I'm still exhausted from the con and my head hurts like hell after a full day of school today, so this post will be a bit more brusque than is usual from me.
EdibleSupported and employed Pesco's vote confusion tactics - that is, adding in additional and largely unnecessary vote types - on day one (see:
here and
here. Pesco
placed the first evict on the d1 wagon against Edible. Has not contributed much since then,
but did place the third real vote on the Pesco wagon d2, which was the deciding vote for the lynch.
RouPesco and Sodium initially vote for him to be king d1. Placed the first evict vote against Pesco, which would eventually become a wagon. Can't seem to make up his mind on whether I am scummy or not. First he suggests that
even thinking about using my vig was scummy, then the results of Sodium's scum flip make him "
pretty sure that Kefit isn't scum" but in the same post says he's torn between lynching Jam or me for today, and finally
expresses frustration that I didn't shoot last night, in seeming contradiction to his d3 post declaring a shot to be a very bad idea.
ZakeriDefended Pesco and his vote confusion tactics on d1. Posted chaff about not having intent to
"dodge responsibility" for the Nietz lynch on d1. Continued to
defend Pesco on d2, but then
suddenly changes his stance to preferring a Pesco lynch, followed by
placing the second real vote on Pesco. Worth noting that Pesco voted for Zakeri d2.
Despite all this, Zakeri's doubling power has been confirmed by Rou, and it doesn't seem to be something that would make any sense in the hands of the scum. Rou wouldn't lie about this unless he was scum, which would probably mean that both Zakeri and Rou are scum - which I very much doubt is the case due to the game size.
JamBasically no real contribution as far as scum hunting goes, but has made continual attempts to appear active, such as keeping track of evict counts and her response to Edible's roleclaim (gone into with more detail by me
here). Was ready to give up and die d3, which strikes me as reminiscent of when she did the same thing in Himelander. Sodium voted against Jam basically the entire game, despite the presence of wagons voting elsewhere.
Hammered Sodium on d3. Has made a dubious roleclaim, especially considering that town has already had one roleblocker.
AnalysisZakeri's behavior on the first couple of days with regards to Pesco bugs the hell out of me, but I simply cannot see him as scum after Rou confirmed his power.
Edible hasn't given much to go off of lately. He supported Pesco's tactics d1, but placed the deciding vote that lynched Pesco on d2. His attempts to add to vote confusion d1 seem to be in line with his signature selfish play, which Kilga averred to on d1. Gets a pass from me now, though I think he deserves a real careful look if he is still alive tomorrow.
Rou is basically the opposite of Zakeri. His play the first couple of days was great for town, first in suggesting the evict system to get around mod assholeness, and second in starting the case against Pesco d2. However, his wishy washy attitudes towards me since I roleclaimed yesterday is disconcerting, though it reminds me of his cautious attitude towards me near the end of Himelander (in which Rou was town).
Jam hasn't done anything except pretend to be active. Her roleclaim doesn't make any real sense unless UK is being especially assholish with this setup. Placed the hammer vote on Sodium after it became inevitable that Sodium would be lynched d3. The train lead by Sodium against Jam all game has made me hesitate, but after a full thread review I agree with Rou's stance that this train seemed too random in origin and too strangely consistent to be a scum vs town train. Jam's rolling over and dying behavior may be an attempt to take advantage of meta from Himelander, and I suppose that I should trust the meta knowledge held by those of you who have played in more than one game with her.
Vote: Jam
