"has been guilty of trying to keep alive a weak case on Alice. isn't much point on keeping a case alive if you don't place your vote on it"
I wasn't voting because... you know, it's LyLo? Well, MyLo so having a single vote on someone=fine, but still. I'm a lot more convinced about Sakana being scum then Alice, not voting someone I'm not trying to get lynched atm.
I addressed Alice!case because Rou's been talking about Sakana/Alice scumpair for all of D3, and considering we've only got 4 Aliceposts to look at (before today), I think the case doesn't look all that bad. I mean, in addition to "everyone sucks post", which lets him go after whoever he wants next, he didn't even use his D1 vote. What? Come to think of it, Alice hardly did anything worth noting on D1, and didn't even post during the headcrabs fiasco.
Kefit's RouThoughts are interesting. Most of the points I don't think look as scummy as Kefit does, but only by a differing point of view. Aggressive point of view; points look valid. More forgiving point of view; Rou justified his worse looking actions with stuff he did already; when he "doesn't present own cases", he was cracking down on cases presented by Alice and Sakana, who ARE his cases, so criticizing their actions is a way in itself of presenting his case. OMGUS is less bad because he's been going after Sakana all day anyway.
Blah, I don't know whether I should believe the Roucase or not. People say I'm too forgiving (see D1 tiebreaker last mafia), something I know is true about myself. Not a good thing in Mafia. I suppose it's something I'll have to come back to tommorow, since either way, I'm still quite sure Sakana is scum.
wordcountsagaghghhahghhhh