Recommendation: Pick someone you don't like (or leave it to the RNG to decide) and track all of the posts of that person. Attempt to pick up something scummy from there (or if you're like me, you're better at picking out who's townie).
I only deal 1 damage, so I couldn't kill her. I was hoping someone else would show up before pesco did to help me do so, but pesco showed up 30 minutes earlier than he did the previous day. This statement really manages to irk me, though, considering you healed yourself instead of helping us gather information by sacrificing the scummiest-looking person we have. You get scum points for intentionally dragging the game out then rubbing it in like this - your abrupt interrogation of my abilities worries me as well, to be honest.
Do you really find it scummy that I protect someone I honestly believe to be townie? But I guess that's not the point, the point is that I'm not more gory and killing people, after all, protecting someone is scummy. Now then, onto you, maybe it's just me, but you only jumped into this debate when you were targeted by UK. Before then, you merely hopped around and made some comments. In fact, you were completely off radar until someone (I forget who) pointed out your lack of presence. I'm going to take the fallacy that lurking equals scumminess and point it at you despite this being wrong. Lurking just merely means you're either undecided about who to chase or are busy in real life. Makes you scummy none the less.
This entire post rubs me the wrong way. You're basically saying "screw logical analysis, I'll use meta clears because it's HOW I ROLL", then following it up with crazy ego flaunting that doesn't serve ANY pro-town purpose. You then top it off with a post that implies you don't give a crap about the game. Way to inspire confidence in your scumhunting.
DAMN STRAIGHT! That's how I roll! I'm here to find townies and chew bubblegum. And I'm all out of gum. Meta is totally illogical despite using the analysis of repetitive actions of players and seeing if it's consist! Because it's illogical, I'll use it.
FUCK YEAH. What now? I don't give a crap about the game?! MADNESS! I love Mafia. Nothing quite like shooting people for being poor at playing townie instead of being Mafian. I LOVE IT SO MUUUUUCCCCCHHHHHH.
Note: If you still say scum hunting, then you've missed the point. If you haven't noticed, I don't look for scum. I look for townies. Which leads me to who is scum. If you got a problem with that, then oh well.
Anyway, Edible's argument is built upon fallacies. For example:
You get scum points for intentionally dragging the game out then rubbing it in like this
Classic example of Pirates and Global Warming. We have less pirates in the world. The world is getting warmer. Therefore, we need more pirates to cool it down. I'm dragging the game on slowly. Therefore I'm scummy. Now, last time I checked, we still have no concrete way of telling whether or not scum get daily potshots at people or not, until that connection is made, I fail to see how this makes me scummy.
Before you ask, the damage on Serp, I'm willing to bet was by you. See now, if UK actually hit you, we would've seen it today by Pesco's mistake. More so, she was able to correctly guess your HP. I'm going to take the chance and say that HP ranges seem to be 6-9 and say that she had a 25% chance of getting that right. I can only assume her card did exactly as it said. If she was actually mafian, then there are two possibilities:
1. She got lucky with a guess.
2. She's in work with you and so knows how much HP you have. I'll willing to give benefit of the doubt here though (like I always do with everyone, see a trend?).
So I'm concluding UK is townie, right? Well, if she targeted you, then that's where her card effect went. You were the only other person to activate a spellcard and because of Pesco's unclearness, I'm sure that you would've been able to activate that card and use its ability on someone else on the same day, privately.
6) So about Spell Cards.
--Declaring one takes up your action for the day.
--All spell cards are one-use.
--Your name will appear in red in damage counts while it lasts.
--Any damage you take will go against your spell card's durability, not your HP. Your spell card will break if you take at least as much damage as your card's durability. Overflow damage will count against your HP.
--Spell cards will automatically fade after a certain number of days.
--While in a spell card trance the only ability you can use is the one associated with the spell card. You can, of course, choose not to target anyone.
See, u? never talks about how to declare an action with spellcard. I believe Pesco or UK already mentioned it being doable by PM.
Can I get mod clarification on that one? Pesco, would you have allowed card skill activation by PM? Regardless, if that's true, like I said, you're the only other person with a spellcard active, you would've been the person to use it and secretly attack Serp.
Past tense. I asked for target confirmation by PM in the event of it being unclear in thread.In short:
1. UK used spell card to find out Edible's HP. Confirmed by Edible to be right.
2. Damage done to Serp without any given reason.
3. UK and Edible both have spellcards active.
4. UK used her own spellcard, confirmed by Edible again with the HP count. So she's probably unable to hit a second target with an attack.
5. Edible used ability granted by his card to attack Serp (for reasons unknown)
This works if: Mafia can't do damage secretly and UK and Edible aren't both scum.
Well, you guys demanded, let's see what happens if UK dies. After all, that should answer several questions, right?
RIGHT?! Or am I still looking at set up too much? Sorry for not using unreliable analysis of people's current and ever changing actions to find out who's scum or not. After all, using what people do constantly between games is always a bad idea.
