm remembering why Sayaka is town. I'm trying to formulate it into a sentence... but my brain is shutting down. But there's something... I'm not... seeing in Meiya.

Maybe it's just because I'm so tired. I really need to sleep.

##Vote Meiya

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 19, 2012, 03:30:54 AM
ads;fjdasf

##unvote
##Vote Meiya
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 19, 2012, 03:38:26 AM
Also, she has not commented much in depth regarding anyone else beyond indifference on other wagons, a willingness to lynch BlackRose and casual interest in my wagon, which she still hasn't really sorted her thoughts on, though she seemed to have the opportunity to do so.  I'm not sure why you think that she is especially town for 'commenting on others' in such a token way. 

Well gee, I'm sorry that identifying multiple lynches I would support and multiple cases/lynches I would not support while providing reasons in every instance is only a "token" effort in your eyes. What is this "indifference" stuff, anyway? If I don't support a lynch that means I lean town on the target and/or simply don't buy the case, not that I don't care whether the target lives or dies.

That being said, I still place lower priority on Miki than the pair of useless lumps because Miki's actually providing a decent amount of effort here, and with the way I'm reading her back-and-forth with Gasai, I think there may be a legitimate Mafia mindset disconnect going on there rather than anything scummy. I understand Albarn's concerns with the concept of ending the day with a lurker lynch, but both of their most recent posts are sufficiently scummy-bad that I'm willing to set aside those worries. I'd be far more worried about something like a dash to Irene or Kenshin.

I'll be around for a few more minutes, but bed is rapidly approaching.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Conqueror on March 19, 2012, 03:38:41 AM
Mod note: Due to my internet connection, I will probably not be here at or near deadline. Hopefully another co-mod will be around to post votecounts etc. In any case, votes made after the deadline will not be counted even if the mods are absent.

Have a Mini-Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (2) Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (4) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (4) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai
BlackRose: (1) Sayaka Miki

Not voting: Maka Albarn

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

A little less than 3 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Remember; no majority = no lynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kiva-la on March 19, 2012, 03:48:34 AM
This is taking longer than I thought.  Sorry for the upcoming brevity, but here's my thoughts on the current wagons:

-I will not support an Eclair or Yuno lynch, as I simply don't see a viable case for either.

-I'd prefer to hold off on a Meiya lynch; I don't think she's the best choice today, and I really need to see more from her to figure her out.

-I'm torn between our lurkers, more in that in a moment.

-I still would really like Sayaka Miki lynched.  Her recent posts have not made me like her more.

Now, our lurkers:

Kaori: Two non-RVS posts, with extremely little content. Has pulled two "BBL"s and failed to be back later both times.  Textbook lurkscum maneuver.

Blackrose: Two non-RVS posts, one with content.  Unfortunately, the content is awful.  Blatant OMGUS FoS on nearly everyone who has something bad to say about her, until she realizes partially through her fence-o'-text that everyone in town is displeased with her.  I can't agree with any of her points on Yuno, to the point where I'm basically willing to forgive Yuno for her immediate OMGUS vote - in this case, OMGUS seems more like 'oh my god ur scum'.

And therein lies my issue.  They're both lynch-worthy but one is due to doing absolutely nothing all day and the other is due to doing nothing all day except for one terrible post.  Gut tells me to vote the latter.

Cut by a votecount.  Holy crap, I completely forgot Irene was even playing.

... Wait, so Irene's been lurking as much as Blackrose and Kaori, basically claimed a third party role, and also pulled a BBL with no return?  Ugggh.

I'm okay with a lynch of all three, with a very slight favor of BlackRose over Kaori and Irene for aforementioned gut reasons.  I'm going to keep my vote on Sayaka for now.  If anyone has questions about why I want her lynched, please ask them while I'm here, but I get the feeling .  I should be around for deadline and will post if I have to leave.

(ATTN LURKERS!  If ANY of you are town STOP FREAKING LURKING AND PLAY! :|)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 03:52:10 AM
You have no idea how many times I've retyped this post trying to decide what to do. We have these two wagons going and the lurkers are off on the moon as far as counting for wagons goes. I'm starting to get a disgusting feeling from how this day is going. As much as my soul yearns to murder one of them there isn't enough movement to do it. People need to stack up, now. Out of the two current wagons this is the one I prefer.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 19, 2012, 04:19:21 AM
@Eclair: I guess I would have to acknowledge the disconnect to negligence.  I had not yet read your #73 in the first post I had given my priorities, but that post improved my opinion on you.  The thing which you put against Yuno in #113, improved my opinion of you further to the point where I am reluctant to lynch you.  A clumsy explanation, but the truth.

Given everyone's willingness to go for either the lurkers or Yuno, and probably the presence of more people who are willing to vote me than Meiya, I think it might be the right time to claim.  I claim Sayaka Miki, townie cop; flavour being that after Sayaka was betrayed by her friends, she was paranoid about where the allegiances of people lay, to the point where she had developed the required investigative techniques.  Every night, I can target one person and determine whether they are town or scum.

I'm still interested in going after either BlackRose or Kaori as opposed to Meiya, but I doubt enough people are awake to make such a move.  Thusly,

##Unvote
##Vote: Meiya
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: DiEnd on March 19, 2012, 04:23:55 AM
I can't stay here any longer, my heavenly bed beckons. I'll admit I was ready to switch to Miki to do my best to secure a lynch, but with the claim that cut me just now and needing to go to bed, I'm gonna stay on Meiya.

Wish the claim had come earlier, but nothing to be done about it now.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 04:26:10 AM
[12:43:45] Yukkii doesn't believe this two hours before lynch claim. We need to talk quickly.

Why would you wait until literally two hours before lynch when your wagon has been looking inevitable for hours to claim the most important town role?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 19, 2012, 04:31:58 AM
I've got reasons to think Cop is a class in this game, so the claim is not far-fetched. Currently wanting to hear Sayaka's answer to Yuno before I do anything like switch, though!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 19, 2012, 04:41:42 AM
I would argue that it did not seem inevitable at L-3 since there were several people who did not give their input yet as to who to lynch out of the three wagons (e.g Eclair, Meiya and mine) (e.g Kaori, Irene, BlackRose), two of which could have voted for my counterwagon.  However, them not being here all this time wore my patience thin.  I did not want to claim by any means.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 04:46:50 AM
Eclair Martinozzi: (3) Esuna Busy, Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (4) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
BlackRose: (1) Sayaka Miki

6 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)
By this point you haven't even voted one of the counterwagons. For someone claiming to be a cop you show no concern for your self-preservation. You're trying to tell me you were counting on the scummy lurkers whom you've said you suspect to be scum as well to come save you?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 04:48:02 AM
Yukkii has a question. Did you crumb your ability to cop people anywhere?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 19, 2012, 04:48:58 AM
Firstly, unless I am mistaken in my interpretation, the basis of miss Martinozzi's reasons for placing her vote upon myself is solely due to the fact that miss Martinozzi disapproved of the fact that I had voted for miss Hinanawi when I had, what appeared to her to be, a more convincing case on miss Farena. I ask again, why must my thoughts conform to yours, miss Martinozzi? Your statement that miss Irene has done nothing after the strange claim is also false, as you yourself have noted in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804894.html#msg804894) that miss Irene has made a useless post that contained naught but a wall of reads. You are one that disapproves of miss Rose's and miss Kanzaki's inactivities and have stated that you would like to see their lynches occur but I must ask, what exempts miss Irene from this list? I also believe that it would be rather prudent to state here that I have dropped my suspicion of miss Farena for the time being. I know not what miss Martinozzi speaks of when she claims in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805451.html#msg805451) that I had a much stronger reason to place a vote upon miss Farena rather than miss Hinanawi. Perhaps it is my fault for not saying so earlier, but may I note that my suspicions of miss Farena have been cleared for quite some time now? I also believe that statements such as "You had time to talk about Gasai's blurb on BlackRose, surely you have time to talk about why the person you're voting is a Galette spy." are highly provocative and serve no purpose other than to smear one's name. Clearly you must be aware that the way in which this statement has been worded is underhanded. In this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805255.html#msg805255) you state "If I didn't mention Gasai during any of my previous posts, it's because I didn't find anything in her posts that really felt scummy enough to talk about. Complaining I do not jump on every little bit and try to spin it into scum is naive and you need to pick up training again. That is not how you catch Galette spies." May I ask why you said this. I believe that my argument regarding the hypocrisy surrounding accusing miss Gasai of performing untelegraphed actions was directed at miss Miki, not you. Perhaps you, miss Martinozzi, are burdened with a guilty conscience?

Unfortunately, due to the delay in making this post and the resulting lack of time, I believe that my vote would best serve it's purpose by being placed upon miss Miki.
##Unvote
##Vote Sayaka Miki
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 19, 2012, 04:51:19 AM
From what you and Tenshi at that point in time said, there seemed to be a possibility that the BlackRose wagon would come into fruition.  However, that was not the case.  As for the lurkers, they may have their votes and opinions, which I felt prudent to take into consideration before claiming (especially when two of them were already prodded).
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 19, 2012, 04:52:38 AM
Have a Mini-Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (5) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy, Sayaka Miki
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (5) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai, Meiya Mitsurugi

Not voting: Maka Albarn

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
 
1 hour, 40 minutes remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Remember; no majority = no lynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 04:53:20 AM
Meiya, since you're going up against someone claiming cop, it's in your best interests to claim as well.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 19, 2012, 04:53:26 AM
Well, I had a thing written up about how I would still prefer a Sayaka lynch over Meiya, with Eclair still at the bottom of my list after my reread, but this shocking revelation changes things. With the claim now, I cringe at the thought of lynching someone who's claimed cop over the non-claimed second choice. I'm leaning towards Meiya on pure basis of principle, even when my intuition says otherwise.

Sorry if this seems abrupt and short, but I have to forgo my preferred longer explanations in order to get this information and my presence out there.

Cut by Meira
You are both tied right now as far as I know, can you please claim?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 19, 2012, 04:55:47 AM
May I also add my dissatisfaction with miss Busy. For one that has both voted for miss Miki and claimed that she believed myself to be town within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805434.html#msg805434) miss Busy's voteswitch looks rather strange to myself. An explanation would have been appreciated but miss Busy stated that she wished not to explain her actions and that she would be unavailable for the remainder of today.

Although I would like to refrain from claiming, it would appear that the current situation leaves me with little choice. I am Meiya Mitsurugi, the Town Godmother that has the ability to survive nine attempts on my life at any point during the day or night.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 19, 2012, 04:57:20 AM
Godmother with nine lives what?... Uhhh does that include lynches?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 19, 2012, 04:58:46 AM
I do not believe that lynches are considered to be an attempt upon my life.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Skull on March 19, 2012, 04:58:55 AM
could someone explain what a godmother is?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 19, 2012, 05:00:15 AM
Godmother is a scum class that makes you return town to cop investigations and immune to kills. I don't think it's a scum claim in this game, though, for reasons that aren't particularly special.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 05:04:33 AM
I am flailing so hard right now. 

Meiya, can you claim flavor?  I'll go into details after that.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 19, 2012, 05:07:40 AM
Very well. My wealth and background as a leading member of society allows myself to be protected from attempts upon my life. This protection disappears when I run out of immediate funds to protect myself with.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 05:13:46 AM
Alright, thanks.  I'm pretty sure Sayaka's claim is fake.  I don't think any sane scum would claim Godmother because they don't know how some of the other roles are.  My role name is anti-town as well.  I assumed it had something to do  with the fact that I'm a super miller.  The way Meiya is claiming and what she claimed is consistent with how I've been reading her all game.  I believe she's town.

Sayaka on the other hand, as a theoretical town cop, never even commented on the millers, which is a huge deal to her role.  It didn't seem to enter her thought process while questioning me and rereading her posts half the time she's not even talking to me like she thinks I'm scum.  I have no idea how I missed this before.  This quote is particularly suspect in my opinion:

Quote from: Sayaka
You have no need to fret over the placement of my vote however, given the outstanding issues I have with you.  There are still 13-14 hours left in the day and I will switch accordingly when needed to Tenshi (unlikely) or BlackRose/Kaori (active lurkers as of now;

Further, I don't think the flavor really  makes sense, but this is a minor point because I don't know how familiar the mods are with the flavor.  It still reads as much more forced to me than Meiya's though.  And finally, she waited until the last minute when there were very few people are to not only switch off of her (which would be important to think about if she were town), but to counter claim her as well.  With a claimed miller it means that it's very likely that there's a real cop in the game, so trying to avoid the CC is important.

I have been having a heart  attack about this for the past few hours, but I don't think I'm wrong.  This claim feels funny.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 19, 2012, 05:25:37 AM
Oh! Well, now I feel really foolish for not considering that she'd want to out a counterclaim. Just... don't get Lord Hector to dock my pay for it, alright?

Meiya's claim sounds a lot more like the truth than Sayaka's to me. Really, I'm pretty sold on Meiya's claim being town, and I can see the case for Sayaka's claim coming from scum, since she waited until the absolute last minute with no breadcrumbs or anything. Thinking about it, this is how an enemy would handle a claim; sounding like an important class when the day is almost over to draw out a counterattack and cause panic amongst the wagons is pretty much a token scumclaim, since it causes chaos and all that.

There's a problem here, though! How're we gonna get two more voters to hammer Sayaka in 30 minutes? I'd call over my sisters for a triangle attack, but they're not on the player list.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 05:26:32 AM
[1:14:30] I'm behind you Yukkii. Don't shake. I'll kill all your enemies for you.

I am willing to stake our cop's life on the line for this. I also don't see scum counterclaiming Town Cop with Please Lynch me I am the Godmother.

Maka, where the fuck is your vote? We can't count on lurk and lurkier to get in here and change anything. Put it down, because it's going to determine who gets lynched.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 19, 2012, 05:28:42 AM
Urghhhhhhhhh. I need to make a decision. My vote plus someone else's (read: someone else gonna need to switch in any case in order to get a lynch) will decide the lynch.
The way my head is working right now is that I've preferred Meiya's general play over Sayaka's for most of the game. Sayaka's claim feels... awkward to say the least, but this boils down to gut instead of evidence, which makes me apprehensive. In the least, her claim fits inside the setup, which again is speculation and makes me apprehensive.

I'm not a fan of either lynch, but a no lynch looks to be the worst alternative. Out of everything, I just feel I have to go with Sayaka due to general play. I'm sorry it has to be like this and I don't want to do it, but I feel obligated to for the sake of the lynch.

##Vote: Sayaka
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Faiz on March 19, 2012, 05:30:58 AM
Okay, I'm pretty sure that I'm playing rather stupidly this game (probably in all of MoTK history), and I guess I'd better come out clean before I hurt someone (if there is a someone).  True claim is that my rolename is Town Paranoid Cop, and that I am a one-shot nightvig.  Flavor is that I took justice into my own hands and started killing scumbags on my own (befitting of a vigilante).  As to why I came up with this ill-conceived gambit in the first place; I really have no explanation.

I suppose today is probably the blackest day for me in all the days I have been in MoTK.  I am really quite the fool.  Will just leave my fate up to the playerbase or something.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Sasword on March 19, 2012, 05:32:07 AM
Ohhhhhhh whatttttttt theeeeeeeeee heckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: capt. h on March 19, 2012, 05:32:32 AM
The Final VoteCountDown

Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (5) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy, Sayaka Miki
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (6) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai, Meiya Mitsurugi, Maka Albarn

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
 
1 hour remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=03&day=19&year=2012&hour=02&min=35&sec=&p0=251)

Remember; no majority = no lynch.

Conq's rules apply even if the mods are away. Lynch = no more talking, and no talking after deadline.
[/quotedfortruth]
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 19, 2012, 05:33:24 AM
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (5) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy, Sayaka Miki
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose

Oh man you know what would be great if one of those lurkers came and lynched the Town Cop Whatever the hell she just claimed because what is that. Okay NeoSayaka. Hammer here please.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: W on March 19, 2012, 05:34:31 AM
Well, Sayaka, you're gonna have to excuse me for being skeptical when scum succesfully pulled this last game and your gambit would have outed the cop, who you should have assumed was in the set-up from Yuno and I talking about millers.

Can we get a (http://i39.tinypic.com/21l2yad.gif) Hammer in here?

Also, I hate using online times as much as the next guy, buuuut, given the player in question's history today...

BlackRose, why are you lurking through deadline?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Kabuto on March 19, 2012, 05:35:59 AM
I get up to use the bathroom and what the fuuuuuck is thiiiiis

I don't even.

I'm almost sort of tempted to say "Go ahead and if you don't manage to shoot we can turbolynch" but Meiya's claim does look pretty town, and the alternative to neither is no-lynch.  Besides, what

So.

##unvote
##vote Sayaka
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 1 Start
Post by: Conqueror on March 19, 2012, 04:09:40 PM
Final Votecount

Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (4) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Sayaka Miki
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (7) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai, Meiya Mitsurugi, Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy - LYNCH!
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

"Wishing for someone else's happiness means someone has to be cursed to suffer as much. That's what it means to be a Puella Magi."

"I'm such a fool."
 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yXUjLjO2X0)
Sayaka Miki, Town Paranoid Cop, lost her soul Day 1!

You have about 24 hours to send in night actions to all three mods. Please don't hold off till the deadline. Additionally, everyone in the game must PM me during the night as an activity check.

Quicksword Irene has been replaced.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Night 1
Post by: Conqueror on March 20, 2012, 03:57:54 AM
Actually I think I'll just open the day when I get all night actions (a.k.a now). The time is more convenient for me anyways, and I think most people have finalized their night actions.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Night 1
Post by: Conqueror on March 20, 2012, 04:11:42 AM
"i lovve shakugan no shana ♥ shana is so cute i want to be a Flame Haze ♥"
(http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/7402/cdfe6cb6888855a7cafde66.jpg)
Shana, Town Superstar, went up in flames Night 1!

Day 2 has begun! You have 72 hours.
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 20, 2012, 04:38:40 AM
[6:66:66] Yukkii hates everything. (http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a197/Lilium1/untitled.jpg)

If anyone else has the urge to fakeclaim when they have a provable role like vig please just stop now. I'm about to go to sleep so I'm just gonna..

##Vote: Blackrose

That entire wagon is made up of town reads. I'm very sad right now. Dissecting will have to wait until tomorrow.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 20, 2012, 04:44:45 AM
##Vote Kaori

When I get back I'm going to make a beautiful case on Uesugi and stuff, and say other stuff probably, but right now I have to go to SLEEP. I shouldn't even be awake now, for that matter.

Still want Kaori to die most today, though.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 20, 2012, 04:46:14 AM
A New Day and a New Votecount

BlackRose: (1) Yuno Gasai
Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Esuna Busy

Not Voting: Everyone Else!

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

71.5 hours remaining.

Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 20, 2012, 10:50:40 AM
I concur with Gasai about the aggravating impossibility of reading that wagon. Nearly half of it is smeared with the need to lynch someone, and no one on it ended yesterday looking all that bad anyway. I have a small wurgle of an issue with Gasai's BlackRose vote, however temporary it was (the extra reason I had asked about the fundamental disconnect was because I have used the late-day-lurker-wagon-shift tactic as scum before, and I have also caught other scum trying to use it), but it's not really anything more than that since I didn't have a problem with Gasai's play otherwise.

Miki's flip makes me not feel quite as gung-ho on Mitsurugi, given I disliked them for rather similar things. So let us try something else.

##Vote: Kaori Kanzaki

This is practically a coinflip between Kanzaki and BlackRose. It's pretty much no effort against terrible effort. I have an ever-so-slight preference for lynching the no effort over the terrible effort, but they both ended the day looking really bad and make me wish I had two votes.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 20, 2012, 05:33:26 PM
A New Day and a New Votecount

BlackRose: (1) Yuno Gasai
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Esuna Busy, Tenshi Hinanawi

Not Voting: Everyone Else!

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

58.5 hours remaining.

Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

Kaori Kanzaki and BlackRose have been prodded again for the nth time. Seriously the dead players have more recent posts than you two do.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 20, 2012, 06:42:33 PM
[2:57:45] Yukkii is falling asleep. This thread is so boring. Where did that loud scythe wielding girl go? Maybe everyone still thinks this is the night phase. The wagon isn't bad for reading though. Everyone who was on it had reasons to be there. I don't think everyone there is town. I would have said the most likely scum were Uesugi and Shana. :x

The only thing disapointing about my Blackrose vote is that it wasn't immediately followed by six after it.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 20, 2012, 07:47:26 PM
A post from miss Kanzaki and miss Rose would be a great thing to see, indeed. However, for the time being, I shall place my vote upon miss Martinozzi for the same reasons that I stated yesterday when I switched my vote to miss Miki.
##Vote Eclair Martinozzi

I shall also note that I will be unavailable for many of the hours in the following day and sincerely apologize for any and all inconveniences that my inactivity may cause.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Decade on March 20, 2012, 07:54:47 PM
So right now its in the eye of the beholder on which is worse, no effort or little effort.
Is that what you are trying to say Tenshi?

@Yuno: So you're saying to lynch BlackRose because everyone on the wagon is town in your eyes?
Don't you believe that would be a too quick of a decision?

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 20, 2012, 08:45:31 PM
Will be gone again as soon as I finish up this post because I'm busy as hell until tomorrow afternoon. I can't really put any roleplay input anyway since I don't know the character and stuff.


Mkay, so let's begin:

I have no idea what the hell.

Not only was that 5 pages of walls in one 4 hour sitting, but I'm also not familiar at all with most of the characters, which made it even more difficult to follow, and as if that were not horrible enough, as a result of not knowing the characters, I was also very confused at some the roleplay that people have been putting in. So basically my brain exploded and I don't know if I'm going to be making any sense.

At this point I'd rather just go on with D2 and not post any opinions about D1 due to not making any sense of it etc, but I figure people will press me for reads sooner or later so I'll also add what I can regarding my first impressions, despite how horribly bad they may be considering the single, one sitting read-through that'll inevitably mean overlooking several points.
The only thing on Irene's D1 I figure I should clarify beforehand is that I have absolutely no idea what the previous player was thinking when doing that weird softclaim in ED1, and that I can't contact him to figure it out. Anything Irene did after that was just promising to get to reading through the text walls, so his play is an overall "??" to me. I'm also pretty confused about how or why anybody would give Irene a pass (Yuno's #93 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805110.html#msg805110)) and she wasn't listed among some people's "lurkers who should die" list, which considering the absolute lack of content seems pretty off. Only seeing side mentions of her once Eclair gave up on trying to get the lynch going almost made me forget she existed this game (which I just noticed Kenshin mentioned in #144 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805462.html#msg805462))

Since I mentioned that, I guess my playerlist breakdown will start with Kenshin:

She was particularly unmemorable, and any reads I have on her are kind of forced out of a re-read. The only thing that really caught my attention during the first readthrough was the beginning of her #73. Despite agreeing with the sissy-slapfight looking townie, I always find it odd and scummy when people post reminders that they're hunting scum, out of nowhere. Town is too busy doing the hunting to care to point out that they're doing it, so I always read this as scum going "hey people look at me! I'm scumhunting too!". I find that small things such as these tend to be pretty accurate, but this thing being mentioned under the pretense of roleplay makes my conviction on the read waver, everybody likes roleplaying and pushing this as the primary reason for a lynch would be awful. However, this small detail still makes me read her as scummier, so this is also a warning of confirmation bias in my reread.

So reread in, she's unmemorable, and she made sure to point this out in her #73. This is very odd to me, considering that her way of reacting to this is saying that she'll answer any questions people have of her instead of being more active in her scumhunting. It reads to me like she's analyzing the thread more than enough, but isn't posting all she could, both in amount of posts and in amount per post. She only posts once more clarifying her ED1 vote and then dissapears until the deadline, keeping her vote on Miki with absolutely no analysis on her recent posts at the time other than "dislike" and saying she'd also be fine with LAL, then dissapears again.
I'm aware of my bias and as such won't push this as horribly scummy yet, but I would appreciate it greatly if Kenshin were to be as transparent as humanly possible this D2 so I can make sure I'm not making a mistake here.


It's unfair that I reread her thoroughly and only her, but I'll be running out of time soon so I'm just posting first impressions from now on with the necessary cautions until I get back tomorrow and get some serious reading done.


Shana.
I once heard that NK analysis is something you do but don't talk about, so I guess I'll save my opinions on this unless somebody is terribly interested.

Farina.
I've been reading people cheering her on for good roleplaying, and not too long afterwards, good content. It may just be that lack of information on the character makes reading her difficult for me, or maybe I'm just not remembering all of her posts properly, but I dislike this. What I remember of her was her pushing certain conducts as scummy, I should probably look further into it since this was back when I still didn't have a good track of the characters and who was voting for whom, but it read to me as possibly twisting things too far to find scummy behaviour. It could also be trying hard, or just that I failed to interpret it correctly, probably the latter, since her comment on Sayaka's claim seemed like she wanted to stop a townie lynch even if it cost her to do a softclaim of sorts. I just disliked that a cheer for good roleplaying turns into a cheer for good play altogether, it reeks of bias and trying to make the player look better.

Tenshi.
Probably the towniest in my list so far. She put some good deal of effort into explaining her points despite the amount of times she was getting misread, and I'm happy with the big degree of transparency. Nevertheless, I don't like town reads at all. I know I'm particularly weak to walls of solid reasoning and that I always read certain players as town, so I will still pass a new judgement upon every new post.


BLAH, everything from here on got deleted due to backspace. Time to start again and write down everything again in more confusing ways. IN A WORD DOCUMENT.


Eclair.
See Tenshi, only pushing harder to get her lynches, I don?t really know what she thinks of anybody who isn?t Miya or Yuno though, and would like to know. Also, although it could be argued that it?s WIFOM, I like the blatant alliance with Tenshi, scum wouldn?t have the guts to do that after calling lynch attention like she did earlier in the day.

Yuno.
I?ve never played a game where millers are told outright that they?re millers, but then again, Miki somehow knew she was a paranoid doctor, so her claim is a lot more believable after her flip. The only issue I have is how she gave Irene and Meiya a D1 pass just ?cause. It kind of makes sense that she?d let Irene get a pass for role-related reasons after her ?anti-town? claim if she?s a miller and has this anti-town name she claims to have, if this is who I think it is playing Yuno.
Well, that would be the case if her #172 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805511.html#msg805511) didn?t completely contradict this by condemning Miki after claiming Paranoid Cop. I mean sure, the cop claim gambit was horrible and I don?t understand why Miki did that, but when did Paranoid Cop seem like a good scum fakeclaim? Farina acurrately described how the cop gambit could be interpreted as 100% scum, but Yuno didn't do anything at all other than demand a hammer. I would like Yuno to answer why she believed that Irene should get a pass and not Miki.
But this is sort of based on meta, in an anonymafia. So yeah. I don?t really want to lynch Yuno right now, unless her answers make me want to use her own ?persuasion tools? against her.
Scratch this. A recent event has lead me to accidentally find out who was playing this account before, and therefore my read on Yuno's player has been proved wrong. I won't be voting Yuno just yet, but hell do I want to hear an answer from her about this.


Kaori and Blackrose.
I don?t like LAL, having people like PX around who lurk regardless of alignment means the probability of lynching town is not low. I?d rather have you two getting a move on and posting content. Lots of it. I?d want myself and everyone else to be able to have a decent read before LAL is pushed to the edge and I?m forced to choose between you two.


People I desperately need to re-read in order to develop some sort of opinion on them:


Maka. Turned unmemorable after the ED1 prod for activity. I thought she hadn?t posted much after that and was going to scold her for it, but a quick glance tells me she actually has been rather active. I dislike her condemning of parroting and her asking Seiya if her bulletproof also governed her own lynches, which would obviously be really ridiculous. She also refused to change her stance on Sayaka after her full claim for some reason when all she needed to do was unvote along with her frustration venting post, but I get how the pressure to get a lynch in 1 hour would make you prefer to risk a mislynch to get a flip than end up with a no lynch so whatever.

Meiya. Needs better post organization, seriously. I feel she might be scummy but don?t have any reasons to back it up, I probably just think so because I liked Tenshi and ?clair?s stuff the most. I have nothing on her myself.

Esuna. I dislike her pushing a Kanzaki lynch over a Blackrose/Irene/Shana lynch, when they were all nonexistent enough to have everybody lack a decent read on them.  And? wait what?
#130 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805434.html#msg805434) -> ?Meiya is town. Why is there a wagon on her??
#174 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805513.html#msg805513) -> ?Meiya?s claim does look pretty town?
I was wrong, I do have a read on her. I just remembered those two posts randomly while doing something else, and unless my mafia play is horrible beyond belief, I believe forgetting your own town reads is not something town tends to do and is scummy as hell.




So TL;DR version for whoever is as tired of walls as I am:
As of now I want to lynch Esuna, but will be placing my vote on one of the lurkers instead to get the wagons going so they stop lurking once and for all. It's pretty ridiculous to assume that things will remain like this by the end of the day, but just to be clear as to where I'm standing, if things do remain like this at the end of the day I'd be willing to lynch Yuno, Kenshin or either of the Blackrose/Kaori pair, given they continue their game like this.

Lastly, reminder that this is originally post #182. I'm posting this with some lag and won't be updating it with the content beyond (except a bit I just did regarding Yuno because it pretty much changed the whole read) because of busy at the time of posting + the stuff coming up tomorrow and the activity I expect to have to catch up to. If something comes up in the meanwhile such as lurker content then all the better!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 20, 2012, 08:58:09 PM
Never did decide which of the two I'd vote. I don't want one of them to turn into a quicklynch before they get a chance to speak up so I'll go with Blackrose.
Note that this does not mean I will not support the lurker lynches under any conditions. If the content either of them provide is ridiculously terrible I will definitely support lynching the lurker in question.

##Vote: Blackrose
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 20, 2012, 09:20:26 PM
Votecount

BlackRose: (2) Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Esuna Busy, Tenshi Hinanawi
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi

Not Voting: Everyone Else!

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

55 hours remaining.

Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 20, 2012, 11:30:59 PM
@Irene

First, I think I explained several times why I found your predecessor's claim really townie, but I'll do so again.  I claimed a role with anti-town implications that would be easy to attack, or at least ignore, and she not only defended my claim, she said her role was something similar.  This means she severely limited the amount of things she could claim and she'd have to justify that defense later when claims came.  I find it unlikely that scum would gimp themselves this badly so early.  It was certainly good enough for a D1 pass considering the only issue I had with her was the fact that she wasn't posting.  Her outright flaking coupled with your post means I don't think I have any reason to reconsider this read.

As for Sayaka's claim, first she did not claim vig/paranoid doc/whatever (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805472.html#msg805472): she claimed an ordinary cop.  Considering I'm a miller and Farina said a couple of times that she had reasons to expect a cop to be in the game, there was a very good chance there was a cop in the game.  However, I figured out pretty quickly it wasn't her.  I recommend rereading the end of the day because some of the things you said were not things that happened and I'm afraid your eyes were just glazing over the posts at that point (totally understandable given you had to read the whole game at once).  If it's not clear why I thought she was fake claiming cop I can go over it again though.

Anyway, I could not think of a single pro-town reason to fake claim cop in a game with a claimed miller.  I could think of a couple of pro-scum reasons though.  First, it would draw a claim from the real cop (and it was done after everyone left, so not only would it draw a claim from the real cop on D2, there's a chance she might have lived another day giving her the best of both worlds with that claim).  Second, it was an important enough claim that it would let her live though the day.  Third, two people on her wagon, Farina and myself, had reasons to believe there was a cop in this game, so it was also an emotionally manipulative way to get us to stop voting her.  Because I figured out it was fake quickly enough I was able to get some support onto her even after her claim.  She then proceeds to claim vig: a confirmable role that could be used to off some of the lurkers I felt were really scummy.  I thought it was both more emotional manipulation and a last ditch effort to shake people off her wagon since she was still more likely to get lynched than Meiya even with the cop claim.

Contrast that with Meiya's claim.  She claimed an anti-town role name (something I have myself), and the role itself was downright insane for scum to claim.  Call it WIFOM, but I can't think of a single mafiaoso that would claim Godmother over something like town cop.  She also gave her flavor to me quickly, which makes me think it's not made up.  So basically, I had to pick between someone that fake claimed cop in a game with a claimed miller and someone with a totally insane claim that had similarities to my own role PM.  It wasn't a hard choice, and I still think Meiya's town because of it.

Irene I explained above.

I also want to say that LAL is NOT a bad strategy.  Lurking is like the best scum strategy ever because people are afraid to lynch lurkers and it gives them a way to say absolutely nothing.  Lurking is scummy.

@Kaori

The Sayaka wagon was made up of people I had town reads on, with the exception of Uesugi who I don't have much of an opinion either way.  It's not premature, it just is.  It means I have to reconsider my reads, which I will do when I have time to read the thread seven more times.  The reason I want lurker lynches so much is because I had no real scum reads while reading the thread, which means the people lurking are probably scum.  Considering lurking is scummy, this isn't that surprising.  I just fine BlackRose barely worse than you.

Also, could you like, tell us what you think about stuff at some point?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 20, 2012, 11:59:43 PM
Irene just shot up in my appreciation. Would not lynch.

I also do not have any desire to lynch Gasai at this point, as her thought processes are clear and easy to follow. I do want to lynch Esuna Busy. I reread her during the night as I recalled almost nothing of her actual stances throughout Day 1, and now I know why. It's because Esuna kept skirting the sidelines and never really joined us in the fight to find Galette scum spies.

There's a typical promise to deliver content on page 2 after being confronted by walls of text, and no real elaboration on her stance on me in light of her vote being due to a miswording on my part or a misreading on her part with respect to my reason for voting Gasai. She later says she thinks my explanation was good enough for an ED1 case, and that my jump to Irene is odd, and even weirder that I go for Meiya in what she determines to be 'not me over me' at a stage so early in the game it was unlikely I'd get lynched.

Even more unlikely considering three of the votes were over ED1 stuff and hadn't been updated yet with serious matter, and it feels like a weird kind of panic mongering by suggesting I was somehow afraid of the pressure building up on me. There was no real, threatening wagon on me at any point before her post concluding I was voting 'not me over me', and it seems like a lazy stretch by just looking at the votes and making opinions. She calls my case on Meiya 'disjointed odd points'... my vote at that time had been accompanied by the question of 'why Tenshi over Farina?', which by no stretch of anyone's imagination should be considered either an appropriate case nor 'disjointed odd points'. It feels like she's forcing herself to have an opinion on me to validate her vote, and uses that to avoid saying anything about anyone else.

By the end of the day she abandons her stance on me and doesn't want to lynch Sayaka, and instead goes for the lurkers. She has now commented that Meiya is Town, Farina is Town, Maka is Town, don't want to lynch Eclair, don't want to lynch Sayaka, and BlackRose, Irene and Kaori are lurky, let's lynch Kaori.

And after toting how Meiya is Town, she swaps her Kaori vote to a Meiya vote for inexplicable reasons ('something I'm not seeing in Meiya'), which feels like the kind of ploy Galettes would use to avoid giving a clear cut opinion.

Even now her opinions offer little and she is still aiming at a lurker, while never quite saying who really are scum. If the lurkers are the only scum in hte game I put serious question marks at your participation and the strength of your desire to see us root out the traitors in our midst.

##Vote: Esuna Busy

I'm not willing to pursue Meiya today.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 21, 2012, 12:02:13 AM
Quote
I also want to say that LAL is NOT a bad strategy.  Lurking is like the best scum strategy ever because people are afraid to lynch lurkers and it gives them a way to say absolutely nothing.  Lurking is scummy.

Lurkers are like the lazy bums who sign up to war and then realize that a full schedule is a full schedule. I don't really like lynching lurkers over scummy people because it feels too much like cleaning up the Town of the lazy bums who don't participate.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 21, 2012, 12:09:01 AM
I'd agree with that if the lurkers weren't scummy and the more active posters weren't town.  Do you disagree that the lurkers are scummy?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 21, 2012, 12:15:09 AM
Kaori does look rather unhelpful and not pro-Town, if that's what you're asking. Were I in her position, I'd have shined my armor and made sure I'd made the darndest best impression of myself I could, and it frustrates me that she continues to be a jerk who doesn't play the game. People who don't want to play shouldn't sign up.

I can get behind a lynch on her on grounds of inattentiveness, lurking and a refusal to take the game serious and partake in scumhunting, but most of it feels like I'd lynch her for being a no-play jerk.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 12:25:15 AM
Yeah, I disappeared for most of the end of D1 and then had to rush to catch up and sort of got buried under a pile of trying to deal with everything at once while sleepy. (This lead to things like "Meiya is town" "##Vote Meiya" "Nevermind Meiya is town again", although at least the last was because of her claim, but I digress.) Now to make up for it!

Also, on the matter of lurking and stuff. There can be people who don't post often but are town. You can often tell this by their posts actually, like, being good and townie looking. On the other hand, you practically seem to be saying "They're lurking so let's lynch someone else." ...this is part of the reason scum lurk. Other parts of the reason is because if you don't post often, you don't have to fake as much stuff, and you're less likely to slip up, as well as less likely to have attention paid to you (If you don't overdo it like Kaori does.). FOR EXAMPLE, HOW MANY PEOPLE HERE THINK ABOUT UESUGI EVER? I'll get back to that later.

Blackrose, TBH, I feel is more likely to be newbtown then scum. Kaori, on the other hand, barely even looks like she's trying. Not "I don't have enough time to play properly", just, not seriously working towards a pro-town win condition. Look at her D2 post, 185. That's like her third post in the game, and they've all been about that long. Also look at the words in it, because... dear god, if you think she's trying, I don't know what is wrong with you. She's not doing crap. Critical things like "My opinion about what's happened" and "Who I think is scum" are missing here. There is none of that present. And it's D2 now. This is so bad I don't even.

Specifically to Eclair... if nothing else, she's worse then useless, being a major distraction to everyone here and provides an easy target for scum to sit on. But I do seriously think she's scum herself.

I also have other opinions to share, of course. For one, Yuno might just be my strongest town read right now. And my second pick for scum after Kaori is Uesugi. I'm about to eat dinner, so I'm going to put this out here now and by the time I go to sleep a post on Why I Think Uesugi Is A Galette Spy should be all bright and shiny and present.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 21, 2012, 12:33:50 AM
I should be attending more important matters, but I'm checking by before heading to bed anyway because I suck at self-restraint.

Eclair pointed out something I missed due to lack of reread, but Esuna's lack of a coherent read on Meiya started way before the hammer post. There's a blatant read flip-flop from "Meiya is Town. Why is there a wagon on her." (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805434.html#msg805434) to "I still need to reread Meiya more" (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805436.html#msg805436), then finally voting Meiya for no reason (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805455.html#msg805455) and disappearing. The scum read was already the strongest I had before, but after this I'm pretty much sold on lynching you today as of now, Esuna, if there's any explanation for this behaviour, I would like to hear it.

And what I wanted to comment on initially was that I dislike this needless repetition of "lurkers are scummy". Everybody already knows this, and are now acting upon it to get them moving. Doing this thing where you keep droning on about it until they post is only going to make it more likely for everybody to get even more confirmation-biasy when reading them, and therefore discouraging them from providing content. I'd rather let them have a shot at playing frickin' mafia and providing something of use in the first third of the day or so.

Comment on Yuno will have to wait until tomorrow, hopefully will have more to go on by then, too.

Cut by Esuna's explanation being an excuse. I would be pleased with some pressure on Uesugi to get her posting, though.
Also an explanation of why Blackrose is newb/derptown would be nice.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 21, 2012, 01:26:50 AM
Bishamonten, grant me your divine protection! (http://youtuberepeater.com/watch?v=01omDpo8Fmk)

First point, a hearty welcome to Irene 2.0.  In one post you've managed to repair my opinion of your prior self and even managed to answer the one question I wanted Irene 1.0 to answer (... to the best of your ability).  So thank you for actually showing up to play; I trust this level of activity will maintain itself.

Second point: Kaori.  You barely showed up all day yesterday and your first post today is a minimum-content garbage post.  Where's the analysis?  Where are your thoughts?  Where's... anything other than some throwaway questions?  This is getting to be just blatant active lurking IN ADDITION TO your regular lurking and argh.  You officially became worse than BlackRose in my book.  Minimum-effort cruising on D2 after EVERYONE WAS ON YOUR ASS YESTERDAY FOR DOING THE SAME THING means not only that you're probably never going to improve, but that you're doing it intentionally.

##vote Kaori

Get dead and take your mediocre anime with you.

Third point: Esuna.  I have a major issue with last night's quickhammering.  We still had an hour left in the day.  You bare minimum could have been like "I am here and willing to switch my vote!" or something first.  It kinda bothered me then (not the least of which because I got cut), and your recent posts aren't helping matters much.  At the risk of sounding moronic I'm going to hold judgement until after I see your case on me, because it might at least show you're putting your own thoughts together.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 01:33:18 AM
Mmm burritos.

Irene: Blackrose, well, at least she actually sort of looked like she was trying when she posted. But given her nonexistence, there isn't much to say on the matter. I wouldn't mind all that much if she got lynched either, but I'd vastly prefer Kaori.

I also somehow doubt pressure will galvanize Kaori into action, either. Note how her latest post came after two out of the three people to post in D2 started off by jumping directly onto her, and a whole lot of people expressing large dislike of her at the end of D1, even if they were not voting her. Her posts are also lacking in any "Sorry, busy" or "This is hard but here's what I've got", which isn't exactly a reason, but IMO helps set in my read of her as uncaring scum skirting by with little to no effort. Possibly hoping that since she was so nonexistent people would concentrate on their scumpicks who were actually present?

That entire paragraph is pretty unhelpful and consisting of silly things. There's a reason it wasn't in my previous post. It's just sort of things that compound upon my read of her due to said things in my previous post, instead of being explicit reasons I think she's bad.

Anyway. Uesugi time.

Uesugi is pulling the lurkscum manuever, except she's doing it more professionally. Her posts are actually nice looking, so with their low number and lack of immediately apparent issues inside, she actually does manage to slide by without much notice.

"But why isn't she just a townie who doesn't post a lot, if her posts look nice and have no apparent issues?", hmm? Right. I do have to admit; she starts out strong. She goes on hard after Sayaka right off the bat, far long before anyone else is voting her, with nice points. She talks about other people at first, although then purely attentions on Sayaka, but given that it's only one post, it's hard for me to actually accuse her a tunnel vision (It's hard to accuse lurkers of a lot of things, honestly.). She finally reappears late in the day... stays on the Sayaka wagon of course given how the day is going, and then spends the rest of her post going hardcore LAL, not just on the standard Kaori and Blackrose but Irene as well.

Note that she doesn't actually comment on anything that had happened during the latter half of D1 apart from the three lurkers.

On the other people, she says she doesn't support their lynches because "She doesn't see a viable case" or "I need to see more from her first", rather then "I think ____ is town". This leaves her options open to be able to easily later jump on them later in the game with a vote if she deigns to... while simultaneously still in the future be able to say she thinks/thought they were town, and whichever she does fits perfectly fine with what she said in the past. (Scum benefit from keeping their supportable mislynch options open.)

Personally, I think she's playing scum quite well right now, and that she hasn't really made any notable mistakes, so while I do commend her play, I'm firmly in the belief that she's still, indeed, scum.

Totally and completely happy with lynching Kaori or Uesugi today.

Cut by Uesugi herself! Her Kaori vote is something obvious to anyone at this point and even if they're both scum I'd honestly be expecting scum to be bussing Kaori right now anyway. She notably still lacks opinions other then the easy targets (Sayaka is the only one in the game she's talked about past very early D1 who wasn't an easy target) so my opinion has not changed a bit. As for defense of myself, A. An hour left in the day is not much, especially when most are sleeping. Second, lynches other then Sayaka no longer seemed viable. Finally, her claiming got super weird and the only viable wagon left had made a claim I felt made her look pretty darn town, leaving Sayaka as by far the better lynch choice.

