I don't mean stay completely absent like I was D2. But basically not consider the alignment of players at all D1. Because I think then I can look back on the evidence from D1 with a clearer head and start making reads D2. If that makes sense?
I was responding more to Edible than you, since he suggested that my method would only lead to random lynches where recent empirical evidence suggests quite the contrary!
I'm also still miffed about how my (and Suwako's) method was approached in Invasion and how, even after the disastrously stupid way the game shook down, one or two people
still didn't think our way to play D1 was the proper way (at least one of which seemed to be holding onto those ideals purely out of spite for Suwako). I do not take slights on my D1 approach lightly - frankly, after Invasion, no one has any business even
suggesting questioning the validity of my hang-back approach as far as I'm concerned.
I don't at all endorse approaching Day 1 with an "I'm not considering alignments" attitude. I caught Zengar for taking a scummy approach to Seniwac's retardation, and I caught VgT for taking a scummy approach to the day in general. If this isn't what you mean, then I'm a bit confused as to what you're getting at.