Basically, if there's "so much that can be said about Zakeri" then you really shouldn't have had any trouble choosing Zakeri from the three here, instead of being all wishywashy about it.
I have more to say about your slot is the issue.
Bard has still made no attempt to say why Sky/DNA decided to bus each other D1.
I feel like there's this heap of stuff that all points to DNA being either Scum or batshit insane Town, and you choose to favour the latter because not every little thing is accounted for.
Sky Pal and DNA could have decided to bus each other D1 because they're both terrible at making up cases? Sky Paladin didn't intend to bus DNA, because
his vote here is easily retractable (and the bulk of the post isn't about DNA)? Maybe ScumPaladin tried to convince DNA to vote in the ScumQT, couldn't, decided to vote there because he couldn't make up a believable case elsewhere? If you look at
DNA's vote, it's Not Me Over Me, then he tries to validate it afterwards so he can take credit for a Sky Pal lynch but uh... he doesn't actually try to bus Sky Paladin at any point before that?
His explanation post isn't backed up by his previous posts where he hardly talks about Sky Paladin.
I don't feel like either of them tried terribly hard to get the other lynched, so in spite of claims that they were "bussing" each other, it moreso feels like SkyPaladin trying to bus DNA (and note that
he did freak out at Sky Paladin) and DNA being forced to vote Sky Paladin near phase-end for NMOM.
Like, seriously, it feels like you've already made up your mind and are grabbing at little things to say, "Well, everything you say is invalid because there's still this little thing."
Tell me honestly: You believe then that DNA was just Town set on intentionally disrupting the game and throwing nonsense all over the place? You think it's more believable that DNA wanted to disrupt the game than it is that DNA was trying to play to Scum's wincon?