And lastly, it was what, 1:30 am? I had to get the hell to sleep. I wasn't going to risk a No Lynch happening, and I'm extremely doubtful anything in that last hour would have changed the outcome of the day or been particularly important.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 01:37:54 AM
For those who tl;dr, these are IMO the most important points on my Uesugi case.
Quote
Uesugi is pulling the lurkscum manuever, except :wordswords: -> actually does manage to slide by without much notice.

Note that in her non-ed1 post she doesn't actually comment on anything that had happened during the latter half of D1 apart from the three lurkers.

On the other people, she says she doesn't support their lynches because "She doesn't see a viable case" or "I need to see more from her first", rather then "I think ____ is town". This leaves her options open to be able to easily later jump on them later in the game with a vote if she deigns to... while simultaneously still in the future be able to say she thinks/thought they were town, and whichever she does fits perfectly fine with what she said in the past. (Scum benefit from keeping their supportable mislynch options open.)

Cut by Uesugi herself! Her Kaori vote is something obvious to anyone at this point and even if they're both scum I'd honestly be expecting scum to be bussing Kaori right now anyway. She notably still lacks opinions other then the easy targets (Sayaka is the only one in the game she's talked about past very early D1 who wasn't an easy target) so my opinion has not changed a bit.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Sasword on March 21, 2012, 01:55:13 AM
Blarghehflargehbop.

Ok to make this brief for now. It seems like the big thing right now is heavy pressure on lurkers. To note, I'm not against lynching them, but it's a matter of personal morals that dictate my apprehension. I don't like to lynch people playing for the sole reason of playing badly, and therefore scummy, because it makes the game unfun.

On this note, I will say right now that I do not plan on voting Kaori right now. I refuse to belive that scum would be that lazy or apathetic or that their buddies would let her do that. If I'm wrong about this, I'm sorry and I will have words for post-game, but I'm not willing to vote her now. This is NOT an excuse to just keep doing nothing, get in here and speak the queen's english in a way that also makes you play the game.

##Vote: Uesugi Kenshin

Again, a quick writeup, but I feel strongly about this. She was almost nonexistant Day 1 with a vote that literally never moved off of Sayaka. The first post had almost nothing but a single reason for voting her. The second post basically reads as "Hi I'm here and I'm gonna keep my vote here". Just to note, it was almost time for the 24 hour prod when she posted it. Darnit, I have to go now but I shall get this post and my position out there and expound on it later when I arrive hopefully.

Can't read much but she posted and looks like taking the easy way ok bye
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 02:00:52 AM
Okay, this might be a little awkward since those posts were made awhile ago, but in hindsight I believe it to be better to put my vote where my mouth is instead of simply verbally going after Uesugi.

##Unvote
##Vote Uesugi Kenshin


Kaori is still scum too, of course. But Uesugi is too, and it matters that I convince others of this as opposed to the already apparent wide agreement of Kaori being horribad, hence the vote to actually throw weight into my case. I'm fine with switching to Kaori to lynch her at the end of the day if my vote is needed there.

Oh boy, a cut with beating me to my own wagonstarting. How embarrassing...!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 21, 2012, 02:34:20 AM
Alright, I seriously suck at finding the mafias unless something seriously ticks for me or there's a scum flip somewhere. So I'll just express my current thoughts with this post.

D2, not liking people who are focusing on lurkers right now. So that means Uesegi, Yuno, and Tenshi. Especially Yuno. Considering how lazy modo she just got, I REAAAAAAAAAAAAALLY wish she could flip scum. Unfortunately, there just seems no way that Yuno is scum for me. Just one question, can you ask the mod how your role works with Weak Roles (http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Weak)?

I really like Esuna's case on Uesegi as it makes sense, and I second Maka that all her posts look like careful prod avoidance.

The Celestial Princess's only post of D2 looks really opportunistic, getting rid of all her suspicion of Meiya and immediately switching to lurker hunt mode after the first few posts of D2 voting for lurkers and the general populace decided Meiya wasn't scum after keeping her vote there all day, disappearing this day 2 so far, forgetting Kaori exists until AFTER she got voted by someone else, among various small things I can't explain, make her my prefered scum pick.

##Vote: Tenshi

Kaori is... basic lurkscum and I don't feel like lynching her right now?

Everyone else is various amounts of Town/Neutral and I don't want to make this post big.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 21, 2012, 02:46:45 AM
I may not have much time at the present but may I direct a question towards miss Busy? I shall assume that the answer is yes and ask my question anyway. Now that you have more time and are not inebriated by a lack of rest could you kindly explain your thought process in reversing your read of myself at the last minute when it appeared as though I would be lynched? I have noticed that, although you have briefly mentioned it within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806369.html#msg806369), you have failed to provide a clear explanation and I am now hoping that you are capable of supplying one.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 21, 2012, 02:48:19 AM
And miss Rose, if miss Kanzaki is lurkscum rather than a simple lurker, may I inquire so as to why do you not wish to view her lynch at the present moment?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 02:51:04 AM
Erm.

To be entirely honest I'm not sure I can adequately explain how I feel about you at all, especially what happened related to you at the end of d1.

I'm sort of glad your claim suddenly made you so town because it meant I can clear you as town and stop worrying about it.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 02:52:27 AM
It's sort of difficult to read your D1 posts at all just because of how drowned in fancy wording they are. I can sort of grasp what they say, but I can't hold it together long enough to have the whole post "translated" in my mind so that I can properly evaluate them.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 21, 2012, 03:41:08 AM
Quote from: BlackRose
Just one question, can you ask the mod how your role works with Weak Roles?
I'm just going to ignore the irony of you calling me lazy and answer this.  They would die if they targeted me.

Comments on everything else will come after I've finished my read.  Hoping that'll be tonight, but I'm not making any promises.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 21, 2012, 03:44:53 AM
Simply because going after solely lurkers would be the laziest thing ever. If Kaori ends up being the lynch of the day, my vote will be there.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 21, 2012, 03:45:44 AM
Count Voting

BlackRose: (2) Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Esuna Busy: (1) Eclair Martinozzi
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) BlackRose

Not Voting: Farina, Kaori Kanzaki

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

48.5 hours remaining.

Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 21, 2012, 04:27:02 AM
Comments on not-me things

Irene 2.0 (and anyone else that thinks this might be relevant/needs the distinction made between different classes of lurkers): For the record, I cared little for pressing your predecessor as a lurker because she was a non-present lurker even as far as lurkers go. People that lurk and pop up occasionally to post scummy things are people worth pursuing. People that plain don't show up at all and have about as many prods as posts by the time Day 1 ends are not people worth pursuing, they're people that you let the mod handle.

I've spent the past little while devoting what energy I can to looking at the Day 1s of Busy and Kenshin. This might seem a bit jumbled, but I swear it makes sense in my head to organize it like this (though I'm reasonably positive I'm coming down with something so who knows). To wit:

I find the charge of lurking against Kenshin intriguing, because it took me a couple of rereads of her posts, but the subtle lurkage did eventually start to come across. Which probably means it's doing its job as a lurk and I should be putting even more stock in noticing it. Albarn's Kenshin case is less than impressive to me because it seems like it glosses over the clarification made in Kenshin's second post. (And go figure how much stock I put in marking someone off for pursing a lurker right now, given where my vote is.) Hopefully the fabled "more" mentioned in #199 will make a stronger case than this.

I think Busy's Mitsurugi bizarreness may be a bit overblown by both Irene and Martinozzi, but I do agree with the pseudo-"panic mongering" Martinozzi brought up in #190 being a bad thing. "Not me over me" not even halfway into Day 1 is not really something that is going to happen and trying to accuse someone of it (even ignoring that it's not really something you bring to bear against someone) in that scenario doesn't read as something a townie would do.

Something I find particularly interesting about part of Busy's case on Kenshin, however, is referencing how open #144 leaves Kenshin to move later in the game. Specifically, I find this bit interesting because I read Busy's #130 in a similar way. I come out of #130 know Busy likes Mitsurugi, isn't sure on Martinozzi and ultimately likes Miki (or at least doesn't like voting for her). Town labels are also slapped on two people I think are pretty obvious townies so I don't put a lot of weight in that. I come out of Kenshin's #144 knowing she isn't sure on Mitsurugi and doesn't like Miki. There's also a re-affirmation of liking Martinozzi, which was established in #79 (as was a like of Farina) and thus not quite the open-ended support Busy claims it is. There are other people mentioned by both Busy and Kenshin in those two posts, but to me the posts still roughly balance out in opinions and support of those opinions and ideally leaving the other mentions out will encourage people to look over the two posts for themselves for comparison purposes.

What all this amounts to me wondering why Busy would hold #144 against Kenshin enough to list it in the #198 summary when Busy's #130 is incredibly similar. Ideally, I'd like to see a clear explanation of how they're sufficiently different that Busy is justified in making the point against Kenshin, because I expect this difference will tip the scales of my opinion between the two of them. (As it stands, since I read Busy holding #144 against Kenshin as hypocritical hunting in light of Busy's #130, I like Busy less of the two.)

Response to case against me

BlackRose: Oh boy.

* I spent Day 1 voting for someone for repeatedly misrepresenting my case and the day ended with a lynch of someone else that had repeatedly misrepresented my case and opinion and that person flipped town. What am I supposed to do there, ignore the flip and keeping on pressing my original target with reasoning that was demonstrably fallable? I'm not 100% convinced she's town, but a large part of my case against her was damaged by Miki's flip. I would've been pretty stupid to open today with a vote on her.
* I'm...sorry for being asleep when the first two votes of Day 2 were cast, I guess? I would hardly say that today's first two votes were what made me change priorities given Kanzaki and yourself were demonstrably in line right after Mitsurugi for me. In fact, unless I'm not reading something right here, implying that I "switched to lurker mode" after Day 2 opened with a couple of votes for lurkers is incongruous with the accusation that I simply "got rid of all suspicion of Meiya" for just that reason.
* I "disappeared" today because I have things to do during the day on a Tuesday. Go figure, I have weekday commitments. Holding a "disappearance" like this against me is extra rude coming from someone that disappeared for roughly the same amount of time at the end of Day 1 after not even finishing reading the game as of their last post (your #101).
* Please point out to me where I forgot that Kaori existed until after someone reminded me she did. If you're referring to #133, I hadn't forgotten she existed, I just didn't think her as relevant as you at the time for lynch purposes because you had a vote and she didn't until Busy posted before I did. See also the bottom of my #87 and the middle of my #107 for evidence that I had had my eye on Kanzaki for a while.

Headed to bed. Hopefully tomorrow will be less busy (no, not Busy) than today was. At the very least, I hope to arrive to the thread earlier.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 21, 2012, 05:14:19 AM
Simply because going after solely lurkers would be the laziest thing ever. If Kaori ends up being the lynch of the day, my vote will be there.
Lynching lurkers would be lazy but I'll do it if it's popular and not me.
No hypocrites here. >.>b
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 21, 2012, 05:43:27 AM
Miss Rose, you have stated within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806423.html#msg806423) that you are reading various people to be either town or neutral to yourself. I understand that the thought of putting any form of  effort into this game appears to be a foreign concept to someone such as yourself but I implore you: At the very least could you kindly differentiate between the two and specify who belongs within each category?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 21, 2012, 06:36:27 AM
Third point: Esuna.  I have a major issue with last night's quickhammering.  We still had an hour left in the day.  You bare minimum could have been like "I am here and willing to switch my vote!" or something first.  It kinda bothered me then (not the least of which because I got cut), and your recent posts aren't helping matters much.  At the risk of sounding moronic I'm going to hold judgement until after I see your case on me, because it might at least show you're putting your own thoughts together.
Yeah, I agree with this woman here! Hey Esuna, you had a town read and openly stated that you were tempted to let Sayaka live to test the claim when you posted the hammer, so... Why did you hammer and yet mention how OK you would have been with leaving Sayaka alive, when there was enough time left in the day to decide further? You're not tricking anybody by fluffing up your post to make you sound pro-town!

Another thing! I also think that an earnest, well-paid townie's reaction to Sayaka's revised claim would have been... you know... less "HMMMM, sounds plausible" and more "what the filth is up with this wretched cur's desperate fakeclaim, lynch now" based on my own personal experience. I seriously went to sleep thinking we got a D1 scum lynch and even revised my reads in light of this. :fail: Naturally, the former is totally worthless coming from a townie if you don't act on the expected plausibility! Scum would have of course wanted the vigilante dead, and what easier way to conceal this than to act like you're giving the person you're hammering a fair chance when you aren't, right?

Now, thinking about today's events, I don't like Tenshi's opener to the day one bit. LAL is a reasonable tactic, but Tenshi's post looked more like she wanted to drive the day toward a Kaori / BlackRose dichotomy without even bothering to consider the implications of votes on yesterday's wagon too, something I wouldn't invest in. The early votes on the Sayaka wagon do look pretty town-intended, but the entire wagon doesn't deserve a pass. This applies the most to those who voted after or otherwise reacted to the claim, since they voted a cop claim at a vital point in the day and their actions should be under heavy consideration, which is one reason Esuna is so questionable today. It's a lazy and inefficient approach to the day to not even attempt to consider the flipped D1 wagon, you see! I also question why Tenshi would admonish Yuno for switching to a lurker during late D1 when she herself offered her services to a last-minute lurker wagon over any wagon except for Meiya's yesterday. Shouldn't she be able to empathize with Yuno a little?
##Vote Tenshi Hinanawi

With all this out of the way, I should be paying the less active women among us some consideration too! I have no objections to a Kaori lynch, but... mmm... I just don't see much pay in focusing on her alone, you see? I think the other options I'm looking into are more interesting today. BlackRose's content has been fine with me, but her activity is pretty terrible. Right now, I'd bet she's just a townie who is too lazy to work for her pay. Naturally, I'd be fine working extra for any gold her employer is withholding from her! Maka's not a lurker, but I'm worried about her allegiance. Nothing's solid during Early Day 1, so that's the easiest time for scum to win favor with townies by sticking their neck out like she did, and she kind of faded into the background for the rest of the day. Starting out a skirmish by being pro-active and vigilantly rushing in to attack red enemies only to switch to just kind of being "there" and picking off reinforcements at the back of the battlefield is scummy without a good reason for doing so. It's basically how a tactician would suggest how their scum forces should coast off of early town reads, so you have to admit it is a little weird. Still, I can't really fault her actual voting patterns from what I've looked into, including the end-of-day Sayaka vote, which was consistent and telegraphed enough that it doesn't irk me... though the attempt to sound like the apologetic voter unwillingly casting Sayaka to her doom is a weird bit of AtE, given that it was telegraphed.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Decade on March 21, 2012, 10:17:38 AM
@Meiya: I think you're vote may be suited elsewhere. It seems to me you're votes on Eclair are now more out of stubbornness that you are right, and disbelief that you may be wrong.

##Vote Esuna

You contradict yourself as others have pointed out, and I believe that contradictions were all made in you're favor.
You're hammer of Sayaka apparently left 1 hour unused, and considering the amount of people that could be swayed to voting another, you went ahead anyways and hammer'd. As Farina has also said, you went from Tenshi is town, to Hammer Tenshi in a change of heart pretty quickly.
You had left you're decisions completely up to role determination, and for the time I believe you thought you're only decisions were

Sayaka- Town Suspicious claim
Meiya - Neutral townie claim

As I, and others have stated before me, there was still an hour (1:00) left in the day, and Esuna had a change of heart more quickly then I would have imagined about a person she believed to be town.

Esuna, since you have made a case on Kenshin, and have said to venomously support my lynch today, who do you believe to be a higher priority of the moment?
Considering you're vote I would believe it to be Kenshin, but I would like clarification.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 21, 2012, 11:31:29 AM
[7:45:22] Yukkii wants everyone to be clear on something. Voting the lurkers right now is not a policy move. We believe at least one of them is scum. I no longer believe it's both because of the sudden discrepancy between the two. For a group of people who don't care which lurker we lynch it sure is interesting how many people aren't willng to lynch Blackrose when it comes down to putting your vote where your mouth is.. Do you want me to requote my entire post about how every single post in by post analysis was crap? Blackrose is acting like it never happened.

Maka, there are so many things I want to talk to you about. You were so active and insisting we talk together. Where are you? If you won't come see Yukkii willingly I'll have to use my tools.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 21, 2012, 11:41:28 AM
I'm not interested in any cases on Esuna based around hammering when there was an hour left in the day. An hour is not alot. The correct reaction to fakeclaiming cop is to ever the everloving poo poo out of the person. I do believe it's possible she could be scum now, but that type of case is too easy and reeks of overdramatization.

@Meiya: I think you're vote may be suited elsewhere. It seems to me you're votes on Eclair are now more out of stubbornness that you are right, and disbelief that you may be wrong.
This is true and makes me feel better about my choice right now. Eclair comes off very town to me now.

Quote
As Farina has also said, you went from Tenshi is town, to Hammer Tenshi in a change of heart pretty quickly.
You mean Sayaka right? Are you sure you read what happened?

Analyzing this wagon is so hard. The spots I consider the most likely to be scum votes are Farina and Tenshi, which rams head first into how town I think they are.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 11:59:51 AM
What the fuck?

Okay. Farina and Kaori, that is bad and you should feel bad. You're seriously critizing me for lynching Sayaka's weird as fuck claim over a claim I thought was very town-looking? Meiya was the only other possible lynch at that point and I did not want to lynch her at all. Even her lynch was extremely unlikely after Sayaka's claiming went fuck all all over the place.

The other part of KAori's case is about how I felt on their claims, which is weird as heck because she seems to be making things up here. I think Meiya's claim makes her look very townie. Sure, I was tempted to let Sayaka live for one night, purely because vig is a provable role, this does not mean I actually thought her claim looked pretty town. The only other option being extremely better looking and the chance that several people would still want Meiya over Sayaka (Which was basically nonexistent, seriously) means there really was not any point to waiting.

It was also 1:30 am. I had to wake up at 7 and go be a functional person. I can't stay up to all hours of the night just to wait out the last hour of a day where almost everyone is not present and Sayaka is almost entirely guaranteed to be the lynch.

But even without the factor of my sleep, I don't know how you people can possibly think you're making a leigimate point and I'm getting ranty because I'm getting slightly "FFFFFFFFFFFF WHY >:C". It feels like you're grasping at straws and blowing insignificant things out of proportion just to try and push my lynch. That's pretty bad. ...gah, I'm supposed to be doing something else right now, not posting in mafia >.>;

As for Farina about Sayaka's cop claim, cop claims in general are suspicious, and moreso when claimed in LyLo or to try and stave off being lynched. Unlike, say, a vig, you can't prove someone is a cop without outrighting having a town rolecop or a real town cop counterclaiming. If someone firmly thought Sayaka was scum, and she claimed cop, it's not bad to keep voting her. Sayaka has no way to prove she isn't lying and if she's actually scum and doesn't get lynched, she easily fake results, which can also lead to at least one guaranteed mislynch for scum (Which is horribad if it's done in lylo)

Okay, Tenshi.

Quote
I think Busy's Mitsurugi bizarreness may be a bit overblown by both Irene and Martinozzi, but I do agree with the pseudo-"panic mongering" Martinozzi brought up in #190 being a bad thing. "Not me over me" not even halfway into Day 1 is not really something that is going to happen and trying to accuse someone of it (even ignoring that it's not really something you bring to bear against someone) in that scenario doesn't read as something a townie would do.
Okay, I don't know whether I should actually say this or not, because the core virtue of it is kind of retarded, but that was my hydra partner's opinion and I'm not wanting to shut them out of influencing the game or anything. They had points to back up our Eclair case so I sort of just put them in and didn't think about it very hard.

This is sort of trying to distance from myself in a way which is sort of dumb (Or just dumb period) so I don't care if you entirely disregard this.

Your analysis and comparison of my and Uesugi's post is awkward in many points overall, but I do not have to time to talk about this at all because I shouldn't even be on here right now. I'll get back to this when I'm home from school. What I will say though is just because I might have done something similar does not mean Uesugi's post wasn't scummy.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 21, 2012, 12:04:07 PM
About Esuna:

I can see how it could be interpreted that the current case on Esuna is "blown out of proportion", but however sleepy one might be, they still have a brain that does stuff. There must have been something that made Esuna read Meiya as town, which she hasn't explained, and given that the excuse was a lack of time to get things straight after the three pages of walls, it feels weird that the first thing she'd do is reread Meiya; then become convinced that she's scum upon the reread because her roleplay fluffed up her posts, which should have been something clear to the naked eye in a matter of seconds upon reading any her posts.
I read through the whole thing in a couple of hours and could still make some decent sense out of it despite missing some points. However, Meiya's roleplaying is just not something you'd overlook, specially considering how difficult reading some of her walls was. Not to mention I consider that null due to roleplaying, but to each their own, I guess. Some may be willing to overlook this contradiction, but it's the scummiest thing around besides the active lurking so I'm not quitting my watch on Esuna anytime soon.

That doesn't mean I completely disregard her cases, though, she could perfectly be attempting to bus her way out of a sticky situation she can't explain, and I can get behind her reasoning for the Uesugi vote since she's my second strongest suspect aside from lurkers, given that I had already spotted the votepark myself earlier.

-After Yuno cut-

I also do not approve the 1 hour thing as part of the case. I hope that this detail that is surely blown out of proportion (by none other than my second scumread) gets ignored in light of what really is important about the case, which is the ridiculous read flip-flopping.

About Yuno:

I can understand your logic here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806327.html#msg806327), but it bugs me that it could perfectly be an a posteriori argument. It didn't ocurr to me that Sayaka's initial fakeclaim was scummy until Farina pointed it out, and your lack of mentioning it in your "HAMMER THIS PLEASE" post makes me doubt whether it really did cross your mind at the moment. I'm hoping you could deliver some content about somebody other than the lurkers soon, even if you prefer not to switch your vote along with it.

About Uesugi and Maka:

Your posts in D2 so far are particularly short and uninformative. I want more content from Maka today, but I'm more willing to forgive because being busy sucks. On the other hand, Uesugi just blurted out an "mkay your town" and completely disregarded all mentions I did of his scumminess in my post. The mention about his #73 I get she'd ignore, but completely ignoring an accusation of voteparking is off, and strengthens my scum read on her, would be willing to lynch as an alternative to Esuna.
I asked you to be transparent, but your post didn't give me any information on what you think about anybody who isn't Kaori obvlurkscum.

Wouldn't lynch: Eclair, Tenshi
Would lynch: Esuna = Uesugi >>>>>>> lurkers.
Iffy: Everyone else

Also Kaori, are you really paying so little attention to the game that you're mixing up Tenshi and Meiya?

Cut by Yuno saying the same thing.

Adding how I'm also pretty confused with Farina's post and vote. Why is there no content on Kaori there aside from the stretch of a vote on Tenshi (didn't her latest wall on Esuna/Uesugi/Blackrose convince you otherwise?) considering that she seemed like the preferred lynch for today?

Cut by Esuna, no more time, will read later.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 12:06:57 PM
I think it's weird as heck when people move along the lines of "In pot calling the kettle black situations, since the pot did it their point of the kettle being black is invalid." It does not make sense.

Also I was cut but I'll have to read it later.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 12:10:06 PM
Okay I lied but OH GOD I CAN'T STOP PLAYING MAFIA

Quote
Also Kaori, are you really paying so little attention to the game that you're mixing up Tenshi and Meiya?
Wow I didn't even notice that. Reading fast because you're not supposed to be doing it is so cool :c
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 12:13:04 PM
Also I hope Kaori's bad case influences the people who think she's just lurking and not actually being scummy. Note how it's made of The One Hour Reason and weird claim opinions that I refuted a few posts ago.

Okay I'm seriously leaving now fffff

OH I FORGOT HER QUESTION

My opinion is that I firmly believe you are both scum and thus as long as one of you is lynched I'm fine.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 21, 2012, 12:38:28 PM
I can understand your logic here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806327.html#msg806327), but it bugs me that it could perfectly be an a posteriori argument. It didn't ocurr to me that Sayaka's initial fakeclaim was scummy until Farina pointed it out, and your lack of mentioning it in your "HAMMER THIS PLEASE" post makes me doubt whether it really did cross your mind at the moment. I'm hoping you could deliver some content about somebody other than the lurkers soon, even if you prefer not to switch your vote along with it.
Farina isn't the one who pointed it out and was in fact responding to me talking about how fake the claim was.. Read this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805474.html#msg805474), then this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805481.html#msg805481), and finally this huge post explaining exactly what was wrong with the claim (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805501.html#msg805501) and then tell me how we never talked about the fakeclaim.

If you mean the for reals this time for sure claim after, my thought process can be summed up as this:
"Whoohoo the scum knows she's caught and is now fakeclaiming random things party at Yukkii's house!"  :toot:
Followed by:  :fail:

I am actually waiting for something before I finish putting my opinions together. Most of my reads haven't changed. I'm studying Uesugi and Maka right now, Esuna later, but haven't come to any decisions. For Uesugi I liked early posts, some later things were off. The top part of #144 is awkward, taking a stance on the wagons is good but the reason not to vote for Meiya felt convoluted.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 21, 2012, 12:58:33 PM
Vote Counting

BlackRose: (2) Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) BlackRose, Farina

Not Voting: Nobody!

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~39 hours remaining.

Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 21, 2012, 01:13:40 PM
Seconding the "can't stop playing mafia" sentiment. I shouldn't have turned on the internet this morning.

And uh... you're totally right, I'm sorry about that, Yuno. I probably should've waited until this afternoon to get a proper reread before I posted that, I guess I got a little ahead of myself when finding that my first impressions hadn't turned out to be as bad as I thought.

I need some more time to think over Esuna's hydra claim. Had I been voting her now, I'd be unvoting here, since I'm slightly less willing to lynch her than my other suspect right now.

Anyway, I found what it is exactly in Farina's post that bugs me. One of the points on your Tenshi case is her refusing to read the wagon, which looks pretty bad when you don't really do it yourself. Don't you think that Uesugi's votepark was a particularly scummy vote in Miki's wagon? why is there almost no mention at all regarding Uesugi and Kaori in your post when wagons were being started on them?
It feels like you just went hipster mode and disregarded any possibility of commenting anything in-depth about them. You said be fine with Kaori's lynch for unknown reasons (which are pretty obvious, but still unmentioned), but that's it. The fact that you agreed with Esuna's disconnect, poked at it but didn't find it scummy enough to vote doesn't help either.

Definitely leaving for a while now, so I'll make clear that I'm keeping my Blackrose vote. I want her to talk more, and since some people are clearing her because ??, she doesn't seem like a quicklynch candidate while I'm gone. Keeping the two votes on her at this point still makes her a viable lynch for the day, which gets the pressure on for her to post. I wouldn't be very comfortable switching to any of my other candidates either way, because there's one person voting for each that I don't like, and I want to have more information on them before I consider their motives free of scum motivation. I would also very much like it if some of these happened at some point:
- Farina explaining some.
- Kaori posting more, preferrably some reads so we know what the hell is going on in her head.
- Uesugi responding to the votepark and accusation of lurking barely avoiding prods.
- Meiya justifying her vote on whoever. Whenever she has the time to do so.
- A more transparent Maka post.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 21, 2012, 03:37:12 PM
Quote
On the other people, she says she doesn't support their lynches because "She doesn't see a viable case" or "I need to see more from her first", rather then "I think ____ is town". This leaves her options open to be able to easily later jump on them later in the game with a vote if she deigns to... while simultaneously still in the future be able to say she thinks/thought they were town, and whichever she does fits perfectly fine with what she said in the past. (Scum benefit from keeping their supportable mislynch options open.)

I don't like this argument in your Kenshin case, Esuna, because it is rather weak. Even if you declare Farina Town during D1, you can still declare her Scum during D2 after a 'reread' or similar excuse. Having  a Town read isn't the cemented 'I cannot possibly lynch that person now' that you claim it is, and in light of your sweeping declaration of Towniness of various people this argument stinks to me more.

Quote
Cut by Uesugi herself! Her Kaori vote is something obvious to anyone at this point and even if they're both scum I'd honestly be expecting scum to be bussing Kaori right now anyway.

This applies just as strongly to you. I wouldn't say you haven't had many opinions since you declared a lot of people Town, but you've notably never gone for anyone except me in the early game, Meiya in the lategame and then flip-flopping on your read of her (Town, not Town, Town, not Town). D1, you certainly never stuck out your neck and went for something that wasn't easy, egregious mostly because you lurked through most of it. Why is Kenshin scummy for this while you should not be? Why should I vote Kenshin for this and not you? This isn't a point of 'pot calling the kettle black and since both are black pot's opinion is invalid,' it is 'pot calling the kettle black, why should we lynch kettle over pot?'

Quote
Okay, I don't know whether I should actually say this or not, because the core virtue of it is kind of retarded, but that was my hydra partner's opinion and I'm not wanting to shut them out of influencing the game or anything. They had points to back up our Eclair case so I sort of just put them in and didn't think about it very hard.

Are you serious. Your defense is 'it isn't my fault blame my hydra?'
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 21, 2012, 07:45:59 PM
The correct reaction to fakeclaiming cop is to ever the everloving poo poo out of the person.
Which is why she's scummy! What was up with the pointless posturing about how she was tempted to leave Sayaka alive, huh? That just looks like scum trying to look better when their hammer target turns out to actually be the vig. It'd be reasonable if she didn't use the hammer in the same post.

Also, this pretty much my response to Esuna's post, too, since she didn't really invalidate the point of "why fluff up your post with posturing when you're gonna hammer anyway if it's not to make yourself look better after the flip?"! So... yep! I'm still not satisfied with her.

Anyway, I found what it is exactly in Farina's post that bugs me. One of the points on your Tenshi case is her refusing to read the wagon, which looks pretty bad when you don't really do it yourself. Don't you think that Uesugi's votepark was a particularly scummy vote in Miki's wagon? why is there almost no mention at all regarding Uesugi and Kaori in your post when wagons were being started on them?
It feels like you just went hipster mode and disregarded any possibility of commenting anything in-depth about them. You said be fine with Kaori's lynch for unknown reasons (which are pretty obvious, but still unmentioned), but that's it. The fact that you agreed with Esuna's disconnect, poked at it but didn't find it scummy enough to vote doesn't help either.
There's nothing to say about Kaori that hasn't already been said by others, and it's not like I didn't mention her, either.

If I wasn't reading the wagon, then why'd I spend my time talking about Esuna and Maka's votes on it!? I just didn't mention Uesugi and Yuno because I didn't think they handled the wagon in a scummy manner, of course. Yuno's already done a fine job of explaining her reactions to Sayaka's claim, and it basically details the impression I got. Meiya can't really be judged either, she voted on Not Me Over Me and didn't look like scum trying to abuse that. (Also, a part of me wants to believe Uesugi is town just because she's the only :goodposter: not posting a shit-ton of walls at this point. Seriously.)

I'm pretty obviously willing to lend my service to Esuna's wagon and have never stated otherwise. Are you making stuff up about me to discredit me?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Pesco on March 21, 2012, 09:20:48 PM
Maka, Blackrose, Uesugi and Kaori have been prodded.

Because I feel like it.


<Conq> None of these people were actually in official prod zone, for the record. If they haven't posted by the time their timer is up, they'll receive an ~*official*~ prod.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 21, 2012, 09:34:37 PM
I hate the backspace.

Is this seriously halfway through D2? I figured the reason why there wasn't much activity while I was asleep was because people were on different GMTs, but almost nothing has happened since I woke up. Can I mirror Maka's activity prod here?


@ Farina
When I talked about finding the lack of support to the Esuna lynch weird, I probably should've specified that this was because you seemed to prefer to focus only on the part of the case on her that said that "hammering 1 hour before the deadline with a fluffed up post is scummy", instead of the scummier read flip-flopping, and preferred to vote Tenshi over odd reasons:
- Wanting to turn D2 into a Blackrose/Kaori dichotomy, when a simple glance further down the thread showed that she was focusing on things other than LAL.
- Deflecting people from analyzing wagons, which seems like quite a stretch.

I honestly don't read Tenshi as so damn townie I'd lynch somebody over voting her, if people find scummy behaviour in her that I've overlooked, I'll be more than happy to look into it. It's just that your reasons to vote her aside from scolding Yuno in late D1 seem so... bland.
I understand them, but they're just not something I'd vote somebody over. It felt like you were giving somebody outright scummy a pass and fabricating reasons to vote for Tenshi.

I never said that this was ridiculously scummy and that I'd lynch you for it. In fact, I'd be inclined to think that it's just play not keeping up with my expectations, if it weren't for this:

(Also, a part of me wants to believe Uesugi is town just because she's the only :goodposter: not posting a shit-ton of walls at this point. Seriously.)

What in the hell. I can get behind this reasoning when it's ED1 and people using voice recognition makes you want to lynch them, but it's halfway through D2, and to be willing to lynch somebody for posting lots of content/not wanting to lynch somebody for posting not posting lots of content is a ridiculous way of throwing out a town read.
Uesugi voteparked on Sayaka D1, dissapeared, came back a little before the deadline and very briefly commented that she "didn't like her recent posts", using that reasoning to keep said vote. This has been pointed out, and Uesugi completely ignored it and went on to vote a lurker. How in the heck do you completely overlook this scummy behaviour and label him town for an ED1 jokereason?

It'd be weird that I didn't give a suspect a chance to defend themselves after doing it all the time, so elaborate on Uesugi, please.

Are you making stuff up about me to discredit me?

I'll try to word this in the least discreditable way possible.
I can see how somebody would think I'm doing this after what happened with Yuno. I was absolutely wrong about that because I posted something I shouldn't have without checking through the thread again, yes, but hearing this discrediting accusation from you is pots kettles (ry

Cut by... Pesco? and holy damn that's a lot of prods.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 21, 2012, 09:39:41 PM
"Not wanting to lynch somebody for posting not posting lots of content"

How did I do that.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 21, 2012, 10:05:54 PM
I'd bet that this is mainly a problem of seeing things differently, hm.

Tenshi's D1 opener is scummy, though. Ignoring a flipped D1 wagon is scummy because it's lazy scumhunting to not even bother, since flipped wagons are valuable... especially when there's the possibility of finding scum reactions to a cop claim, which they would obviously want to lynch. Immediately driving the day toward two lurker lynches without an explanation why Lurker A is more likely to flip scum than Lurker B, or a reasonable explanation why focusing on lurkers is more interesting than any other options is also weak, lazy and therefore scummy. I didn't think Tenshi's second post today made her look much better, since she was still ultimately voting a lurker lynch without an answer to any of what I just described.

LALu is a valid and effective strategy, but it's not all-encompassing. In the end, it's still something scum can abuse to distract and mislead town. I'm still reading BlackRose as town and don't have enough faith that Kaori will flip scum to assume that driving the day toward a lurker dichotomy instead of analyzing the flipped town wagon and related players isn't a scum move.

The line about wanting to believe Uesugi is town was a joke. In short, I've re-read her multiple times and haven't been able to see her as "obvscum lurker manipulating reads so that she can jump on whoever" instead of "succinct townie not posting more than necessary". There are specific issues I have with the case on her as well, but I believe she's a capable enough woman that I'd like to see her defend herself instead of me!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 21, 2012, 10:15:22 PM
Back now, but later than I wanted to be, and I won't be here for too long. I suspect I won't get to cover everything I want to cover before heading out again. Should be good for the calendar day after coming back the second time, though.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 21, 2012, 10:49:43 PM
Prods; Prods Everywhere

BlackRose: (2) Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) BlackRose, Farina
Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~29.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

Farina receives a retroactive prod for bookkeeping purposes.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Sasword on March 21, 2012, 10:53:00 PM
Back with why Uesugi is scum.

To recap, her presence yesterday was almost nonexistant and her vote was parked for the entirety of the day onto a single person. Posts have been lacking in much content at all and gives off a feeling of just sticking around on someone than real hunting. The "follow up" on her vote from her third post is just responding to Sayaka about things that didn't even concern her. The whole post is kinda pointless and just defending others by attempting to poke holes in her logic. This is unrelated to her vote or hunting in many ways.
And then her #144 gives NO solid stances on who she thinks is scum, but she does leave herself open to lynch any of the lurkers and fencesits on Meira, who was a big thing at the time. And then saying you will not support the lynch of two people doesn't hold much water as they had sorta calmed down at the time and two main wagons had been formed. I see a fair amount of scum intent from this post alone. And then that's all for Day 1, which looks less than amazing.

And then today's case on Kaori just smells like taking the low hanging lurker mislynch fruit with minimal effort.

Gonna get this out there, more on others later. But she's my #1 pick for the day.

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 21, 2012, 10:54:42 PM
One hour later, I realize that I accidentally typed "Tenshi's D1" instead of "Tenshi's D2" in my recent post. Um, whoops? I think it's obvious what I meant, but... I hope this clears things up!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 21, 2012, 11:00:54 PM
Okay, here we go. This is a bit more mixed than usually but I'll try to divide it for clarity regardless. Doubly so given how long it is.

Responses to Farina

I didn't completely disregard the D1 wagon, I had looked it over and saw 7 votes that I found reasonable for one reason or another. Some were for reasonable cases, some were for needing a lynch, one was Not Me Over Me, etc. I'll admit this lack of word clarity may be on me, though, because I can see how the first two sentences of my first D2 post looked like I hadn't given it more than a passing glance and a handwave. Hopefully with this explanation my wording there will be a bit clearer. Ultimately I disliked Kanzaki and BlackRose more than anyone on the wagon even after going over the wagon, and that's why my vote ended up where it did.

Esuna's vote in particular needs a bit more touching upon from my standpoint. This may be because I'm not the strongest-willed person about these sorts of things, but having fallen victim to it myself multiple times in the past regardless of alignment, I am willing to grant someone a little slack for succumbing to deadline lynch pressure and flipping out a little bit. The sleepiness thing I'm willing to give a little bit of slack to as well, again due to personal experience. Hell, just in this game, in my not-totally-coherent mindset last night I completely skipped over responding to Kanzaki's question directed at me. (As much as the post was incredibly forgettable regardless of one's mental state.) Between those two things, I didn't mind Esuna's later-day actions that much. There is at least one other notable "aspect" of this slack-handout that I have yet to mention, though, but I'm going to withhold speaking any more on it until I see certain posts from certain people and have a chance to see what those posts do (and do not) contain. Please bear with me on this one. (And no, I'm not waiting for role shenanigans or anything like that.)

I'm a little surprised that BlackRose's content sits well with you when of her grand total of two legit scumhunting posts, one stopped reading the game with 30 posts still to go and the other containted at least oner rather unfair accusation (the "disappearing" thing). The latter was also addressed by me in full already, a response that you don't seem to have acknowledged at all. What parts of BlackRose's hunting is good? If you could produce specific examples that'd be peachy.

The Yuno thing I will address later in this post.

The Pot Calling The Kettle Black

Martinozzi hit the nail on the head in regards to stuff like "you're accusing someone of being scum for reasons that apply to you as well". Pointing this out doesn't magically make the accusation invalid, no, but what it does do is weaken the weight of your case because it strengthens a/the case against you. Why should we lynch the person you're attacking ahead of you when you two are guilty of the same things? This is why I asked for a possible explanation for why the two posts I highlighted were different; if Busy can show me why her #130 is better than Kenshin's #144, then I will think more of Busy and less of Kenshin.

The Pot Calling The Kettle Black/Farina read this

With this, let's go back to the Yuno thing. Farina's right: I expressed willingness to vote for BlackRose while also not having Gasai's BlackRose push sit well with me at the time. The best defense I can offer for this is that I hope the amount of effort I (didn't) put into pushing the point demonstrates how much I wanted to hold it over Gasai's head. Contrast this with Busy including the assessment of Kenshin's #144 in her list of most important things to her case, which is why I pushed her about it. Beyond that, I can't blame anyone for holding it against me. All I can do is keep going in a fashion that I hope makes you change your mind about me.

Okay you're good

Responses to Kanzaki

Since I didn't address it in last night's post, yes, I give slight vote preference to no effort over terrible effort. As much as I thought that would be obvious from my original voting post, but eh.

The Busy vote fails to inspire by using the parts of the case I liked less (the hour to deadline thing in particular leaves a bad taste in my mouth). I'm also not confident she was completely focused on it, given, as others pointed out, that the reference to me should have been a reference to Miki. I'm also not entirely sure Kanzaki is aware that we need a majority to lynch because her "change of heart" comment on Busy seems to suggest Kanzaki thinks Busy laid the hammer down for changing her mind and deciding Miki was scum rather than because we needed that majority. This would be pretty bad misrep of Esuna if so.

Busy's Schizophrenia

I doubt I would have signed up for the game if I knew hydras were in it, but such are the perils of Anonymafia, I guess. Moving on regardless.

If your partner was the one that posted the "not me over me" thing, then the solution is simple: have them come back in and explain it. If that's not possible, then it's still a strike against the Busy camp regardless of which person posted it. Hydra or no hydra, someone, for some reason, thought it a good idea to post that under the Busy banner, and as much as I won't hold it personally against the head that didn't post, I will hold it against the player, because it is a terribad reason to vote for someone even by D1 standards.

I think this might actually be everything I wanted to get to, actually. Albarn posted more Uesugi reasoning while I was writing this, though, and since I kinda want dinner before I head back out a proper read and assessment may have to wait a couple of hours. (Also, yes, Farina, I figured you meant D2 instead of D1.)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 21, 2012, 11:10:10 PM
As unfortunate as it is, I am creating this post to inform the good townsfolk here that my unavailability shall continue for approximately 9~12 hours. After this period of inactivity, I shall be able to devote my efforts fully towards this game once more. I must sincerely apologize to all of you yet again for my inactivity.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 11:24:10 PM
Quote
I wouldn't say you haven't had many opinions since you declared a lot of people Town, but you've notably never gone for anyone except me in the early game
I disappeared after ED1 because me and my partner weren't avaliable and after that I haven't touched you. YES the disappearing isn't a good thing but it's also a different matter entirely.

If you want to accuse me of only going after easy targets, then does that mean Uesugi is suddenly an "easy target"? I sort of wrote up a big wall on why I think she's scum. Even if you don't agree with all of that.

Speaking of Uesugi, HEY FARINA WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO CONDENSE THE CASE INTO
"obvscum lurker manipulating reads so that she can jump on whoever"

You pick one of the most easily disagreeable points on the case almost like you're trying to discredit it. Did you see her D2 post? All she did was vote Kaori and be unhappy with me for my very obviously weird end-of-d1. She ignored everything else. She also only talking of finding fault with me hammering with an hour left in the day, which we've been over why that's a COMPLETELY non-scummy thing in this case.

Quote from: Farina
(Also, a part of me wants to believe Uesugi is town just because she's the only :goodposter: not posting a shit-ton of walls at this point. Seriously.)
Because clearly you seem to think her D2 post is Really Good and better then what other people are saying, so you must think that only mentioning a super silly reason on me and then sitting on the superobvious Kaori wagon is a nice post.

You seem to be saying loooots of things today that I think are really funked up. Maybe I should make a list.
Quote from: Eclair
Even if you declare Farina Town during D1, you can still declare her Scum during D2 after a 'reread' or similar excuse.
This is so amusing to me now because her constant weirdness D2 is making me want to reread her D1.

Anyway in other news I think Irene 2.0 is very town.

Also Farina, what do you think of Kaori's post where she makes a case on me? Please don't cite anything about your own feelings on me or things from other people's case on me. Please only pay attention to the case that -she- made for the sake of this question. I would like to know how you feel about it because you seem to think Kaori does not look too bad (Maybe a little bad, but not too bad, because you express that you don't have much faith she'd flip scum.)

Finally, I've remembered I meant to address my actions at the end of D1, which many have found suspect, and it looks like it's horribly disjointed, doesn't it?

