@Ramus:
If you want to complain about my case, reply
to my latest post instead of nodding your head blindly and cheerleading, please. I don't see the fallacies you extol. The fact that you are also clinging on to the disadvantages to 69 is also rather funny, really. Other than that you, don't seem to be doing all that much in pointing out fallacies without following up on them.
Furthermore he does not follow up on his list of suspicions
here here at all.
And Ramus, why are you defending against UK about other people, when they could best be answered by those people in question themselves.
---
@UK:
Affinity 69 also bothers me. I don't think the reasoning was all that sound. Especially since he seems to play both sides at the end.
Elaborate on the second part.
Affinity 158 is bad. He acts like my declaration was just as bad as actually doing it.
Since I'm not a very utilitarian person, I disagree with you on this. You would also be calling most of town 'bad' in a way because this is what most of the town think; and primarily why you are liable to be lynched soon. Intent is just as, if not, more important than the consequences of your actions because some factors that bring those intentions to realization are rather left to chance (especially in this game), but your intentions are clear and solid the moment you utter them. As for going back on Nietz, isn't that calling me out on the fluidity of opinions?
Affinity 165 feels like baiting. Especially since, yanno, Ramus CAN'T do more than one action
What? He healed you because Rou though you had bad reasons for attacking him and yet feels that you are town. He did not heal Edible, without even elaborating why even though these two situations are similar, even going so far to say things which are irrelevant to the topic at hand, about 'the playstyle changing' and stuff when the main focus was Roukanken's actions.
Affinity 256: I want to know why fluidity of opinions is bad?
Idea goes that changing your opinions when there has been a minimal change in that guy's actions screams insecurity. Scum, who have to go to lengths to fake an opinion, is thus
Affinity 316 feels rather bad. He's disregarding general town consensus
Worst point ever. So... by not doing what town is doing... I'm scummy? What? This is my view about you, that flips are needed and are beneficial for town, which was justified. And you don't, for example, call Zakeri out for agreeing with me... it seems that you are skimming without analysis. Might as well say that I was scum for attacking Ramus from the very beginning.
point about Rou being handwaved
It's his choice not to reply despite two or more instances, and labeling those two or more instances as 'handwaves' is a rather dubious action.
---
Not convinced by the wall. And nope, I'm all out of actions.