hi!! I got my ava and sig back~~
yay! and this new forums is bad for the eyes man.
@pesco: I agree with the guys here, especially about the parts about not posting useful stuff and such.
But you're pesco, gambit player so I gave you a pass on that.
Wrathie had my vote for his strange posting and ducking off without a vote down. He's still not communicating to us and there's no way I can believe in his sincerity like this. When I commented on Wrathie reacting strongly, it was about this post. If he was throwing a fit like that at L-1 or 2, fine. But he was only on 2 votes (L-5) at the time.
as many people has pointed out, i was out of character that day.. it was Real Life rearing it's head on me.
I can't find anything else asides from what you guys posted... but as he is still playing on setup subconsciously.. what with raising Lynchee and etc every other post when he is actually posting content, pesco is skirting around with the borders of speech.
I dislike it lots, ready for a pesco lynch.
You asked for where people acknowledged my content, I gave the links that were broken then fixed them. Affinity noted the callout to KY for not asking questions and UK noted my determination of Wrathie having ulterior motives for not voting.
i can't see the links now.. but no reason for me not to vote you thou.
I saw something about why was I able to post if my keyboard was busted.
Simple.
my ###### key was busted and i fixed it the next day.
Happy? Real life stuff so I can't give any proof ^^
Answering to Alice's 2 questions from the end of the last topic.
1) The initial pass was due to knowing your RL circumstances and that was null in determining you town. Your lurking at that time was insufficient to call scum and vote. The switch in my voting came after Edible's explanation post. It sounded reasonable enough to me then and that a SP lynch looked unlikely, I made my switch.
So my real life's not even valid there? but the rest of it checks out... a Lynch IS better than No lynch at Day 1.
At least till i re-read Rou, was there no post between yours and Edible's?...
smell a scum. ^^
2) I didn't buy your doc claim. There was no doc in Kilga's last game (which I co-modded) and in my mod-fishing, I deemed it unlikely for there to be a doc at all in the game.
This is just stating past experience, i call it a gut vote then anything else.... which point comes first however?
##unvote##vote pescoMy stand on this is that he's not posting as much as he can, and as it can only be on my pov, he's gunning me for a case that i know is weak and cannot be proved easily.
@Edible: ur post has more content now.. seems okay to me and straightforward... so nothing much to add on.
But Kiro brought up a good point on why did you unvote when it was after his claim, which i nearly skirted over due to his sob-party of sorts.
But your reply:
I was not aware I was required to be wholly convinced someone was scum to vote them, or wholly convinced someone was town to unvote them.
Providing a detailed answer here would probably prove insulting to donut. I will therefore say that it's my personal belief, based off donut's overall personality, that his actions this game make sense for someone with no power role. Thus, vanilla townie makes some sense. (This would probably also apply to mafia goon to a lesser extent, I suppose.)
Elaboration: I'm still okay with a donut lynch, especially if he doesn't come up with something worthwhile. Until then, my vote has better things to do than waste time on him.
seems okay to me.
A few questions thou. it's loosely based on meta, again... but it probably is a null tell on that since you are willing to vote on donut if it comes to it.
Was thinking i should point that out.
@Kiro: Pro-town as usual. If you end up scum, I'd have to blame myself again...
@rou: i gotta ask something before i do another analysis..
Is it Edible's Link or pesco's link that is broken. in my knowledge Edible's was broken but was pesco's??
Confused.
but you check out okay ^^