Even apart from my own state rushing to catch up with half the game, I disliked all the ending wagons, and was basically forced to have to vote for one of the three anyway. I thought both Sayaka and Meiya were town and disliked the Eclair wagon as well as thinking she'd improved since ED1. But I had to pick one of them, so I ended up having to decide which town read could possibly be more likely scum, so I just sort of grasped at the first thing I noticed while rereading Sayaka's posts and Meiya's flamboyant walls and tried to make it sound like I actually somewhat believed it.

Okay if I missed anything just tell me. Oh dear three cuts. And just disregard the hydra comment I made, it's ridiculous to try to defend the action in such a manner. I tend not to really think something's not a good idea until after I do it.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 21, 2012, 11:27:00 PM
As much as I've expressed my willingness to contribute to lynching Uesugi, I don't like Maka's last post one bit.

It might be slightly confirmation-biasy because her very strict amount of content was on the level of Uesugi's, and I felt both were focusing on talking about one person alone, which doesn't give any information on what they think about anybody else at all. Like Esuna said, this is scummy, since they can just make up an entire read on the spot without having to make it tie up with earlier reads.

So yeah, Maka's last post literally added nothing to her initial vote post. I liked her better when she at least pointed out that Uesugi was almost at prod time when posting, which showed she was actually rereading and getting stuff straight. Despite the lack of time she might be subject to, I doubt town would post twice to say the very same thing about their case.

Uesugi is my main priority, and lynches I find possible but would like more information on if possible before supporting would be Kaori's, Blackrose's, Maka's and Esuna's.

Cut by Esuna, reading.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 21, 2012, 11:31:29 PM
Quote
so I just sort of grasped at the first thing I noticed while rereading Sayaka's posts and Meiya's flamboyant walls and tried to make it sound like I actually somewhat believed it.
This is worded a little awkwardly. I didn't intend to make it sound like I had completely faked what I was saying about Meiya, which it sort of looks like here. This would be a better wording.

Quote
so I just sort of grasped at the first thing I noticed while rereading Sayaka's posts and Meiya's flamboyant walls and ran with it while trying to make it actually sound like I had changed my mind to think she's scum. (As opposed to voting a less-town-then-Sayaka read)

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 21, 2012, 11:42:37 PM
It might be slightly confirmation-biasy because her very strict amount of content was on the level of Uesugi's, and I felt both were focusing on talking about one person alone, which doesn't give any information on what they think about anybody else at all. Like Esuna said, this is scummy, since they can just make up an entire read on the spot without having to make it tie up with earlier reads.

What I meant to say is that I've been thinking this throughout the day, and therefore it's an everpresent thing in my head right now.


I find myself agreeing with Esuna's accusations of Farina ignoring important parts of cases, it seems to be a recurring thing.

Esuna, can you answer that bit about your #130?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 21, 2012, 11:52:16 PM
Quote
This applies just as strongly to you. I wouldn't say you haven't had many opinions since you declared a lot of people Town, but you've notably never gone for anyone except me in the early game, Meiya in the lategame and then flip-flopping on your read of her (Town, not Town, Town, not Town). D1, you certainly never stuck out your neck and went for something that wasn't easy, egregious mostly because you lurked through most of it. Why is Kenshin scummy for this while you should not be? Why should I vote Kenshin for this and not you? This isn't a point of 'pot calling the kettle black and since both are black pot's opinion is invalid,' it is 'pot calling the kettle black, why should we lynch kettle over pot?'

Ignoring people voting for you isn't magically going to make the votes disappear.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 22, 2012, 12:32:05 AM
Okay, where was I.

First, let me see if I can summarize Esuna's case against me.

"Kenshin looks good but she barely posts and tunneled on Sayaka all day.  In addition, she doesn't elaborate upon her town reads.  I also dislike her vote on Kaori because Kaori's the easy obvious lynch today.  Therefore, she is lurkscum."

In rebuttal:

1) I fully accept the burden and accusation of "doesn't post much".  It's true and I don't plan on changing it; I feel my activity levels are acceptable along with my level of scumhunting content per the pace of the game.  If it gets me lynched, so be it.  My cases and analysis are compact because I dislike wasting words, and they're brief because I dislike walls of text.

2) I dislike talking about why I think people are town or why I don't think they're good cases for a lynch; this is not a game of "i think this person is town because", it's a game of "i think this person is scum because."  Doing the former is a waste of my resources.

3) The accusation that I haven't talked about anyone other than Sayaka past ED1 is, uh... well, false.  I mean, this is pretty easily verifiable by a quick glance at my posts.  I may not be saying much about other people (admittedly) but I'm hardly ignoring everyone.

4) I dislike that Esuna calls Kaori the "obvious" vote; something about this word choice bothers me.  Attacking me for voting someone that Esuna disapproved of and was also voting (for similar reasons to myself, no less!) is pretty silly.

Now then.
As for defense of myself, A. An hour left in the day is not much, especially when most are sleeping. Second, lynches other then Sayaka no longer seemed viable. Finally, her claiming got super weird and the only viable wagon left had made a claim I felt made her look pretty darn town, leaving Sayaka as by far the better lynch choice.

And lastly, it was what, 1:30 am? I had to get the hell to sleep. I wasn't going to risk a No Lynch happening, and I'm extremely doubtful anything in that last hour would have changed the outcome of the day or been particularly important.

Esuna, you're either evading my point here or misunderstood the purpose of me bringing it up.  I was okay with you hammering Sayaka; it was necessary for a lynch.  What is not necessary is doing it with no warning!  That meant anyone else who was around, including Sayaka herself (and me :|), no longer had the chance to say anything!  You just showed up and hammered.  That's completely careless at a minimum and suspicious otherwise.  Don't do it ever unless there's like a couple minutes left.

She was almost nonexistant Day 1 with a vote that literally never moved off of Sayaka.

Sayaka never gave me a reason to move my vote away.  If you'll recall, she was yesterday's lynch, for better or for worse.  Say what you will about my case on her, but saying someone's scummy because they started a wagon on someone and built on it for most of the day is pretty weird.

Miscellaneous notes:

I still need to see more analysis from Meiya.  There's some decent prodding from her today but not much analysis, and all of it seems somewhat brief (even by my standards).

Voting the lurkers right now is not a policy move. We believe at least one of them is scum.

This is why I like Yuno's posts.  For anyone who doesn't understand why minimum-content lurkers are dangerous and often scummy, I have a fantastic video to show you. (http://www.viddler.com/v/558c7042)

Okay, I don't know whether I should actually say this or not, because the core virtue of it is kind of retarded, but that was my hydra partner's opinion and I'm not wanting to shut them out of influencing the game or anything

... This is an awful thing to say, full stop.  Anything that you post is your responsibility.  Going "but it was my hydra's opinion, not mine" is horrible escapism.

Maka's case on me isn't really worth addressing but I do find it's terribly amusing that she has spent all day D2 tunneling on me, an accusation that is a primary base of her case on me in the first place.  I'm slowly starting to feel she isn't really saying much with her posts in general.

Fake edit: Ha!  Posting yet again right before when my prod was going to come up!  Take that, activity rules!

Further thoughts on Kaori  in a moment.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 12:55:00 AM
It is severely frustrating to get ignored twice.

##Unvote
Vote: Kenshin

You voted Sayaka ED1 and kept the vote disguising it in a reads post with no reads whatsoever aside from lurkers'.

Quote
I'm going to keep my vote on Sayaka for now.  If anyone has questions about why I want her lynched, please ask them while I'm here, but I get the feeling .

One of your posts D1 was spent  justifying your ED1 vote and encouraging people to question you if they felt the need to, then your later D1 post disguises a lack of further reasons to lynch Sayaka in a reads post which barely amounted to who you were willing/not willing to lynch and a few words on the lurkers. This one also encouraged people to ask you why you wanted her lynched. One thing is to offer further clarification like you did in the earlier one, but a completely different thing is to provide 0 content and make town press you for it when it's late D1 and people are scrambling around to figure out who they want to lynch. Not only this, but then this D2 you completely disregard questioning when it arrives just 'cause.
So I'll be clear:
How is your D1 any more than a Sayaka votepark?
Why did you want her lynched?

On an unrelated note which might just be playstyle differences: From where I see it, the utility of town reads is forcing scum to give them so their scope of switching around is reduced as long as town doesn't do scummy shit, which they shouldn't be doing anyway.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 12:55:37 AM
##Vote Kenshin

Screwed that up.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 01:05:56 AM
Quote
I disappeared after ED1 because me and my partner weren't avaliable and after that I haven't touched you. YES the disappearing isn't a good thing but it's also a different matter entirely.

If you want to accuse me of only going after easy targets, then does that mean Uesugi is suddenly an "easy target"? I sort of wrote up a big wall on why I think she's scum. Even if you don't agree with all of that.

I realize you actually responded to part of my beef with you. Considering you voted Kaori while promising content on Kenshin, and you had all of the night phase to actually gather this content and then a good part of Day 2, I'm not at all happy with the claim that you went for Kenshin that strongly. Why did you deliver the content on Kenshin so late, and why did you focus first and foremost on Kaori?

Please answer that alongside other outstanding issues I have with you regarding 'why is Kenshin scummy for it but you aren't?'
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 22, 2012, 01:11:22 AM
Irene: My apologies for not addressing you directly, but I did answer your initial question in response to the case against me:

Sayaka never gave me a reason to move my vote away.  If you'll recall, she was yesterday's lynch, for better or for worse.  Say what you will about my case on her, but saying someone's scummy because they started a wagon on someone and built on it for most of the day is pretty weird.

I just didn't feel it warranted mentioning twice.  As for your second question...

Why did you want her lynched?

Originally, I disliked her vote on Meiya as I viewed it as opportunistic.  She ignored my vote-prod until later in the day, and refused to refute the point to make some poorly thought-out cases instead.  She failed to say anything redeeming for the remainder of the day until her claim.

One thing is to offer further clarification like you did in the earlier one, but a completely different thing is to provide 0 content and make town press you for it when it's late D1 and people are scrambling around to figure out who they want to lynch.

It is sometimes difficult to judge when people are reading the reasons for other people's votes.  At the time of the second "hey ask me questions" I was the head of the wagon against a likely lynch candidate with several more lynches.  Having people ask me questions instead of straight-up offering a rehashed version of my earlier posted thoughts not only allows me to convey those thoughts in a manner the other player can digest at a more personal level, it also gets them to post more - and as you've seen we're not always the most active of a playerbase.

Other thoughts.

Kaori's case on Esuna appears to be largely regurgitated off points other people have made.  I'm seeing very little original thought here and her points seem to echo the words of the cases she's borrowing from, but not the reasons why they're scummy.  Still happy with my vote.

I do think Esuna looks a bit better than Maka right now.  I think Yuno needs to post a bit more analysis today, as does Meiya.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 01:15:05 AM
Quote from: Uesugi
I have a fantastic video to show you.
Thank you for posting this.  It's basically what gave me the motivation to finish this post. :V  This game has been horribly boring and frustrating for me so far for two reasons:

1.) I'm suffering from EVERYONE IS TOWN syndrome.  I spent last night and a lot of today rereading the game and specific people.  I'm so annoyed that Sayaka didn't flip scum because that wagon is composed of all my stronger town reads, and I have no idea what to do with it.  I don't think that entire wagon could be town, but at the same time EVERYONE IS TOWN.  It's utterly maddening.  Anyway, enough ranting.  At first I thought it might be Uesugi that was scum on the wagon, but every time I read her posts (with the exception of #144, which bothers me) I absolutely love them, and with every new post she makes she looks townier to me.  So I looked towards Esuna.  This one's kind of in Meiya's boat of hard to explain town reads, but I absolutely cannot see her as scum.  If people want me to try to come up with words to explain it I will, but I want to just leave it at that for now.  So then I thought maybe I was cutting Meiya too much slack, but when I look through her posts and that claim I just see green.  Shana's dead and flipped town and Farina is my strongest town read right now.   I'm just like @_@.  I might be willing to get behind a Maka lynch due to terrible end of day posts (#157 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805488.html#msg805488) is basically the biggest fence sit ever at a particularly important time).  She's really the only person on the wagon that doesn't ooze green to me at this point. @_@

2.) Lurker love.  Don't even try to argue that there's a lot of lurker hate going around, there really isn't.  People are still treating it like they're just prods or like I just want to get them to post, or that I just find them scummy only because they're not posting.  On the first two, no they're not, their outright calls for death.  They are scum, so I want them dead.  On the second, that's also wrong.  Note that I didn't call for lynches on Irene or Shana D1.  They were not scum, so I didn't want to lynch them.  This may be my fault for not pushing my case as hard as I could be though, so I'll try to fix that once I work up the motivation, time and energy to put it all into better words.  For anyone that says it's lazy to push lurkers I invite you to try it sometime.  It's the most maddening thing ever.  You see all this scummy behavior and no one takes you seriously and sometimes they may even call you outright scummy.  It's not easy to actually PUSH the case if you're not using it as a vote park and I'm annoyed that people are viewing it as lazy and bad despite how difficult it's been for me.

I apologize for the rant.  I just wanted to get my views on the current wagons out there (namely that I don't like either of them, but I might be able to get behind Maka since a few people have mentioned her) and vent a little.  Ima get on posting that case now.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 01:17:50 AM
Oh, and in regards to Maka's content today I can sum in up with this:

Maka, why aren't you saying anything?  Talkkkkkkkkk to meeeeeeeeeeee.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 22, 2012, 01:43:44 AM
Back from my nap! Wait what the heck.

Why do people say weird things that don't make sense about me every time I leave?

I realize you actually responded to part of my beef with you. Considering you voted Kaori while promising content on Kenshin, and you had all of the night phase to actually gather this content and then a good part of Day 2, I'm not at all happy with the claim that you went for Kenshin that strongly. Why did you deliver the content on Kenshin so late, and why did you focus first and foremost on Kaori?
What are you talking about.

I never even mentioned Uesugi D1. I had forgotten she existed. You seem to be thinking of my first d2 post... then I went to bed, went to school, came home and posted a big case on Uesugi. It was during the same IRL day, most of which I was not in possession of computer access during until I actually began to post, at which point a large case on Uesugi promptly emerged.

Meanwhile, Uesugi can't seem to remember what my case on her even is. I never said you didn't talk about anyone other then Sayaka, I said you never talked about anyone other then Sayaka and lurkers. (Then you cut my post with a blurb on "You hammered at the end of d1 with an hour left so you're scummy"

NOW. EVERYONE. LOOK AT UESUGI'S POSTS. NOTICE WHAT IS DEFINITELY MISSING IN IT? WHO SHE THINKS IS SCUM OTHER THEN KAORI.

This means that the only person she's deigned to tell us that she thinks is scum right now is Kaori. Do I need to explain why this is bad? I'm pretty sure Kaori has been talked about to death and everyone knows that she's the easiest vote ever and totally acceptable. Yes, voting her is fine. No, not having any other suspects is not fine. A braindead person could skim the game and know to throw a vote on Kaori.

She even posts again and there is still no opinion on who is scum other then Kaori. Folks, you heard it here. Uesugi is not even scumhunting.

Okay now that I've got this out I'm going to go and answer the other things that have been asked of me since my previous post. So those answers will be coming shortly. And my partner did try to answer the shenanigans about the other stuff, as much as I'd like to BURY IT UNDER A ROCK because I know it was a dumb thing to say and I shouldn't have done it.

"About the "not me over me" point, that wasn't even that significant. The main point of the case was that Eclair let her Irene vote fall because there where no support. That's not a reason to let a vote fall, especially since she never tried to get any support for it in the fist place, what let me doubt that she believed in that vote herself. The "not me over me" was nothing more then the miss worded observation that her new vote got on the biggest wagon that wasn't hers."

(I've probably been a terrible hydra partner but I totally enjoy their company and appreciate them at least D:)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 01:55:11 AM
Bedtime is approaching dangerously, I won't be around tomorrow for the lynch resolution because it's right in the middle of my bedtime and I can't possibly stay up that late or wake up that early. Activity while I'm awake seems to be ridiculously low unless I stay up late, so I might not have a chance to actively interact with some of the players at all, and it feels particularly important that I should leave my vote in the right place before leaving... and I don't really know what I want to do with my vote. There's people I dislike on every wagon, and going back to voting Blackrose seems utterly useless when nobody else seems to feel like putting the lurkers at L-2 or similar to get them to claim, which might just be the only way to get information out of this game.

Out of the four I managed to somewhat question so far, Yuno reads very town, above Tenshi and Eclair who pale in comparison to the point where I'd even hestitate to call them slight town reads.

I don't like Kenshin's attitude at all, and I still have issues with her #74 opening, but I can understand the logic of continuing her vote on Sayaka because she continued to feel like the most scummy aside from the possibility of scum hiding among the lurkers when she posted back in late D1. I was never around during D1 and when I was reading through it, I already knew Sayaka was town, so I can't really put any further judgement in there without trying way too hard to reread being objective, which I feel still wouldn't get me much of anywhere, so I would only lynch her if there were no better candidates. I seriously want to see her post some other reads even if they're not town reads, though.

Esuna's D1 actions are scummy, but her attitude throughout the whole D2 reads as honest town admitting incompetence, which leaves me pretty confused as to what to think of her, and I'm no longer as sure she'd flip scum.

Farina went from null to somewhat scummy due to randomly disregarding key case points twice and voting Tenshi for reasons I believe are really too much of a stretch.


So overall, I'm not comfortable with voting anybody other than Farina or Maka. I already had some words exchanging with Farina, and I suspect it might be possible that my read on her right now is wrong and may change later when I see more of her content, so I don't really like the idea of voting her right now after all. I certainly will consider doing so tomorrow this cherry picking of arguments in cases to discredit them continues, though. I'm not sure how much exactly Maka is pressed for time, but I figure she should show up sometime while I sleep, and considering I'm not the only one who thinks that her D2 is highly unsatisfying, I can see pressure on her actually getting somewhere.

##Unvote
##Vote: Maka Albarn


Cut by Esuna.

That's good and all, but don't you think you should also comment on who's scum other than Kenshin?

Might be posting once more before hitting the sack but it's unlikely.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 02:00:13 AM
Also hoping I can actually get a read on the lurkers with what they provide with their last prod-avoiding post.

If either of you two are town, please friggin' try and post the largest wall you can put into existence to make up for the lack of content so far.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 02:39:39 AM
Quote
I never even mentioned Uesugi D1. I had forgotten she existed. You seem to be thinking of my first d2 post... then I went to bed, went to school, came home and posted a big case on Uesugi. It was during the same IRL day, most of which I was not in possession of computer access during until I actually began to post, at which point a large case on Uesugi promptly emerged.

No, let me rephrase. You had the entire night phase to get a case on Kenshin, why didn't you have one if she was your second scumpick after lurker? Kaori's case required literally no effort since she made like three short posts, I find it hard to believe you had no time to compound on a case against Kenshin if you felt that strongly about her.

I'm currently not finding myself in Kenshin's lynch as I like her posts and find them thoughtful. I am rereading Farina and Tenshi. I want Yuno to at least try: read the cases we've made and point out where you disagree if you say everyone's Town barring the lurkers.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 22, 2012, 02:57:02 AM
Quote
That's good and all, but don't you think you should also comment on who's scum other than Kenshin?
I'm entirely sold on two people being scum, do I have to catch the entire scumteam d2? ;_;

I actually am pretty confident that Farina will flip scum due to her overall total weirdness today and her opinions towards her scumbuddies Kaori and Uesugi, but seriously trodding down that path and making a case on her before Kaori or Uesugi flips would be ridiculous, so I'm leaving that until we actually get their scum flips out and on the table. I might be able to make a good case on her WITHOUT those twos flips if I reread her d1, but :effort:, I'm fine with where I am now and once one of them flips it should be even easier to make a good case on Farina.

and if one of those three flipped town I'd look at Eclair, but that's getting even farther into future stuff based on flips we don't have, and right now I feel good enough that those three will flip scum that I would actively dislike an Eclair lynch.

Anyway, onto the stuff I'm supposed to be answering.

Can't say much towards what Eclair pointed out to me in her posts to answer, because I really didn't get any chasing done D1 due to not being present until the end. Although,
Quote
This isn't a point of 'pot calling the kettle black and since both are black pot's opinion is invalid,' it is 'pot calling the kettle black, why should we lynch kettle over pot?'
I would like to think I've been doing a good job on this part through D2 so far! Eclair, do you think Uesugi's scumhunting effort D2 being practically EXCLUSIVELY LIMITED TO KAORI is okay? Yes, Uesugi is saying more things then just stuff about Kaori. NO, none of it is actually scumhunting or opinions on who she thinks could be scum other then Kaori or anything of the sort.

Now for the one I've sort of been procrastinating on. Comparing my 130 to Uesugi's 144 because a few people have asked for it.

Brief summary of my post: These people are town (including one of the 3 wagon choices), iunno about the lurkers right now but Kaori is pretty bad because ___, I don't want to vote Eclair because ____ and I do not like the others on her wagon. ##Vote Saya-oh wait no, she's town too. (I have now declared a dislike of all three of the wagon choices but a desire to lynch Kaori instead)
Later I collapse mentally and go for the Meiya vote as I manage to convince myself she's somehow less town then the other two wagon choices that I think are town, and because the Kaori lynch is not happening. Claims mess that up because Meiya's looks quite town while Sayaka's is totally weird and freaky.

Brief summary of Uesugi's post:
-I do not currently see a reason why I would want to vote Eclair or Yuno, and I do not believe Meiya is the best choice for D1's lynch.
-Still don't like Sayaka (Not any further advancement of why this is so)
-Cases on three lurkers, two of which practically did not exist and the third barely so
-Okay with lynching any of the lurkers, but going to leave vote on Sayaka

Notice that Uesugi's is polarized towards voting people who almost do not exist (Or practically don't), does not actually comment on anything Sayaka had done in the latter part of D1, and also that she completely dropped Blackrose D2 despite her being the top priority lurker D1, instead focusing on Kaori who had been recieving much more critisism then Blackrose D2 before Uesugi appeared. I personally find her wording in the first - to be weird as well, but whatever, that's not as important I guess.

I'm not sure how I can explicitly point out things in mine that are better, because I didn't logic much in any of them and just barfed reads, and then lots of awkwardness because I thought all three of the wagon choices were town in addition to the issues I was encountering. My end of d1 was pretty bad and there's no avoiding that. However, I -can- explicitly point out things that are bad about Uesugi's post, and I'd like to hope that can count. Honestly, everything Uesugi has done #144 and onward seems pretty scummy looking to me.

Oh, cut. My answer to Eclair's question is that I am a lazy hoe and cannot be arsed to create a case when the day has not actually started yet. If nothing else I like to recieve the NK results first.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 22, 2012, 03:04:18 AM
I'm honestly confused as to why Eclair thinks it's bad or weird or whatever that I didn't create a case on Uesugi during the night, and instead created it as soon as I had the time to do so after D2 started.

Does the fact that my case came as soon as I had time on D2 to write it instead of the moment D2 started seriously make me worse?

This really just seems like a weird thing to try and use against me. Can't you stick to actual valid points? I think it honestly looks pretty scummy when you start to grasp for weird, sketchy points to use on me even if the rest of your case isn't sketchy. And I'm trying to keep thinking you're town right now. Partially because it means Farina+Uesugi+Kaori can still all be scum together.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 22, 2012, 03:10:47 AM
Votes for everyone!

BlackRose: (1) Yuno Gasai
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) BlackRose, Farina
Maka Albarn: (1) Quicksword Irene

Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

25 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 03:30:35 AM
BlackRose: (1) Yuno Gasai
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) BlackRose, Farina
Maka Albarn: (1) Quicksword Irene

---

BlackRose's lynch I like.  If I were scum in a D1 where the townies were fighting each other I would sit back and lurk.  If I were scum in a D2 where townies seem to be losing their motivation and not posting very much I'd sit back and try to get the most dangerous targets (read: those attacking me and my behavior) lynched.  That's exactly what she's doing (seriously, look at all her suspicions on D1 and D2, they're all people that think she's scummy and would lynch her over the more active people), and therefore is still the best lynch.

Kaori's lynch I like.  She's been totally active lurk and bandwagon hops while asking throw-away questions that are either obvious by reading the thread, or mean absolutely nothing and she does nothing at all with these questions and never follows up on anything ever.

I'm still irritated that we're actually considering other people at this point.  This isn't laziness here.  Anyway!

Eclair is tunnely town.  D1 started shaky, but the way she's been going after her targets reads as townie.  I think she believes in what she says, she just doesn't know when to let go.

Esuna is bleeding green in her defenses and attacks on Uesugi today.  The fact that you (read Eclair) are going after her for not typing up a case during the night phase is really silly and leads me to believe that you really want her to be scum, but don't really think she is anymore.  This is totally glorious townie fury.  I found most of her content agreeable yesterday, and the parts that were silly could be read as waffly confusion rather than anything outright scummy.  I get the feeling you think confusing people are scummy Eclair. :P

Uesugi...still looks kind of townie to me.  Esuna's point on her not really giving reads is more accurate than I initially thought, so I should probably take another look at her later.  I just really like her D1 posting outside of #144.  Better than any of the non-lurker lynches except for maybe Maka (who is starting to approach being in lurker territory anyway :V)

Tenshi, why are there people voting her?  I am totally unimpressed with the case and don't see it at all.

Maka feels like a PoE compromise lynch.  I've really disliked her content today (I don't know why she doesn't want to talk to me ;_;), and the way she handled the day end was really bad.  I'd still be kind of upset if I had to switch though.

---

That sums up my opinion on everyone and responses to the cases I've seen.  I still have no idea what to make of the Sayaka wagon, and I've basically read the people on it to death (and I'm considering looking at Uesugi again, which is @_@).  I'd like it if we could just lynch the scum in front of me.  None of the cases have really impressed me, except for maybe Esuna's which has merit in a few places, and a lot of the cases are focusing on downright silly things (hammering in the middle of the night when few people were around, attacking scummy lurkers).  So I'm not seeing any reason to get off of them at this point.  Slight preference for BlackRose because it reads more like something I would do if I were scum.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 22, 2012, 03:45:00 AM
BlackRose has been prodded.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 03:46:39 AM
I change my mind on Esuna, she's obvtown on the lone basis that up until now, everybody has been buddying up to me (naturally, as I am the finest mercenary Ilia has to offer) and I should've been a difficult mislynch from scum's PoV. Seriously.

Talking about people buddying me up to me on D1 reminds me that I should humor Yuno and Yuukii and listen to them, since they're quite obviously getting permakilled tonight!
##Unvote
##Vote BlackRose

I'm quite certain BlackRose is now the definition of lurkscum.

Basically my only issue with BlackRose's D1 content was that she pretty much acting as my personal promoter whenever possible, the rest of her only content post read as frustrated town. However, it's been about 24 hours since I first posted today, and now it's currently BLATANTLY OBVIOUS that her gameplan is to abuse how people are giving her a pass to coast as an unpopular target, then switch to the much more popular Kaori wagon at the last moment if necessary, since she already set that switch up. People aren't pressing her for lurking enough so she's not bothering to post because she knows she won't get lynched for it today anyway based on what people like me have been saying.

I also remain unwilling to bet any of my hard-earned money that Kaori will flip scum, even though her play is "scummy".

mmediately driving the day toward two lurker lynches without an explanation why Lurker A is more likely to flip scum than Lurker B, or a reasonable explanation why focusing on lurkers is more interesting than any other options is also weak, lazy and therefore scummy.
Tenshi's response to me covered a lot of my quarrel with her, but it doesn't make me feel any safer about this. Why is Kaori a better target than BlackRose is when Tenshi has been spending the day with just as much conviction against BlackRose, if not more, shown by her questioning of me? Tenshi isn't pushing for a lurker lynch like Yuno was talking about, she's voteparking without a clear thought process toward her lurker-based priorities and is using LALu as a basis to push a lynch mindlessly, which is exactly how I would expect non-lurking scum to handle a situation like this. Every time she mentions Kaori, she also mentions BlackRose, but there's no thorough explanation why Kaori is scummier. This is also a major reason I've been hesitant to jump Kaori all day despite disliking her play.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 22, 2012, 03:47:08 AM
Some thoughts before I head to bed. Since the game seems to be getting close to the point of stagnating, I figure now is as good a time as any to look at the people in my middlish-opinion area. Kanzaki and BlackRose need to eat keystone. Gasai, Martinozzi, Irene, and Farina all look pretty town to me (despite Farina inexplicably giving BlackRose's content a positive review). This leaves Kenshin, Busy, Albarn and Mitsurugi.

Kenshin and Busy I've already spoken a fair amount about. I am still waiting on that thing I mentioned earlier, so pushing that aside. With how recent proceedings have gone, both of them have actually gone a little bit up my happy chart. If I had to pick one I liked better I suppose I would pick Kenshin for two reasons.

- Near as I can tell, the biggest group issue with Kenshin is staying on Miki all day, and I think she's adequately explained that one at least once.
- This is a bit of general principle, but Busy seems rather spastic with the posting over the past 24 hours or so. Might just be the player, but there's a higher pure probability of flailing here.

That being said, I like them both better than the other two.

- Given how all of no one except for one person has voiced serious suspicion of her today, can we all agree at this point that it is extremely unlikely that an Eclair train will reach the station today? We can? Good. Because Mitsurugi's had a vote on Eclair since her first D2 post and has done...basically nothing else all day! She's sprinked a few short questions here and there, none of which had anything to do with Martinozzi, and hasn't provided any further opinions. Kanzaki (of all people) asks a good question of the vote in #213, and we've yet to see a response to that, though I guess maybe weekday commitments are getting in the way of that. Still, holy Toledo is this ever a votepark. (Watch people decide these comments are somehow a continuation of my Day 1 case and get mad at/suspcious of me.)

- Albarn has taken a rather sharp nosedive since D1, and the activity drop in particular is amusing given the circumstances (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804496.html#msg804496) under which we first crossed swords blades. (Dump the scythe and pick up a true lady's weapon, would you? Scythes are only there for lazy titty-monsters like Onozuka.) I don't think Irene is entirely right in her assessment that Albarn's Kenshin case was the exact same thing, but it might as well have been because I can't find anything new in it that I agree with. I disagree with claiming Kenshin was fencesitting on Meiya in #144 because I read that as "I do not want to lynch Meiya today" which is very much not a fencesit (or at least it isn't to me). The referenced "follow-up" I'm guessing is #82, which looks to me far more like Kenshin elaborating on her reasoning for Miki after Miki asked a word use question than "responding to Sayaka about things that didn't even concern her". Given Kenshin's vote was due to dissatisfaction with Miki's vote for me, I would guess going over the reasoning for Miki's vote on me would be relevant to Kenshin's vote for Miki.

The recap that "[Kenshin's] presence yesterday was almost nonexistant and her vote was parked for the entirety of the day onto a single person" applies to Albarn today and raises the question of why we should vote for Kenshin over Albarn with this just as parts of Busy's case on Kenshin raised the question of why we should vote for Kenshin over Busy.

In summary, I'm starting to get a bad feeling that Busy vs. Kenshin might be town vs. town and scum are taking advantage of the fact that it has dominated the day by sitting on the sidelines and letting town drown itself in a deluge of words. Honestly, at this point I would prefer Mitsurugi and/or Albarn bite it before Busy or Kenshin.

Cut by Gasai and Farina posts. Guess I'm not going to bed just yet.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 03:52:42 AM
Also Farina, what do you think of Kaori's post where she makes a case on me? Please don't cite anything about your own feelings on me or things from other people's case on me. Please only pay attention to the case that -she- made for the sake of this question. I would like to know how you feel about it because you seem to think Kaori does not look too bad (Maybe a little bad, but not too bad, because you express that you don't have much faith she'd flip scum.)
I don't find fault with it, except for the part where she mixed Sayaka and Tenshi up in the middle of her post, despite having the names write a single sentence ago.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 03:53:19 AM
"right", not write. Excuse me!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 03:56:29 AM
[11:52:54] Just when I thought I finished hating everything I have found more everything to hate. At least Yukkii is still trying. You can do it Yukkii! But stop cutting me, it's bizarre.

Yes, more walls of PBPA please we need more reasons to hate the lurkers. I would prefer something concise about all the players Kaori and Blackrose have reads on. (This is untrue, I'd prefer if they both died of mysterious causes overnight involving rope.) It's consolidation time again. If I can't have one maybe we can squeak through another. And then tomorrow I will use the blood to draw pictures of why Blackrose is still scum. Ahaha~ But I've been cut by something that makes me happy!

Originally, I disliked her vote on Meiya as I viewed it as opportunistic.  She ignored my vote-prod until later in the day, and refused to refute the point to make some poorly thought-out cases instead.  She failed to say anything redeeming for the remainder of the day until her claim.
Are you implying the claim was townie? :V I wish you to clarify what was scummy about Sayaka making cases instead of defending against your prod vote. I actually felt her later day content was really good right up to fakeclaiming. Oh the morals these children are learning..

I agree with Tenshi about Meiya's vote. I note that she hasn't followed up her vote with any mentions of Eclair after that. I'm aware she's busy but if you have time to prod the lurker surely you have time to look at your suspect?

Busy is a flailer. It's like a bleeder, but with words gushing out everywhere. If she were scum she would likely not be angry people are misunderstanding her.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 22, 2012, 04:05:55 AM
Quote
- Near as I can tell, the biggest group issue with Kenshin is staying on Miki all day, and I think she's adequately explained that one at least once.
What about the lack of having any scum suspects other then Kaori d2?

Because I honestly think that's way worse then voting Miki all day one, even if she didn't comment on anything Sayaka did past Uesugi's second post in the day.

In other news, on the front of lynching lurkers, just reminding that I'm totally 100% fine with switching my vote to Kaori at the end of the day rather then Uesugi unless it looks like Uesugi is actually being lynched. (I know the Kaori lynch can easily happen, but my Uesugi casing doesn't seem to be taking hold with people quite as well as I thought it might, so I'm more worried on that front)

And that I definitely prefer Kaori as a lynch way more then Blackrose. But I guess Blackrose is okay too because... she won't even show up ;_; I'd rather she died of mysterious causes overnight too, Yuno, but I just can't hold faith that it will happen.

I have to admit I've practically forgotten that Meiya and Maka are superlurking/lurking out the day, respectively. This makes me really sad. The only reason I'm not more interested in them is because my other suspects already look so surely scum to me that I will be simultaneously amazed, horrified, and depressed if they don't flip red. BUT THAT WOULD JUST BE TOO EASY, NOW WOULDN'T IT?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 04:18:04 AM
Okay, really. Esuna, how is Kaori's activity scummier than BlackRose abusing the state of the day while lurking right now!?

I also wish Yuukii would tell me why he thinks that Tenshi looks like she actually cares about pushing Kaori's lynch when just about all of Tenshi's mentions of Kaori are boxed in with a mention of BlackRose.

When Uesugi explains why she wants to lynch Kaori, she gives reasons why Kaori's combination of play and activity is, in fact, scummy, justifying her vote.

When Yuno ('s playerslot, this applies to Yuukii too) explains why she wants to explains why she wants to lynch BlackRose, she also gives reasons why her target's combination of play and activity is scummy, justifying her choice to vote BlackRose over Kaori.

How is Tenshi failing to do this not scummy? Her only point that came close to explain why Kaori was a better target was more "feelings" than anything, and she should be able to provide more given what the lurkers have posted. It just makes her safe to drive the day toward lurker lynches all day, commenting on points of interest when prompted by other players or the general day's course without actually pushing for them, then switching to BlackRose if BlackRose is a more popular choice than Kaori.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 22, 2012, 04:29:10 AM
...are you implying Kaori has activity? Both her and Blackrose are both nigh-entirely nonexistent. Blackrose might be slightly MORE nonexistent but they're both nonexistent.

I've explained plenty why I hate Kaori, and it doesn't really need any updating because she hasn't posted once since the last time I tore her posts apart. I could go dig up where the relevant things are I guess. But you were aiming the lack of explanation more at Tenshi then me.

Even if Uesugi is explaining her Kaori vote, that does not change the fact that it is STILL only Kaori. Explained or not, it's just as easy.

It's 12:30am so I can't really think about Tenshi right now, but maybe when I get back from school tomorrow D: G'night!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 22, 2012, 04:29:47 AM
Farina: I wouldn't say I'm pushing LALu mindlessly because I've tried to at least make the distinction between scummy lurking and not-scummy lurking. Even if you missed the backhanded distinction in #142, I figured the Irene comments at the very top of my #209 would make it clear. Not posting a lot isn't scummy, not posting a lot and posting garbage when you do post is scummy, which is why I made the Irene and Kenshin references across #142 and #209. They fit the former while Kanzaki and BlackRose fit the latter. If you'd like a log of my vocalized issues with the two of them (i.e. why their posts were/are crap), I can produce that as well.

- Kanzaki issues at the bottom of #87 (note that, in this post, I am also uninterested in a BlackRose lynch, because it was prior to her posting garbage)
- BlackRose and Kanzaki issues in #106, with Kanzaki issues explained further in #107
- My response in #209 to BlackRose's case should demonstrate how little I thought of it as a case (note the massive tone difference in me addressing her "points" in this post and me addressing your points in more recent posts)
- Kanzaki issues near the bottom of #234

I've had issues with both of them since before my Kanzaki vote at the start of this day and I have continued to have issues with both of them after it. The list looks small, sure...because they're lurkers that haven't posted much of anything.

The distinction in voting Kanzaki over BlackRose was made in the voting post (#181). I considered BlackRose's Day 1 post terrible effort and Kanzaki's Day 1 post no effort. I have a slight preference for the terrible effort over the no effort because terrible effort is still effort. I just prefer terrible effort to no effort in the same way I prefer getting shot in the shoulder to getting shot in the head. So they both get repeated mentions while I vote for the one that makes my stomach churn a few iotas more.

Busy: After checking through Kenshin's posts today, I have to admit that you may be on to something with that. I get the feeling Kenshin thinks Albarn is scummy from the bottoms of #241 and #245, but she didn't actually come out and say it either time, so...yeah. Make that a slight (good) preference for you above Kenshin. I still don't think either of you should be our priority today, though.

Farina again: I'd say Gasai makes distinctions between the two because she sees a wider gap between them than I do.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Decade on March 22, 2012, 04:38:05 AM
My main problem with Esuna was that at the time, it seemed as if she saw an opportunity and used it for her own benefit, rather then for town's benefit.
Also,
@Esuna: Should the last paragraph in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807017.html#msg807017) be taken as you indirectly throwing your support in lynching those two?
Feeling too Busy to take it Easy?

It makes it sounds as if you don't actually believe in your scum picks even though you've been continuously stating how confident you are in your picks as of the moment.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 04:49:29 AM
Scumori. Who do you think is scum. Who do you think is town. Tell us. Why. And NOW. (Only Esuna will be met with me punching you in the face repeatedly with my vote.)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 22, 2012, 04:52:57 AM
See what I mean about terrible effort vs. no effort, Farina?

Bed.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 04:54:54 AM
Tenshi's distinction in #181 works for me for now.  I don't really need a wall of text explaining why lurkers suck.  The only reason I'm saying so much is because I've been pulling my hair out trying to figure out how to get people to vote for them. >_>

In regards to her not pushing them very hard, I agree there.  Her other content has made up for it mostly, but this point is something to keep in mind for the future.  I just haven't had issues with the rest of her content, so I didn't find it worth pressing.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 09:04:12 AM
[5:20:00] fdgfdgs less then 24 hours and no one wants to move their votes. Yukkii gets headaches just from reading the thread now.

Enough fooling around. We have somehow gone the entire day without a proper wagon. I will be the big girl and make the first step.

##Unvote
##Vote: Kaori


Everyone needs to figure out some compromise in themselves and move their votes together in their next posts.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 22, 2012, 10:58:34 AM
I apologize once more for my inactivity but I am pleased to give the news that I have found reprieve from my duties for the time being and am, therefore, capable of diverting my efforts into playing this game and finding those that wish to hinder town from achieving its win condition once more. As we are, once again, pressed for time I shall temporarily cease diverting my energies towards miss Martinozzi and instead further investigate the other people that, I believe, are of interest.
##Unvote

I must express my dissatisfaction of both miss Kanzaki and miss Rose. I believe both of these people to be acting without the town's best interests in mind. As mentioned many times before by others, miss Rose's activity on D1 amounts to a grand sum of nothing. Lurking through the day whilst providing nothing places town in a disadvantageous situation and those that wish to work towards the town win condition should not rely on such a tactic to avoid attention and therefore avoid becoming targets for the day's lynch. Miss Rose's continuation of this behaviour during the second day portrays a lack of remorse which may be used to infer that miss Rose is, indeed, using this tactic in a way that benefits herself and only herself. I must also note something interesting within miss Rose's two posts today. Within both posts are sentiments that defend lurkers. Within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806423.html#msg806423) is a statement that miss Hinanawi is suspicious for directing her efforts towards lurkers and another that miss Rose would not like to see miss Kanzaki's lynch despite the fact that miss Rose labels miss Kanzaki as one that works against the town win condition. When I questioned the reasoning behind miss Rose refusing to vote for miss Kanzaki, miss Rose stated within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806459.html#msg806459) that it was due to the fact that attacking lurkers would appear lazy. However miss Rose then further adds that she would not mind seeing miss Kanzaki falling victim to the lynch if that were to be the day's end result. I ask of the people: Does this willingness to lynch not mean that miss Rose believes in her own thoughts that miss Kanzaki is not working towards the town win condition? If this is the case I refuse to accept miss Rose's reasons for avoiding placing her vote upon miss Kanzaki. I find this mindset to be very strange and cannot fathom any reason so as to why one that works towards the town win condition would be thinking in this manner. I believe that it appears as though miss Rose is attempting to avoid any responsibility whatsoever and is wholly focused on self preservation.
##Vote BlackRose

Despite this miss Kanzaki herself does not demonstrate a higher level of competence. Miss Kanzaki's activities during the first day result in voting for miss Martinozzi for being overly focused upon myself without any opinion given in regards to the target of miss Martinozzi's efforts, myself. In addition I believe that the claim that miss Martinozzi was tunnelling at this point was nothing more than a cheap statement designed to smear miss Martinozzi's reputation. Not much of the day's time had passed nor had there been much activity. I must wonder why it was that miss Kanzaki singled out miss Martinozzi as being overly focused upon another when many others were the same way? Miss Kanzaki's first post for the second day which can be viewed here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806201.html#msg806201) says, unless my interpretation is incorrect, absolutely nothing that is relevant to the game. Miss Kanzaki's second post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806544.html#msg806544) is similar to the first in that it offers nothing to those that are attempting to divulge the identities of those that work against the town's win condition. However there is an interesting matter that can be gleaned from this post. It is that miss Kanzaki attempts to present an amalgamation of the ideas of others in regards to miss Busy as her own case. It is true that miss Kanzaki refers to the others from which she has drawn her thoughts within her post but the fact that miss Kanzaki mentions the timing of miss Busy's hammer twice is very interesting. The first time it is mentioned no credit is given to others unlike the second time where miss Kanzaki acknowledges that others have stated this sentiment before she has. I am rather inclined to believe that this is indicative of miss Kanzaki having originally written the contents of this post as though they were her own before deciding against this and noting the appropriate sources of her suspicions as she believed it to be a better idea to take refuge within audacity; announcing that she was doing naught but parroting rather than chancing somebody discovering that none of miss Kanzaki's thoughts were her own. Even if I am mistaken on this point the fact that miss Kanzaki has been pushing for miss Busy's lynch for the entirety of the second day based purely on the premises of others rather than her own is a rather worrying point. Miss Kanzaki also brings up in her latest post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807037.html#msg807037) that she believes that miss Busy does not place faith within her own case. I wish to ask a similar question to miss Kanzaki. Are you able to believe in your case on miss Busy despite the fact that it is built entirely around the thoughts of others rather than yourself? At this point I would even go so far so as to claim that both miss Kanzaki and miss Rose are working against the town's win condition.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 12:27:09 PM
Quote
I change my mind on Esuna, she's obvtown on the lone basis that up until now, everybody has been buddying up to me (naturally, as I am the finest mercenary Ilia has to offer) and I should've been a difficult mislynch from scum's PoV. Seriously.

