@Rou:
Not responding is scummy in its own way.
This was a point that Eliphas had made against him the day before which no-one had really followed up on. Why was he compelled to produce a defense against it?
This is a direct contradiction to what your scumhunting philosophy seems to be, isn't it? I respond to whatever I like and don't to whatever I don't like, so I don't see why you should bring that point up in any way. Besides, your paranoia, with your numerous mistakes and bad scumhunting, is far worse that what I supposedly have in the first place, so what is wrong, exactly? Even if you suppose that I did make a mistake, how does it make me scummy in comparison to anyone else like yourself?
This is especially odd since Affinity claims in said post that he doesn't appreciate VgT's tone or play.
Tone of play has nothing to do with whether one is scum or not. I didn't appreciate UK's in the past either, but that doesn't necessarily mean that she was scum. I found Suwako more scummy, went for it, since he put in less effort than VgT and more glaring in my eyes than he was. Neither have you said anything about VgT much either, moreover, you just stuck him to the 6th in the suspicion list which did not mean anything. Again we have the 'I can accuse anyone else of not being on the VgT bandwagon except myself' mentality.
Furthermore, quote me on when I said that Serp was cleared in my eyes.
Repeat it in red. I simply did not read him enough to find him scummy at that point in time, and was merely questioning you on what I found contradictory, which uhh, produced results.
This post has also lampshaded me finding him scummy.
---
Roukanken seems horrible for now, since
this post has confirmed that three-quarters of his 'scumhunting' (K4u take note) on day two has been rendered absolutely worthless from a 'mistake', going so far as to pin me and other people for things less serious. Contradicts himself more than the number of times I water my fields, and the latter is already quite a bit. Third lowest content to post ratio for D2 (behind Anthony and Angel Milk). Preferred lynch for today.
Sodium is merely piggybacking on a number of cases except for Kitten4u yesterday's with very little insight and elaboration, as can be seen by his short and unfulfilled promises to reread, with nothing original to his name, which shall be detrimental to him in the later days. By the way, how is my D1 'bad'? Seems to be the manifestation of everyone else's opinions but his own.
Suwako is haha for going back to pesco even after all his meaningless posturing yesterday about day 1 cases are day 1 and uses my questioning as a non-existent foothold for suspicion without explaining why it is scummier than say, 'contradictions on day 1'. He has also dumped his vote on Angel Milk for the majority of the day and has not commented anything on the existing cases of note on D2, other than 'it's good' for the Serp case. Also refuses to answer questions, and his Kilga suspicion from early D2 has faded away like Cirno in summer. Third scummiest even after considering D1; scummiest if not. Things like
these also give him no reason not to put forward the pesco 'case' on D2, since he had, uhh, nothing to say. Reactionary scumhunting.
Serp is horrible for focusing all his energy on the Angel Milk and Anthony cases when there was nothing left to analyze, resting his vote there while not commenting on the remaining players at all, which was more important for day two. Things pointed out by Kilga more prevalent now that he merely stuck a vote on Angel Milk the entire day without looking at flips; I could lump Suwako and Serp together in this regard, but bandwagon analysis from D1 favors the Serp case more. Second preferred lynch for today. Also does not answer Kiro's latest post against him.
Nietz is far better than Sodium despite the latter's hypocritical prod for him to post more. Is a little bit of a person trying to get under the radar with opinions which are reasonable but common enough. His D1 actions as pointed out by u-mu aren't very great due to wishy-washiness but that has not been done in D2, which is a plus point. Neutral for now.
pesco has done his fair share of piggybacking and cheerleading, but with valid contributions. Also, original analysis at points gives his opinion some weight.
This is an example.
UK I have no idea. Only person whose posts I have not completely read, but I would like to see her opinions today to get a better opinion.
Kiro is solid in his areas of suspicion, Anthony and Serp, but does not provide much outside that window. Opinions on other people would be greatly beneficial. Good questioning of Serp as well.
Kitten4u's analysis is slightly lacking; posts are concise and opinions original but without sufficient explanation. Better than Sodium. Neutral for now.
---
Therefore with willingness to switch to Serp if situations call for it,
##Vote Roukanken