Coming from you, that's quite rich.
Hypocrisy is the funniest humour.
Rule 5 infraction btw.
The GM qualifies as a player?
It's my game and I damn well will play in it :V...Okay. Since Pesco seems very much intent to convince us that this isn't a simple task of 'lynch GM, win it easy', I guess I'm going to start playing properly.
The mystery vote has been around from the beginning, now that I look properly - on the first post, it specifies that there are '11 votes in play' despite there only being 10 players. The question, then, is whose vote is this? It can't be the dead player vote, because there aren't any dead players, and I doubt it's a scum power because why the hell would they play a trump card like that
less than two hours into the first day? Hence I'm willing to go to the last conclusion and decide that Pesco is the mystery voter. (Note also that the haste of the vote effectively eliminates the chance of it being anyone who didn't post before the first vote count.)
The problem is determining where to go from here. Are we meant to 'win' in terms of not contributing effectively, or win by lynching scum? The two seem naturally opposed, especially since in this setup we have more or less nothing but our wits.
I'll try and come up with a decent suspect when I get home from uni, but I might be a good few hours.