Yeah, it certainly doesn't have anything to do with her suddenly being transparent as humanly possible, which is something you and Uesugi should be doing but for some unknown reasons refuse to do.


Well, Maka will have to show up eventually and I don't really want to lynch her until I see more from her, so
##Unvote
I will very, very heavily frown upon her if she does nothing more than provide a vote for today's lynch and doesn't make a good mention about the case against her (votepark on Uesugi, tunneling, adding 0 content in her latest post) when she does finally show up, though.

Meiya, your walls still make my eyes hurt. Press the preview button and space the walls out a little before posting or something.

I know that saying "not working towards town's win condition" is your flamboyant RP way of saying "scummy", but something in the back of my head keeps poking at this as suspicious wording similar to Kenshin's #79 (wasn't this #73? have I really been mixing that up all this time? why hasn't anybody pointed it out? you guys haven't been reading me at all  :fail:). Roleplaying issues make these things very hard to read so they most likely won't be in any of my cases, but they inevitably make me read Kenshin and Meiya as scummier. I'm going to try to overlook that as null as much as possible, but it'd certainly help if people didn't cover up scummy comments with RP altogether.

Regarding differences in Blackrose and Kaori's self-preservation:

I somehow find that Blackrose getting prodded more is less scummy. It feels like a PX-ish townie who gave up on the game long ago and barely cares if they get modkilled, whereas Kaori seems to be deftly avoiding prods while posting minimal content to avoid doing anything scummy aside from lurking, so that people won't get any further reasons to vote her. However, when we look at their votes, Kaori was parroting the Esuna case and now refuses to lift her vote despite the case having died down and having most of the support for it gone, which doesn't feel like scum pushing a mislynch, while Blackrose seems to dislike the idea of lynching anybody who isn't scumhunting and posting walls of content, which is scummy as hell. I'm pretty confident that one of the two is scum, but I want to see a Blackrose post before I decide amongst the two.

Like I mentioned before, I feel that the way to go with these two lurkers is to seriously get the two main wagons on them and get them both to claim. Even if we lynch one of them, scum will leave the other one alive in D3, when we most likely won't be able to afford a mislynch, so I'm pretty sure that this course of action would benefit town more than scum as of now. I can't think of anything right now, but I just woke up, so just in case I'm overlooking something important and this is totally wrong, please let me know ASAP so I can change my priorities before the time to reread runs out.



Either way, if there's somebody among the wagons I don't want to lynch whatsoever today, it's Esuna. Eclair, you've been really tunnelly all game and I'd like to know what you think of other people other than "okay yeah lurkers should also die" before we enter the chaotic stage of the day, why do you still think Esuna is scummier than anybody else? what do you think of Maka, Uesugi and the lurkers?
I don't want to be distracting your attention solely to my targets, so if you have anything to point out regarding Tenshi, Meiya, Yuno or even myself then go ahead by all means. (but I would still appreciate it if you had more than a sentence's worth of comment on Maka/Uesugi/lurkers. I'm not accusing you of doing this, but it seems to be cool and fashionable to provide no content in this game so just in case).

And as for Meiya, you've made no mention of the accusations you've received about parking your vote on Eclair all day, and now you're focusing entirely on the lurkers. You've made good points about them, but if you have the time again at some point, could you please explain why you thought Eclair was a good place to set your vote for the whole day until now?

I might be forgetting something important, but this has taken too long, I'll continue and hopefully place my vote when I'm back from routine.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 22, 2012, 12:35:31 PM
I placed my vote upon miss Martinozzi for the sentiments I expressed within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805376.html#msg805376). I was unable to follow up on my actions due to a set of circumstances which rendered me unable to focus my attentions upon this game.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 12:53:21 PM
Really fast comment I really shouldn't be posting due to lacking a decent reread on the issue:
I don't quite follow why misunderstanding a case makes one scummy. Tenshi's cases, my own and many others' have been misinterpreted and required clarification. Your cases are also particularly difficult to follow due to the fluffy wording, so I don't see how a case misinterpretation automatically makes Eclair scum.

Before being accused of hipocrisy seeing how I'm seeing Farina as scummy for similar reasons, I'll clarify that my issue with Farina isn't as much misinterpreting cases, but cherry-picking arguments out of them as she sees fit in order to make them look more or less important than they are as a whole. If this was also the case with Eclair then I apologize for not waiting until getting a reread, but we don't really have much time.
Even if that's the case, though, didn't any of the accusations against Kenshin, Esuna, Blackrose or Kaori satisfy you at all to the point where you'd support pressure on them, instead of pursuing the Eclair case that was dead aside from your input on the issue which was nonexistant throughout the day?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 22, 2012, 01:17:29 PM
Again, I had not the time to read through any of the accusations in any form of depth.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 01:36:16 PM
Don't have time to comment, but I noticed there's two people that aren't me on BlackRose now.

##Unvote
##Vote BlackRose
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 03:16:05 PM
Quote
Eclair, you've been really tunnelly all game and I'd like to know what you think of other people other than "okay yeah lurkers should also die" before we enter the chaotic stage of the day, why do you still think Esuna is scummier than anybody else? what do you think of Maka, Uesugi and the lurkers?

I already said I am not finding myself in Kenshin's lynch. In any case, I pored over the records Riccotta had of the early battle to see if I'd missed anything! After all, it is hard to keep an open mind and see everything going on during a war when you're already in the heat of battle.

Naturally I dislike her early game vote on me because anyone who votes me is Scum?, but I can understand the thought process behind it and it seems sincere enough.
Quote
I don't think this looks like a matter of Eclair not being able to vote two players at once, it comes off more as disconnect, like she doesn't care about reading players aside from her main case.
This though seems more of a playstyle argument. Speaking of, I am still happy with Irene the Second that I do not want to do anything to her.

I definitely don't like
Quote
given that I definitely don't trust Eclair right now, consider my negotiations with Meiya's wagon to be over.
since it's the only comment she makes about my case on Meiya sort of a little I guess, and it discredits it based on who posted it, not the merits of its points or whatever.

Not sure how I feel about the request for a hammer and then subsequent attack on Esuna for hammering, although her argument seems much less the fact that Esuna hammered and more the circumstances. In any case, Esuna hammering itself wasn't scummy, for all that I think she is over other points. Farina has the same problem where she votes me and then Sayaka that is also present in Esuna, and it's a bit worrisome that she hasn't had an opinion on scum outside of Sayaka and me.

After asking BlackRose why she was lurking through deadline, it honestly feels weird for her to declare BlackRose Townie, considering it adds to the Kaori/BlackRose lynch thing and edges it closer into 'lynch Kaori' over 'lynch BlackRose.' I of course fiercely dislike how she says Esuna is scummy and then posts this gem:
Quote
I change my mind on Esuna, she's obvtown on the lone basis that up until now, everybody has been buddying up to me (naturally, as I am the finest mercenary Ilia has to offer) and I should've been a difficult mislynch from scum's PoV.
Because that's a rubbish reason to declare someone Town.

In short, while I don't think Farina is the shining exemplary hero of Biscotti, I wouldn't label her Galette scum just yet. Most her stances have been consistent and valid with some small exceptions. I do want her to closer explain why Esuna saying she is scummy immediately invalidates any scum suspicion on Esuna Farina had before, especially considering her vote's been on Tenshi all day until the swap to BlackRose. Esuna was just as guilty as Tenshi for ignoring the D1 wagon, except Tenshi openly stated she was ignoring the D1 wagon: why was the public declaration scummy while voteparking on Kaori in preparation of a case on someone else wasn't scummy enough to be voted?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 03:16:29 PM
EBWOP: The above is all about Farina, of course. How'd I forget to mention her name?!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 03:21:03 PM
Also unhappy with Meiya's only contribution to the day being a vote on BlackRose, considering she voteparked on me for most of the day for a D1 case that she ignored my response to. If that isn't lazy Galette scum behaviour I don't know what is, and in spite of my intention to look past her I find myself wanting to lynch her still for this incredibly lazy way of handling the game. Everything everyone's said about going after lurkers still applies here, because Meiya only talks about Kaori and BlackRose while there are other scummy people as well.

Gonna read over the records of Tenshi, since I've felt pretty good about her and I want to see if I am right in that feeling.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 03:32:34 PM
I should probably first respond to the bit about Maka, Uesugi and the lurkers. In reverse order, I don't think the lurkers are worth my attention because they're policy lynch material based on not-playing-the-game-you-jerks. Outside of that, Kaori is extremely lazy and unapologetic which makes me want to murderize her, and BlackRose is just Not There which makes me want to murderize her, and I realize Maka's picked up lurking like Meiya has and it makes me want to murderize them.

I'd need to glance over their posts to decide if there's anything in there that's scummy.

Kaori: Rubbish content, no attention for the state of game at the time of her post, incorrect or outdated observations and unapologetic attitude about her own lacking behaviour. Stereotypical promise of making another post but not doing so. All of these points separate are scummy and I fully understand why people want to lynch her, but it still feels like The Easy Way Out: I'd imagine a scumbag Galette spy to actually try hard and put effort rather than hope to skirt by to endgame on credit of being a useless sack of flesh. As-is I'd support a lynch on her because the content she has is fully scum, I minorly dislike the paranoia that all lurkers can be scum due to hiding since it's an easy stance to take and I minorly dislike the fact that Kaori's lynch and case are easy, open-and-shut things we can all basically agree on that the Content Is Rubbish.

BlackRose: this shows effort (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805185.html#msg805185). It just takes more effort on my side to actually decipher who she is talking about and it's not clear why her vote goes to Yuno over whoever else she might have thought was scummy. Using her first D2 post to sow dislike on those going after lurkers smells of OMGUS because she is a lurker. I don't have a long list of scummy things she's done because I realize I like her better than Kaori but what content there is is still rubbish and her stance during D2 is hypocritical in that she says Kaori is lurkscum and simultaneously decries people scummy for going after lurkers. If Kaori is scum of whatever flavor you don't suffer her to live.

tl;dr would lynch Kaori much sooner than BlackRose, but also dislike BlackRose. Both lurkers have crappy content on top of crappy participation.

Maka now, then Tenshi.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 03:44:34 PM
Maka: Dislike opening panic about quietness (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804474.html#msg804474), especially since I'd need to look at her posts to remember what she posted. (Random note: I realize I still remember Yuno's stances so I like her more because she's memorable.)

I'm unfond of her declaration that it's a toss-up between Yuno and Sayaka, which is supposedly a 'fine' toss-up, and then her subsequent post talking about her having a post written regarding Sayaka over Meiya. I mean I understand since the two are wagoned, but it would have been nice to see the conundrum solved of Yuno and Sayaka who you graded as equally scummy at some point. Her D2 content has been sparse in contrast to D1 content which was large walls demanding activity and now small posts focused on a single person.

She's at least consistent in her suspicions so I'm not that interested in a Maka lynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 22, 2012, 03:50:27 PM
Quoting for truth (and apathy. Mostly apathy)

BlackRose: (3) Farina, Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin 
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) BlackRose
Maka Albarn: (1) Quicksword Irene

Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~12.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 04:07:43 PM
About Tenshi, them are a lot of walls, but after reading them I certainly still like her. I can follow her thought processes and feel that she did indeed have misrepresentations used against her for the cases, so I'm not terribly interested in anyone declaring Tenshi must be lynched. A point I agree on is that her first post looks bad, but in light of plenty of other people doing the same except they don't declare it, I don't think it's entirely valid to ride Tenshi so hard for it.

Personally, I'd rather people admit to their laziness than pretend they aren't, for all that Tenshi clarified she did not intend to be lazy. Since I like Tenshi's posting I am not afraid to say I feel she is entirely Town to me and I would be very surprised to see her flip red. Meiya's case on Tenshi was utter rubbish and her initial vote was made over misrepresenting Tenshi entirely (Tenshi voted Maka over panic-mongering by going all post post post and talking about getting a coherent lynch at the start of DAy 1, which Meiya construed into 'you're voting who you think has put in the most effort') so much that I almost want to vote Meiya again given her unnoteworthy presence today and her baffling stances yesterday which seems to be built on continuously misrepresenting the arguments on you and dancing around actually giving an answer.

Still. I should talk about Why Busy now because I've been too Busy looking at others. I feel like such a wall of text spammer now.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 04:23:32 PM
Amusingly my six-post chain got cut by a vote-count, impressing on me the need to actually solidify on a wagon. I don't like my companion on the Busy wagon regardless, so I do not think I shall see Busy hang today.

Quote
I'm honestly confused as to why Eclair thinks it's bad or weird or whatever that I didn't create a case on Uesugi during the night, and instead created it as soon as I had the time to do so after D2 started.

Does the fact that my case came as soon as I had time on D2 to write it instead of the moment D2 started seriously make me worse?

This really just seems like a weird thing to try and use against me. Can't you stick to actual valid points? I think it honestly looks pretty scummy when you start to grasp for weird, sketchy points to use on me even if the rest of your case isn't sketchy.

This makes me go all ლ(?ロ?ლ) considering how it took repeated requests from multiple sources for her to actually respond to the case on her completely, but it's fair enough I guess, although I always like to think Townies have a firm enough grasp on Why Person X Is Scum that they needn't votepark on a lurker in preparation of their actual target. The lack of actual case building on Kaori also doesn't please me given reading her three posts would be easy cakes.

Quote
I would like to think I've been doing a good job on this part through D2 so far! Eclair, do you think Uesugi's scumhunting effort D2 being practically EXCLUSIVELY LIMITED TO KAORI is okay? Yes, Uesugi is saying more things then just stuff about Kaori. NO, none of it is actually scumhunting or opinions on who she thinks could be scum other then Kaori or anything of the sort.

I'd like to think you should answer why your content is better than Kenshin's, because I am clearly not seeing it. Kenshin's scumhunting being limited in its scope isn't the slamdunk that you think it is, for all that I hate the lurker chasing, multiple people are guilty of it. And let's not you yourself voteparked on Kaori at the start of the day, so it seems inexcusable to use her D2 conduct to say something about her D1 conduct.

In fact, this is a misdirection answer. My question to you was why Kenshin is scummy over chasing an 'easy' target when you aren't? You certainly never did much D1 that was strongly original considering you jumped onto easy wagons, and you parked your vote on me in the early game without shedding opinions on others. I want to know why Kenshin is scummy for it but not you.

I find Esuna Busy scummy for evading the questions for this long and misdirection answers to the questions posted, but I recognize the futility here when people much rather lynch the lurkers.

I'd vote Kaori over all else, barring revelations. I really should leave now, I wasted my entire afternoon with this post combo. I'll be around again before deadline at least.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 06:40:13 PM
So I take it I didn't overlook anything horrible in pushing Blackrose and Kaori as the main wagons for today.

##Vote: Blackrose

I'm doing this, but I feel particularly hesitant to do so. This is because these two have been actively lurking the hell out of this game, but I'm getting the feeling that the way they're doing it isn't all that scummy. Well, not really, it certainly is scummy as hell, but I don't think scum would be this incompetent about it. Let me attempt to explain why.
If they wanted to live they'd most likely want to justify their lack of activity like PX did in IMP Mafia, but they're not even trying to do that and just keep up the minimal content. Hell, as far as I've seen, they've been doing this active lurking while logged into their mafia accounts, when it doesn't take a genius to open a different browser to lurk without being logged in and then make up whatever excuse for the lack of activity when posting. I want them to claim, but I'm not really sure whether I want them lynched or not. Saying so kind of defeats the purpose of the wagon pressure, yes, but considering I won't be around during the deadline to unvote and that other people probably don't share my opinion and might want to strangle the living hell out of Blackrose and/or Kaori means it's still going to be there anyway.

If it were up to me, I'd get the wagons on L-1/L-2 with a few hours' worth of time left to get them to claim, analyze and discuss the claims and quickwagon Farina at the end of the day due to the amount of holes in her content, if, and only if, Blackrose and Kaori don't look like better lynches after their claims.
So I'm concerned about today's results. LAL should be a viable strategy D1, not D2. If things start to go wild in a way I really dislike, I'll consider getting off the lurkers to try and get a last-6-hours Farina lynch, since it seems that at least Esuna and Eclair, who both read town to me, might support it.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 07:04:30 PM
[3:23:45] Yukkii's brain just exploded reading that last post. Hold on while I clean it up and then we can talk about how awful that reasoning is.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 07:14:38 PM
This (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807148.html#msg807148) basically explains why I prefer BlackRose over Kaori even though you came to the opposite conclusion.  They're lurkers, of course they're lazy.  I'm not really basing my read off the effort, but what I feel like they're trying to accomplish.  BlackRose is more trying to discourage suspicion at her (again, look at her FoSes D1, here, I'll even post them for you)

Quote from: BlackRose
FoS: Irene
Quote from: Irene
BlackRose would be my 2nd choice for scum. It's these two lines that bug me

Quote from: BlackRose
FoS Sayaka
Quote from: Sayaka
But I guess I should not let my feelings get the better of me. In any case, I more or less echo the above posters on Tenshi (that her hedonistic laziness is infuriating), and BlackRose and Meiya (for standing back and laughing at the mistakes of others). I also question as to why Eclair would rather go for what amounts to a useless vote rather than Meiya, whom she acknowledges as bandwagon hopping.

Quote from: BlackRose
FoS Yuno
Quoting all my posts would be annoying, but I think you get the idea here anyway.

And today she's trying to go after the people that are discouraging her behavior.  So yeah.

Though, looking at the time stamp of her last post it's been over 48 hours since she posted, so I suppose she's approaching modkill territory.

@Mod: How are you handling inactivity modkills?

---

Irene, I'm not quite sure I understand your post.  I can understand being forced onto a wagon you don't like due to deadline, but why do you want to get claims out of both of them?  Especially if you don't think they're scum?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 22, 2012, 07:20:12 PM
Votecount

BlackRose: (4) Farina, Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin 
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) BlackRose

Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

A little less than 9 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

BlackRose is currently skirting the edge of inactivity. I've sent her an ultimatum to post; if she continues to avoid the thread she will be modkilled in the manner most detrimental to her faction.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 07:34:06 PM
I already mentioned at some point before that I really disliked Kaori and Blackrose's absolute refusal to provide content, and that getting them to claim might just be the only way to get information out of them. I thought that the stance I just took should've been pretty clear after my last post, but sure, I'll quote the part where I referred to that:

Like I mentioned before, I feel that the way to go with these two lurkers is to seriously get the two main wagons on them and get them both to claim. Even if we lynch one of them, scum will leave the other one alive in D3, when we most likely won't be able to afford a mislynch, so I'm pretty sure that this course of action would benefit town more than scum as of now. I can't think of anything right now, but I just woke up, so just in case I'm overlooking something important and this is totally wrong, please let me know ASAP so I can change my priorities before the time to reread runs out.

I wish I could be as set on lynching them as you are, Yuno, but the closer the deadline gets, the less it feels like I'd be lynching scum with my vote and more it feels like I'm gambling. I obviously worry that I'm letting scum slip right past me just because we have to get rid of lurkers to play decently, but letting scum slip past because I feel too insecure about lynching the lurkers if they're scum would be worse even, so I'm caught between the two, and what I would want to be able to make a solid decision is some damn information on them. I've called them out several times throughout all D2 and got nothing. They're obviously going to continue giving nothing, so I want them to claim and god I'm repeating myself now.
I can see how wanting people to claim is really scummy, but when there's no information on them other than terrible play I just don't see any other way to go about it.

I'm not making any sense am I?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 07:46:08 PM
Hm, alright.  I suppose that's fair.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 07:59:47 PM
My opinions on Esuna are really in limbo right now. I still maintain that her hammer was scummy. However, I second Yuukii in that I think her reactions to everybody's posts to day have looked very townie, including her jerk reaction to my recent content. I also thought that Esuna's Uesugi vote implied she was reading the Sayaka wagon. On a related note, I never mentioned the rest of the case on Esuna aside from the hammer because I didn't see worth in it. Addressing every single point is a good way to make my walls unnecessarily larger than they already are.

Kaori is just infuriating now! I seriously can't see how somebody of either alignment would possibly benifit from ignoring the entire game except for her vote target, and I don't get her! I'm tempted to say her recent post leans tunnelly townie because that's now how you get people off your back as scum when everybody is willing to lynch you. I also get bad vibes from how the entire game is willing to lynch Kaori the most, it gives the impression that her lynch would be to some extent engineered by scum, while the BlackRose lynch has been met with more subliminal opposition than anything else.

There is really no way BlackRose's lurking has been townie, though. She stopped posting while people were giving her passes and were unlikely to lynch her over the other lurker. That's blatant scum behavior, waiting out the day when pressure on you dies down. Like I said, I'd bet she planned to stop posting and engage Kaori at the last moment to secure a lynch with a telegraphed voteswitch, huh?

I still don't see Tenshi's distinction between the two lurkers. Both lurkers have posted enough that there is content to their name that they can be judged beyond how much effort they're putting into playing. I imagine town would want to look into them enough to decide which has outright scummier behavior instead of just treating them like a coinflip.

Maka is somehow fulfilling the activity drop I guessed at the start of the day. Her D2 looks worse than Uesugi's D1. I don't like her right now and I'd really like her to post again for further judgment.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 08:19:00 PM
It's fair, but it's quite silly. Instead of the middle ground, tell us why you dislike Farina so much that you want to quicklynch her after effectively clearing the lurkers.

I do have my own questions for Farina. Weren't you the one that said Kaori was way worse then Blackrose (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805449.html#msg805449) when people were divided between lurkers at Day 1 end, and who insisted Blackrose was just a lazy townie (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806505.html#msg806505) right after calling her out during deadline? Your reasoning for voting with us frankly creeps me out. :S Why does it seem like the only reason you don't want to vote Kaori is because Tenshi is voting her?

I also want to know why you keep questioning Esuna about why she hammered when you were one of the people calling for the hammer at that moment.

Oh why would you of all people cut me. -_- I question why you say that Kaori is the engineered wagon while Blackrose is subliminally scum removed. I question it because you accuse Tenshi because she's not making a distinction between them. Most of the game isn't.

post this out there gonna get
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 08:38:11 PM
I do have my own questions for Farina. Weren't you the one that said Kaori was way worse then Blackrose (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805449.html#msg805449) when people were divided between lurkers at Day 1 end, and who insisted Blackrose was just a lazy townie (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806505.html#msg806505) right after calling her out during deadline? Your reasoning for voting with us frankly creeps me out. :S Why does it seem like the only reason you don't want to vote Kaori is because Tenshi is voting her?
I changed my mind based on the way her D2 content plays into her activity schedule.  My opinions from the start of the day were before she went another 24 hours without posting. Maybe my expectations are too high, but I thought she and Kaori would make more of an effort today after the way the day started.

Also, I thought her OMGUS-posting from D1 looked like a townie frustrated with people voting her for reasons she didn't agree with. Calling her out during deadline was because I thought Sayaka was about to flip scum after the revised claim and that BlackRose was trying to avoid commenting on or hammering her buddy. It had less weight after Sayaka flipped town. I didn't wait until after the flip because I thought there was a high % I'd take a hit overnight after most of the players had posted something along the lines of "FARINA IS SO TOWN" that day.

Why does it seem like the only reason you don't want to vote Kaori is because Tenshi is voting her?
That's not scummy like you're implying so much as silly play! I just stated why I'm uncomfortable with the Kaori wagon in the post that cut you.

I also want to know why you keep questioning Esuna about why she hammered when you were one of the people calling for the hammer at that moment.
Hammering alone wasn't scummy. It's what she posted when hammering. Read my posts.

Oh why would you of all people cut me. -_- I question why you say that Kaori is the engineered wagon while Blackrose is subliminally scum removed. I question it because you accuse Tenshi because she's not making a distinction between them. Most of the game isn't.
I am, you are, Uesugi is in that she's blasting one but not the other. Tenshi's the most egregious because she looks like she's making a slight distinction but doesn't put a town effort into deciding between the two, as opposed to, say, Eclair and Esuna. One reason the Kaori wagon looks engineered is because people who aren't making much of a real distinction seem to automatically pick Kaori.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 22, 2012, 08:51:44 PM
Firstly, I must apologize once more. Within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807124.html#msg807124) I left a link to this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805376.html#msg805376) when, instead, I had been intending to link this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805484.html#msg805484). What I had found particularly jarring was the fact that miss Martinozzi had responded with much passion to a question that I had directed towards miss Miki and had little to no relevance to miss Martinozzi.

I know not how to explain my reasons for placing my vote upon miss Martinozzi for such an extended period of time during this day in a simpler way than what I have already discussed. I placed my vote upon miss Martinozzi with my thoughts from the preceding day but, due to extrinsic circumstances of which I had very little control over, I found myself without the time to read through much of the content that was being released throughout today.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 22, 2012, 08:54:54 PM
I was catching up and for awhile I was all "Hooray, Eclair is actually being town again" and then she went back to using weird as heck reasons on me right before she finished.

I'm sort of getting tired of rebutting these, but okay.

Quote
The lack of actual case building on Kaori also doesn't please me given reading her three posts would be easy cakes.
Super misrep, uhhhhhhhh here let me screenshot some examples of me having a case on kaori

> http://puu.sh/lUNO <--- The end of the paragraph here is more the point. Both of the things are critically important things to have. Not exhibiting either of them is beyond horrendous.
> http://puu.sh/lUOH <--- Here I tear apart her post where she votes me because it's horribad.

And as for her latest post... really, I don't think I even have to go over this. For what it's worth, Kaori, no, it does not mean that. Anyway the post is horrendously empty and it should be incredibly clear she's not trying in the least, which is still horribly scummy. Blackrose may not exist (she has not posted in 40 hours), but Kaori does exist and her posts are actively scum-tastic. TBH Blackrose lurks so bad it's almost to the point where "I don't think scum would do that because they're risking just getting an inactivity modkill", but I'm not using that as a reason for Kaori>Blackrose because Kaori is SO [FLUFFING] BAD in the first place.

Okay moving on, think of happy thoughts think of happy thoughts <3 Eclair is cute. But I do think Prosethius is cuter. Doros, on the other hand, is not. (http://puu.sh/lVgc) I cut him to pieces, though, so it's fine.

Quote
Kenshin's scumhunting being limited in its scope isn't the slamdunk that you think it is, for all that I hate the lurker chasing, multiple people are guilty of it.
Difference:Other people are doing more then COMPLETELY concentrating on a lurker and doing nothing else. (Granted, there are some who might not be, but I have more reasons then this on my uesugi case as well at least.)

Not only that, but your point here was that Kenshin's content is supposedly better then mine, because... apparently, because "multiple people are guilty of lurker chasing". ...so just because multiple people did that bad thing Uesugi is doing, suddenly Uesugi's content magically became better then mine? If nothing else, given that both me and Uesugi have made cases on Kaori and condemned her, the fact that I've also done more then that in the realm of scumhunting makes it seem like my content would logically be better then hers.

So how is Uesugi's content better then mine, again?

In addition to this, you are forgetting that I have other reasons Uesugi is scum as well. Let's recap some of them.
-She stops saying anything about Sayaka's posts for roughly the latter half of D1 other then that she does not like them, despite the fact that Sayaka is her main target of the day (Basically, goes :effort: instead of advancing her case against Sayaka any despite a large amount of Sayaka posts having happened and several other possible lynches being around, ones she does not wish to occur!)
-D1, she prioritized Blackrose over Kaori. D2, she comes in after it seems fairly clear that many favor lynching Kaori over Blackrose, and then promptly drops Blackrose entirely and focuses on Kaori. She says Kaori "officially passed Blackrose as scummy in my book", and then never mentions Blackrose again.
-Throughout the whole game, her posts have barely avoided lurker prods

Quote
And let's not you yourself voteparked on Kaori at the start of the day
I never said voting Kaori was bad. I want Kaori dead very much. It's not exactly a votepark given that I both made a case on Kaori as soon as I was avaliable and also made a case on someone else and then moved my vote onto said other person. Also before I forget, since it's consolidation time,

##unvote
##Vote Kaori


Quote
they needn't votepark on a lurker in preparation of their actual target
This is a misrep, because Kaori is My Actual Target too. I have two Actual Targets. I firmly believe both are scum and I have been saying so all day. Why do you seem to keep forgetting key things about me when you're trying to prove I'm scummy so hard?

Quote
My question to you was why Kenshin is scummy over chasing an 'easy' target when you aren't?
Kenshin has NOT DONE ANY OTHER SCUMHUNTING then the easy target today. That is why. She even stopped scumhunting on Sayaka, her target throughout d1, partway through day one.

For people who tl;dred through the stuff I'm saying to Eclair, this post does also have some minor recaps on Uesugi and Kaori, and the Kaori stuff is right at the top.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 09:00:22 PM
@ Farina
When I talked about finding the lack of support to the Esuna lynch weird, I probably should've specified that this was because you seemed to prefer to focus only on the part of the case on her that said that "hammering 1 hour before the deadline with a fluffed up post is scummy", instead of the scummier read flip-flopping, and preferred to vote Tenshi over odd reasons:
- Wanting to turn D2 into a Blackrose/Kaori dichotomy, when a simple glance further down the thread showed that she was focusing on things other than LAL.
- Deflecting people from analyzing wagons, which seems like quite a stretch.

I honestly don't read Tenshi as so damn townie I'd lynch somebody over voting her, if people find scummy behaviour in her that I've overlooked, I'll be more than happy to look into it. It's just that your reasons to vote her aside from scolding Yuno in late D1 seem so... bland.
I understand them, but they're just not something I'd vote somebody over. It felt like you were giving somebody outright scummy a pass and fabricating reasons to vote for Tenshi.

I never said that this was ridiculously scummy and that I'd lynch you for it. In fact, I'd be inclined to think that it's just play not keeping up with my expectations, if it weren't for this:

What in the hell. I can get behind this reasoning when it's ED1 and people using voice recognition makes you want to lynch them, but it's halfway through D2, and to be willing to lynch somebody for posting lots of content/not wanting to lynch somebody for posting not posting lots of content is a ridiculous way of throwing out a town read.
Uesugi voteparked on Sayaka D1, dissapeared, came back a little before the deadline and very briefly commented that she "didn't like her recent posts", using that reasoning to keep said vote. This has been pointed out, and Uesugi completely ignored it and went on to vote a lurker. How in the heck do you completely overlook this scummy behaviour and label him town for an ED1 jokereason?

Quote
The line about wanting to believe Uesugi is town was a joke. In short, I've re-read her multiple times and haven't been able to see her as "obvscum lurker manipulating reads so that she can jump on whoever" instead of "succinct townie not posting more than necessary".

The issue with Uesugi was disregarded as a joke, and Farina refused to defend Uesugi from my case for some reason. You don't see me having any issues with defending somebody from somebody else's case if their reasons feel totally off, which is exactly what happened with Tenshi in that very post. Either Farina, as town, read me as so town that she couldn't find scummy intent in a case that she thought was wrong, or she's scum and she just didn't want to get involved with me any further.

The line I also quoted along with that is pretty ridiculous in it's descrediting way of shrugging off the whole Uesugi case, and the more I read her.
The more I read her, the more I get the impression that she's using the excuse of not liking to post walls/read through walls to get away with posting succint content that could hide scum intent more easily, which would fit with wanting Uesugi to live regardless of alignment so that this wouldn't stand out so much. I also don't like how she took zero time to accuse me of discrediting her when she's been all "that's scummy, you're not fooling anybody like that!" discredit-fluffing all game long. But those arguments are not too heavy at all and most likely confirmation bias, I'm just putting it out there anyway as a call-out for her to quit that if she wants me to stop reading her as scummy someday. My main problem with her is how she ignores case points and boils actual scummy behaviour down to nothing, while her own arguments for a Tenshi lynch were much more of a stretch.

I change my mind on Esuna, she's obvtown on the lone basis that up until now, everybody has been buddying up to me (naturally, as I am the finest mercenary Ilia has to offer) and I should've been a difficult mislynch from scum's PoV. Seriously.

Before anybody goes and calls this Eclair parroting, my earlier comment in #272 should make it pretty clear that I also had isues with this argument.

What I do feel like parroting however is how it's also been pointed out that she found Esuna scummy for hammering when she was pressing for said hammer right then, and to that I add that this was when Esuna was looking like a viable D2 lynch, however, as soon as people start openly giving Esuna a town read, she comes up with this ridiculous excuse of a town read. It reads like a pretty opportunistic chance to support an incoming wagon followed by not wanting to stray from the general opinion in order to look more town.

Granted my read on her isn't incredibly solid, and I could understand people not agreeing with it and preferring a different lynch, but it's the least wavery of my scum reads right now, and I would prefer her to be today's lynch as such even though I can't really see people voting for her.

The following shouldn't be interpreted as an attempt to put more weight on the case, it just bugs me:
It has also been pretty unanimously agreed that Maka's D2 so far is tunnel/votepark/nocontent scummy, so why are you bringing that up now when you've been hipsterish enough so far that you've almost only wanted to post original content?

Cut by Meiya and Esuna, only have like 2-3 hours left and I don't want to leave with things unsettled so I'm putting this out and reading.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 09:02:14 PM
Quote from: Farina on March 21, 2012, 12:45:59 pm

    (Also, a part of me wants to believe Uesugi is town just because she's the only :goodposter: not posting a shit-ton of walls at this point. Seriously.)

This is supposed to go between the last two paragraphs of my first quote.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 09:20:30 PM
What I do feel like parroting however is how it's also been pointed out that she found Esuna scummy for hammering when she was pressing for said hammer right then, and to that I add that this was when Esuna was looking like a viable D2 lynch,
I had that read from the start of the day before anybody said anything, but couldn't post it because I wasn't available to be deployed at the time.

Part of this can be proven, too, since I PMed Conq in advance that I wouldn't need a prod, and if you'll check the votecounts, I received no prod after hitting the 24 hour mark.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 22, 2012, 09:24:02 PM
Whoa, just got the PM. Quick not me over me vote, currently posting up reads.

##Unvote
##Vote: Kaori
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 22, 2012, 09:31:11 PM
:I
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 22, 2012, 09:32:45 PM
Am I correct in making the assumption that I need not disclose my reasoning so as to why appearing only when threatened with a modkill fails to impress me?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 09:39:13 PM
Also, by "not seeing people voting her" up there in my Farina post I mean not quickly enough to get her lynched in what's left of the day.

Esuna just brought back some of the most solid reasons for the Uesugi lynch I was pushing myself before but had started to reconsider after Uesugi's words somehow convinced me that there was no reason to move off Sayaka in her last D1 post, since she seemed the scummiest at the time. Esuna's absolutely right about her refusal to comment on any of Sayaka's content other than that she provided when voting ED1, and I've regained confidence in Kenshin's scumminess. I'll be rereading her now.

Cut by Farina and Blackrose. Hoping for that Blackrose content to arrive soon, and Farina, I probably mentioned this before but just I don't understand how a fluffed up hammer post is more scummy than the "Meiya's town, wait no, vote Meiya, wait she's town again, vote Sayaka instead" flip-flop that was under discussion at that moment. You never mentioned anything on it at all, and excused yourself from it with the weak argument of "not making walls any larger".
Not only is it weak in itself, but it is especially weak when we're having content issues, damn it.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 10:11:57 PM
We're not having content issues from anybody but the lurkers.

I think it's totally pointless for scum to justify voting for Meiya with absolutely nothing when Sayaka was obviously the more experienced player and therefore the preferred lynch target, so I'm not seeing the scum intent in Esuna's flip-flop. It could be either waffly town or crazy scum, either way, I think it's a null tell.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 10:18:10 PM
We're also having content issues from Maka, Uesugi and Meiya. Especially Maka, and you were also waiting for more content from her to reach some sort of judgement, how are you forgetting about her just like that?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 10:22:16 PM
She's a lurker at this point.

I don't think we're having content issues from Meiya right now. Uesugi needs to make another post, but otherwise she's good.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 22, 2012, 10:27:03 PM
Votecount!

BlackRose: (4) Farina, Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene
Kaori Kanzaki: (4) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin, Esuna Busy, BlackRose
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn

Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~5.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

Maka Albarn has been prodded.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Ryuki on March 22, 2012, 10:38:30 PM
Since I don't see anyone buying into the Esuna case,

##Unvote
##Vote: Kaori Kanzaki
, as mentioned earlier. Unlikely I will be back again for deadline. BlackRose makes me go :\, content where.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 22, 2012, 10:39:08 PM
Meiya: And this is exactly why I was disliking those people at the beginning at D2. Yeah, you're gonna blame everything on being busy IRL, but you come back and make a giant wall of fluff rp post focused solely on... THE LURKERS. And nothing else. Also, what you're saying about me defending lurkers is completely wrong. If you read my post, you'll see it says that FOCUSING SOLELY ON LURKERS IS THE LAZIEST THING EVER. Fun fact, everyone here will presume 3 scum in a 13 player game. Thus, it should be common opinion that there are three scum. Even if both me and Kaori flip scum, THERE'S STILL ONE MISSING. Simply going "Meh, take care of it later after we waste two lynches on these people" is the laziest and easiest stance scum could take, allowing them to basically ignore the rest of the game and just go with popular opinion afterwards because they have said absolutely nothing in between. Also, so you're saying that I'm scum because I'm AVOIDING A MODKILL? What makes you think that only scum would do that?
Quote
However miss Rose then further adds that she would not mind seeing miss Kanzaki falling victim to the lynch if that were to be the day's end result. I ask of the people: Does this willingness to lynch not mean that miss Rose believes in her own thoughts that miss Kanzaki is not working towards the town win condition? If this is the case I refuse to accept miss Rose's reasons for avoiding placing her vote upon miss Kanzaki. I find this mindset to be very strange and cannot fathom any reason so as to why one that works towards the town win condition would be thinking in this manner.
...Sorry, I should just leave my vote parked on a lurker and not chase for other options. Clearly that is the town way. I'm sorry for my ways and cleanly accept my death now. *raises sword*

Yuno: I know you're gonna go "LOOK AT HER, SHE'S FoSING PEOPLE THAT ARE VOTING OR PUTTING SUSPICION ON HER! OBV. SCUM LYNCH NOW." God, I wish you weren't confirmed town to me

Esuna: I'm trying to explode at night T_T Why are people trying to lynch you?!

Kaori: :| does anyone really want me to post a wall on why she's scum like many others have already said?

Rest of players coming up in soon post, also might not be around for deadline, we'll see later so I can claim soon if need be.

MORE CUTSSSSSSSS
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 10:44:32 PM
Eh, fair enough, but Uesugi needs to post and talk about somebody who isn't Kaori (all her content on non-Kaori was the last line in #245, which pretty much leaves her open for vote on either four she mentioned), and Meiya needs to talk about people who aren't the lurkers, all both did aside from that was justify their voteparks in D1 and D2 respectively.

Yuno, I don't think I saw much of a mention on anybody other than lurkers after your #255 where you're still suffering from Everybody is Town, is this still the case or have you considered any of the cases on the non-lurkers?

Cut by Blackrose, thank god, I was starting to believe she had just promised content and disappeared, reading.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 22, 2012, 10:52:16 PM
Just pointing out that Kaori is at L-1.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 22, 2012, 10:56:24 PM
Present. Please don't hammer, I'm writing. I plan to post within the next 20 minutes because I have to leave again at that point.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 22, 2012, 10:57:15 PM
Actually ##Unvote: Kaori Kanzaki

I'll stick this back on at the end of my upcoming post. Just want to avoid ninja hammers.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 22, 2012, 11:18:08 PM
I shall also note that my comment in regards to the timing of your post is an observation in regards to your character, rather than an indicator of which alignment that you are working for.

Unfortunatly I have limited access once more until the deadline at this point. My apologies.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 22, 2012, 11:23:29 PM
I still don't see Tenshi's distinction between the two lurkers. Both lurkers have posted enough that there is content to their name that they can be judged beyond how much effort they're putting into playing. I imagine town would want to look into them enough to decide which has outright scummier behavior instead of just treating them like a coinflip.

You say this like effort and scummy behavior are independent concepts, which I disagree with pretty heartily. I suppose if this is the stance you hold on the concept of effort, though, then I can at least try to verbally transform Kanzaki's lack of effort into something you'd more easily consume as scummy behavior.

WARNING: PBPA-ISH STUFF BELOW (but at least there's assessments/explanations to go along with it)

#67 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804765.html#msg804765): Waffle on Gasai, waffle (complete with "it's too early to judge" buzzwords) on Irene, obvious and largely irrelevant comment directed toward Mitsurugi. Empty, empty, empty. No effort here.
#103 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805211.html#msg805211): Question/accusation of Martinozzi that was easily seen to be garbage just from looking at Martinozzi's case. Demonstrates no effort in reading her own case target. The Gasai and Irene one-liners aren't noteworthy considering they completely lack explanation. Demonstrates no effort in commenting on things that aren't her case.
#185 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806201.html#msg806201): Asks me a question with an (I think) obvious answer. Empty. Asks Yuno questions with obvious answers. Empty. Total lack of actual opinions. Empty. No effort here.
#213 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806544.html#msg806544): A lackluster case that I've already addressed, but I will admit it's more effort than anything else she's done, even if I'm not fully confident she was paying it full attention while writing it. Then asks Esuna a question with an obvious answer. Empty.
#266 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807037.html#msg807037): Busy "covered" this in #295 with as much coverage as it warranted. Not quite pure empty, but damn close, and what little is there is laughable.

Look at that collective post-to-content ratio and marvel at how bad even given how little she's posted. There's practically nothing there, and the one notable thing across an entire two days is a very lackluster Busy case. Does this better explain my issue with "no effort"? It translates directly into contentless filler.

As for BlackRose, #101 actually looks like it has actually semblances of thought behind it, actually provides explanations, and actually provides a few suspicions even if they were directed at people that found her suspicious, for all that Gasai's #102 is the proper response to it and it still stopped thirty posts short of where it should have. The #201 case on me is nothing at all special, but I don't think I was a particularly obvious vote target at the time. The act of trying to justify a vote for me at that time is, by itself, more effort than basically everything Kanzaki's put together across the entire game. It's still content. Crappy content, but content nonetheless.

Gotta go. Sorry if the latter half of the post looks kinda rushed, because it is. Will be back in a little over two hours, assuming hammer hasn't fallen by then.

##Vote: Kaori Kanzaki

KANZAKI IS AT L-1 AGAIN PLEASE DO NOT SURPRISE HAMMER
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 22, 2012, 11:32:03 PM
Maka: I don't really have much problems with her, so she's not scum to me.

Eclair: Green

Tenshi: Dropping suspicion as her latter posts have been perfectly reasonable and really concise.

Eclair Irene: Green

Farina: Okay, why did you just describe how I'm scummier without explaining how Kaori is less? Thankfully, I like your earlier posts enough to label you not scum

Uesegi: Ahhhhhhhhhhhh mixed feelings. She can easily read both ways ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

MOAR CUTSSSSSSSSSSSS
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 11:36:22 PM
LOOK AT HER, SHE'S FoSING PEOPLE THAT ARE VOTING OR PUTTING SUSPICION ON HER! OBV. SCUM LYNCH NOW.
Actually at this point everyone is putting suspicion on you so this is a moot point.
Quote
Kaori: :| does anyone really want me to post a wall on why she's scum like many others have already said?
YES more text walls I've almost been able to read people's posts lately. Give me more things to carve up. I want to show off my sword some more, episode 21 was just the start!

