Which is why, as with all your other rhetoricals, are not answered with directly because they are not meant to. And then you accuse me of jumping to conclusions. Wow.
Reiterating here. I am not a brick wall. My scumread on you is a conclusion constructed off the arguments we had and roles and flips. In fact, last day phase I actually ended up rescinding my vote from you precisely because I processed the facts on the table and others opinion and your behavior, then came to the conclusion after also processing Dorians post that Dorian was a more likely scum target last phase.
Since I was admittedly basing my scumread on Dorian less on my own terms, but is instead more influenced by others, it was a very unsettling experience to just shut off my usual alarms and tolerate your obsessive and overly eager push on Dorian. In fact, I had a generally positive opinion on Dorian, coupled with my suspicion at the scum safeclaim argument upon rereading the game, as I have posted yesterday. I am ashamed to admit therefore the fundamentals my read on Dorian, and subsequently my decision to instead leave Serela for next lynch are largely influenced by the consensus Serela being unpredictable (read: crazy) is just part of his meta.
Which is why I am so irked. You are a player well versed in the meta, you have shown that you are capable of playing well. Regardless of alignment, you have an obligation to play like a decent human being with sportsmanship, and yet you revel and take advantage of others' benevolence by faking incompetence and using spam tatics. My bias and anger are therefore exclusively on your decision to adopt such a low down playstyle. And has nothing to do with the conclusion drawn which is based off facts.
Also, if there's anything to take away from my arguments, its that they all articulate themselves fucking crystal clear. I thought we could at least agree on that.
##Vote Serela