Irene: There is so much consideration going on you don't even know. But my post right above yours is me considering other people so the answer to that is probably yes. Esuna is super townie, Uesugi is townie but not as townie so might be scum via PoE i don't know. I'd support a lynch that way.

Maka probably hasn't had her role pm change since ED1 so I think she's still town even if Soul is holding her hostage in a maid cafe or something.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 22, 2012, 11:53:03 PM
Kaori: :| does anyone really want me to post a wall on why she's scum like many others have already said?

Please do so.
You yourself mentioned that everybody assumes that there's 3 scum, and yet you only seem to have a single scum read, who else is scum?

I have to leave any moment now so if I just disappear it's because of net being cut off.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 22, 2012, 11:58:01 PM
It would be p awesome if Kaori came in and claimed at this point. No one is intending to hammer before then right? >:|
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:00:32 AM
Eh, scratch that last post, I'm sleepy and not thinking straight, you actually posted two scum reads if you count Kaori, and Yuno already asked for that wall anyway.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Decade on March 23, 2012, 12:10:59 AM
##Unvote
##Vote BlackRose

Not me over Me.

I claim Jailor.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:12:25 AM
Role name, flavor and any other details please?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 12:12:52 AM
This is confirmable.

Were you responsible for roleblocking me last night?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:13:54 AM
Yeah, don't forget the target.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:15:39 AM
Eh, if I'm not mistaken, Jailors get to anonymously talk to their targets, right?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 12:16:34 AM
Jailers roleblock and protect at the same time.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:17:18 AM
Doc + Roleblocker (http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Jailer)

Cut by someone else saying the same thing, but I'll post the wiki link anyway. :V
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 23, 2012, 12:19:14 AM
Even if confirmable, Mafia Jailer has happened on MotK before, plus she could just be a roleblocker.

No, they don't usually get to anonymously talk to their targets, haven't heard of it at least.

I'm pretty busy right now unfortunately
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:20:58 AM
Meaning the target should've been involved in the conversation and should be able to confirm that they were jailed.

Cut

http://wiki.sc2mafia.com/index.php/Jailor
=/
If it isn't obvious yet, this is the first time I play a game with a jailor. Kaori, please specify if this is the anon night chat executor kind of jailor or the roleblock/protect kind.

Cuts cuts cuts

So jailors before this game have always been the doc + roleblock kind?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 12:21:34 AM
Requesting that Kaori hurry up and answer both Yuno and myself. Town doesn't have to spend time making up role flavor.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Decade on March 23, 2012, 12:23:53 AM
This is the roleblock/protect Jailer.
and, no Farina, I did not target you last night.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 12:25:29 AM
That checks out with what I know.

I don't actually have any reason to believe I was roleblocked last night, it was just a bluff to see if Kaori would take the bait as scum and go for an easy clear, given the level of effort she's put into the game so far.

Who did you actually target, though?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:26:28 AM
This is the part where you list:

Flavor - Why is Kaori a Jailer?
Targets - Okay, so who did you jail? :)
The other dudez: You may be forced to vote them but do you think Blackrose has a chance of being scum?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Decade on March 23, 2012, 12:26:52 AM
My target N1 was Irene,
I was still suspicious of her due to her ED1 claim.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:28:05 AM
And role name and flavor?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:32:23 AM
While Kaori finally gets onto doing that.
Blackrose, we know you're here, can we get your claim now?

I have half an hour at the very most, and I'm stretching to the point where I might not be able to function properly tomorrow.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:33:16 AM
Oh good, you are here still.  Do you have reason to believe you were roleblocked last night Irene?  Yes or no suffices.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 12:35:47 AM
I think the target makes sense. Roleblocking is a confirmable action, so it's very likely Kaori targeted Irene. Scum wouldn't prefer to roleblock the player who claimed that they had a 50% scummy, 50% anti-town role, right? They'd much rather roleblock a role that seemed pro-town and dangerous to them! A townie, however, would definitely want to stop a pro-scum role that they believed was scum.

One problem, though. Kaori, what's taking you so long in paraphrasing your flavor!? Out with it!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:37:12 AM
No.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Decade on March 23, 2012, 12:42:58 AM
For me BlackRose feels more like a coinflip.

Kaori Kanzaki - Town GaolKeeper (Literally that is how the name was spelled)
There are sinners in the area, it is up to you to find, and purify these wayward warriors and send them on the path of righteousness.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:44:17 AM
Pointing out that, while it's possible that this is true and the target makes sense, I also find this claim very scummy because it is pretty much forcing me to claim an active or passive/no role, giving scum information for the nightkill that is probably being debated between Yuno, Eclair, Tenshi and myself who are mostly read as town.

Also fuck
? Reply #335 on: Today at 05:32:23 pm ?
Blackrose, we know you're here, can we get your claim now?

Last Active:
    Today at 05:32:46 pm

That is a very convenient moment to dissapear. Just saying.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:44:46 AM
Oh god did you just quote your role pm
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 12:46:37 AM
I don't think it's a direct quote! The structure doesn't look like the structure of my own PM.

I buy the claim, in any case. Aside from what I already stated, it's about the same amount of flavor I got explaining my own abilities.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:48:13 AM
Okay Blackrose probably saw that and hurried back. Claim nao.

Well, it doesn't have "You are" in front of it, and not greening the role part means it doesn't technically count as an outright quote. I hope.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:48:44 AM
I think it checks out too.  Assuming that's not a direct quote and she does indeed live I'd be willing to go into detail if necessary.

And Irene, that was my bad, not hers.  I probably shouldn't have asked you that, I just wanted to confirm something.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:49:35 AM
Yeah, I don't think it's scummy in that way. If scum doesn't know what your role is, they have no way to tell if their fakeclaim just got them killed or not. Anything confirmable is risky enough that the claim is probably town.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 12:53:29 AM
Triple posting is town etc.

Kaori, since you're here can you update your opinion on Esuna and give your opinions on the Uesugi, Maka and Tenshi cases?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 12:58:05 AM
I was going to have to say so anyway because the claim is pretty believable, and refusing to answer would make it look like I was trying to discredit her claim and press her lynch with it.
I probably should've just gone to bed earlier.

I don't think jailor is a very popular fakeclaim, but it still bugs me is because she's been the day's target for almost 72 hours now, so scum could perfectly have fabricated such a claim beforehand. And I'm stupid for not realizing before that I gave them a ton of time to prepare after I announced that I wanted them to claim long ago, therefore making the information I was looking for unreliable.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kabuto on March 23, 2012, 12:59:52 AM
Yeah, I don't think it's scummy in that way. If scum doesn't know what your role is, they have no way to tell if their fakeclaim just got them killed or not. Anything confirmable is risky enough that the claim is probably town.
No, because she could have actually blocked Irene last night, as either a Mafia Jailer (I recall this in Subterranean Animism mafia, Reimu, right?) or just a roleblocker.

Although I do fine Irene a sort of odd choice.

But it's just SO HARD for me to grasp the concept of Kaori not being scum :c
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 01:01:15 AM
Kaori constantly shows being up to date with the thread while providing minimal input on the game. Her D1 consists of leaving a vote on Eclair the entire time, expressing a willing to lynch Yuno and Irene early for absolutely nothing but their claim, and a bare bone nearly non-existant case on Eclair. D2's first post looks like a no effort prod avoidance/response which provides questions, and completely ignoring everything that has happened on D1, including her "suspicion" of Eclair. Second post consists of a vote on Esuna, while taking on the case made on her and pushing one of the worst parts of it. She also states that the "contradictions were made in her favor" yet never explains it. Also, she provides a point on Meiya which shows that she's keeping up. Last post basically restates something and a pretty bad point that looks like grasping at straws and not reading the thread. She shows signs of Active Lurking, Minimal Activity, Not Reading, and Bandwagoning, which makes sense as being scum to provide minimal connections, barely staying alive, and being an easy bus target at any moment.

WARNING SHITTON OF CUTS

I am BlackRose, Town Bodyguard. The MMO world and real world are colliding, and I can "hack" someone to prevent the spreading of the infection. Basically, I target someone, and I redirect any action they take towards me. Last night I targeted Yuno.
Reasons:
1) She looked suspicious to me still
2) Her role claim claimed to be anti-town to any informative role. If she were scum, she'd be the perfect target to send out the night kill because if any tracker/watcher saw her, they could put it on the role claim

Since I'm still alive, either I have been roleblocked and mod didn't inform me about it, or she did not send out a night kill. I'm leaning on the latter and she's basically confirmed town to me.

Cut 2 more times
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 23, 2012, 01:03:48 AM
Votecount!

BlackRose: (5) Farina, Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene, Kaori Kanzaki
Kaori Kanzaki: (5) Uesugi Kenshin, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn

Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~3 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

Stuff looks fine etc.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 01:04:37 AM
To make sure I'm understanding, if I took an action last night it would be redirected to you?  If so, why won't you talk to me?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 01:06:56 AM
So... Reverse Martyr?

There goes my YUNO IS PGO theory.  :ohdear:

Yuno would actually be the absolute easiest target to fakeclaim for this role. Outside of Role Madness games, Millers typically don't have actual roles beyond returning to scans oddly, and I don't believe that this is a Role Madness game.

Due to the nature of the game as I know it, I'm thinking there's definitely scum between these claims and Meiya's, however.

Maka is still lurking! What is that girl even getting herself up to!?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 23, 2012, 01:07:16 AM
I'm here.  Please don't hammer until close to the deadline.  I've been writing up a rather large post and I don't want to get cut by a sudden hammer again. :|  I will have it out before then.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 23, 2012, 01:10:44 AM
Friendly Neighborhood Votecount

BlackRose: (5) Farina, Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene, Kaori Kanzaki
Kaori Kanzaki: (5) Uesugi Kenshin, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
BlackRose and Kaori Kanzaki are at L-1!


Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~3 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

Stuff looks fine etc.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 01:11:36 AM
I am BlackRose, Town Bodyguard. The MMO world and real world are colliding, and I can "hack" someone to prevent the spreading of the infection. Basically, I target someone, and I redirect any action they take towards me. Last night I targeted Yuno.
Reasons:
1) She looked suspicious to me still
2) Her role claim claimed to be anti-town to any informative role. If she were scum, she'd be the perfect target to send out the night kill because if any tracker/watcher saw her, they could put it on the role claim

Since I'm still alive, either I have been roleblocked and mod didn't inform me about it, or she did not send out a night kill. I'm leaning on the latter and she's basically confirmed town to me.

Eh. Wat.

You do realize that you don't redirect your target's actions against you, but rather redirect the actions your target receives, right? You'd only have died if Yuno was targeted by scum.
Not paying attention to your own role isn't very townie.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 01:12:17 AM
Do recall that this is the game with a Paranoid Cop the One-Shot Night Vig.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 01:13:51 AM
That doesn't change that her claim contradicts itself.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 01:14:45 AM
Funny enough, I thought that I was a bodyguard. Then I read the PM again and found out I was the opposite :\

No, I redirect any action THEY TAKE to me.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 01:14:51 AM
"Taking an action" = Using one of your own night actions

Language barrier?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 01:15:11 AM
THERE ARE NO HAMMERS IN SWORD GIRLS!
That is what a normal Bodyguard does, yes, but do recall the Paranoid Cop was a Nightvig. Blackrose, can you reread your role pm and make sure that's what you do? I wouldn't be surprised if she didn't act like a bodyguard.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 01:16:49 AM
Yes, I redirect any action the target takes towards myself. I'm simply trying to find the scum and eat the NK instead of someone else. Also, do remember that we have a claimed "Godmother" and the Paranoid cop vig thing.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 01:17:34 AM
No, I redirect any action THEY TAKE to me.

This is exactly what I am pointing out. Your initial claim says this, but your night choice is chosen upon who you think would give out the night kill, which shows you thought you would redirect the night action they do rather than the ones they take =/
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 01:19:13 AM
I should be sleeping and I can't tell if this is a horrible scumslip trying to stirr up chaos or very, very, very incompetent town.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 01:19:40 AM
"Taking an action" = Using one of your own night actions

Language barrier?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 01:21:09 AM
More simply: when somebody "takes action", they are making an action, not receiving one. This is what BlackRose meant.

Uesugi is probably going to end up with like a million cuts.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 01:22:16 AM
Okay I'm finally seeing that.

If that is the exact wording of the role PM, it is particularly confusing, did you ask the mod which of the two it was referring to?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 01:24:20 AM
Cutting Uesugi because it's funny.
As long as no one cuts with a vote it's all good. We still got what, five hours to talk this out?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 01:25:44 AM
Four, actually.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 01:26:30 AM
Was going to say that but heading out to dinner right now. No, that's a paraphrase to simplify the Role PM. Anyways, out for now gonna try following on phone

2 cuts, 3 hours actually
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Sasword on March 23, 2012, 01:28:15 AM
Literally just got back home before I need to go in like 10 or so minutes. I really am very sorry about the inactivity, I've been busy and the window for my free time to post keeps getting eaten up by things.
Catching up reading right now.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 01:29:30 AM
Less than three hours.
My muddled brain and clarifications aside, it would be nice if everybody started discussing if they dislike one of the two claims enough to want a hammer on it or if they'd rather attempt a quickwagon.

I feel like it's a bad idea to leave my vote on Blackrose, but unvoting would be the same as supporting the Kaori lynch. I'm in a state where I dislike Kaori's claim for forcing information out of me, but still buy it, and Blackrose's doesn't seem horrible either. I'm leaving once and for all and entrust you all with this despite the feeling of impending doom :fail:
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Den-O on March 23, 2012, 01:30:38 AM
Also if both of you are town I'm going to cry.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 23, 2012, 01:31:50 AM
Back and feeling like shit. Apparently singing for two hours in oppressive heat makes one queasy. Who knew?

Catching up now.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Sasword on March 23, 2012, 01:42:56 AM
Ok it's looking like Kaori vs. BlackRose for the main wagons and I don't like either one as I've said before. Lynching the lurkers when they've just been mostly useless throughout the game instead of the people who've been taking advantage of it cough Uesugi cough just isn't something that appeals to me in terms of validity. As far as I can remember offhand, there isn't anyone else who isn't ok with lynching them, which gives me more reason to be apprehensive.

I'm going to stick to what little I've said and keep my vote off either of them because I do not support their lynches.
And I need to go like right now so I won't be around for deadline.

oh heck i needed to leave 3 minutes ago can't prorffread any more gotta go bye
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 23, 2012, 01:46:49 AM
Going right down the list.

Farina is extremely active D1, posting many good posts and both clear scumhunting and prodding.  Of particular interest is this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804534.html#msg804534) which contains an echo of my thoughts on the D1 Eclair wagon and some nice Meiya prods, and this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805140.html#msg805140) which is an acceptable explanation of her switch off Eclair.  D2 starts out well with soundly explained suspicion of Tenshi's ED2 actions (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806505.html#msg806505), though the RP gets a bit thick.  This (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807004.html#msg807004) is noteworthy as it's a strong stance on BlackRose; it also shows she clearly favors that lurker lynch over Kaori's.  Overall I think she's obvtown.  The only real weirdness I see from her is the distrust of Eclair but I guess that's mostly because I disagree with it.

Meiya's been a huge question mark for me all game, and her low-content posts today haven't helped matters much.  Her original vote on Eclair (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804488.html#msg804488) felt too opportunistic to be legitimate, and she follows it up with what is explained as a "mistaken" vote on Tenshi before apologizing and moving to Eclair (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805163.html#msg805163).  Rereading this stuff doesn't give me the same "townie slapfight" feeling I had yesterday, but I did think she was acting townie at the time, probably because buried in her pile of :words: she's at least putting effort into her cases and reads.  D2 content she starts to get markedly worse.  Basically nothing but a couple (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806430.html#msg806430) prods  (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806496.html#msg806496) until today, when she moved her votepark off Eclair (the vote for which I'm still not clear on) to BlackRose.  I dislike the timing of the vote but at least she's consistent, as one of the prods was towards BlackRose anyway.  The rest of the day she's been mostly minimum-content so I have a slightly worse read of her today than I did yesterday.

Yuno is the townest player in the game.  I don't think this requires much elaboration, but she posts good cases (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805273.html#msg805273), good analysis (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805110.html#msg805110), and knows what she wants and tries to get it.  All of these things are good strong town reads.  To respond to a query she raises here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807011.html#msg807011), I was not satisfied with Sayaka's quick switch to another case as soon as she got called out for the no-explanation Meiya vote.  Yuno was pretty quiet for some of today but she's made up for it, so no problems here.

Still not sure about Irene.  An extremely heavy weight hangs over her head from D1's no-content lurkfest, but Irene 2.0 is proving that at least she's not continuing the lurk strategy.  High level of detailed analysis in her reads (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806223.html#msg806223), and they continue (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806568.html#msg806568) all (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806794.html#msg806794) day (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806945.html#msg806945).  Unfortunately, I still keep coming back to Old Irene's supreme weirdness claim (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804373.html#msg804373) - I know Irene 2.0 said she had no idea what was going on, but I still feel like she's hiding something, because there's no way a townie makes that claim outside of a jester role or a crazy gambit, and Old Irene never followed up on the gambit if it was one.  She might be third party, but otherwise I'm just not seeing her as scum.

BlackRose was my preferred lynch yesterday (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805462.html#msg805462) behind Sayaka.  This one's not hard.  Lurks all through D1 and D2, posts awful (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805185.html#msg805185) things (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806423.html#msg806423) when she's not lurking.  Given that she hasn't showed up yet I suspect she's given up.  Correction, as she showed up.  Thoughts on her claim (and Kaori's) in a bit.

PART TWO FEAT: ECLAIR TENSHI MYSELF MAKA ESUNA KAORI to come after this commercial break!  (aka - I'm getting some food and getting this out there before writing the rest, writing long analysis posts makes my head hurt)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 23, 2012, 02:11:42 AM
It appears as though I have miscalculated when the deadline would occur and am, in fact, available from now until the deadline occurs.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 02:23:47 AM
Meiya, what do you think of the claims?  I'm going to wait until everyone else comments until I share my thoughts. Specifically we are waiting for Uesugi who I am slightly annoyed with for putting off commenting on the claims until later when they are the highlight of the show. >_>
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 23, 2012, 02:41:25 AM
Blugh. Of all the times to get sick, it had to be now. I wanna go to beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed ;_;

I've never been great with the role game, but neither claim stands out to me over the other. Kanzaki's claim is at least somewhat consistent with things she said on Day 1, and Irene seems like a bizarre choice for a scum faction roleblock. BlackRose's claim is harder to prove (obviously) but the results were also telegraphed in her #308, wording I found curious at the time but understand now. I think BlackRose may be a bit premature in calling Gasai "confirmed" town, since there are a number of reasons a given scum may not act in a noticeable way (something that wouldn't leave an appreciable mark like Rolecop or Framer, or something that may not act at all like the conventional Godmother), but It's possible her word choice is being influenced by Gasai's play.

Really, the thing that stands out the worst to me over the past couple of hours is Irene getting huffy about Kanzaki's claim forcing her to commit to a style of role and then vocally still hoping for a third train, which would presumably generate a third roleclaim from someone else. Scum don't only look for role info from their preferred NK targets, you know, and I know you've been looking for Farina pressure for a while, someone I'd consider to be a prime NK choice anyway.

Nothing stands out to me as needing immediate addressing from either Albarn or Kenshin, though I think the latter doesn't make enough of a distinction between scummy lurking and not-present-at-all lurking if she's still that irritated with Irene 1.0. For as much as the concluding statement is possibly-third-party and unlikely-scum.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 23, 2012, 02:47:52 AM
I do very heartily enjoy miss Rose's interpretation of my post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807113.html#msg807113) as demonstrated here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807306.html#msg807306). Is it not true that failing to produce any contributions is an action that benefits those that are aligned with forces that work against the town win condition far more than it does for the actual members of town? Does that not, in turn, make it more likely for those that participate in this behaviour to be aligned with the forces that work against the town win condition? Miss Rose's misrepresentation of my point in regards to where she had placed her vote also amuses me so. At that point few people shared miss Rose's suspicion of miss Hinanawi and miss Rose explicitly stated that she would be willing to see miss Kanzaki's lynch. This enforces my belief that miss Rose was attempting to culture an environment where chasing after lurkers would be frowned upon. I also notice that miss Rose does not actually deny any of my allegations. Instead miss Rose simply argues about the fact that I have only judged two people so far to be appearing to working with those that wish to hinder the town win condition when miss Rose herself has naught but one. In addition, miss Rose's one suspect is that which she argued so vehemently about avoiding lynching earlier in the day, a lurker by the name of Kaori Kanzaki.

As for my thoughts upon the claims, miss Yuno, I believe that whilst skimming a thought had crossed my mind that I have since lost. Allow me some to reread this section of the thread once more and I shall attempt to reclaim this lost thought.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 23, 2012, 02:48:53 AM
Ugh, I don't have time to write another post like that.  Switching to overall opinions instead of detailed analysis.  When my only available time to create posts is right before the day ends every day, it feels like I'm always a year behind every other player.

Eclair: Probably town.  Good read, decent activity levels, strong content.  Her method of scumhunting appears similar to my own, looking at her case on Meiya yesterday.  Only weirdness is she kind of completely dropped her case on Meiya; I'm not seeing how Meiya is confirmed town despite a believable claim yesterday unless I missed something obvious, so I'm not sure why this is.

Esuna: Bluh.  Like she said here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804817.html#msg804817), bad play is not always scummy.  Her case on me is pretty mediocre and she doesn't seem to like anyone attempting to deconstruct it, but she pursues it with such a flailing-armed fervor that I have a hard time believing she's scum because of it.  This one's riding the derptown wagon all the way to Oregon.

... One more thing I should address.  Esuna - calling you out on your quickhammer yesterday was not calling you scum.  I called you out on it because it was excessively bad play and I never want to see you, or anyone else, do it again.

Tenshi: Slightly less of a town read than Eclair, but still up there.  It's a little troublesome that she spent so much time yesterday talking about herself and Meiya.  Outside of that I've liked her posts (and her RP hurr hurr) for the most part.

Me: MY AWESOME THEME SONG MAKES ME TOWN (http://youtuberepeater.com/watch?v=01omDpo8Fmk)

Maka: She shows no interest (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805439.html#msg805439) in pursuing her case (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg804987.html#msg804987) on me yesterday, which I find strange given her "I would gladly like to see her lynched" wordchoice.  Her case on me today isn't any better, paraphrasing Esuna's at best and rather blatant misrep at worst.  What REALLY gets me is this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805506.html#msg805506) late yesterday, then this (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807438.html#msg807438) today.  Outside of ED1, yesterday she either had her vote parked on me or on no one, and jumped in at the last minute to go "I don't like either lynch ~but~", and is now doing the exact same thing today.  Reeks of scum sniping intent, the only difference is she refuses to drop a vote today (likely because one of them is at L-1).  Her vote will have been parked uselessly all day on me as she says she's going to miss deadline.  Don't like it.  Strong scum read.

Kaori: I don't think my opinions need elaboration here outside the claim.

asdfoijasdfoijasdf oh god I think that's everyone NEXT POST WILL HAVE THOUGHTS ON THE CLAIMS and maybe some advil.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 03:00:29 AM
[1:15:00] Ask for opinions on claims, get a bunch of 'I'll get to it later.' I hope you guys realize we're running out of later.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 23, 2012, 03:05:22 AM
I had found what I had found odd with miss Rose's post however, upon a detailed reread, this was due to a misinterpretation on my part. I suppose that the inability to prove the role would be my only qualm. As for miss Kanzaki's claim my issue with it would lie within the amount of time that it took for miss Kanzaki to produce the flavor surrounding her role.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 23, 2012, 03:07:51 AM
Okay, so.  BlackRose and Kaori have both been useless lurky and/or activelurky players all day.  If all else is equal and we're going to lynch one over the other due to their claim...

I know for a fact we've had Scum Jailers on MotK in the past.  Kaori's not getting points from me for that.  I still want to see her lynched.

... However.

I refuse to believe that BlackRose got her role completely backwards.  How does one not even read their role PM?  BlackRose said that she targeted Yuno because she thought Yuno would have sent out a night kill.  This proves that BlackRose thought her "Bodyguard" role did the exact opposite of what it actually did until her claim.

I hereby suspect BlackRose of being the scum here.  Minimal activity and poor content hint that she is a new player unfamiliar with the demands of the game, and if you consider her as scum everything adds up.  I posit that in a rush to find a fakeclaim, BlackRose picked a role that she did not have prior knowledge of, claimed with it, and realized after the fact that she completely mucked up the role.

##unvote

Willing to lynch either and not voting BlackRose yet for obvious reasons, but I would prefer to see BlackRose hang today for the above reason.  I simply can't accept that she had no idea what her role did after two full days and a submitted night action.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:11:37 AM
I'm very, very certain that BlackRose is not a new player, just a terrible one. I imagine most people, except maybe Meiya, have figured out who she is.

That said, doesn't her role actually do what she said it does? The role name is just a lie, like the nightvig being a Paranoid Cop.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 23, 2012, 03:14:34 AM
Miss Kenshin's post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807478.html#msg807478) is very interesting to myself. Allow me some time to reorganize my thoughts.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 23, 2012, 03:17:30 AM
That said, doesn't her role actually do what she said it does? The role name is just a lie, like the nightvig being a Paranoid Cop.

Yes, I redirect any action the target takes towards myself.

Nope, she clarified and said it's a regular bodyguard role.

I think we're getting down to around an hour.  @Mods: Votecount + Time left please.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:19:22 AM
Yeah, but immediately after, she said she was trying to find the scum and eat the NK. A normal bodyguard doesn't have to find scum to eat the NK, they have to find the NK target.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 23, 2012, 03:20:45 AM
Votecount

BlackRose: (5) Farina, Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene, Kaori Kanzaki
Kaori Kanzaki: (4) Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
BlackRose is at L-1!
Kaori Kanzaki is at L-2!

Not Voting: Uesugi Kenshin
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~54 minutes remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 03:21:45 AM
*facepalm*

No, I claimed my role is the opposite and redirects my target's actions to me. Also, you refuse to believe that someone could misinterpret their role PM on their first read? Also, I changed my target for the night because I realized what my role did exactly.

2 cuts orz phone posting
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:24:16 AM
BlackRose, why did you think Yuno was scummy at the end of D1?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 23, 2012, 03:26:51 AM
... jfasdofj now I'm confused too.

So it IS the opposite of a bodyguard role she's claiming? -_-;

Also, I changed my target for the night because I realized what my role did exactly.

Wait, you didn't target Yuno?  Who did you target then?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:28:37 AM
Additionally, BlackRose, why did you care how Yuno would interact with Weak Roles when there was nothing implying the existence of a weak role in the game and you already believed she was town?

I'm thinking you were setting up a fakeclaim for Weak Doctor or something similiar with Yuno as your target, but had to switch at the last moment because Yuno confirmed that a Weak role would have died after targeting her.

It would explain why you've been implying Yuno should confirmed town, when your role does not even come close to confirming her as town.

Your trail of crumbs doesn't look very consistent.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 03:29:16 AM
[0:45:00] Here I go Yukkii! Let's do our best!

Alright, I'm sorry to have kept you all waiting, but I wanted to see what people thought before busting this out.

I have a role ability and I know it did not target Blackrose.

I do believe that she targetted me however, because her question earlier about Weak Docs leads me to suspect she was trying to figure out a claim she could claim on me that would let her pull that 'is totes confirmed town to me' stick. The thing is when there are three people who can do the killing it doesn't prove anything when you don't die from one.

It's almost like confirming someone as town to yourself because you tracked them going nowhere. I'm sure that claim has never been done before either though.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:31:17 AM
##Unvote
Not letting her self-hammer this time.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 23, 2012, 03:31:59 AM
Kenshin: I imagine BlackRose had her revelation before deciding on her Night 1 Action, and that Gasai was the choice she changed her mind to, rather than a choice she changed her mind away from.

I don't like doing this, but between being sick and not getting enough sleep for work even when I wasn't sick, I have to go to bed. The roleclaims more or less balance out for me, which defaults me back to my original gameplay stance, which is still the Kanzaki vote.

Cut by stuff wait what argh I have to read this before I leave don't I
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:32:41 AM
Or, maybe that's not necessary.

Does anybody have anything else to say, particularly Uesugi?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Kiva-la on March 23, 2012, 03:34:22 AM
... Okay, that's what I was thinking.  Yuno crumbed that ability earlier.

Farina, I think we can afford a few more minutes to let everyone else chime in.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 03:34:53 AM
I will admit this is possible without Blackrose being scum. The Weak part more then cinches it to me though. The fact that certain people are treating this like a dichotomy, that one of them HAS to be scum, does not sit well with me at all. They could both be town with these claims. That and the fact that despite the weird belief that people were carrying NO ONE MOVED THEIR VOTE AT ALL makes today sit really badly with me and these wagons are going to be combed like precious silk threads.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 23, 2012, 03:35:40 AM
Farina: I don't know. I might. I'm having a little trouble internally parsing what's being said here but I do remember there was a Weak Roles question from BlackRose so let me go back and look at it again before going over what you two are saying again.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 23, 2012, 03:36:37 AM
Votecount

BlackRose: (4) Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene, Kaori Kanzaki
Kaori Kanzaki: (4) Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
BlackRose is at L-2!
Kaori Kanzaki is at L-2!

Not Voting: Uesugi Kenshin, Farina
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

~38 minutes remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=23&year=2012&hour=00&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

No Majority = No Lynch!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:37:37 AM
I think it's very likely one of the two wagons and Meiya is scum just because Reverse Martyr + Jailer + Bulletproof is pretty crazy. Reverse Martyr and Jailer can both clear people with 1 scum left. Bulletproof is overpowered if the RNG Goddess wills it to be.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 23, 2012, 03:41:56 AM
Oh, okay, what's going on makes sense now.

I have nothing further to ask/say that's relevant to the immediate issue. In light of this turn of events, I guess it won't kill me to stick around and wait to see if BlackRose has a response if the deadline is in less than 40 minutes. (No promises I won't eject early, but I'll at least try to warn if that happens.)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 03:45:12 AM
If you do eject early I'd appreciate if you moved your vote so Farina can hammer appropriately after. Or Blackrose can kill herself, robbing me of another glorious hammer time.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 23, 2012, 03:50:21 AM
~25 minutes left
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 23, 2012, 03:50:25 AM
If BlackRose hasn't produced something by the top of the hour and I'm still awake, I'll switch my vote and go to bed then.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:55:00 AM
After Yuno and I both treated Sayaka's claim like she had just claimed scum? Really?

How does this explain why Yuno wasn't actually redirected?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 03:56:36 AM
I have no idea if my action succeeded, as the mod didn't clarify that. That said, I don't know if the mod told Yuno if she wasn't redirected or not.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 03:58:18 AM
Genius. I have been wrong all this time.  Let me repent my sins by claiming cop vig weak doc redirecting bodyguard . 17 minutes left, hammer now please.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 03:59:45 AM
Why didn't you ask the mod whether your target would be told they were redirected or not before claiming? That's pretty important, since you could mess up investigative roles.

Your entire defense is based off of vague "what if"s, and one of these should have already been solved. I'm willing to revote you in 5 minutes if nothing amazing happens.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 23, 2012, 04:00:07 AM
15 minutes
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 04:01:16 AM
Well enjoy having your no effort Kaori D3 then.

I'll toss scum as Meiya, Uesegi, and Kaori. Now watch as everyone ignores me.

Cut: I'll ask, sure.

Cut: Mod replied they won't know if they're redirected or not
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: DiEnd on March 23, 2012, 04:03:40 AM
Maybe I should have clarified that I wanted to see something good, not...that.

##Unvote
##Vote: BlackRose


And I'm out.

Fake Edit: Gasai seems awfully sure she didn't end up targeting you, so, uh, yeah.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 04:04:31 AM
HAMMER
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 23, 2012, 04:05:08 AM
Uhm, how to put this. If we'd actually targetted Blackrose, she would know.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 23, 2012, 04:05:15 AM
10 minutes remaining.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 04:05:30 AM
That's not a hammer, you didn't self-vote yet.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: OOO on March 23, 2012, 04:06:47 AM
Well, there's only one thing left to do.

Come on everybody smile smile smile
Fill my heart up with sunshine sunshine
All I really need's a smile smile smile
From these happy friends of mine.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: W on March 23, 2012, 04:07:30 AM
##Unvote
##Vote BlackRose (L-0)

Everybody's in favor of a hammer, I offered to hammer earlier and there's little more to be said.

Apologies to Uesugi if I end up cutting her.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 23, 2012, 04:08:00 AM
That's hammer.

No more talking.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 23, 2012, 04:09:15 AM
Final Votecount

BlackRose: (6) Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene, Kaori Kanzaki, Tenshi Hinanawi, Farina - LYNCH!
Kaori Kanzaki: (3) Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Eclair Martinozzi
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
Not Voting: Uesugi Kenshin
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

BlackRose, Town Bodyguard, was corrupted Day 2!

You have about 24 hours to send in night actions to all three mods. Please don't hold off till the deadline. Additionally, everyone in the game must PM me during the night as an activity check.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Night 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 24, 2012, 02:31:06 AM
All night actions have been received. Day will start in about half an hour to an hour.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Night 2
Post by: Conqueror on March 24, 2012, 03:13:50 AM
(http://i43.tinypic.com/33ndwl1.gif)
"Oh...I've saved up so much money... ...Florina... I'm sorry...Sister..."
Farina, Town Framer, fell in battle Night 2! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bdrXc5JxHo)

Day 3 has begun! You have 72 hours.
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=26&year=2012&hour=23&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 03:21:20 AM
(http://r27.imgfast.net/users/2716/24/86/48/avatars/16-51.jpg)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 24, 2012, 04:01:57 AM
The following is written in the mindset that Kanzaki is scum, because I still think she is.

Looking at how yesterday's wagons shook down, I am the least pleased with how Mitsurugi handled the situation. At the risk of stating the obvious, scum went into the situation knowing BlackRose would flip town. In reading Mitsurugi's #271, it's a lot (a lot) of fancy words that show disdain for both BlackRose and Kanzaki, but unless my eyes really started to atrophy in reading it all, I couldn't find a "this is why I'm voting for BlackRose instead of Kanzaki" anywhere in it. (I realize I was overly succinct on that same issue, but at least I made some sort of distinction and tried to explain it as Farina kept asking about it.) It also came right after Gasai switched to Kanzaki, which means it could be an effort to keep the trains close in the hopes the winds would ultimately blow BlackRose's way. Anyway, the Kanzaki comments without the distinction as to why BlackRose was worse could very well have been because Mitsurugi wanted to avoid both voting for her partner and looking like she didn't want to vote for her partner. If that makes any sense.

I'm also not quite sure I like Kenshin's confusion regarding BlackRose's role and the way it played out in the thread, given how gung-ho she was about it. It's not as bad as Mitsurugi's approach because maybe it was just an honest mistake under deadline pressure, but it still doesn't sit well with me.

Irene is a little of Column A, a little of Column B in that she's generally guilty of both of the above things but not quite to the same degree as either Mitsurugi or Kenshin. Her indecision on the lurkers and her confusion surrounding BlackRose's claim feel more genuine. I do note she said in #272 that she wanted to see a BlackRose post before deciding but then went ahead and decided six hours later anyway in #285, however. What changed in the meantime? (Also, just as a general gameplay thing, LAL is far more applicable after D1 than on D1. On D1 there are far too many potential outside circumstances to really accuse someone of trying to lurk through the game.)

Obviously a lot of the above loses oomph if Kanzaki turns out to be town, but that's what the opening disclaimer is for. If Kanzaki DOES turns out to be town then my suspicions would lower on Mitsurugi and Kenshin and rise a little on Irene due to what I pointed out in #378. I can easily see scum "reluctantly" getting involved in a double-town lurker dichotomy while trying to get lots of info out of it.

I give Albarn a null-tell pass for holding her position because she had repeatedly disapproved of lurker voting and her vote would have been the hammer if she had switched regardless of who she switched to. Nothing else really stood out to me in my re-read; everyone else either went where they had telegraphed they would go or made a clear decision if they hadn't shown one already.

##Vote: Kaori Kanzaki for the same reasons I've gone over in the past. I still think she's the scummiest thing on the table.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 04:18:12 AM
Okay. All forms of LAL are apparently going to catch town this game. As with previous times fakeclaiming has been the raeg, the key is finding the people who believed the claims without reason. At least clinging to this hope keeps me from killing you all in a blind rage.

Kaori needs to claim her target for a partial clear.

Reading words for hours have hurt my head so I'm going to stare at vote counts for a sec.

Quote
Day 1 Final Votecount
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (4) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Sayaka Miki
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (7) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai, Meiya Mitsurugi, Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy - LYNCH!
Indecisive as Fuck Votecount

BlackRose: (2) Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Uesugi Kenshin
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Esuna Busy: (2) Eclair Martinozzi, Kaori Kanzaki
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (2) BlackRose, Farina
Pre-Claim Day 2 End

BlackRose: (5) Farina, Meiya Mitsurugi, Yuno Gasai, Quicksword Irene, Kaori Kanzaki
Kaori Kanzaki: (5) Uesugi Kenshin, Esuna Busy, BlackRose, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Maka Albarn
(Only change for day end is Tenshi switches to Blackrose.

Current notes:
- Kaori Kanzaki, Tenshi Hinanawi and Uesugi Kenshin are probably not a scumteam.
- Uesugi is either trying to incriminate themselves really badly or isn't scum.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 05:51:56 AM
Our vote will probably come as a surprise to people considering our earlier stance on this.

##Vote: Tenshi Hinanawi


Here are Tenshi's reactions to the claims.

Sayaka:
I can't stay here any longer, my heavenly bed beckons. I'll admit I was ready to switch to Miki to do my best to secure a lynch, but with the claim that cut me just now and needing to go to bed, I'm gonna stay on Meiya.

Wish the claim had come earlier, but nothing to be done about it now.

BlackRose:
Blugh. Of all the times to get sick, it had to be now. I wanna go to beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed ;_;

I've never been great with the role game, but neither claim stands out to me over the other. Kanzaki's claim is at least somewhat consistent with things she said on Day 1, and Irene seems like a bizarre choice for a scum faction roleblock. BlackRose's claim is harder to prove (obviously) but the results were also telegraphed in her #308, wording I found curious at the time but understand now. I think BlackRose may be a bit premature in calling Gasai "confirmed" town, since there are a number of reasons a given scum may not act in a noticeable way (something that wouldn't leave an appreciable mark like Rolecop or Framer, or something that may not act at all like the conventional Godmother), but It's possible her word choice is being influenced by Gasai's play.

Really, the thing that stands out the worst to me over the past couple of hours is Irene getting huffy about Kanzaki's claim forcing her to commit to a style of role and then vocally still hoping for a third train, which would presumably generate a third roleclaim from someone else. Scum don't only look for role info from their preferred NK targets, you know, and I know you've been looking for Farina pressure for a while, someone I'd consider to be a prime NK choice anyway.

Nothing stands out to me as needing immediate addressing from either Albarn or Kenshin, though I think the latter doesn't make enough of a distinction between scummy lurking and not-present-at-all lurking if she's still that irritated with Irene 1.0. For as much as the concluding statement is possibly-third-party and unlikely-scum.
Kenshin: I imagine BlackRose had her revelation before deciding on her Night 1 Action, and that Gasai was the choice she changed her mind to, rather than a choice she changed her mind away from.

I don't like doing this, but between being sick and not getting enough sleep for work even when I wasn't sick, I have to go to bed. The roleclaims more or less balance out for me, which defaults me back to my original gameplay stance, which is still the Kanzaki vote.

Cut by stuff wait what argh I have to read this before I leave don't I

The first has instant belief of a cop claim and a declaration to stick where she is before Meiya or anyone else had offered a counter-claim. There was no question in her mind that this was anything but a trueclaim, but there wasn't any reason to believe it yet. It felt like she was in a rush to clear and go.

I also have issues with her declaration the Day 1 wagon was smeared with the need to lynch someone (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806041.html#msg806041). Everyone on the wagon had taken time to justify their votes either through dislike of play or suspicion of claim. I didn't think much of it at the time but I also didn't say the wagon was unreadable, only that it had contained people I thought were town at the time. Declaring a day's efforts wasteful is a good scum tactic to keep us from seeing how bad a wagon was.

The second has the equivalent of saying she believes both roleclaims but one of them must be scum. For what reason? There is no reason to have dismissed the possiblity they were both telling the truth. Instead she phrases it as a false dichotomy where one of us must be the liar. It also seems off that you make a case on Kaori and forget to ask her who she targetted last night.

It's also my opinion that when someone is nightkilled screaming someone else's name all day that said person just might be scum.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 24, 2012, 06:10:03 AM
Another day, another votecount.

Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Tenshi Hinanawi
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Yuno Gasai

Not Voting: All of the other reindeer.

With 9 alive, it takes 5 of you to lynch.

69 hours remaining.

Countdown timer. For all the cool people. (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=26&year=2012&hour=23&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 24, 2012, 06:47:33 AM
In regards to the Day 1 claim, I was in a rush to go to bed. 4/5 days this week I've sacrificed sleep (and therefore work productivity) for this game, and that was one of them. (In before AtE accusations) I had already staying up later that night than I wanted to, and my options at that time were to not switch to the cop claim without thinking about it and go to bed, switch to the cop claim without thinking about it and go to bed, or sacrifice more sleep time waiting for a counter-claim, dwelling on them both, and making work the next day suck even more than it was already going to. Ultimately I think I made the right choice. (And before you ask, note the hour difference between my quoted post from the end of Day 1 and the end of Day 2 - this is why I was willing to stick around a little bit longer for the latter, physical condition aside.)

In regards to yesterday's claims, I'm not quite sure what you're getting at (especially in your use of "one of us must be the liar" - who is "us"?). My mindset with the roleclaims was that both of them looked plausible, and both may have been functionally truthful, but neither of them were anything close to the level of "if this claim is true, this person is town", so I had to fall back on scumhunting, and even with the roleclaims I didn't think anyone else looked worse at the time. Kanzaki still looked the scummiest to me at that point even with the claim, so I couldn't internally justify moving off of her at the time when I originally thought I was going to bed.

Speaking of Kanzaki, after what happened at the end of Day 2, do you really think she won't claim who she targeted if she's not asked?

In regards to the Miki wagon, the last two votes were an Albarn vote where she had made a distinction but still clearly wasn't happy and a Busy vote after spending time earlier talking about how she didn't want a Miki lynch. Even with Busy's vote being influenced by the fakeclaim, I'd still say there was a reasonable amount of "gotta lynch someone" present. I will admit that I mentally lumped Mitsurugi's "not me over me" vote in with them when describing the wagon, though, which made the assessment end up broader than it should have been.

There's nothing I can really do toward the nightkill specualtion except point out that I think Farina was a reasonable NK choice regardless of whatever the scumteam is.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 07:07:05 AM
* one of them. Specifically one of Blackrose or Kaori.
Speaking of Kanzaki, after what happened at the end of Day 2, do you really think she won't claim who she targeted if she's not asked?
Yes. After how difficult it was for her to understand what we wanted her to claim there is no reason to assume she would helpfully volunteer information needed for our discussions. As scum she would have no reason to either. Why do you assue your suspect will be forthright with information?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 08:20:07 AM
Request to Meiya.  Drop the RP completely.  I'm sorry to be such a party pooper, but your posts are really hard to read, and I want some clarity while I'm doubting all my reads.  Say everything you have to say in simple sentences in the easiest way to read possible please.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 24, 2012, 09:14:31 AM
I am still highly suspicious of miss Kanzaki's behaviours. As I mentioned within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807113.html#msg807113) miss Kanzaki's actions are filled with contradictions and hypocrisies. Of particular note is the point I presented in regards to how much faith miss Kanzaki is able to place upon her own case when it has been entirely derived from the thoughts of others and how miss Kanzaki has failed to provide an answer when contrasted with an important piece of miss Kanzaki's "case" upon miss Busy being based around how miss Kanzaki thought that miss Busy did not believe in her own arguments.

Now as I mentioned yesterday here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807480.html#msg807480), even if I had not the time to organize my thoughts, miss Kenshin's post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807478.html#msg807478) highly interested me. Miss Kenshin felt it appropriate to use miss Rose's supposed confusion in regards to her own role as her reason to vote for miss Rose. Others pointed out to miss Kenshin that her analysis in regards to miss Rose's role was flawed. However miss Kenshin's response was to ignore these words of advice and to instead call for others to speak upon the subject whilst leaving her own vote upon miss Rose. Miss Kenshin clearly stated within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807478.html#msg807478) that she believed miss Kanzaki's claim to do her no favors so I ask why was it that miss Kenshin failed to move her vote when the basis for miss Kenshin choosing to place her vote upon miss Rose rather than miss Kenshin was proved to be nothing but an misinterpretation on miss Kenshin's part? In addition I believe miss Uesugi to be a large offender in regards to over-dramatizing the timing of miss Busy's vote on miss Miki during the first day, though this has been covered in depth by others before me and I feel not the need to bore you all by reiterating their thoughts.
##Vote Uesugi Kenshin

I have heard your request, miss Gasai, and will attempt to be more concise with my words from this point onwards. I am sorry to say, however, that in order for myself to grant you this personal favor I shall have to forget my prior arrangement with yourself and refer to Yukiteru as "Yukkie" once more.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 24, 2012, 10:01:06 AM
Quote
I am sorry to say, however, that in order for myself to grant you this personal favor I shall have to forget my prior arrangement with yourself and refer to Yukiteru as "Yukkie" once more.

When was this arrangement? I can't recall you ever talking about Yukiteru and Gasai making an arrangement with you. Did you just slip between the scum QuickTopic and this thread?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 24, 2012, 10:05:45 AM
I am afraid not, miss Martinozzi. I was referring to what miss Gasai said here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805169.html#msg805169) and how I have since refrained from referring to Yukiteru as "Yukkie".
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 10:17:55 AM
My diary carries no mention of this blasphemous Yukkie. >:< For the sake of clarity you are permitted to do so without being stabbed repeatedly with knives until Yukkii stops looking.

Meiya, if you had to name a third scum whom would you suspect?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 24, 2012, 10:44:09 AM
Ah, now I see it. It was at the start. Geez, here I was getting excited for nothing!

In any case, I'm not sure I get the case on Tenshi. The dichotomy doesn't strike me as entirely hard, given everyone had cemented the Town lynch to be on either of BlackRose or Kaori. It would be a right miracle to have moved the lynch onto someone else at the time, so judging by whoever is scummier by the end of it, I don't have problems with Tenshi's conduct much. I, likewise, decided Kaori seemed more scummy to me than BlackRose when moving my vote.

In any case, the above post may indicate where my suspicions lie and they have not moved since Day 1 much. I was willing to let up on Meiya yesterday because multiple people concluded I was tunnelling and I decided to look at others besides Meiya, thinking that if she were the scum I think she is, there would have been pos that provided further evidence; posts which, I believed, would be easier to come by if I did not focus my entire Day on her and turn it into another back-and-forth.

Then Day 2 happened and Meiya provided nearly nothing. I reiterate that Meiya has done nothing but misconstrue others to provide her case. Examples such as:
Quote
Firstly, I must ask how miss Martinozzi's thoughts on both miss Gasai and miss Irene have changed. Miss Martinozzi first voted for miss Gasai within this post due to miss Gasai's miller claim. The fact that miss Gasai has claimed to be a miller has not changed. Does this mean that your attitude towards miss Gasai has also failed to change? The same can be said of miss Irene who has, from miss Martinozzi's perspective, claimed to be aligned with anti-town forces in this post. There have been no actions to change this fact so this leaves me to wonder why miss Martinozzi would not be voting for one that she believes to have outright claimed to be aligned with forces that work against the town. Miss Martinozzi claims in this post that she wishes not to leave her vote in a place that will serve no purpose however if miss Martinozzi truly believed miss Irene to be aligned with those that are not working towards town's win condition then would the vote not be serving a purpose simply by being upon miss Gasai? I ask why miss Martinozzi was so quick to give up on her vote on miss Gasai.
To which my response was:
Quote
If I didn't mention Gasai during any of my previous posts, it's because I didn't find anything in her posts that really felt scummy enough to talk about. Complaining I do not jump on every little bit and try to spin it into scum is naive and you need to pick up training again. That is not how you catch Galette spies.
And near Day 1 end she claimed:
Quote
In this post you state "If I didn't mention Gasai during any of my previous posts, it's because I didn't find anything in her posts that really felt scummy enough to talk about. Complaining I do not jump on every little bit and try to spin it into scum is naive and you need to pick up training again. That is not how you catch Galette spies." May I ask why you said this. I believe that my argument regarding the hypocrisy surrounding accusing miss Gasai of performing untelegraphed actions was directed at miss Miki, not you. Perhaps you, miss Martinozzi, are burdened with a guilty conscience?
I cannot see how she can misconstrue her cases like this continuously and still not get flak from the rest of Town. There is a distinct difference between bad play and horrible play, and I consider her wordiness and extravagant attitude more of a way to hide the true meaning of her words than anything else. Continuous inattentiveness towards what she claims is Scum is horrible.

That she lurked through the entirety of Day 2 with a few exceptions further raises my heckles, and I just don't like how she picked up her Day 1 Eclair case when most of it honestly was her attempting to discredit my case on her by continuously spinning the truth around like a baby. She voted me for reasons posted at the time of her switch to Sayaka, which is this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805484.html#msg805484).

She doesn't say why her actions aren't scummy: she returns a question. This is avoiding answering to stuff and it is simply not Townie to avoid answering stuff and justifying yourself. I showed time and again that her vote on Tenshi was, at the time, due to solely one question related to a gross misinterpretation of Tenshi's case on Maka Albarn in the early-game, and it strikes me as a gruesomely inattentive attitude to hold. That she claims Farina was redeemable yet Tenshi was not, despite the entire vote being based on a question oozing with inattentiveness, and then refuses to give further clear answer on it, is the entire crux of why I believe her vote was insincere and Meiya has not been scumhunting. Things like
Quote
I also believe that statements such as "You had time to talk about Gasai's blurb on BlackRose, surely you have time to talk about why the person you're voting is a Galette spy." are highly provocative and serve no purpose other than to smear one's name.
are further deflections to answer to stuff. Highly provocative it is, because I want Meiya to finally make clear why I am Scum, and she has yet to provide so.

Quote
As we are, once again, pressed for time I shall temporarily cease diverting my energies towards miss Martinozzi

This is of course a riot because Meiya has never diverted any energies to providing a case on why I am Scum. This post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg805163.html#msg805163) has her voting me, and it contains two arguments:
1) Eclair's case on [Meiya] is contradictory.
2) How have your thoughts on Gasai and Irene changed, Eclair?

That is not a scum case to hold on to to Day 2.

Quote
Miss Martinozzi also states that: "This isn't enough reason to vote Tenshi over Farina for me and I want her to make that abundantly clear." I also find the notion that miss Martinozzi feels that she has the authority to determine what appears to be ill-motivated behaviour to others to be laughable. Especially when one considers the fact that miss Martinozzi complains within the very same post about how she cannot do anything if others do not agree with her viewpoints in regards to miss Irene's behaviours.

This is another example of deflection I find when I read back to the early game. If you read her post voting Tenshi over Farina, I believe there is sufficient reason to at the very least ask why Farina is less suspicious than Tenshi, and returning the answer "Haha, you have no authority" to that is at best unhelpful Townie behaviour but likely Scum dancing around the issue.

When I look at her only real post on Day 2 here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807113.html#msg807113), the case on BlackRose is needlessly wordy and can be condensed easily:
1) BlackRose provided nothing. This is disadvantageous to Town's win condition.
2) BlackRose continuing to provide nothing shows she intends to continue this tactic that benefits only herself.
3) BlackRose defends lurkers and says Tenshi is suspicious for voting lurkers, while BlackRose herself agrees to Kanzaki's lynch.
4) BlackRose says attacking lurkers is lazy and then says she'd like to see Kanzaki lynched. Question.
5) "I refuse to accept miss Rose's reasons for avoiding placing her vote upon miss Kanzaki."

To be sure, there is no explanation why these actions are scummy: lurking itself is not scummy, and if it is then Meiya is scummy for lurking through Day 2. A tactic that benefits only oneself isn't so much scummy as third party, and there's the omission of how continuing that tactic would be hazardous, considering everyone harped on her for not providing. I cannot see how Meiya pressed BlackRose continuing to post in the way everyone criticized as something scummy. It's honestly just dumb.

Number 3) is another inattentive and gross misrepresentation of the truth. I believe BlackRose adequately explained herself there. Number 4) is almost the same, except that Meiya poses a question attached to the observation, rather than a conclusion or opinion. I have never liked people who avoid posting their own opinions.

Number 5 is a blatant admission that the vote is at least partially fuelled by BlackRose not attacking a lurker as her top priority, given BlackRose's reasons were that attacking a lurker would be extremely lazy considering you can put your vote there and call it a day.

Her Day 3 post has no mention of me which is baffling considering I was her sole aim for the better part of Days 1 and 2.

All things considered, I stand by the idea that Meiya is scummy and would like to see her lynched, or else given sufficient reason to believe she isn't Scum enough to want someone else over her.

And now back to rereading Busy.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 24, 2012, 10:44:27 AM
##Vote: Meiya Mitsurugi, forgot my vote.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 24, 2012, 11:34:34 AM
I am uncertain so as to my third suspect, miss Gasai. I believe it is most likely to be miss Busy, but I require more time in regards to this matter.

Miss Martinozzi, I had stopped addressing you and directed my efforts elsewhere because I have acknowledged that I was at fault in our exchanges. Perhaps if I had had more time during the second day I would have realized this sooner, but alas.

I will, however, argue against miss Martinozzi's argument that my thoughts revolving around miss Rose were not genuine.
-Miss Rose was providing no content. I found this behaviour to be unacceptable. Being in possession of a grand total of four posts up until the point where one is threatened by a modkill caused me to believe that miss Rose's tactics were reminiscent of scum attempting to abuse the MotK meta of allowing lurkers to live.
-I, personally, felt miss Rose's case on miss Hinanawi to be nothing more than a placeholder whilst the only read that miss Rose remained convinced of was that on miss Kanzaki, a lurker. As I assume my thoughts to be true, it appeared to myself that miss Rose was doing what she was calling lazy within the very same post, looking solely for the lynch of a lurker.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 24, 2012, 12:15:15 PM
I'm avoiding reading the D3 posts before I'm properly woken up and functional, mostly because I'm heavily questioning my own reads in regards of textwall people I've been reading as town after seeing Farina's flip, namely Eclair, Tenshi and Yuno.

So for now I'll just ask what's obviously bugging me.

How in the hell does a town framer make any sense?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 24, 2012, 02:22:24 PM
Quote
How in the hell does a town framer make any sense?

Bastard mod setup where Townies get pro-Scum power roles. Given Cop-Who-Is-Actually-Vig, Yuno's claimed Miller, BlackRose's Bodyguard-Who-Actually-Misdirects and a claimed Godmother-Actually-Bulletproof, Irene 1.0's "my role is 50% scum 50% anti-town..." I'm afraid Conqueror seriously thinks that 'it is not bastard mod if you tell the players it is.'

In any case, why does a Farina flip shake your belief?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 2
Post by: capt. h on March 24, 2012, 02:27:45 PM
Needs more votecount

Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Tenshi Hinanawi
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Meiya Mitsurugi: (1) Eclair Martinozzi

Not Voting: More than half of you.

With 9 alive, it takes 5 of you to lynch.

~60.5 hours remaining.

Countdown timers are for gun girls. None of you are gun girls, are ya? (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=26&year=2012&hour=23&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 24, 2012, 02:27:54 PM
Quote
Miss Martinozzi, I had stopped addressing you and directed my efforts elsewhere because I have acknowledged that I was at fault in our exchanges
I kinda missed that acknowledgement in the stream of words and will look for it then. If so, consider the point withdrawn. Still stands everything else.

Your clarified reasoning towards BlackRose are at least much more acceptable, but how was BlackRose's content worse than Kaori? You specifically voted BlackRose over Kaori, so I'd like to know why Kaori was better in your eyes.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 24, 2012, 02:47:25 PM
@MOD: Would you announce LYLO, Potential LYLO and MYLO?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 24, 2012, 03:05:50 PM
I als need a response from mod to a different issue before posting what I've written up.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 24, 2012, 03:06:06 PM
also* blegh.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 24, 2012, 03:32:55 PM
Gasai: Regardless of her alignment, Kanzaki would be beyond stupid to try to get away with not talking about her night actions when she was a hair's breadth away from being lynched last night and it was her claim that stayed the aggressive hands up until the BlackRose nonsense. There's putting forth no effort and then there's having the brain of a gnat, and I've only ever accused her of the former. I would assume my vote for her shows her that at least some of the wagon against her yesterday still isn't satisfied, so I have no idea why she would think she could try to waltz on by without being transparent (to use Irene's terminology) about her night action.

Thank you for the clarification on the "you" thing, though it doesn't really change my response since I was trying to respond to as general a question as possible.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 24, 2012, 04:18:02 PM
Other stuff, shortly before I have to disappear for a while.

I kinda missed that acknowledgement in the stream of words and will look for it then. If so, consider the point withdrawn. Still stands everything else.

For the record, I can't find this either. Mitsurugi's switch off of Martinozzi in #271 was spurned by being "pressed for time" and doesn't appear to say "Okay, Martinozzi, I was wrong about X, Y, and Z." #273 chalks her lack of a follow-up due to lacking time from outside circumstances rather than believing Martinozzi addressed her issues to her satisfaction. #294 is the same way.

So...where's the acquiescence, exactly? This makes the Martinozzi vote look even more like a votepark than before.

I also noticed Mitsurugi addressed the Kenshin post she found "interesting" at the end of Day 2 by blasting Kenshin. Funny thing is that I had figured at the time that Mitsurugi may have found it interesting because maybe she made the same mistake Kenshin made, since Mitsurugi was also voting BlackRose at the time and may have wanted to push her further. Note that she didn't elaborate on why it interested her at the time - not even to say "Kenshin, something's up with your post" to make it clear who the post made her think less of. Which means it could basically be used to spin a thought process in whichever fashion Mitsurugi found convenient later.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 04:38:04 PM
The role names are like anti-town versions of their real roles. She wouldn't actually be a Framer, but I can't guess what a Framer would relate to. I would have guessed Jailkeeper, but she didn't counterclaim Kaori so \0_o)/

Eclair, if you believe Meiya is scum again you probably shouldn't include her role in your list. :p

To respond more directly to Tenshi, specifically her posts today: Can you explain why your suspicions of Uesugi would decrease if Kaori flipped town, when Uesugi had been voting Kaori since the start of the day? Can you also explain why Uesugi being confused about a town's roleclaim and believing they were lying is scummy?

Regarding terrible sleeping habits which I can hardly condone because sleep is the most important thing to me: The nature of my problem is more that you refrained from commenting overmuch before the claim happened. It didn't seem like you were fighting hard to oppose the lynch to push your own target and when the claim went down you just said obv true and left it at that.

I also note the next day you refrained from commenting on Meiya's claim at all. You never justify why you dropped your suspicions. At all. There isn't a single mention of her Day 1 after that. This post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807005.html#msg807005) contains your only mention of her that day, in a post that talks majorly about Uesugi and Maka and it's easy to miss the paragraph about how Meiya is voteparking. (You even comment that your current suspect brought up a good point about it.) You also never follow up on these comments and they aren't included in your accusations directed at her today. In my opinion it seems like you're taking each day seperately and bringing up the things people have done lately instead of making your reads based on fluid continuous thought processes.

Also, because you add on the Kaori vote on the end like that I can't tell why you're voting her over Meiya at this point, who it sounds like you have a much better case on. Your cut emphasizes this point to me.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 24, 2012, 05:23:41 PM
The following is written in the mindset that Kanzaki is scum, because I still think she is.

Looking at how yesterday's wagons shook down, I am the least pleased with how Mitsurugi handled the situation. At the risk of stating the obvious, scum went into the situation knowing BlackRose would flip town. In reading Mitsurugi's #271, it's a lot (a lot) of fancy words that show disdain for both BlackRose and Kanzaki, but unless my eyes really started to atrophy in reading it all, I couldn't find a "this is why I'm voting for BlackRose instead of Kanzaki" anywhere in it. (I realize I was overly succinct on that same issue, but at least I made some sort of distinction and tried to explain it as Farina kept asking about it.) It also came right after Gasai switched to Kanzaki, which means it could be an effort to keep the trains close in the hopes the winds would ultimately blow BlackRose's way. Anyway, the Kanzaki comments without the distinction as to why BlackRose was worse could very well have been because Mitsurugi wanted to avoid both voting for her partner and looking like she didn't want to vote for her partner. If that makes any sense.

I'm also not quite sure I like Kenshin's confusion regarding BlackRose's role and the way it played out in the thread, given how gung-ho she was about it. It's not as bad as Mitsurugi's approach because maybe it was just an honest mistake under deadline pressure, but it still doesn't sit well with me.

Irene is a little of Column A, a little of Column B in that she's generally guilty of both of the above things but not quite to the same degree as either Mitsurugi or Kenshin. Her indecision on the lurkers and her confusion surrounding BlackRose's claim feel more genuine. I do note she said in #272 that she wanted to see a BlackRose post before deciding but then went ahead and decided six hours later anyway in #285, however. What changed in the meantime? (Also, just as a general gameplay thing, LAL is far more applicable after D1 than on D1. On D1 there are far too many potential outside circumstances to really accuse someone of trying to lurk through the game.)

I voiced why I thought neither of the lurkers were scum at the time, yes, but seeing how the day was definitely not going anywhere else by that point (as proved by the nigh-zero frickin' reaction to my case on Farina and my later restating of my case to clarify why I'd rather lynch her than either of the lurkers), I placed my vote on Blackrose to get a final confirmation through claims since given the amount of content I just could not be completely sure. You guys still had almost 12 hours at that point, while I only had 6 (which later stretched into 8 and a half despite losing precious sleep).
I really can't defend my LD2 stance as anything other than "shit, I'm pretty sure neither of them are scum" -> "...but if they are letting them go would be horrible" -> "I want their claims to make sure" -> "Okay I'm pretty sure neither of them are scum but I'm already going to be running tomorrow with less than 5 hours of sleep and nobody gives a damn about my case, less even a quickwagon, so let's just hope that I screwed up when announcing my wagon intentions for the day and one them got themselves a good scum fakeclaim, meaning one of them does flip scum in the end". It didn't help that Blackrose dissapeared for 15 minutes just when I asked her to claim.
This is WIFOM but I'd find it ridiculous that I engaged in such questionable behaviour instead of just going to bed early if I were scum given, the amount of town reads I was receiving throughout the whole day and perfectly being able to get away with it due to GMT differences.

Regarding stuff other than trying to explain myself, I mirror Yuno's sentiments regarding your condemning Kaori way too early, given that her role is confirmable if her target is town interested in finally clearing her and redirecting scumhunting towards other objectives. Not only that, but your post in general comes across as... scummy. This thought starts when you completely disregard any possibility of citing earlier mentions on how Kaori is scum despite however clear they were yesterday, specially after how many people commented on how they bought her claim. This translates into no scumhunt effort and picking up what was a valid case back then without adding anything new to it (just in case the validity of the case where to be discredited) to get a vote on a plausible lynch. It reads further into your first three paragraphs on Meiya, Kenshin and I being given particular importance in comparison, but I can understand all the points in those so I will disregard that part of it for now.

I give Albarn a null-tell pass for holding her position because she had repeatedly disapproved of lurker voting and her vote would have been the hammer if she had switched regardless of who she switched to. Nothing else really stood out to me in my re-read; everyone else either went where they had telegraphed they would go or made a clear decision if they hadn't shown one already.

I don't like this. Maka's D2 behaviour throughout was highly questionable, and not hammering when I had already openly expressed my dislike of something like that happening without very, very thorough justification was a given, and cutting her slack early isn't good in my book when she certainly needs to get in here and do something.

Have I mentioned how I dislike that Tenshi is the only one openly admitting they dislike my behaviour? I can definitely understand how it would be questionable, and would've expected more people to see the same thing, and yet I'm stuck with reading her as scummier now despite that, which could be interpreted as a blatant OMGUS. I voiced my intent to read her closer after throwing her a town read, but I admit I never really did that since I was so absorbed in trying to get people to move throughout all D2. Despite all this, I dislike how Farina dying after her #378 could be a set-up to get us to duel today and disregard everything else, so I need to reread her after this.


Hell, Uesugi seems to have already found out about my identity, given how he commented on MotK not being the most active, and since scum might attempt to treat me as a regular I'll just go ahead and say stuff since having meta on me is outright impossible. It's my first time playing something other than epicmafia or a newbgame in a different language, and reading through the recent MotK games has quickly made me realize I'm weak to certain wording styles and highly dislike rereading due to paranoia over it, and that I most likely won't do the rereading despite promises unless I find myself forced to. Okay that sounds like lack of town effort, but I've openly mentioned this before, I'd rather stick with mostly first-impressions because I beleive it's when I get the most out of posts (unless under bad mental conditions, which is why I was willing to reread D1 after going through it in a single sitting) and what I mentioned about paranoia over styles, so it shouldn't be a surprise.


Back to the actual game, I considered writing up a case on Uesugi at night, but I figured her words on not giving all her cards away were particularly right in my case and that I had overdone my transparency throughout the day to the point where I'd most likely be the NK. I'm happy that being tired at the end of D2 made me look a bit worse and I wasn't killed, because I get to play more, but not writing it then means I now heavily question my read due to the NK being my prime suspect yesterday and what Yuno pointed out about regarding Uesugi incriminating herself badly. My paranoid mind thinks that this could also be a bus-if-necessary setup, so here's my most important concern regarding her that wasn't already mentioned in Esuna's #295 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.ph...l#msg807251) which I already showed agreement with at the time to the point where if I had acutally spent time rereading instead of trying to keep up with the day end I probably would've been fine with a quickwagon on her instead of Farina's, or at the very least on equal terms.

2) I dislike talking about why I think people are town or why I don't think they're good cases for a lynch; this is not a game of "i think this person is town because", it's a game of "i think this person is scum because." Doing the former is a waste of my resources.

#144 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.ph...msg805462)
#375 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.ph...msg807441) and #380 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.ph...msg807471)

I hope I'm not being retarded and somebody can see the issue I have with this. She showed cocky attitude over what she and Farina defended as optimal amount of posting dedicated to scumhunting. She expresses dislike for giving out town reads and prefers to focus on hunting scum, and yet didn't give anything throughout D2 that suggested any other suspects other than Kaori, as already pointed out to the death by Esuna, and this flip-flops the hell into her end of day posts being short reads/comments on the playerbase, which absolutely reeks to me as just trying to provide some non-compromising content to keep town happy.
On the other hand there's the convenient incrimination and that I remember my very first impression on her being "she's town" due to the rageprod in #144, so the issues I have on rereading might be applicable here, I'm ultimately not sure what I think of her.

I'm still reading Yuno as town, I want Esuna to appear and keep doing her green stuff so I don't have to question the alignment of absolutely everybody in the game, Kaori should claim her target, I want Maka to appear and I need to develop some sort of stance on Meiya tonight.

IRL commitment has come up and I really hastily edited some stuff so I can't read and reply to the last two cuts.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Conqueror on March 24, 2012, 05:55:37 PM
Your Mother Was A Votecount
Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Tenshi Hinanawi
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Meiya Mitsurugi: (1) Eclair Martinozzi
Not Voting: Everybody else

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
~54 hours remaining.

Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=26&year=2012&hour=23&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

@MOD: Would you announce LYLO, Potential LYLO and MYLO?
No.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 24, 2012, 09:29:43 PM
Right then, LYLO won't be announced.

If you believe there are three scum, we are now in (potential) LYLO.

I can't find Meiya's acknowledgement and I continue to find her scummy for all the reasons outlined. Add to that now declaring events that never transpired.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 24, 2012, 09:53:35 PM
I ate some of the words in that post due to the hasty editing and hasty everything, I hope it's still readable. Let me know if anything is confusing in it.

Does it clarify your question in #440, Eclair?
I don't want to declare Kaori 100% town prematurely since she still has to appear and claim night target, but I'm pretty sure she isn't scum. I've never seen this before so it might be something scum actually avoid for whatever reason, I read the fact that Farina, who flipped town, was left to hammer between the two as both of them being town and scum not caring which got lynched. If a lynch was being decided between two lurkers and one of them was in my scum team, I'd try to set up the hammer for one of my mates to ensure the mislynch. I'm not entirely sure, but I'm inclined to think she's town, which followed by the Farina flip means it's either a Maka/Uesugi/Meiya scumteam or my town reads were wrong, and seeing how I didn't put as much effort as I should've into analyzing my town reads further, the suspicion that there could be one scum among them is growing strongly.

How is it potential LyLo if there's three mafia? 6vs3 would turn into 4vs3, unless you're guessing third parties or town killing roles who I figure should be smarter than to shoot if today ended up with another mislynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 24, 2012, 10:42:16 PM
It is true that I have not stated outright my thoughts in regards to miss Martinozzi. I had begun rereading once I had come across miss Kanzaki's statement here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806544.html#msg806544) in regards to stubborness and was therefore reserving judgement. It was some time after I had made my post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807113.html#msg807113) in regards to miss Kanzaki and miss Rose that I had finalized my judgement and I felt not the need to post my every thought.

Miss Hinanawi, in your post here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg808088.html#msg808088), you state that you believe my thoughts in regards to miss Kenshin to be ungenuine. May I ask how so? You have not commented on its contents at all, only the timing of which I delivered it with.

On an unrelated note, as some seem to be arguing about the numbers of the anti-town faction in this game, I must add that there is a portion of my role PM that I had disregarded as I assumed that everyone had this ability. It confirms that there are three among us that are not aligned with myself. I have asked the moderator for clarification in regards to this and was met with the response that my role PM contained no lies whatsoever.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 24, 2012, 11:45:31 PM
All it would take is one extra kill to make it a Potential LYLO. 10-3 is what we've been assuming.
Eclair, it's possible we're not working at cross purposes right now. The could-bes are starting to get filtered down. Simply do some thinking in your head, looking over the players. If there are three scum, we don't see a combination that doesn't include Tenshi right now, including groups with Meiya.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 24, 2012, 11:52:10 PM
Kaori. I'm finding you town and yet you've been here lurking again for quite a while, can't you just be nice and please us with your presence and night target claim?

Trying to develop an individual opinion on Meiya is hard when Eclair's #436 is so thorough. It's certainly a lot more solid than any of the problems that have been pointed out about Tenshi so far. Have your comments so far the only thing you had to say about it, Meiya?
At this point I'm pretty sure town interested in pursuing their winning condition would drop the RP effort and substitute it for justification and scumhunt effort right about now, so please.

Also, why didn't you mention anything about the three scum when Blackrose commented on it in her #308 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807306.html#msg807306)?

I just noticed all of the links broke in my earlier post, I apologize for that.

Cut by Yuno. I have nigh-zero experience at wagon analysis, could I get some explanation for that? No matter how much I stare at the votecounts you quoted, I don't see anything other than your first conclusion, which is still probably not very trustworthy considering there's a history of scumplayers here bussing like hell and doing weird stuff like bus triangles.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 25, 2012, 12:07:12 AM
I accept the fact that I have performed sub-optimally this game and that miss Martinozzi holds valid points against me. Rather than waste everyone's time arguing over things that I am at fault for, I would prefer to direct my efforts towards voicing my suspicions and providing clarification in regards to my actions when requested.

I did not mention this because miss Rose's assumption that everyone would believe there to be 10 members of town reinforced my belief that the information that there are 3 people not aligned with myself to be common knowledge.

I shall return later whilst hoping that those that have not posted today appear to do so.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Decade on March 25, 2012, 12:13:26 AM
My target of N2 was Eclair. Unsure if it succeeded, I'm under the impression of being roleblocked.

I'm going to try to get another post out
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Conqueror on March 25, 2012, 12:58:19 AM
Esuna Busy and Maka Albarn have been prodded.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 25, 2012, 01:12:35 AM
Quote
Eclair, it's possible we're not working at cross purposes right now. The could-bes are starting to get filtered down. Simply do some thinking in your head, looking over the players. If there are three scum, we don't see a combination that doesn't include Tenshi right now, including groups with Meiya.

Hm. I'll go reread the cases on her, I am personally not seeing Scum when I read her in isolation.

Tenshi, who besides Kaori are Galette scum, again?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 25, 2012, 01:13:01 AM
Kaori, did you target me because you thought I was Scum and wanted to Roleblock me, or did you try to Protect me because you thought I was Town?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 02:09:36 AM
Why are you under the impression of being roleblocked?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 02:23:30 AM
Bleh I'm feeling under the weather today so here's hoping I wake up feeling better. Until then, I should be able to whip up something that's at least passable.

Actually why would I do that, when my lovely partner sent me one? <3 Quoting it directly removes the quotes inside, so instead I have a picture of it for you. http://puu.sh/mfxW

This might inconvenience people on a phone, I wouldn't know. I apologize if it does. I'd ask if they could get me a whole copy but they're asleep, so this shall do fine.

To sum up the points inside, however, I do find it odd that Uesugi decided to take two claimed L-1 wagons with three hours left and spend over an hour commenting on EVERYONE ELSE EXCEPT FOR THEM before them. I suppose I can't explicitly say this is scummy, but... seriously? I personally think that's ass-backwards. Moving on, she repeats the same song and dance as had already happened shortly before about Blackrose's claim, making me question how hard she was seriously trying to evaluate Blackrose's claim rather then get her lynched. As well, Uesugi had placed Kaori far ahead of Blackrose for all of before during D2 to the point of not even mentioning Blackrose past a single line in her first d2 post where she says Kaori is far worse, but then comes in and says they are equal.

Then there's still everything bad about Uesugi from before, so. She's still scum.

Kaori is also still scum. She may have fakeclaimed and not have any roleblocking capability at all (Especially if scum had info that Irene wouldn't know if she was roleblocked) especially considering that Kaori claims to be rb'd last night, or she could be a Mafia Jailor (Even my partner has been a mafia jailor before) or Mafia Roleblocker, so no, her claim does not make her more townie. As well, one cannot argue that her posts practically leak scum out of their pores. She posts barely enough to dodge lurking prods, and every single post is barely more then a prod dodge in the first place. She seems to have a brain, but it's incredibly clear that she does not wish to use it. It is amazing she has made it to D3. I do not know how Blackrose was lynched over her.

For that matter, why was Blackrose lynched. She superlurked... to the point of almost being modkilled, which is beyond a good idea for mafia to lurk at all, so at best her lurking wasn't super scummy, and Kaori was also guilty of this. When Blackrose actually posted however, her posts were far superior to Kaori; Blackrose actually tried. Her end-of-D2 posts actually made sense and looked pretty townish to me. And do you really think scum would think to claim a reversed bodyguard role? In addition, her explanation of her D1 target was well thought out, with a disconnect in that fact that it would kill her if her suspicion of Yuno was correct that's believable from someone like Blackrose but would be questionable to be given by scumpartners brainstorming what to claim.

She also breadcrumbed it earlier, making it more believable, with her line of "I'm trying to explode during the night".

I wish I was present last night to cockblock the fuck out of the Blackrose lynch but OH WELL WHAT'S DONE IS DONE.

Also Kaori isn't even attempting to put up a pretense of trying to play anymore. She just said what her n2 target was. And ontop of that, that she was rb'd, excusing her from any possible effect of her role that we could look for.

Kaori and Uesugi are both scum, Kaori is super obv-scum. I want both of them dead ASAP.

##Vote Kaori
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 02:28:04 AM
When I'm reading this over I'm seeing a few minor errors like "I wish I was here last night to cockblock" when it was two nights ago, and I said so at best instead of so at worst and some sketchy wording and blegh but my head hurts and I feel bad and I think I'm going to go nap or sleep
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Ryuki on March 25, 2012, 02:29:52 AM
No time, but.

Quote
Also Kaori isn't even attempting to put up a pretense of trying to play anymore. She just said what her n2 target was. And ontop of that, that she was rb'd, excusing her from any possible effect of her role that we could look for.

How is this "not even attempting to put up a pretense of trying to play any more?", and how strong is this part of your case? It looks like a confirmation-biased argument there.

Quote
Bleh I'm feeling under the weather today so here's hoping I wake up feeling better. Until then, I should be able to whip up something that's at least passable.

Actually why would I do that, when my lovely partner sent me one? <3 Quoting it directly removes the quotes inside, so instead I have a picture of it for you. http://puu.sh/mfxW

Stop reminding me why I dislike games with hydras.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 02:33:13 AM
In the end I ended up paraphrasing the whole thing anyway.

I definitely could have went in and removed the partner-post afterwords if I thought about it but I didn't because ow

Just be glad we aren't both actively posting under the account, it's only me.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 02:35:14 AM
And if you look at it a different way it's two different versions of the same post that you can use as a analyzation tool!

It'd be annoying disjointed disconnect all over if we both posted under the account I imagine.

But yeah I don't think I'm going to hydra again in the future. Unless one of us is explicitly limited to advice-only.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 02:37:42 AM
Yes. Hydras are the devil. Especially when there being two of you somehow leads to you posting less. Tell your other head not to be so shy and to post to stop you from getting prodded.

I would have been more likely to believe the claim if it didn't conflict with mine and she hadn't asked me for clarification on what she could fakeclaim against it. :/ Are you really going to sleep?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: capt. h on March 25, 2012, 02:39:20 AM
You're a Son of a Votecount
Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (1) Meiya Mitsurugi
Meiya Mitsurugi: (1) Eclair Martinozzi

Not Voting: Quicksword Irene, Uesugi Kenshin, Maka Albarn, Kaori Kanzaki

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
48.5 hours remaining.


I don't care what the question is, the answer is NO.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 02:51:20 AM
(Especially if scum had info that Irene wouldn't know if she was roleblocked)

Just pointing out that this wouldn't be possible unless rolecop, and I'm pretty sure copping somebody who was in danger of getting modkilled if a replacement couldn't be found would be silly. Scum probably even forgot Irene 1.0 existed just like many other people did.

I don't want to make you feel like a worse player, but what Eclair says is right, a lot of those points seem pretty confirmation-biasy, your hydra's points are pretty much the ones I consider worth paying attention to, specially the parts on how Uesugi suddenly switched from wanting Kaori lynched throughout the whole day, to suddenly bring both lurkers down to the same level and then supporting the lynch (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807478.html#msg807478) based on confusing wording that had already been sorted out earlier. Either Uesugi wasn't reading the thread properly and scumhunt effort where or this was a scum move made to prevent a Kaori lynch when a Blackrose mislynch was available.
This added to my point on her flip-floppy attitude on reads is settling Uesugi as scum in my head right now. I probably still want to read some words from her first though.

On a side note, I seriously want to know what the hell is going on in that Mod QT, these three seem to be having loads of fun.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 02:55:20 AM
supporting the lynch (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807478.html#msg807478) based on confusing wording that had already been sorted out earlier.

Eh, meaning the Blackrose lynch, of course. Just in case somebody's lazy and doesn't feel like clicking links.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 03:20:32 AM
Okay I became more awake.

And Eclair is defending that fact that Kaori is not trying to play the game.

:psyduck:

(also Kaori pulled the "making another post that never actually happens" card again, if you didn't notice)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 03:23:15 AM
To elaborate, it's not even trying to put up a pretense of attempting to play because she said what her supposed n2 target was (and that she was roleblocked) and left.

Nothing else. Other then BROKEN PROMISES

/me cries
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 03:31:04 AM
Honestly, I have to admit I might be getting confirmation biasy because the colors of my world will invert themselves if Kaori isn't scum in order to change the color of her flip from green to...

Well it'd be somewhere between blue and pink (Purple is in there!) but you get what I mean.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 03:31:40 AM
I totally forgot to mention one last thing.
Reading through old PMs in this account, mods seem to usually let the player know when their night action outright fails, why would you "suspect" that you've been roleblocked when it should be a matter of the action going through or being told that it didn't?

Are you trying to get a softclaim out of Eclair today as well or what?

Way past my bed time, I need sleep.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 03:34:25 AM
BROKEN PROMISES

/me cries
You have no idea how appropriate this is to me. Although it doesn't change my opinion on what I've already said your words are attempting to make me see the light. Do you disagree with my assessment on Tenshi?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 03:36:52 AM
Oh yes, Yukkii thinks it would be a fun idea, but I want to know what Eclair thinks. Do you have enough reason to believe the game will end today to call for a massclaim? Yes or No will suffice.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 03:43:39 AM
I personally am not in the least interested in voting Tenshi today, especially in comparison to how horrible I think Uesugi and Kaori are, however I went and reread your Tenshi case and I suppose it does make sense. (After I sleep and wake I'm going to reread d3 in general)

That being said, I also have to be entirely honest and come out and say that I haven't read Tenshi's posts very much during this entire game.

...I got everyone else, though D:

Anyway, speaking of things appropriate to you, Yuno.
Yes. Hydras are the devil. Especially when there being two of you somehow leads to you posting less.
THE POT SURE IS BLACK TODAY, ISN'T IT? <3
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 03:50:55 AM
I have no idea what you mean. I'm just a sweet innocent Diary Owner writing about her beloved. And we're more like posting ad a median between us.

I hadn't been paying a huge amount of attention to them either because of said town read. Hence why I was disturbed to realize she'd dropped a suspect because 'they were being brought up on things similar to Miki'. If she never thought Sayaka was scum, it really shouldn't have mattered. Contrast it against today, where she opens up with a vote on Kaori for being practically the same as Blackrose.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Conqueror on March 25, 2012, 03:59:35 AM
Uesugi Kenshin has been prodded
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 05:20:08 AM
Oh holy hell, it's exhausted quote stripe time. This post (pair) is pure responding to stuff directed at me, which I don't like doing on general principle, but I really do not have the time or energy to do anything else right now, and a tomorrow where I can dedicate some real time to this game is finally looming and I want to get there ASAP.

Gasai stuff

To respond more directly to Tenshi, specifically her posts today: Can you explain why your suspicions of Uesugi would decrease if Kaori flipped town, when Uesugi had been voting Kaori since the start of the day? Can you also explain why Uesugi being confused about a town's roleclaim and believing they were lying is scummy?

I looked at the two possible situations from Scum Kenshin's perspective.

- Town Blackrose/Scum Kanzaki: I can see Scum Kenshin trying to make up a reason to flip from Kanzaki to BlackRose to avoid lynching a buddy, given the oportunity had presented itself in the BlackRose wagon. I didn't think there was really that much to be confused about, especially after Irene's initial confusion came and went since I felt that should have cleared up any remaining uncertainty, which is why I questioned the sincerity.
- Town Blackrose/Town Kanzaki: Where on Earth is the benefit in Scum Kenshin pulling a stunt like that? Is saving one night-worthless townie by sacrificing one that hadn't been much better really worth all that negative attention? I don't see the reward at all, but I see a good deal of risk. It's such a nonsense move for Scum Kenshin, which is why I think Town Kanzaki would make Town Kenshin more likely.

Regarding terrible sleeping habits which I can hardly condone because sleep is the most important thing to me: The nature of my problem is more that you refrained from commenting overmuch before the claim happened. It didn't seem like you were fighting hard to oppose the lynch to push your own target and when the claim went down you just said obv true and left it at that.

The nature of the claim was such that I couldn't produce an immediate strong enough reason in my head that it was fake to feel comfortable switching to her before going to bed, especially since I was switching to her largely to avoid No Lynch.

The lack of extensive commenting/case pushing was due to a day full of commitments; note #119 and #133. When I finally got a little bit of time in #142 I would like to think I expressed why I was a little less sold on the Miki lynch than the Mitsurugi lynch. I didn't think there was much to push on Mitsurugi at that point that I hadn't already done throughout the day.

(Also you're going to hate this post even more because if it were not for this game I would have gone to bed immediately after getting home over two hours ago. >_>)

I also note the next day you refrained from commenting on Meiya's claim at all. You never justify why you dropped your suspicions. At all. There isn't a single mention of her Day 1 after that.

From my #181:

Miki's flip makes me not feel quite as gung-ho on Mitsurugi, given I disliked them for rather similar things.

I saw one person who I felt had been misrepresenting my cases flip town and figured that maybe the problem was actually on my end. I can go "well, Townflip Person A must have just been confused about the way I worded things, maybe Person B is the same way and is also town." (Contrast this to BlackRose's flip not making me change my mind about Kanzaki; I'm not going to go "well, Townflip Person A barely ever posted and their content wasn't great when they did post, maybe Person B that has barely ever posted and mostly made posts devoid of meaning when they did post is also town.")

Cut by discussion surrounding this. I wasn't entirely devoid of suspicion of Miki, since she has been making misrepresenty mistakes about my cases in a fashion similar to Mitsurugi (along with a couple of other things mentioned in #87 and #142). Hopefully you can see how this led to the above, since you make less of a distinction between Kanzaki and BlackRose than I do.

This post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807005.html#msg807005) contains your only mention of her that day, in a post that talks majorly about Uesugi and Maka and it's easy to miss the paragraph about how Meiya is voteparking. (You even comment that your current suspect brought up a good point about it.) You also never follow up on these comments and they aren't included in your accusations directed at her today. In my opinion it seems like you're taking each day seperately and bringing up the things people have done lately instead of making your reads based on fluid continuous thought processes.

What, you think that since I didn't mention those thoughts again that I don't hold them anymore? I haven't somehow forgotten I said those things, and they do still apply. If I decide in the future that Mitsurugi is more worth my vote than Kanzaki, I'll probably reference them directly then. But I don't like to repeat myself if I don't think it's necessary, doing so clogs the thread, and I didn't see a need to put those thoughts in a post that was focused on a Kanzaki vote and what new information could be gleaned from how the end of the day played out.

Also, because you add on the Kaori vote on the end like that I can't tell why you're voting her over Meiya at this point, who it sounds like you have a much better case on. Your cut emphasizes this point to me.

Because contentless posting is pretty much the scummiest thing possible, and Kanzaki is guilty of it in spades. Given this, while I think Scum Kanzaki/Town Mitsurugi is unlikely, I think it's still likelier than Town Kanzaki/Scum Mitsurugi, which makes Kanzaki the likelier scum to me. This does make me realize that I should give Mitsurugi, Albarn, and Irene a proper reread in a "what if Kanzaki were town?" mindset, since I haven't had the chance to do it yet. Tommorow could work for that, since it'll be the first day in a long time where I won't have to be away from the computer for the majority of it. (Clearly the optimal thing to do with a day off from life commitments is to spend it dealing with Mafia!)

Giving this its own post because the rest addresses other people and all of it combined isn't nearly as long as this one.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 05:22:38 AM
Irene stuff (not gonna quotestripe the rest of this because I don't think it's necessary)

- The explanation for the BlackRose vote seems reasonable. I'd still don't like how you bristled at being forced to partially commit to a role type when your preferred course of action (the attempted lynch of a third person) would have also given scum extra information after they claimed, though.

- I'm not seeing how someone corroborating Kanzaki's Jail target claim by claiming to be roleblocked translates to "Kanzaki's claim is true and therefore she is town". Mafia roleblocker is certainly a possibility, one Busy has mentioned at least two or three times at this point, and while Irene 1.0 would have been an odd scum faction roleblock choice, it's not an impossible one. (On the subject of today's claim, I could certainly see Eclair as a scum faction roleblock.)

- See the "repeating myself" comments above for why I didn't go over the Kaori case again. There's an extra bonus here in that I ended up going over the case again anyway in #314 because Farina still wasn't satisfied. I figured that post would still be reasonably fresh in everyone's minds, given I had explicitly requested time to make the post and pulled off of Kanzaki temporarily to make sure I didn't get interrupted by a quickhammer.

- I'm only giving Albarn not hammering a null-tell pass. I'm not giving Albarn herself a null-tell pass for her yesterday. My #258 still applies. Unless you disagree with giving the lack of a hammer a null-tell pass? (Note that "null-tell pass" does not mean "I think this was a townie thing to do," It means "I think Albarn would have acted exactly this way regardless of alignment.")

- If you're really that worried about it, I don't currently see a good reason to hold your Farina suspicions against you. It's not like Mafia has a long and colorful history where no one has ever suspected anyone that later got NKed and flipped town.

Mitsurugi stuff

The suspect nature of Kenshin's end-of-day dance is not something I disagree with. The problem I have with your original post last night is that it didn't actually commit to any meaningful position. It left you open to later explain why it interested you in whatever fashion you found most advantageous. Just as one example, if other people gave Kenshin's idea consideration, you could have said the post interested you because it highlighted something that made BlackRose extra suspicious and used it in an attempt to push BlackRose further over Kanzaki.

Martinozzi stuff

Mitsurugi's next in line after Kanzaki, with Albarn and Kenshin following in some order that changes almost every time I think about it. I'm hoping the "what if Kanzaki was town?" reread I mentioned earlier will make it clearer. Irene's also possible but at present I don't put her very close to the other four.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kiva-la on March 25, 2012, 06:10:40 AM
Just got home.  Best friend got engaged!  Been out basically all weekend.  Going to bed shortly, hope to respond to a few points first.

Miss Kenshin felt it appropriate to use miss Rose's supposed confusion in regards to her own role as her reason to vote for miss Rose. Others pointed out to miss Kenshin that her analysis in regards to miss Rose's role was flawed. However miss Kenshin's response was to ignore these words of advice and to instead call for others to speak upon the subject whilst leaving her own vote upon miss Rose. Miss Kenshin clearly stated within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807478.html#msg807478) that she believed miss Kanzaki's claim to do her no favors so I ask why was it that miss Kenshin failed to move her vote when the basis for miss Kenshin choosing to place her vote upon miss Rose rather than miss Kenshin was proved to be nothing but an misinterpretation on miss Kenshin's part?

Speaking of misinterpretation, I did not vote BlackRose at all (though I suppose I would have had she not been at L-1)... so this entire statement seems pretty meaningless.

Quote
I'm not  In addition I believe miss Uesugi to be a large offender in regards to over-dramatizing the timing of miss Busy's vote on miss Miki during the first day, though this has been covered in depth by others before me and I feel not the need to bore you all by reiterating their thoughts.

Despite quite clearly stating that I did not think she was scum because of it?  I'm seriously starting to doubt you're even reading my posts. :/

specially the parts on how Uesugi suddenly switched from wanting Kaori lynched throughout the whole day, to suddenly bring both lurkers down to the same level and then supporting the lynch (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807478.html#msg807478) based on confusing wording that had already been sorted out earlier. Either Uesugi wasn't reading the thread properly and scumhunt effort where or this was a scum move made to prevent a Kaori lynch when a Blackrose mislynch was available.

I was certainly confused by BlackRose's claim, and continued to be confused until here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807492.html#msg807492).  ... Actually, you know what?  No, that's not true.  I'm still confused by her damn claim, because she flipped town and was therefore being truthful... but admitted to fakeclaiming (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807517.html#msg807517)?!  She targeted Yuno but Yuno effectively counterclaimed her (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807494.html#msg807494)?  I clearly don't understand anything about this game anymore.  Ugh, if someone whose brain isn't currently a scrambled mess wants to clue me in on what happened yesterday prior to the lynch, I'm all ears.

That being said, I also have to be entirely honest and come out and say that I haven't read Tenshi's posts very much during this entire game.

Thanks for admitting you're only reading the posts of the people you're trying to lynch. :|

That's enough for now, even this token amount of posting is giving me a migraine atm.  Sleep forever then more post tomorrow.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 07:19:57 AM
I don't think she was fakeclaiming.

The part you just pointed out about never having voted Blackrose is fucking strange. Meiya how did you not notice that? We don't believe you're paying attention to the game at all at this point.

Yukkii manages to post while drugged enjoying tea in my basement. He doesn't believe anyone should use excuses for that.

We will reply to Tenshi after we've had time for a proper reread ourselves.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kick Hopper on March 25, 2012, 08:42:08 AM
That is a blunder on my part. I am not entirely certain on so as to how I interpreted an empty unvote as a vote on miss Rose.

However I believe this to be a moot point as the two viable wagons at this point were miss Rose and miss Kanzaki. Does the point not remain that she did not withdraw her statement in regards to miss Rose and simply allowed miss Rose's lynch to occur when she was so against miss Kanzaki?

Yes, you have not explicitly stated that you found miss Busy's hammer timing to be scummy, however when you mention your disapproval in this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg806388.html#msg806388) of miss Busy's hammer along with a statement such as "At the risk of sounding moronic I'm going to hold judgement until after I see your case on me, because it might at least show you're putting your own thoughts together." does this not imply that you find miss Busy suspicious for the hammer?
I realize that miss Kenshin states within this post (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807471.html#msg807471) that she thinks of miss Busy as not being scummy due to the hammer timing. I believe, however, that miss Kenshin would have used this as an argument against miss Busy if she could. This is naught but speculation on my part but if I do not believe in my own thoughts, who else will?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 12:46:24 PM
I'm ashamed to admit that I didn't consider the possbility of plain roleblocker until Esuna mentioned it last night. I seem to have been to hung up on my town read on Kanzaki due to her active lurking while logged onto her frickin' mafia account to consider that her jailor claim was false, and I figured "there can't be a scum roleblocker and a town roleblocker at the same time, the universe will divide by zero if they block each other", which not only is a really dumb train of thought, but was also completely disregarding the possibility of Kanzaki fakeclaiming as an actual scum roleblocker.

Quote
I have no idea what you mean. I'm just a sweet innocent Diary Owner writing about her beloved. And we're more like posting ad a median between us.

I've only managed to find out who Blackrose and Esuna are after being told that about half the players have already softclaimed, I can't believe I missed all of them, and after this I no longer have any idea what's going on with players in this game. I hate you all :V

Now to read Uesugi and actually do something.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 12:55:43 PM
@Mod. Uh... actually, can we get a prodcount?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 02:22:14 PM
Speaking of misinterpretation, I did not vote BlackRose at all (though I suppose I would have had she not been at L-1)... so this entire statement seems pretty meaningless.

Given Maka's refusal to vote for either, I myself had voiced concern on how unvoting one of the two at that point pretty much meant avoiding a lynch on them and supporting the other lynch, and considering that your unvote happened along with a ridiculous read flip-flop, it makes it scummy as hell. Don't you people keep rambling on about how you shouldn't depend on the role game and such? You gave up your scum read just because and decided that Blackrose deserved being lynched for a series of misinterpretations.

Despite quite clearly stating that I did not think she was scum because of it?  I'm seriously starting to doubt you're even reading my posts. :/

This took about a whole day to happen. A day in which pretty much everybody voiced their concern on how this point was overdramatized, except Farina, who didn't really pick up the point as much as she had issues with the fluff sorrounding the quickhammer, which is a much more valid point.

I was certainly confused by BlackRose's claim, and continued to be confused until here (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807492.html#msg807492).  ... Actually, you know what?  No, that's not true.  I'm still confused by her damn claim, because she flipped town and was therefore being truthful... but admitted to fakeclaiming (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807517.html#msg807517)?!  She targeted Yuno but Yuno effectively counterclaimed her (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807494.html#msg807494)?  I clearly don't understand anything about this game anymore.  Ugh, if someone whose brain isn't currently a scrambled mess wants to clue me in on what happened yesterday prior to the lynch, I'm all ears.

Seriously? Is anybody paying any proper attention to this game?
#355 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807407.html#msg807407) to #366 (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.msg807422.html#msg807422) is me being confused with the wording in the same way you later were, and sorting it out while you were too busy posting reads on people after saying how much you disliked it (repeated for emphasis since she's completely disregarded this point that I find to be complete and utter disconnect). You must've definitely skimmed through this, and doing so when you had the time to make an important decision, then disappearing in the last half an hour of the day after Farina attempted to make it clear to you as well doesn't strike me as very town.
Her fakeclaim comment was not implying that she was doing so with her claim at that moment (I question the veracity of this confusion, because who in their right mind would say that?), but rather that she had considered gambiting like Sayaka did, but decided against it seeing how she could've been overlooking important things like Sayaka did that would make people want to hammer her over Kaori.
The only valid point among these is the Yuno counterclaim, which seems odd considering I'd find scum blocking Blackrose... weird. Unless it was planned out that Blackrose would become a lynch priority during D2 and that her claim would make her suspicious if she didn't have any results to give, making anybody want to hammer her over Kaori, but that's assuming Kaori!scum, and it would mean that scum!Kaori was gambiting hard claiming a roleblock on me, unless they did actually rolecop me which I already mentioned I'd find "??". This is a very confusing counterclaim, and considering how Yuno was the first one to call out for a possible massclaim herself it makes me slightly suspicious, depite my otherwise town read on her.

Can I get anybody else's impressions on the counterclaim?

Overall likeliness to be scum today from my PoV:
Uesugi > Meiya/Maka(until post, and I'm expecting something along the lines of my D2 opener at this point) >> Tenshi/Yuno/Kaori >>>>>>>>>>> Esuna/Eclair.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 02:40:17 PM
Forgot to add that in 25 minutes I'm disappearing for 5~ hours.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 03:02:20 PM
Prodding Kaori for that empty post promise before I go.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 03:05:57 PM
I can't believe there are people who still think Irene is suspicious. So adorable. But stay away from my Yukkii. I don't want a massclaim unless Eclair is certain today could be the last day. From the sounds of roles I wonder if we could have broken the setup from Day 1 by claiming.

Eclair is too.. what is the word. Solid? Yukkii told me I'm not allowed to go knife her anyways. :< Maka was too enthusiastic to get all the townies talking. Esuna is too offended that people think she's anything but town. Irene is so green they're going to print her into 20 dollar bills.

2) Meiya Mitsurugi (Muv-Luv)
8) Tenshi Hinanawi (Touhou Project)
9) Uesugi Kenshin (Sengoku Rance)
12) Kaori Kanzaki (To Aru Majutsu no Index)

These are the four suspects I've narrowed my search down to. Yukkii is curled in a ball in the corner talking about how everyone is town so I guess it's up to me to find the evidence. (Incidentally have I mentioned how much I like all the wagons today?)

I'm still half asleep but I can answer Tenshi in that I'm well aware what her stated reason was for dropping Meiya in her suspicions. I ignored it because it's not a reason at all. You thought Sayaka was a town cop being put up against Meiya as a mislynch and there was no real doubt in this stance. Why would Sayaka's town flip convince you her counterwagon was also town? Why didn't you mention this at the time? It looked like you just wanted to forget the first day ever happened.

I guess I should ask Eclair the same question I asked Tenshi. Why did you drop Meiya to go after someone else after focusing on Meiya for the entire Day 1? I don't see a reason that you disregarded her, and you only brought up her behavior and her sleepy vote on you at approximately 12 hours left in the day.

Kaori has alot of things she needs to answer to right now and if she posts and goes I'm not going to stop her lynch.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Decade on March 25, 2012, 03:11:43 PM
@Eclair : The Latter, I believe you're town.

Why are you under the impression of being roleblocked?
I believe I was roleblocked because That is the main role I know of that causes actions to fail.

I totally forgot to mention one last thing.
Reading through old PMs in this account, mods seem to usually let the player know when their night action outright fails, why would you "suspect" that you've been roleblocked when it should be a matter of the action going through or being told that it didn't?

Are you trying to get a softclaim out of Eclair today as well or what?

Way past my bed time, I need sleep.
I had no thought of this until you pointed it out.

I Agree with EsunaDra case on Uesugi.
##Vote Uesugi Kenshin

To elaborate, it's not even trying to put up a pretense of attempting to play because she said what her supposed n2 target was (and that she was roleblocked) and left.

Nothing else. Other then BROKEN PROMISES

I never promised, I said I would make a post, I never specified what time it would be. This applied to every other post that used it as well. It was merely the way you looked at it, and expected it to come soon each time.

I also, You were needlessly antagonizing Yuno with "Pot calling the Kettle Black". While not scummy, but definitely needless.

Also,
@Mods: Kaori Kanzaki: (1) Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Pesco on March 25, 2012, 03:51:46 PM
Effortcount
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (1) Eclair Martinozzi

Not Voting: Quicksword Irene, Uesugi Kenshin, Maka Albarn

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
35.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=26&year=2012&hour=23&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

@Mod. Uh... actually, can we get a prodcount?

There have been way more prods than people deserve.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 05:33:36 PM
8) Tenshi Hinanawi (Touhou Project)

<-

I'm still half asleep but I can answer Tenshi in that I'm well aware what her stated reason was for dropping Meiya in her suspicions. I ignored it because it's not a reason at all. You thought Sayaka was a town cop being put up against Meiya as a mislynch and there was no real doubt in this stance. Why would Sayaka's town flip convince you her counterwagon was also town? Why didn't you mention this at the time? It looked like you just wanted to forget the first day ever happened.

Because it genuinely didn't occur to me that people would take my post as "Tenshi believes the claim and therefore thinks Miki must be town." If I had immediately believed the claim I would have outright said so (for all that this is worth now). My thought process was "The claim could be true, or it could be a scum fakeclaim, but I don't have the time or energy to reread and make a solid decision and/or wait for a Mitsurugi claim, so I'll do the responsible thing and not switch my vote to the cop claim I'm not presently sure is fake." Remember that you were in an advantageous position at the time to speedily determine the claim was fake, since you "live" with being a miller. I didn't have the miller-copclaim-incongruity cemented into my head like you did because my role situation is different, so I couldn't make the same quick this-is-obviously-fake call you could.

Gonna look over Mitsurugi and Kanzaki's latest posts, then see about that reread I mentioned last (non-game) night.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 05:52:22 PM
Mitsurugi making stuff up about the status of Kenshin's is bad as others have pointed out - I think Mitsurugi may have hit the point of just making stuff up - but I don't think pointing that out counters the entire argument as much as Kenshin thinks it does because Kenshin still expressed willingness to cast that vote.

I Agree with EsunaDra case on Uesugi.
##Vote Uesugi Kenshin

Why is it agreeable? Why it ahead of any other case?

I never promised, I said I would make a post, I never specified what time it would be. This applied to every other post that used it as well. It was merely the way you looked at it, and expected it to come soon each time.

hahahahahahahahahaha

I'm going to assume Busy's going to be useless for the rest of the game because I'm pretty sure both hydra heads exploded into a million tiny pieces upon reading this.

And now for that reread.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 25, 2012, 06:17:53 PM
I'm going to assume Busy's going to be useless for the rest of the game because I'm pretty sure both hydra heads exploded into a million tiny pieces upon reading this.
One of us did, and the other got some glue and a broom. We're back, folks!

Uesugi's post:"Here's some defense on myself, bye I'll be back tomorrow"
...okay now she's just active lurking. In other words, "Excuse me, I'll pass, and wait on having an opinion until it gets close to time for me to be prodded again."

Anyway to her poke on us, well yeah, I do focus a lot more on people I'm trying to lynch. That being said, Tenshi is the only person whose posts my eyes actually glaze over on (Now that Meiya's are not impossible to read) and I don't really care that much because nothing -really- bad sticks out when I skim them, unlike, say, Uesugi and Kaori being horribly bad. I have my priorities and they're pretty satisfied with the two Scum In Front Of Me.

Kaori's post:"Hi let me go sheep Esuna whom I was chasing as scum all d2, by the way I was just trolling you about posting lulz"
To put it a different way, she basically said "Yeah I mean I'm going to make a post at some point in the future." GEE, I THINK WE KNOW THAT. If you weren't going to you would just be modkilled. It's blatantly obvious that you're going to post eventually (And if you aren't we wouldn't care anymore because you would be removed from the game after you didn't post for 48 hours or so). If you actually tell us you're going to make another post then the statement explicitly implies that you are going to make another post soon.

I highly doubt I actually needed to explain that to anyone but whatever. The part of the post that's actually scummy is the "Let me go blatantly sheep the case off the person I thought was scum all of d2"

And her poke on the needless shenanigans: Yeah, a tiny bit of needless shenanigans never hurt anyone. It's just part of the fun :3c

...wait what the heck happened to Maka? It's like she fell off the face of the planet. It makes me frown deeply.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 06:37:37 PM
Quote from: Kaori
I believe I was roleblocked because That is the main role I know of that causes actions to fail.
This doesn't answer the question at all.  Why do you think your action failed?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 07:47:08 PM
Aaaaa still have to read past #491 but don't leave yet Yuno! I forgot this!

Eclair, it's possible we're not working at cross purposes right now. The could-bes are starting to get filtered down. Simply do some thinking in your head, looking over the players. If there are three scum, we don't see a combination that doesn't include Tenshi right now, including groups with Meiya.

I have nigh-zero experience at wagon analysis, could I get some explanation for that? No matter how much I stare at the votecounts you quoted, I don't see anything other than your first conclusion, which is still probably not very trustworthy considering there's a history of scumplayers here bussing like hell and doing weird stuff like bus triangles.

I was going to accuse you of forgetting this point in #490 but hydra. I can see why Eclair hates you guys now =<
Still reiterating the question to whoever of the two posted it being so sure that Tenshi is scum whatever the scumteam. If there's a case based on that I want to see it rather than have to believe it's there just because I can't see it myself. It'd be like agreeing with a crazed cultist just because everybody else looks like crazier cultists.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 08:55:44 PM
Blah, she left =/

I have this really bad feeling about Yuno. If she's who I think she is, she's not flailing like she usually does, and it makes me uncomfortable. It might be due to trying to keep her identity at least somewhat covered, but I still feel uncomfortable about it. However, there's that thing where she was the first one to claim an anti-town role in a game full of weird town roles that she couldn't have known and millers don't usually get told that they're millers and blah.

Why is everyone ignoring me? Can I please get those impressions on the Yuno not-redirected-nightaction claim?

@Mod I mean the official ones, of course, not the ones due to your feeling like prodding people.

Still waiting on that Tenshi post, Maka post and Uesugi doing something. Does she sleep for over 16 hours or what? If she does nothing in what's left of the day and runs into LD3 saying that no time, throwing out reads and being confused about things that have already been discussed, I want her lynched. I'll still wait for her reponse before voting I guess. It's unlikely, but this could be MyLo/LyLo/whatever so I don't want to be putting people at L-2 with over a day left, specially since I really want to see Maka and Tenshi's posts, as well as Yuno's reply to what I just mentioned earlier.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 09:32:46 PM
I do not flail. >:< Who told you these lies and slanders? The answer to your question about Tenshi is we both do. I wouldn't be posting if we didn't agree on something. (The part about keeping our identities secret is also funny. I would be surprised if anyone besides you didn't know who we were. )

In the games on this site Millers do get told that they're millers. The times they don't are bastard mod exceptions. If this was untrue 12 people would have called me on it on Day 1.

Frankly I think your paranoia will be sated tomorrow, but to understand what we think you have to see the votecounts from our point of view.

Quote
Eclair Martinozzi: (1) Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (4) Quicksword Irene, Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Sayaka Miki
Yuno Gasai: (1) BlackRose
Sayaka Miki: (7) Uesugi Kenshin, Shana, Farina, Yuno Gasai, Meiya Mitsurugi, Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
The theory is that scum don't want to be seen together. One scum on each wagon and one off-wagon or two on the main wagon and one on the other. With the possibility of Meiya being scum high, if Tenshi isn't scum it would mean Meiya is scum and there were no scum on the scum wagon. Considering the scum here catch scum more often then town do that is highly doubtful. Also, third on the wagon is scum. :V

Although Tenshi is attempting to appeal to my sense of awesome. I will not be swayed by your shiny sunglasses young lady. Urge to vote.. fading..

Kaori is begging to be punched in the throat. Urge to quicklynch rising.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 10:16:55 PM
(The part about keeping our identities secret is also funny. I would be surprised if anyone besides you didn't know who we were. )

Hence my pointing  out that I hate you all. I'm pretty much the only one playing anonymafia, and given how heavy on meta my reads were while following the latest games, I am very frustrated. Not that I didn't know what I was getting into when I replaced, but knowing that other people have way more information than I do makes me paranoid over manipulation ;_;

Also I have issues with Maka being green until she posts. She read really town during D1, but I dislike her last five posts, meaning the one where she fluff-posted asking Meiya if her bulletproof also autogoverned and her rage-vent post before the hammer. When bad things happen, town gets their brains working into drawing conclusions from them, whilst scum pretend to be town by openly voicing the townie frustration. And then there's the three D2 posts where she first comments only on Uesugi, then adds nothing to her own case and finally refuses to vote in the end of day lynch. Well, the last one is null, like Tenshi said, but I dislike the other four.

Regarding the votecount things... I'm inclined to believe that two people around here who are most likely to cause odd votecount distributions as scum are already dead, but the facts that the D1 lynch in IMP Mafia had two scum offwagon on an offwagon target and the D2 lynch had the three scum on it doesn't make me very keen on reading possibly WIFOMy wagons. I'll stare at them for a while until people get around to posting, but I'm pretty sure I won't be getting anything solid out of it.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 10:31:15 PM
Irene: Here you go. This took so long because I was stupid enough to start with Mitsurugi, which lasted all of two minutes of reading her earlier posts before my brain went "OKAY, THAT'S IT. FUCK YOU AND FUCK THIS GAME. I HAVEN'T HAD TIME OFF IN FOREVER. I'M NOT GOING TO PAY ATTENTION TO THIS UNTIL I'VE DONE SOMETHING ELSE." And then I went and did not-Mafia things for a while. :V

Anyway!

WARNING: This is long, even by my standards.

Mitsurugi

In rereading I found #271 amusing in the wake of Gasai's #269 talking about how she doesn't need "a wall of text explaining why lurkers suck." I can't believe I missed that at the time. :< I blame them being on opposite sides of a page turn.

Reading #271 from a Town BlackRose/Town Kanzaki/Scum Mitsurugi perspective is interesting in light of Mitsurugi appearing to pretty much drop everything else prior that she had been seriously focusing on (i.e. the Martinozzi vote). It's basically "Look at how much I can say about the obvious things regarding the people that are obviously suspicious!" With how the Martinozzi case disappeared, this post was the entirety of her vocalized suspicions of people. Far be it from me to criticize someone for finding BlackRose and Kanzaki suspicious, but with no effort to distinguish why Blackrose was the worse of the two despite having towers to drop about both of them individually, not having any other real suspicions on the table, and coming in that late in the day with talk about how the lurkers suck after the day had been spent hashing out why the lurkers suck between other people (including some people from the beginning of the day), thgis post really looks like a lazy flop onto easy targets with the "lazy flop" part hidden by all dem big werds. Truth be told, I'm going to be a little less sympathetic to "I was busy" if it's the explanation for why there were not any other meaningful vocalized reads at that time because I've been busy this entire goddamn game with a variety of outside circumstances and I still put in the time to discuss things aside from lurkers.

Ultimately I think #271 is scummy regardless of Kanzaki's alignment, since either this post or what I wrote in #425 applies to it.

The rest of the day is less of a psychological point against Mitsurugi if Kanzaki is town. I had noticed that Mitsurugi spend the rest of the day mostly talking to or about BlackRose, which I figured could have been a "subtle" attempt to keep BlackRose at the front of everyone's minds (she mentioned Kanzaki only when asked about the claims). Most of it was reasonably explainable, but #301 in particular bothered me even with the #314 explanation since it seemed so needless. I don't see a reason for Scum Mitsurugi to try to keep the focus on one of the two wagons given Town BlackRose/Town Kanzaki.

Assuming Scum Mitsurugi for #432 makes less sense with Town Kanzaki than with Scum Kanzaki, because I don't see why Scum Mitsurugi would switch over to pursuing Kenshin instead of continuing the path against the ball of contentless gas when she had just dropped a tower about her the previous day and was willing to say more today.

Albarn

A common theme in Albarn's anti-lurker stance seems to be that she completely ignores the possibility that lurkers can act scummy when they post. It's like there's some arbitrary magical threshold where if your word production rate drops below that point then you can't possibly be scum regardless of what you've actually said. As an example:

And regarding Esuna's vote on Kaori while I write this. That would be a waste of a lynch today and would tell us nothing since she has almost no interactions with others. To me, Kaori just reads as newbie/bad play.

From Day 1, in reference to this reasoning:

Irene is lurky so iunno about her yet. Conversely Kaori is lurky but she's really bad because her posts are creatable with a bare minimum of thought put into playing. Shana is [REDACTED] and so I don't even know yet.


I don't like how Kanzaki was dismissed so easily as a "waste of a lynch" because of her lack of interactions with others given Busy's reasoning was based less on post volume and more total lack of content. Someone like Irene would have been a waste of a lynch, but when someone's acting scummy their post volume should be that much of a factor. Lynching scum is never a waste of a lynch, no matter how little they've said.

Holding this stance would actually make sense in conjunction with Town Kanzaki, because it keeps Albarn's hands clean when Shana, BlackRose, (possibly) Irene, and Kanzaki all flip town. It lets her go "I told you so" and makes her look that much better. Holding a stance so broad about general gameplay relating to alignment that it pretty much outright ignores what a player's input actually is does not sit will with me in general and extra rankles me in particular in combination with the possibility of promoting oneself in this manner. Reeeeeeeeally don't like this.

Specifically calling Kanzaki a mislynch in the "low-hanging lurker mislynch fruit" line in #232 could possibly be a psychological slip but even assuming Town Kanzaki I don't think I'd put a lot of stock into it.

Irene

I don't think the choice of BlackRose over Kanzaki in #187 is scum motivated regardless of Kanzaki's alignment given how early in the day it was. As much as worrying about a quicklynch that early is silly. The wording of the post is odd and almost incongruous with voting for a lurker, but I'm pretty sure I understand what Irene was trying to get at here anyway (I'd assume it was a pressure vote, given how much Irene wanted the lurkers to talk more) so it doesn't bother me.

Irene's #285 feels very genuine from a Town Kanzaki perspective, because I generically don't know why Scum Irene would keep trying to push the idea of getting a Farina lynch instead after forcing content from the lurkers. Especailly when considering that (a) Farina was pretty obviously never going to take as a lynch rush, and (b) scum likely knew this given Farina's death. I can only see this post as scum-motivated if Kanzaki is scum because it's a BlackRose vote without much justification of why BlackRose over Kanzaki.

The rest of the day played out in such a fashion that I don't think there's an appreciable difference between Town Kanzaki and Scum Kanzaki from the perspective of Scum Irene.

Summation

Kenshin I've already addressed, since my thoughts on her were asked specifically.

Regardless, operating under the assumption that Kanzaki is town, my vote priority order would most likely go Mitsurugi > Albarn > Irene > Kenshin, though there's a sufficiently large gap between Albarn and Irene that I would need to look over Gasai, Busy and Martinozzi again if this actually somehow happened. If anything, this reinforces the idea of Scum Kanzaki to me, because even with Town Kanzaki/Scum Albarn/Scum Mitsurugi, there's presumably still one more scum to go, and the idea of any of my remaining five options being scum and interacting with/talking about a town Kanzaki in this fashion (or just plain playing the way they have) feels ridiculous.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 11:18:27 PM
OH GOD WHY AM I STILL READING THIS GAME

I like Busy pointing out the extra-hilarious aspect of Kanzaki's post agreeing with the case of the person she spent Day 2 "pursuing" (if you want to call it that). And with no explanation of where that Day 2 "case" went, no less. I think the volume of the case against Kanzaki has exceeded the collective volume of Kanzaki's posts at this point.

Irene: Only half of that hydra flails. :V In all seriousness, could you redescribe exactly what your issue is with Yuno counterclaiming BlackRose? I'm having a hard time understanding what exactly you're getting at. If it's purely because you don't know why BlackRose wasn't redirected, Gasai did say in #398 that the role happenings were possible with Town BlackRose and that it was the earlier question about Weak Roles that cemented the choice due to looking for all the world like a setup for a fakeclaim (which it ended up being because BlackRose is BlackRose). If there's more to your suspicion then ???

Gasai: I think you give Albarn way too much of a pass over ED1 shenanigans, considering where her game has gone since. I guess it might not matter in about 4 hours, though. -_-
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 25, 2012, 11:29:52 PM
So there, Yuno claims that her ability was not redirected by Blackrose. I don't understand that thing in #398 where she says that this is possible without Blackrose!Scum because if Yuno claimed an active role that produces results to the point where she could confirm that her action wasn't redirected to Blackrose (which she did), the only things that I can think of that could explain the lack of redirection would be:
a) Blackrose's ability was not entirely as she described, which is pretty silly to believe when she already admitted to discarding any weird gambit fakeclaims.
b) Blackrose got roleblocked
c) Yuno lied

...Or am I missing something?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 11:36:01 PM
There is at least one thing you're missing.

d) There is more to Gasai's role than what she has said, and she's going to keep not saying more about her role because scum do not need to know about it.

This was the conclusion I arrived at after the fact. I'm kind of surprised you didn't; given your misgivings about talking about anything related to your role, I figured you'd be sensitive to the secrecy of others regarding theirs.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: capt. h on March 25, 2012, 11:43:23 PM
Countcount
Kaori Kanzaki: (2) Tenshi Hinanawi, Esuna Busy
Tenshi Hinanawi: (1) Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin: (2) Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki
Meiya Mitsurugi: (1) Eclair Martinozzi

Not Voting: Quicksword Irene, Uesugi Kenshin, Maka Albarn

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
27.5 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=26&year=2012&hour=23&min=15&sec=&p0=251)

Maka Albarn has been prodded. If she does not post within an unspecified amount of time (soonish, considering it's almost been 48 hours) she will be modkilled.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: DiEnd on March 25, 2012, 11:55:38 PM
Dwelled on this some more. General principle again hisses at moving when Kanzaki herself hasn't given me reason to, but.

##Unvote
##Vote: Meiya Mitsurugi


I still think Kanzaki is, individually, the scummiest player in the game. But, at the same time, I don't see a scum team that doesn't include Mitsurugi, regardless of Kanzaki's alignment.

Case repeat time

I've discussed her #271 at length in both #425 and #501, her #385 is still a total setup of a post, and she's talking about a Martinozzi acquiescence that didn't actually happen and a Kenshin vote for BlackRose that didn't actually happen, and I've already discussed why that sort of thing is scummy back on Day 1.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 25, 2012, 11:59:50 PM
If it makes you feel better Irene I don't know who most of the players alive are either. >_>

God damn you and your words. I am going to continue being suspicious of Tenshi but it doesn't look like I'm getting the time of day. Yukkii still believes Kaori may be town trolling. I have to agree that it doesn't look like anyone is helping her, or telling her to stop saying the things that are making people hate her.

##Unvote
##Vote: Meiya


This lynch I also prefer. Meiya's posts are just plain lacking in emotion. I don't know how to describe it, but they're very detached. Day 2 was also mediocre. Bulletproof isn't really a claim to clear people by. Also anyone that uses the word Miss that much is clearly scum.

I don't think we've ever been promised a modkill. The rules say they'll be killed eventually if the mods feel like it.

Cut: >.>!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 26, 2012, 12:06:58 AM
I had considered that option as well, and there are roles in this game I never knew before so I figure it's valid, but no matter how much I search around everywhere, I can't find any roles that would fit into such a weird situation.

...Unless, now that I think of it, it's some weird variation of a role similar to Dormio's don't-know-if-protecting-on-odd-or-even-nights doc from last game. Which in retrospect I should totally be expecting given the amount of bastard thrown into town roles this game. I don't really want this turning into me getting suspicious of anybody posting anyway, and I can see how this could be interpreted as me trying to get Yuno to fullclaim, so this was overall really dumb of me. She already said that my suspicions will be cleared tomorrow, so I guess I'll just sit back and stare at wagons or suffer through the hell of rereading furthering my indecision until Maka, Uesugi and Kaori decide to post again.

Regarding my dislike of being forced to claim active or passive, I was afraid that doing so after Irene the First's early softclaim might actually give it away, but it seems it hasn't been the case.

And cut by synchronized voting. The hell?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 26, 2012, 12:07:50 AM
Quote
I have to agree that it doesn't look like anyone is helping her, or telling her to stop saying the things that are making people hate her.
Yet despite how much everyone hates her

it's d3 and people STILL seem to be wanting to lynch someone-who-is-not-her over her

CONQ YOU BETTER NOT BE LAUGHING RIGHT NOW I WILL HURT YOU

Meiya is L-1. Why the hell is Meiya at L-1 when Kaori is right there sitting there being obvscum.

If we don't lynch Kaori today (Or at -least- Uesugi but) I will hurt you people (If whoever it was flips scum I'll get over it then, but I'm skeptical.)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 26, 2012, 12:10:50 AM
That's L-2.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 26, 2012, 12:15:57 AM
Oh.

...um well still
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 26, 2012, 12:21:11 AM
I'll go sit in the corner now
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 26, 2012, 12:23:52 AM
It wouldn't be synchronized if I hadn't hit backspace mid-post.

We think they will be cleared because we will probably be dead. :p It's not an odd-or-even night doc type situation. It's kind of important that Kaori answer the question we've asked her three times now. What happened to make you believe you were roleblocked?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Decade on March 26, 2012, 12:30:00 AM
@Yuno: Sorry for the wrong answer, I had misinterpreted the question.
I'm under the impression of being roleblocked because because it didn't say I succeeded.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 26, 2012, 12:31:50 AM
If it makes you feel any better, I'd rather lynch Uesugi, but the two votes on her are... ugh =/

Oh, and looking at wagons was actually useful for something. I suddenly remembered Eclair switched her vote onto Kanzaki in her last D2 post seeing how nobody seemed to be buying into her Esuna case. She mentioned she'd be rereading her, but there's almost less than 24 hours left and there's still nothing on that, which leads me to believe she's dropped it for today. I don't think it's necessarily scummy, since she also mentioned time issues, but still, can I get some words on what's making you read Esuna either way when you're back, Eclair?

Cut by aaaaaaa
I wouldn't be against your claiming at dayend if there's something important you feel you should clarify if the flip is potentially confusing and you have reasons to believe you're definitely dead tonight, but otherwise don't specify any further, it makes me look scummy as fuck after that rolefishy severe mindclog of mine ;_;
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Sasword on March 26, 2012, 12:32:54 AM
##Vote: Uesugi
Uesugi is still scum and the one we should be lynching today.
With that out of the way, I'm back for now.

I've not been in a good mood lately so I'll keep this concise. I have 4 main people I will talk about who are also my suspects.
1. Uesugi
2. (and a complete 180 since i don't think i've really mentioned her before) Tenshi
3. and 4. who are both somewhat tied (and another out of the blue 180) Meiya and Kaori

The way I've decided on the last 3 is almost soley by process of elimination. Everyone else I generally have some higher opinion of as townish.
I place Tenshi as 2 over Meiya and Kaori because I've had some sort of town, or at least not scum read of them at some point. Whereas Tenshi I've had no clue for most of the game, therefore she gets prioritized.

Note that this is NOT my case on them and I will say more. I just want to make my stances known right now and prepare people for what I will say later.

Also, I apologize that the latters are mostly guided by gut, which I can imagine people will hate me for, but it is truly the best I can do in reads right now.

Going to get this post out there.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 26, 2012, 12:35:58 AM
Eh, Kaori, to make it absolutely clear since we've only got 27 hours left. Does this mean:
a) you were told you succeeded N1 and that you didn't receive that confirmation N2
Or
b) you were outright told that you didn't succeed N2
?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 26, 2012, 12:39:25 AM
If it makes you feel any better, I'd rather lynch Uesugi, but the three votes on her are... ugh =/

Something tells me I'm not placing my vote before I go to bed today.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kabuto on March 26, 2012, 12:44:02 AM
At this point I do not even care who is voting Uesugi. Jolly fucking sunflowers to you all if the entire wagon on Uesugi is scum and lurkers (and me), I believe she's scum and a lynch is a lynch.

For god knows why Kaori isn't a high priority lynch to an awful lot of people right now, so I'm going to take the lynch I think is scum that I can actually forseeably obtain.

##Unvote
##Vote Uesugi
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Decade on March 26, 2012, 12:47:08 AM
Eh, Kaori, to make it absolutely clear since we've only got 27 hours left. Does this mean:
a) you were told you succeeded N1 and that you didn't receive that confirmation N2
Or
b) you were outright told that you didn't succeed N2?
Reading and rereading the the message, I'm going to assume it is more closely related to (B)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 26, 2012, 12:50:08 AM
Uesugi is at L-1

I am going to frown, really really, really heavily if somebody dares to quickhammer. I want that Maka and Uesugi content.

Cut by...

Are you seriously trying your best to be as unclear about this issue as possible?
Conq, if Kaori isn't being utterly useless and this is actually your fault for purposefully vague bastard wording choice, I'll cry.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 26, 2012, 12:50:47 AM
You two are so adorable. I don't think you could be 'scummy as fuck' if you tried. Uesugi is at L-1 btw.

Kaori should answer Irene's question as well as possibly I don't know give some god damn reads because I will turn this wagon right around. Cut by a half answer. Answer clearly. Did you get told you suceeded Night 1? Did you get told you failed Night 2?

We are probably going to fullclaim once we are done questioning.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Decade on March 26, 2012, 12:51:58 AM
...
I failed then.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: capt. h on March 26, 2012, 12:57:07 AM
Votecount
Uesugi Kenshin: (4) Meiya Mitsurugi, Kaori Kanzaki, Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Meiya Mitsurugi: (3) Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Yuno Gasai
Uesugi Kenshin is at L-1!

Not Voting: Quicksword Irene, Uesugi Kenshin

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
~26 hours remaining.
Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=26&year=2012&hour=23&min=15&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 26, 2012, 01:00:16 AM
I'm asking you two yes or no questions.  I only want one yes or no response to each of them.  No additional words are required.

1.) Did you get told you suceeded Night 1?
2.) Did you get told you failed Night 2?

Again, yes or no only.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Decade on March 26, 2012, 01:02:20 AM
I'm asking you two yes or no questions.  I only want one yes or no response to each of them.  No additional words are required.

1.) Did you get told you suceeded Night 1?
2.) Did you get told you failed Night 2?

Again, yes or no only.
I have no idea how that is a yes or no question,
but
1) No
2) Yes
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Den-O on March 26, 2012, 01:03:10 AM
Finally. Harold Wilson Jesus.

Now can you please explain why you buy the case on Uesugi over anybody else's? What happened to your D1 Eclair vote? and your D2 Esuna vote?
You should be aware that your vote has been muddled all over the place with little to no explanation on it and that nobody has any idea what the hell goes on over in Kanzakiland. Surely you could provide a summary of your line of through throughout the game or something similar?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Decade on March 26, 2012, 01:46:46 AM
Assuming I have a linear though process

D1) Vote on Eclair due to an extreme focus on what I believed to be a weak main case.

D2) I had inflicted on myself a too stubborn case that I scolded Meiya for.

D3) Esundra's points on Uesugi are clearcut, and has a fact that supported each of it. Each point flowed to the other easily.







On that note
##Unvote
##Vote Meiya Mitsurugi

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Kiva-la on March 26, 2012, 01:46:54 AM
So I'm at L-1.  Oh look, every single person voting me has a terrible reason for doing so.  As far as I can tell, the only person who might be voting me today who posted something resembling legitimate criticism is Irene, and she isn't even voting me.

I doubt I'm going to convince Esuna that I'm town; I'm not sure if she's aware that her case on me is pretty flimsy, and her hydra partner is rather infamous for refusing to let go of a point, so he's probably been stabbing Esuna in the face every time she doesn't go after me in the thread. <_<

Nevertheless, I'll address some general accusations for the rest of town.

"Uesugi has only been posting to avoid prod/comes in at the last minute every day/etc!"

Maybe this is because my window of availability is quite specific and limited?  Every single post in this thread by me is within an approximately three-hour window, with the sole exception of my last post (because I got home really super late).  It is the only time I have to play mafia.  I rarely even get the chance to read the thread before this window.  I dislike the start time because it means I'm posting close to 24h after the day starts every day, but at least it also means I can be around at the end too.

"Uesugi dropped her scum read on Kaori to switch to BlackRose at the end of D2!"

I "dropped" it because I had a strong suspicion that BlackRose had basically scumslipped.  The conversation that followed involved a crumb-backed counterclaim by someone I view strongly as Town, followed by the agreement of several others who I also thought was town.  And people are wondering why I didn't just blindly keep going "Hey, let's NOT lynch this person who just got counterclaimed!"... yeah, no.

This took about a whole day to happen.

So it did.  Point conceded.

I would really rather not be hammered, since if we're in LYLO or MYLO and I get killed we lose.

That said... who is scum?  Meiya's scum!

That is a blunder on my part.

I accept the fact that I have performed sub-optimally this game

this was due to a misinterpretation on my part

It appears as though I have miscalculated

My apologies.

Firstly, I must apologize once more.

I apologize once more

I must sincerely apologize to all of you

I shall also note that I will be unavailable for many of the hours in the following day and sincerely apologize for any and all inconveniences that my inactivity may cause.

I must apologize once more

Miss Hinanawi, I will apologize in regards to the first point.

Seriously, no townie apologizes this much.  Jeez.  Also you never read any posts.

##vote Meiya
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 3
Post by: Conqueror on March 26, 2012, 01:51:12 AM
Final Votecount

Uesugi Kenshin: (3) Meiya Mitsurugi, Maka Albarn, Esuna Busy
Meiya Mitsurugi: (5) Eclair Martinozzi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Yuno Gasai, Kaori Kanzaki, Uesugi Kenshin - LYNCH!
Not Voting: Quicksword Irene
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Meiya Mitsurugi, Mafia Godmother, became a pauper Day 3!

...

jk

Meiya Mitsurugi, Town Godmother, became a pauper Day 3!

24 hours to send in night actions...etc.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Night 3
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 01:53:30 AM
Eclair Martinozzi, Town Mirror Knight, was sent to the pound Night 3!

Day 4 has begun! You have 72 hours.
With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

Countdown timer (http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=&month=3&day=29&year=2012&hour=21&min=55&sec=&p0=251)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: DiEnd on March 27, 2012, 01:57:51 AM
(http://i42.tinypic.com/33m7hog.jpg)

Hi-diddely-ho there, townerinos! It's your friendly neighborhood scum team. I bet you're wondering why Day 3 ended the way it did? Well, maybe you're not wondering that as much as hoping it was us throwing in the towel. The answer is that it's a little of Column A and a little of Column B. See, something's up with this game, and being the good little behaving scummies we are, we decided that town should be let in *~*our little secret*~*.

BUT FIRST, SOME BACKSTORY!

Okay so. One of our roles is indeed a Jailer role - that'd be the lovely Kanzaki over there all of you aside from Busy were too naive/blind/whatever to see how scummy she was being to seriously pursue her - complete with the protective part. The thing is that she's also a cop. Not a roleclop, no no no, an actual-factual alignment cop. Why would the scum team need an alignment detector?

Hmm.

Another one of our roles, which you'll see by the end of this post, is an unlimited-but-once-a-day dayvig. Neat stuff, right? Except this particular dayvig comes with a teeeeeeeeeeeny tiny little drawback; since I'm such a good and pure heavenly being, if I kill an innocent, I am dishonored, and I will fall and die along with them. Isn't that just a kick in the pants? Why would scum team have a dayvig that dies when it shoots town? Hmm. Hmmmm.

HMMMMMMMMM.

(http://i43.tinypic.com/rlb3fo.png)

AHA! There are THIRD PARTY SHENANIGANS AFOOT.

Now normally this wouldn't be such a big deal. I don't give a flying shrine maiden about third parties. We'll just outnumber 'em when the time comes.

EXCEPT

This third party's been GETTING ALL UP IN OUR GRILL ALL GAME LONG.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/350t502.png)

We haven't had noticeable control over a single one of our night actions. Shana was not supposed to die Night 1. Farina was not supposed to die Night 2. (And yes, we asked, and were told our kills went through.) Since I'm posting this as fast as I can and not reading the thread for any possible ninjas I'll come out and say that Martinozzi was supposed to die tonight - I figured my final act of evil scumminess should be to go and kick a puppy, since that's what all evil people do, plus I'm apparently a cat now as of the most recent image so fuck dogs - and I'm guessing she didn't actually buy the farm. We are the exact opposite of sure that Kanzaki actually copjailed Irene on Night 1 and I'm reasonably positive she roleblocked herself on Night 2. Needless to say, as fun as causing surface mischief can be, when you're naught but a puppet to some other asshole redirector's mischief, it loses its appeal pretty damn quickly. It didn't help that Kenshin got powered down on Night 2 for ??? reasons.

Now we could aaaaaaaaaallmost tolerate this, since we had an ace up our sleeve - LYLO was kinda-sorta a day earlier, since getting to a 3-3-1 would be a win for us is I could shoot the third party. So we kept going along, and Dragon help me, I actually started to get a little excited when the Gasai sisters recognized the combined might of their words were never going to be a match for mine and they hopped on over to Mitsurugi (earlier than I expected, in fact - I was trying to set Mitsurugi up as the mislynch immediately after my death, not as the first one to go!).

We were even going to get an inactivity modkill!

(http://i44.tinypic.com/iyltms.png)
Then Albarn appeared at the 45th hour, posted for the third time in roughly 100 game hours, plopped a vote down on Kenshin with nothing that indicated she'd read any of the posts addressing her case over the past game day and a half, and more or less vanished again.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/345hdep.jpg)

Now Kenshin's sitting there at L-1 with Irene's vote open and previously stated to be willing to descend upon Kenshin. Everything was going so well again, and now we had to deal with this nonsense, as well as yet another nightmare of a nighttime where who knows where the fuck any of our actions would go.

So we did what I know best, what I know better than anyone in history ever knew about the thing they were most familiar with.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/12314js.jpg)

We threw a calculated tantrum.

This was originally going to be shadowehgetslynchedonday1again.jpg but TinyPic doesn't roll that way with filenames. ALAS

All of us had had enough of the living hell that was this game. So we took what we felt was our best shot at a win: we rushed the Mitsurugi lynch through and prayed we would survive the night intact (you were all at least so kind as to lynch the nightvig Day 1!) so I could shoot the third party and we'd get the parity victory. I also have no idea if this happened, since I'm just Posting To Get This Out There. (I spent a lot of time doing this up, like hell was it not getting posted.)

But who to shoot? For a long time, we thought Irene was the third party. But she's since only dropped to second place. (Speaking of which, if a day dawns with no scum alive, lynch her, she's still probably third party.) No, now I have a new target, decided upon for reasons I will explain in postgame but am leaving out here for lack of time dramatic effect. This will end with me either dying or winning, so whatever the case, see you all then!

(http://i40.tinypic.com/d05e.jpg)

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2upbg9k.jpg)

The weather in the sky, the stability of the earth, and the hearts of man are all in the palm of my hand. Hear this, know this, and feel the wrath of the mightiest of all of

Heaven!


(http://i40.tinypic.com/34nk6zb.jpg)

##Enlighten: Yuno Gasai
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 02:02:26 AM
Scarlet Weather Rhapsody of All Humankind (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhrWTJODfYk)

Yuno Gasai: (4) Tenshi Hinanawi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Tenshi Hinanawi, Tenshi Hinanawi - LYNCH!
Not Voting: Everybody else
With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch

Yuno Gasai, Town Cult Recruiter, was purged of her sins and ascended to heaven Day 4!
Tenshi Hinanawi, Mafia Demagogue, committed seppeku Day 4!

...

The day resets.
You have 72 hours.
With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch.

>_>
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kiva-la on March 27, 2012, 02:08:38 AM
Now that's comedy!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kabuto on March 27, 2012, 02:12:39 AM
TOWN CULT RECRUITER.

Okay, even with the entire scumteam claimed, I'm still scared now.

At least I can go :smug: because I was right, but, still.

...I'm not sure what to do now. How the hell do you catch cult members again? Guess who Yuno's been targetting, I guess...? I imagine she'd pick some obvtowns, so maybe Irene?

Debating whether I should claim stuff or not. I don't know.

##Vote Kaori

I have a feeling Uesugi will be better company then Kaori until she gets lynched the next day.

(By the way Tenshi scumteam, that was incredibly amusing and ilu. I really do feel bad for you.)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kiva-la on March 27, 2012, 02:14:52 AM
Oh, hold your horses.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kabuto on March 27, 2012, 02:17:35 AM
Oh sheez fine

I'm game for whatever at this point. After that post by Tenshi, this game is gold regardless of anything. Not that I'm going to not try to win still, oh-ho no, but we've got 72 hours to humor you. (Not that I imagine today will last anywhere near that long)

##unvote
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kiva-la on March 27, 2012, 02:18:13 AM
I don't think it will either!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Den-O on March 27, 2012, 02:18:33 AM
I'm staying up this late for the start of day because that quickhammer means today is really in trouble.

I was actively wishig I had been the NK here, because I got told on Friday I'd be having a pretty badass exam on Wednesday (including content from the day right before it, which also means I can't skip lessons to study). The day ending right around now or an hour later like it should've originally meant that I'd miss less than the first 19 hours of the day so I figured it should be alright if I made it clear the night before that I wanted no quickhammering in that time window no matter the circumstaces. And now with this schedule change I'm stuck with having to study and play mafia at the same time tomorrow, which is going to be frickin' impossible. 95% sure this is LyLo now so I figure nobody should have any problem with not voting until things are clear, but still calling it out for possible lack of activity or lack of decent activity tomorrow given I'll be focusing on something else.

Cut by oh god what

Esuna posted so I figure I can post too.
I assume you've rolecopped Yuno. What the hell is a Town Cult? aren't Cults third party?
If Tenshi dies targeting Yuno being a Town Cult, I guess that means there's some other third party running around, but I only know Fool, Survivor and SK, and it doesn't look like any of them could do anything as weird as redirecting NK's.
Unless some Town role was doing this, Mass Claim time?

Cut by Tenshi Dies. Oh god YES.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kiva-la on March 27, 2012, 02:19:41 AM
Hi, Irene!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kabuto on March 27, 2012, 02:21:11 AM
Irene, don't play silly, you're already cult, aren't you?

Anyway, this isn't the first time there's been a cult recruiter that isn't actually part of the cult (Although it's weird.)

Pretty sure we're going to have to guess who Yuno targetted N1 and N2. SURE MAKES SENSE WHY THERE'S BEEN ALL THESE REDIRECTION SHENANIGAN ROLES HUH?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kiva-la on March 27, 2012, 02:23:16 AM
The chances of her actually being a cult recruiter are nil.  She's town, for one.  And, y'know.  Whole "role names are not what your roles actually do" thing.

Where are you, Kaori? :(
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kabuto on March 27, 2012, 02:24:45 AM
The chances of her actually being a cult recruiter are nil.
Fucking dammit why does this have to actually sound plausible?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kiva-la on March 27, 2012, 02:27:01 AM
Meh, I was gonna wait for Kaori's approval but it's not like she showed up for the rest of the game either. <_<

If you guys lynch her, I'm self-targeting, so that's game.

##towel
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Den-O on March 27, 2012, 02:28:15 AM
Well, it seems we're jointing with scum at this point. I don't really see why given that as far as I know, the only third party role I know of that Town couldn't joint with right now would be SK, which are kind of forced to kill every night. So unless we had people blocking the Mafia NK'ers through N1 and N2 and then blocking the SK N3, there shouldn't be an SK left. I'd be glad if somebody could clarify this situation for me.

Either way, Tenshi seems to have been pretty clear on me being the possible third party, should I go ahead and claim?

Okay somebody better explain what's going on here. Is it being suspected that Yuno was a Town Cult member that was recruited by the Third party cult? don't cult members turn third party when they're recruited?
God damn it the only thing I've ever read with a cult in it was Shadoweh Quest.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kiva-la on March 27, 2012, 02:28:54 AM
Irene: The short version is this - when they said it wasn't bastard mod, they lied.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 02:32:46 AM
Uh so yeah
Uesugi Kenshin, Mafia Swordswoman, and Kaori Kanzaki, Mafia Swordswoman, have conceded.

It is impossible to prevent a win condition from being reached!
Esuna Busy, Bus Driving Serial Killer wins!

(But yeah; game over, town wins. I'll post...stuff later.)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Den-O on March 27, 2012, 02:33:44 AM
I figured out that much so far given the amount of bastard town roles.

I'd really appreciate the long version. Does this mean that this was also the case for scum and that you were given that suicidal dayvig with no actual third party in-game?

Is there any reason why we shouldn't massclaim right now to clear this up? I have reasons to believe there are more investigative roles than Sayaka among town.

Cut by what happened :V
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 02:33:52 AM
 :toot:
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em on March 27, 2012, 02:34:04 AM
goty
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Hanged Hourai on March 27, 2012, 02:34:14 AM
huh? what?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Day 4
Post by: Kabuto on March 27, 2012, 02:34:34 AM
YAY I WIN

I'm sorry, scumteam. I redirected your nk from myself to Farina n2 :V I really do feel bad about it now.

No idea about Shana.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 02:35:04 AM
I'm Esuna! bet you didn't see that coming

Dorian is my hydra buddy. This is our QT! http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/YT3MBbL32xSGx
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em on March 27, 2012, 02:35:23 AM
rawr was a one-shot lightning rod

hourai and px: PLEASE DO NOT JOIN GAMES THAT YOU ARE NOT GOING TO POST IN IF YOU ROLL TOWN
Thanks!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 02:35:39 AM
<-shana

redirected all investigative and kill roles to me n1 and also canceled out all other roles
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: DiEnd on March 27, 2012, 02:36:17 AM
The fact that there was a third party at all makes me feel slightly better about the game. I probably would not have guessed you: Maka was the only person lower on my likelihood list.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Den-O on March 27, 2012, 02:36:32 AM
It feels like I got ripped off ._.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: PX on March 27, 2012, 02:37:16 AM
there is no 3rd party
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 02:37:58 AM
Yeah I wasn't seriously third party.

But it sort of felt like it n2  :]
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Affinity on March 27, 2012, 02:40:21 AM
... Uh huh.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Vhaltz on March 27, 2012, 02:41:00 AM
I know you seriously weren't a third party, Conq said town wins. It just feels like I got ripped off since I never got to lynch scum ._.

Also I don't know what the scum team got so panicky about with me not voting seeing I was repeatedly saying I was not voting xD
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Punch Hopper on March 27, 2012, 02:41:28 AM
ALL I WANTED TO DO WAS MAKE PEOPLE LOVE KITTEN
WHY DO YOU ALL HATE KITTENS YOU BASTARDS ;_;
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 02:42:51 AM
i wouldnt start a cult over kittens
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 02:42:55 AM
K4U, when I was talking about the pot and the kettle I meant Shkannon :3c

What the hell was your role anyway?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Vhaltz on March 27, 2012, 02:43:12 AM
Also that "don't play dumb" really hurt me because that was my exact reaction when I reached the Cult QT as you'll be able to see when it's made public. I'm just Noobsword Irene ;_;
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Edible on March 27, 2012, 02:44:05 AM
dum dee doo this game is a trainwreck

Edit: http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/mcufw79yX9UQX
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Hanged Hourai on March 27, 2012, 02:45:49 AM
Also, sorry for the drop in my activity, but I'll explain it and probably ruin any happy mood or cheerful conception of me you may have.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Edible on March 27, 2012, 02:46:38 AM
Don't worry about it.  You should have been replaced or modkilled but you likely had a legitimate reason for not posting.0
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 02:51:22 AM
Dead QT: http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/fHSznXZ9PBiBg
Cult QT: http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/kcF5t2SmrphRB
Mod QT: http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/DeJT8MY5mUyJ

Role PMs:

Town:
Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Affinity! You are Sayaka Miki, Town Paranoid Cop.
You became a magical girl to protect the people who couldn't fight back...or so you told yourself. But after being betrayed by the people closest to you, you've adopted a rather different philosophy. You'll rip apart the scumbags of the world with your own hands, whatever it takes.
During the night, you have the ability to target certain players with your enhanced investigation techniques in the hopes of revealing their true alignment...by flipping them dead. For you though, the real question is this - are the scum lurking inconspicuously, or actively leading the town off a cliff?
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active, One-Shot) During the night phase, you may ##Execute the player(s) with the most number of prods the previous game day in an attempt to kill them. You may use only one ability per night.
(Active, One-Shot) During the night phase, you may ##Murder the player(s) with the least number of votes at the end of the game day in an attempt to kill them. You may use only one ability per night.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Dormio! You are Meiya Mitsurugi, Town Godmother.
You are the 1% and as such, you've decided to come and play with the rest of the "common people" to partake in their worldly knowledge. You hear that there's a group of people going around using such underhanded tactics as murdering people in the middle of the night. How despicable!
As a leading member of the society, you have the ability to appear as town to any investigation. Additionally, your wealth and background ensure that you are protected from harm during the night, but only as long as the money lasts.
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Passive) You are a member of the town with [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and [REDACTED]. You may communicate with them during the day in this thread (http://www.shrinemaiden.org/forum/index.php/topic,12276.0.html).
(Passive) You will appear as town to all investigations.
(Passive) You have a 9-shot bulletproof ability.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Hanged Hourai! You are Maka Albarn, Town Vanillizer.
As a meister, you're out to defeat and collect the souls of evildoers and witches. What better way to do this than to exterminate the mafia hiding amongst you?
Using your trusty scythe, you are able to remove the abilities of any poor soul that crosses your path.
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active) During the night phase, you may ##Reap a player to absorb their soul. This will remove most, if not all, of their non-factional abilities for the remainder of the game.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Shadoweh/Kitten4U! You are Yuno Gasai, Town Cult Recruiter.
Some people think Yukiteru is a loser. But you know better. He's the #1 cutest, and you'll make sure that everyone else knows that too.
Every night, you may recruit another player into the cult of Yukiteru, where you may converse with them at all times about what Yukiteru is doing, how great he is, etc. Unfortunately, some people regard your behavior as a bit obsessive, and they automatically assume the worst whenever you're involved...
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active) Once per night phase, you may ##Recruit a player into the cult of Yukiteru and converse with them in this QT (http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/kcF5t2SmrphRB) at any time.
(Passive) You are a Miller of all Trades. Any alignment investigation will return you as anti-town. You will be seen visiting any night kills that occur. In addition, any investigative or statistical ability not mentioned here will return the worse possible result.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, PX! You are BlackRose, Town Bodyguard.
They told you it was just another MMORPG. But when the boundary between the gaming world and real life begins to fade, you know something's up.
You're here to contain the incident before it spreads any further. At night, you can target a player to absorb all night actions they perform in an effort to stop the infection. After all, the only way to win is not to play.
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active) Once per night phase, you may ##Hack a player to redirect all actions originating from that player to yourself.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Bardiche! You are Eclair Martinozzi, Town Mirror Knight.
As the captain of the Praetorian Guards, you know quite a bit about swordplay. If anyone tries something funny on you, you'll parry their actions right back. Just because your ears are small doesn't mean you can't fight, after all!
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Passive) Any non-fatal actions directed at you will be reflected back at the originator.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, ActionDan (later Vhaltz)! You are Quicksword Irene, Town Chief of Police.
Once a high-standing member of The Organization, you've now gone into hiding. But you're not going to just stand there and take it when some dog tells you your life is forfeit. You didn't become No. 2 for nothing, after all.
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active, One Shot) Once in the game, you may prevent a lynch on yourself. Your flip will not be shown, and the day does not reset unless specified otherwise.
(Passive) If you are lynched, all investigative results will return no result for the rest of the game.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, huhwhat! You are Farina, Town Framer.
A true mercenary, you'll get the job done as long as you're paid. And as a Pegasus Knight, nothing on the battlefield is hidden from your view. Unfortunately, your love for money leads to some rather unfortunate side effects...
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active) During the night phase, you may ##Rolecop a player to determine the name of their role.
(Passive) Any player you target will have their investigative alignment switched for the rest of the game.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, NeoSerela/Dorian! You are Esuna Busy, Town Teamster.
You're some lame elf magician who doesn't even use swords. Get out, knave. Well, at least you're not totally useless.
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active) During the night phase, you may ##Switch two players such that any night action performed on a switched player will affect the other player for that night.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, drrawr! You are Shana, Town Superstar.
You're not just any high school girl. You're the Flame-Haired Burning-Eyed Hunter, and the scumbags here won't stand a chance. You're here to eat melonpan and kick Guze no Tomogara, and you're all out of melonpan.
You win when all threats to your faction are eliminated and there is at least one Town member remaining. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Active, One-Shot) Once in the game during the night phase, you may activate ##Fuzetsu to tell everyone to urusai. This will draw all investigative and killing actions towards you, while also canceling out the effects of most other roles. However, this ability may still be blocked.

Mafia:

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Kilgamayan! You are Tenshi Hinanawi, Mafia Demagogue.
Drinking sake and eating peaches gets boring after a while. So now that you've nicked the Sword of Hisou, you have the urge to bash some townie heads in. Just to keep things fresh and exciting, you know?
You win when the Mafia outnumbers the town or when nothing can prevent the same from happening. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Passive, Factional) You are a member of the scum team with Kaori Kanzaki and Uesugi Kenshin. You may communicate at any time in this QT (http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/mcufw79yX9UQX).
(Active, Factional) You may submit the factional mafia kill for the scumteam.
(Active) Once per day, you may ##Enlighten a player, resulting in their lynch and otherwise resetting the day. However, if this results in the death of a town player, you will commit suicide. Far be it for a celestial to sin, and you still have your pride to watch out for.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Hero999! You are Kaori Kanzaki, Mafia Gaolkeeper.
They call themselves townies, but all you see is a carnival of sinners. You've teamed up with your partners to purify these wayward warriors and set them on the path to righteousness.
You win when the Mafia outnumbers the town or when nothing can prevent the same from happening. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Passive, Factional) You are a member of the scum team with Tenshi Hinanawi and Uesugi Kenshin. You may communicate at any time in this QT (http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/mcufw79yX9UQX).
(Active, Factional) You may submit the factional mafia kill for the scumteam.
(Active) During the night, you may ##Investigate a player to simultaneously protect them and determine their alignment. You may not perform this action while sending in the factional kill.
(Passive) All night actions performed by you will perform an automatic roleblock on the target.

Quote
Welcome to Sword Girls Mafia, Edible! You are Uesugi Kenshin, Mafia Spirit Medium.
Looking at the playerlist, you realized that many of them weren't even sword wielders. Absolutely atrocious! As the God of Warfare, you've come to teach these lightweights how to fight with a real weapon, and the first step in that lesson is to smack them down like the ants they are.
You win when the Mafia outnumbers the town or when nothing can prevent the same from happening. Please confirm in the thread with your anon account. Good luck!

Abilities:
(Passive, Factional) You are a member of the scum team with Tenshi Hinanawi and Kaori Kanzaki. You may communicate at any time in this QT (http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/mcufw79yX9UQX).
(Active, Factional) You may submit the factional mafia kill for the scumteam. Night kills performed by you will pierce through any protection due to your unparalleled swordsmanship.

Comments on modding will come later.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em on March 27, 2012, 02:59:29 AM
postin' the rage PMs i sent to the mod

Quote
FUCK, WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?

I went to the bathroom after sending those PMs, thought about it some more, and... no, I don't get it. He KNEW there was a Cop in the game. He knew roles in the game were most likely oddly named, too! He could have just claimed vig! It would have been more believable, wouldn't have outed a counterclaim and would have had a higher chance of him surviving to D2 if it was believed, because that's how you handle provable claims.

Just... why. I am so fucking confused by this game right now.

In other news, I'm pretty sure Esuna's hammer came from scum.

I'm also pretty sure I'm dying tonight though because just about everybody except for Meiya buddied up to me with some sort of 'FARINA IS SO TOWN" yesterday. SIGH.

Quote
congratulations, your pm inbox is my new thoughts quicktopic, since there's no way I'll not be instalynched if I post meaningless NK spec in-thread

ANYWAY

They killed Shana? Really? This is the game with Hourai the wannabe pro-active supertown, Kilga and umu the N1 Policy Kills, a Shadoweh/Dormio superhydra, and whoever the hell Eclair is and I getting heralded as townie in like every other post, and they killed fucking SHANA? As in the lurker who didn't even know what a Godmother is until somebody told her?

A part of me wants to just policy lynch Shadoweh because I think that kill would come from her and set-up speculation says she's obvscum, but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't go through. :eng99:  Still, there had better be a town bus driver, otherwise scum is just laughing at us and we probably have a Kilga/umu/Shadormio scumteam who are just making dumb kills to fuck with the town because they know they've won anyway due to RNG and can be smugnoxious about it. Though I guess none of them are the type to actually do that except for maybe Dormio. I don't actually think Shadoweh is scum, either, but it FEELS like she should be.

anyway, uh, i'm probably not going to be available to play mafiers until like Late Nite or something so if i hit the 24 hour mark i'm probably just then working on a post
(I wasn't actually analyzing Yuukii's posting style so I thought it was just Dormio being Kyon or something, and I thought Edible was umu because his first D1 post reminded me of Kuruμnut, like, a lot)

Quote
At the very least, I think PX BlackRose's player deserves to be carded for that entire day. Throughout the last few games, he's basically been flaking and lurking constantly regardless of alignment. It's infuriating to play with and only serves to degrade the quality of the game. What happened here (ignoring the meat of the day to the point where he was modkilled) was just ridiculous given his D1 and his history in general. I kind of get the impression that what I said about him lurking because he knew he could survive the day might have actually been true even though he flipped town. He's fully capable of actively playing and contributing to the game instead of only making random readposts on occasions and he has shown this multiple times before, why does he not bother doing so?

Obviously, this doesn't really apply if he had a good IRL excuse, but if he did, then I'm not aware.

If BlackRose was somehow NOT PX then ignore me.

this one still stands
FUCK YOU PXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 03:01:20 AM
Role PMs and QTs were posted on the previous page.

This chart (http://i40.tinypic.com/jijok4.png) is probably the best thing to come out of this game.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 03:01:45 AM
Quote
They killed Shana? Really? This is the game with Hourai the wannabe pro-active supertown, Kilga and umu the N1 Policy Kills, a Shadoweh/Dormio superhydra, and whoever the hell Eclair is and I getting heralded as townie in like every other post, and they killed fucking SHANA? As in the lurker who didn't even know what a Godmother is until somebody told her?

Quote
7) Shana (Shakugan no Shana) <-- Town, but totally punchable

 :ohdear:
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Affinity on March 27, 2012, 03:04:53 AM
I am very sorry to town for my horrible fakeclaim and for claiming far too late.  Yeah, that was really, really terrible, and I don't even know why I did it (though I didn't think there was a real cop in the game since I was a 'cop' by name).  It was the first time I got a nightvig role in four years, and I didn't even get to have fun with it!  Gosh.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 03:08:17 AM
Conq deserves a medal.

Even I can't make a setup this bastardly.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 03:18:22 AM
I cant tell if my role did more bad then good  :X
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em on March 27, 2012, 03:21:33 AM
you were part of the reason scum forfeited to the non-existant bus driving serial killer, so yeah
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Kitten4u on March 27, 2012, 03:21:57 AM
Conq, can you post night actions?  I want to know what happened!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 03:28:24 AM
you were part of the reason scum forfeited to the non-existant bus driving serial killer, so yeah

this makes no sense to me  ???
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 03:28:33 AM
Aftermath of Conq's game in irc by most people with a game in queue: "Oh god I'm just going to remove all elements of role madness out of my future set up, right now."

And then suddenly the game queue was filled with tame and normal setups.

Except for Shadoweh's.

Also K4U they're in the mod QT, if you don't want to wait for him to post them (Or if he doesn't)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Shadoweh on March 27, 2012, 03:42:34 AM
I-it's not bastard mod! It's just a little special!
*pets game* It's okay little setup.. ;_;
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: DiEnd on March 27, 2012, 04:00:03 AM
Fun fact: I had actually considsered requesting a town role because I didn't have a lot of time to dedicate to the game. I will admit I did some scummy things, but everything I said about activity, including everything I said surrounding the Day 1 non-switch to Miki, was 100% true and would have played out exactly that way were I town. (And PX, it was still seriously uncool to talk about how I wasn't around for most of the beginning of Day 2 in your vote on me since I had spent some of that absent time with my grandmother in physical rehab.)

So I promised this, for that it's relevant now. For the record, I really, genuinely did believe that Shadow4u was third party.

And on that note, while I'm thinking about it, I am well and truly floored to read through the mod QT and finding those in charge at least mildly surprised that the scum faction would chase third parties around after they were given a cop and a vig that couldn't be used on townies outside of desperation moves. (I guess this is what I get for forgetting my resolution to not join games where Pesco reviewed the setup after the equally-"enjoyable" Cavalier of the Abyss game.) If possible, I would like to hear from all three people involved in making or reviewing the setup as to why they thought they could give scum those roles and then expect scum to assume 10 town. Because, to be frank, as rage-inducing as CotA was, that's ultimately all it really was. It was a setup that was nigh-impossible to overcome, but at least I could see it coming and try to work around it (and almost did). I feel cheated by this game. I busted my ass paying attention to this game at work and during other commitments (for those that haven't read the Scum QT yet, the time I spent coaching Kanzaki through the Day 2 claim process, including calling Farina's bluff, was done in the middle of choir rehearsal - I literally had one eye on my music and one eye on my phone) and sacrificed a good deal of sleep and a shitton of free time to put my best effort forward. We were running out of time, but we had that light at the end of the tunnel. All we had to do was get to LYLO and I could shoot the right person...and then there was no right person all along and all the damage I had done to my sleep schedule, productivity at work, and rehearsal time for various musical commitments had all been for squat. I know games are supposed to be fun, and if I put in that amount of time but eventually lose on my own merits and faults, I can still have fun in that scenario. I lost this game because the game lied to me from start to finish. Not quite as fun to lose that way.

Anyway.

Why did I shoot Gasai?

For this to make sense, remember that I'm operating under the assumption that there has to be a third party, because why scum cop and dayvig that can't kill townies etc etc etc.

The first major point, which didn't occur to me at the time but really sunk in at work today while I was dwelling on it, was the highlighted votecount post. Four days, four "unknowns". Gasai looked, for all the world, like she was lining up the obvious lynches to get herself all the way to and through the final day safely. This was compounded by the Albarn clear, which looked like a incredibly lazy non-reason to clear someone and thus just an exceuse to match the number of unknowns to the number of available lynches.

The second major point comboed neatly with the first one; Gasai was trying to lead the game. Third parties do their best when they're active participants because they only have themselves to rely on, and as such they need to minimize the effect that dumb luck has on their playing status. Being an active participant like that gave Gasai a degree of control over the game.

From that realization, other lesser things set in. It occurred to me that, as much as I racked my brains for how it could work as a direct function of her role, I couldn't figure out why Shadow4u would claim the BlackRose role wurgle could have still happened with Town BlackRose. I also thought Kanzaki was obviously far scummier and I figured at least half of the Gasai sisters knew because K4U was scum in the game that spawned the video Kenshin linked to. She, above all else in this game, would have known what scum lurking really looked like. This led to me convincing myself that Gasai was knowingly getting rid of the townie at the end of Day 2.

And then there was Gasai using the Farina death against me so blatantly at the beginning of Day 3. In retrospect, had I know Day 3 was all Shadoweh, I might not have giving this as much thought because I think K4U would have been far less likely to bring it up even if she thought of it, but I didn't know who posted any given post aside from the one fuckup when K4U posted a thing with her actual forum account, and I fiugred they both had to be working together so K4U approved it. I know K4U knows very well the dangers of NK speculation, and I got the strong feeling Gasai bringing it up meant she knew it wasn't the intended kill and was just using it to jab at me. Which made her more likely to be the phantom omniredirector we had been worried about for a little bit.

Also the omnimiller claim was there and yeah.

As for other people, Albarn was completely out of my mind as a third party because who the fuck gets prodded that much and comes within 4 hours of a modkill as a third party. Irene both had good content and was greener than grass; she was obviously nervous and not entirely sure of herself, but was still giving it her all. If she was the third party, then kudos to her on a damn fine acting job. I don't think I can properly articulate why I didn't think it was Martin Ozzy or Busy (perhaps the latter I could say was because of how incredibly spastic Serela started being after Day 1; it didn't feel at all like a third party playstyle) but I didn't think it was either of them.

So Gasai it had to be. And we all saw how that worked out. I don't regret the decision in the slightest, though, and at least it made for an amusing read.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 04:14:53 AM
I expected scum to assume 10 town because there was a town role which was explicitly told that there were 10 town members, and I'd expect most townies to just claim that early...but that didn't happen, which ended up punishing the scumteam, which was an oversight.

Considering that I didn't declare LYLO and didn't put a restriction on when you could vig though, I don't know why you thought I would have given scum an instant win ticket, but I guess bastard mod setup etc.

I explained why I added a cop in the mod QT, but the meat of the role was always the jailor and I imagined most scumteams would use it that way.

I can accept that the addition of town roles like the bus driver and lightning rod screwed over the scumteam, but I don't agree with your statement that the game lied to you from start to finish.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 04:17:22 AM
I can accept that the addition of town roles like the bus driver and lightning rod screwed over the scumteam, but I don't agree with your statement that the game lied to you from start to finish.

I still dont understand
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: DiEnd on March 27, 2012, 04:20:01 AM
Then next time you don't give scum 2/3 roles that say "HI GUYS THERE IS A THIRD PARTY". (Or you just actually include a third party.) Of course we were going to use the Jailer as a roleblocker, but why did we need an alignment detector or a nightkill stopper? The latter can be kinda chalked up to the nightvig but the former was pretty blatant deception.

I figured we were given the one-day-early-LYLO-combo thing because our roles were pretty shit otherwise, and even then it was hardly a guarantee because we still would have had to pick the third party out of a bunch of townies (which is why we had the cop, of course!). It's easy to point at the rest of the setup and how underpowered a lot of the town roles were in order to balance the underpowered scum roles because you knew what the setup was. We didn't.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 04:20:53 AM
I still dont understand
It's because the scumteam was not even able to choose their nightkill target.

I made it worse by redirecting it N2 as well. Because my logic is silly I hit a town despite knowing (and practically knowing that I knew) 2/3 scum, at least.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 04:29:58 AM
So because there night kills were redirected, they thought there was a third party at work or something?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 04:35:57 AM
They had an alignment cop and a vig that would suicide kill the user if it hit town (As opposed to, say, hitting third party).

So it only made sense that there was a third party they were supposed to kill.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Schezo on March 27, 2012, 04:36:22 AM
Bu- But I don't forget commas.

So it wasn't just me reading along going, "Man this is a trainwreck I don't really know what's happening."
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 04:40:52 AM
The nightkill stopper could be used against the vig in the early game, while the alignment detector was mostly there to provide interaction with the rest of the setup, so scum wouldn't fakeclaim impossible role actions or something. But that never ended up being relevant in this game.

I don't think including a third party would have improved the game balance, if that's what you're saying. It probably would have made it even more swingy than it was.

I figured we were given the one-day-early-LYLO-combo thing because our roles were pretty shit otherwise, and even then it was hardly a guarantee because we still would have had to pick the third party out of a bunch of townies (which is why we had the cop, of course!). It's easy to point at the rest of the setup and how underpowered a lot of the town roles were in order to balance the underpowered scum roles because you knew what the setup was. We didn't.
Mmm, this I can understand. I originally designed this setup because I wanted to have a setup with roles that didn't focus on the roles, so mostly functional vanilla, or perhaps town roles with negative utility, etc. Sometimes the best way to use a role is to not use it at all. I ended up having to add actual roles to the setup for "balance." I dislike town cops because any half-witted townie can use a cop role to great effect, so I tried giving town some more unconventional roles (redirectors, all of which were basically last-minute additions, especially the bus driver and lightning rod). Redirectors are less reliable and pretty swingy, but their ability to mess with the scum NK means they can do a lot more harm in the right hands. On the other hand, the scumteam had basically the same power it had before. If I were to run this setup again I'd nix at least those two roles; I imagine the scumteam would have had a different perspective on the game if their kills the first two nights had gone the way they wanted to.

But yeah, if I do run a setup again it'll probably be an open setup or something. >_>
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em on March 27, 2012, 04:41:00 AM
Bu- But I don't forget commas.

So,  it wasn't just me reading along going, "Man, this is a trainwreck. I don't really know what's happening."
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: capt. h on March 27, 2012, 04:42:18 AM
I apologize for not arguing against the cop. I didn't even notice that the jailer was also a rolecop when I reviewed the setup. I thought Conq was just making millers all over the place to mess with town.

I do not apologize for giving your role the OK though (Kilga's vig that only survives if he hits scum). I thought that role was brilliant, allowing it's holder to either get rid of an extremely pesky townie when staring down a lynch anyway without giving town night actions or the ability to redirect it, or to just getting rid of a particularly troublesome scum buddy for lots of townie cred.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Shadoweh on March 27, 2012, 04:44:13 AM
Wait wait

Quote
As for other people, Albarn was completely out of my mind as a third party because who the fuck gets prodded that much and comes within 4 hours of a modkill as a third party.
Kilga, aren't you the one that modded the Moriyavatar? 8)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Vhaltz on March 27, 2012, 04:44:38 AM
I just noticed that my death N2 would've probably been more beneficial for town than scum.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: DiEnd on March 27, 2012, 04:48:32 AM
Moriyavatar didn't come quite that close to a modkill, though. :V Also they said more when they posted than the very little Albarn said when she was here.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Pesco on March 27, 2012, 04:50:58 AM
Roles aside, there's also the fact that Hero and Edible cemented themselves as scum over the course of the game. Kilga's shot was a gambit with too much risk given that he'd have to solo the rest of the game even if it worked out.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Edible on March 27, 2012, 04:52:55 AM
Roles aside, there's also the fact that Hero and Edible cemented themselves as scum over the course of the game. Kilga's shot was a gambit with too much risk given that he'd have to solo the rest of the game even if it worked out.

Uh

We "cemented ourselves as scum" because we intentionally quicklynched a townie to pull off a gambit because none of us wanted to play anymore, because the setup was impossibly bad.  I stopped playing after N2.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: I have no name on March 27, 2012, 05:18:40 AM
...and this shenanigans is half of why I didn't join this game.
The other half being its original name, I wasn't about to forget that.

The "Who's Who?" chart is pretty interesting, hopefully it'll expand as more players join games.

I understood very little of this game as an observer, I'd imagine I'd understand less as a player.

I'll assure you this game is far from typical. :v
I figured as much.  It's why I decided to sit this one out as opposed to "oh boy my second game let's play the craziest one possible"
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 05:31:37 AM
I'll assure you this game is far from typical. :v
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: ActionDan on March 27, 2012, 05:36:18 AM
I loved this game, because I loved the roles!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Conqueror on March 27, 2012, 06:05:42 AM
Night actions

Night 1:
Shana - ##Fuzetsu --> Successfully activates lightning rod ability
Yuno Gasai - ##Recruit: Maka Albarn --> Roleblocked by Shana
BlackRose - ##Hack Yuno --> Roleblocked by Shana
Maka Albarn - ##Reap: Quicksword Irene - Roleblocked by Shana
Esuna Busy - ##Switch Maka and Eclair - Roleblocked by Shana
Farina - ##Rolecop Esuna Busy --> Redirected to Shana --> Shana now investigates as anti-town --> Returns 'Your investigation reveals your target is a "Superstar"'
Kaori Kanzaki - ##Investigate Quicksword Irene --> Redirected to Shana --> Jails Shana (Shana can only be roleblocked directly) -->'Your investigation reveals your target is anti-town.'
Uesugi Kenshin - Mafia NK Farina --> Redirected to Shana --> Pierces Kaori's protection --> Successful

Night 2:
Esuna Busy - ##Switch Esuna and Farina
Maka Albarn  - ##Reap: Uesugi Kenshin --> Kenshin becomes a Swordswoman
Farina - ##Rolecop Kaori Kanzaki --> 'Your investigation reveals your target is a "Gaolkeeper"
Yuno Gasai - ##Recruit: Esuna Busy --> Recruits Farina due to busdrive
Kaori Kanzaki - ##Investigate Eclair --> Roleblocks herself instead --> 'You did not receive a result from your investigation.'
Tenshi Hinanawi  - Mafia NK Esuna Busy --> Kills Farina due to busdrive --> Successful

Night 3:
Esuna Busy - ##Switch Esuna and Uesugi Kenshin
Maka Albarn - ##Reap: Kaori --> Kaori becomes a Swordswoman
Yuno Gasai - ##Recruit: Quicksword Irene --> Successful
Tenshi Hinanawi - Mafia NK Eclair Martinozzi --> Successful
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on March 27, 2012, 07:09:39 AM
Nobody reads my posts ever.
I believe this to be proven as fact.
Anyway, GG.
Sorry about disappearing during D2, my tendency to procrastinate when it comes to stuff related to uni decided to wail on my pretty hard.

Oh yeah, it's linked in the graveyard, but here's my private thoughts QT.
http://www.quicktopic.com/47/H/uK82ctDqvEMCg
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Ryuki on March 27, 2012, 07:41:58 AM
I explicitly said in my join PM that I had no intention of joining if it was bastard mod and I am disappointed the request was not honoured. I, personally, gave up midway D2 and when I was ready to post again scum had quick hammered.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on March 27, 2012, 09:57:08 AM
God damn it the only thing I've ever read with a cult in it was Shadoweh Quest.
Wait why have people not forgotten about this yet fffffffffffffffffffffff
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: ?q on March 27, 2012, 11:19:23 AM
(I wasn't actually analyzing Yuukii's posting style so I thought it was just Dormio being Kyon or something, and I thought Edible was umu because his first D1 post reminded me of Kuruμnut, like, a lot)
I happened upon this thread just late enough to realize that I missed my chance to be Farina who is in no way a sword girl.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Vhaltz on March 27, 2012, 11:53:01 AM
Wait why have people not forgotten about this yet fffffffffffffffffffffff

Because it's the thread that got me interested in Mafia in the first place, go figure :V

It went something like Dormio RtD -> "Lynch Shadoweh" -> "Oh look Shadoweh Quest they like lynching her so it'll be fun" -> "What the fuck is this" -> *read mafia games* -> *read wiki* -> *read mafia games again* -> *enter cult*

Also I'm finally reading through the QTs and I am not adorable or whatever I was just trying hard okay ;_;

Quote
they're not posting because they don't want to interrupt the ever-exciting xXx Vhaltz and Shadoweh Variety Hour xXx, of course

And I suddenly feel violated.

EDITagain. I should probably clarify for Dormio that Remilius and Vhaltz are the same person :V
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Edible on March 27, 2012, 02:48:25 PM
Nobody reads my posts ever.

To be fair, you didn't seem to read anyone else's. 8)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: ActionDan on March 27, 2012, 03:06:18 PM
its ok Dormio!

I would have cleared you after your response to my vote.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Edible on March 27, 2012, 03:06:29 PM
I'ma just post this again so people can stare at it in bewilderment.

Town:
Restricted 2-shot nightvig
9-shot bulletproof godmother, knows there are 10 town
Vanilla-izer
Neighborizer miller
Self-redirector
Non-kill redirector
Self-governor
Rolecop
Bus driver
1-shot lightning rod

Scum:
Suicidal dayvig (with the implication that there's third-party to kill that won't trigger the suicide)
Jailer Cop (town was full of false investigation flags and had no cop themselves)
Strongman (town had no doc and one bulletproof)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em on March 27, 2012, 03:54:20 PM
Farina who is in no way a sword girl.
(refer to confirmation post)

Also, Edible, it's unfair to paint me as an actual Rolecop, given that I also had to target carefully due to the bastard framing and learned jack shit due to the game's role names. Not denying that the game was imba, though.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: ActionDan on March 27, 2012, 04:38:54 PM
Well.... Scum had the opportunity to claim whatever with impunity for the most part.  I dunno.  it wasn't that bad, ofc I love bastard modding.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on March 27, 2012, 07:56:18 PM
EDITagain. I should probably clarify for Dormio that Remilius and Vhaltz are the same person :V
See Conq? I was right!
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 08:47:30 PM
Quote
<Conq> Haha
<Conq> I like Serela after Tenshi suicided
<ActionDan> lol
<Conq> IRENE YOU'RE ALREADY CULTED AREN'T YOU
<ActionDan> lllllllllllllllllol

If I could just have any level of persuasive power, I swear

(We didn't have to kill the cult anyway though so)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Edible on March 27, 2012, 08:49:39 PM
(refer to confirmation post)

Also, Edible, it's unfair to paint me as an actual Rolecop, given that I also had to target carefully due to the bastard framing and learned jack shit due to the game's role names. Not denying that the game was imba, though.

Yeah, the rolecop in this game was completely a bastard role.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on March 27, 2012, 08:52:35 PM
It would have been hilarious if the scumteam thought that people that HW framed were traitors though.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Vhaltz on March 27, 2012, 08:58:36 PM
See Conq? I was right!

It wasn't that hard to check back on IMP for half a second and look at one of the votecounts ::)

I was more amused at Conq being totally confused about who Remilius was in your QT :V
I totally just joined MotK under that name for kicks and switched it over to my regular name once I figured I'd be playing mafia and being active and whatnot.

Remilius' face (http://danbooru.donmai.us/post/show/547498/armor-beard-blue_hair-cloak-divine-genderswap-lowr) isn't particularly townie-looking either.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on March 27, 2012, 09:01:09 PM
I was more amused at Conq being totally confused about who Remilius was in your QT :V
That is what I was referring to.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Hero999 on March 27, 2012, 09:16:33 PM
DAMMIT YUKARI CONQ
And I'm sorry for not being here at the time, I decided to take a nap at 7pm, and when I woke up it was already 6am :<
However
Question: How in the world did I end up surviving till end game?
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Serela on March 27, 2012, 09:20:56 PM
Question: How in the world did I end up surviving till end game?
don't even get me started

RAAAAAGE
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Vhaltz on March 27, 2012, 09:32:11 PM
Because PX lurked harder than you did, pretty much.

Also Dormio, you certainly weren't set on it until later on, though, given how you thought Esuna was Vhaltz/Serela hydra and Remilius was Irene 2.0 :derp:
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dormio Ergo Sum on March 27, 2012, 10:15:47 PM
My brain wasn't working and I forgot who I thought other people were. :V
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Kilgamayan on March 27, 2012, 10:30:00 PM
Question: How in the world did I end up surviving till end game?

Because people absolutely refuse to lynch lurkers for ??? reasons.

It's why (a) scum lurk, and (b) that Downfall video exists.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Dr Rawr on March 27, 2012, 11:21:20 PM
I now see whats missing from tenshis suicide post.

8)
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Kilgamayan on March 28, 2012, 12:04:32 AM
It's in the avatar, where it's more important.
Title: Re: Sword Girls Anonymafia - Someone Wins
Post by: Shadoweh on March 28, 2012, 04:30:12 AM
Kilga's post makes the entire game better. Tenshi just wanted to save the world from the creepy yandere stalker.