Author Topic: Rhythm Heaven Mafia (Superb) (Read 74347 times)

WHMZakeri · « **Reply #30 on:** September 05, 2014, 02:33:52 AM »

ActionDan: (2) Prims, Schezo
Raikaria: (1) ActionDan
Prims: (1) Lexicat

Not voting:
Everyone else.

7 Votes needed for Majority
45:40 hours left

Dorian White · « **Reply #31 on:** September 05, 2014, 02:42:20 AM »

Quote from: Prims on September 05, 2014, 02:25:31 AM

basically what I'm trying to get at is: do you have a real problem with this policy, or are you just bringing it up for the sake of bringing it up, or what

Well, it could be scum trying to establish a votepark wagon or town putting pressure on Dan for the reason you gave, I could see it go both ways right now.
Now my turn, if policy votes are so serious that you can discuss them, then am I scum for disagreeing with you or not?

Dorian White · « **Reply #32 on:** September 05, 2014, 02:44:09 AM »

*I mean "either way" not both.

Lexicat · « **Reply #33 on:** September 05, 2014, 02:48:37 AM »

People without their votes on Prims should reconsider their life choices. People with their votes on Prims are awesome cats who deserve head-scratches.

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #34 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:03:10 AM »

Dorian, disagreeing with me isn't scummy but your posts have been very wishy-washy, like "why did you post this" wishy-washy. Was hoping your answers would be more transparent; as is though I'm leaning town with weak footing. Basically, work with me here.

LLD, post a case so I can decide if you're town playing mafiascum and not Mafia or if I'm lynching you today.

Lexicat · « **Reply #35 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:11:02 AM »

You want a case? You're scum. There you go, case compiled.

Not satisfied? I'm not really bothered. If you wanna vote me, you should just do it instead of threatening to do it.

Lexicat · « **Reply #36 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:11:50 AM »

Or, in the immortal words of UK:

GUT! >=D

ActionDan · « **Reply #37 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:14:50 AM »

I'd actually be inclined to go with LLD over not going with LLD on this one.

But Raikaria is scum I bet.

Lexicat · « **Reply #38 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:18:55 AM »

Quote from: ActionDan on September 05, 2014, 03:14:50 AM

I'd actually be inclined to go with LLD over not going with LLD on this one.

But Raikaria is scum I bet.

This player has not posted anything since Day 1 begun. Why do you say this?

Dorian White · « **Reply #39 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:20:35 AM »

Quote from: Prims on September 05, 2014, 03:03:10 AM

Dorian, disagreeing with me isn't scummy but your posts have been very wishy-washy, like "why did you post this" wishy-washy. Was hoping your answers would be more transparent; as is though I'm leaning town with weak footing. Basically, work with me here.
...

I'm sorry if I disappoint you but if you think that I can draw a clear conclusion out of your whimsical gambit right now, then you talk with the wrong one.^^;

Good night

Affinity · « **Reply #40 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:23:26 AM »

cyberbullying is bad.

##Vote; Prims

ActionDan · « **Reply #41 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:26:17 AM »

Quote from: Lexicat on September 05, 2014, 03:18:55 AM

This player has not posted anything since Day 1 begun. Why do you say this?

I'm using that confirm post.

Lexicat · « **Reply #42 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:36:22 AM »

Quote from: ActionDan on September 05, 2014, 03:26:17 AM

I'm using that confirm post.

Fair enough. All I wanted to know.

Sky_Paladin · « **Reply #43 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:45:51 AM »

I think Dorian is scum.

His confirmation post feels bad to me, like scum trying to disassociate themselves from the kill. I complained about lack of coffee. He called the scum team bastards, and 'they'. I don't know, maybe I watched too much CSI, I just think it's telling of a guilty conscience.

He has some other odd content today, specifically;
Asking if the Dan vote was serious.
Fence sitting about the Dan policy lynch, "I'll take my time see what the guy is doing before I reconsider the idea." It's the second time Dorian touched on it without voicing his opinion. I feel like town would have an opinion - mine is "I am OK with a Dan policy lynch in the absence of Serela".
Further questioning the Dan vote. That's three times. Also rolefishing.

There's a few more posts where he has a back and forth with Prims but I already figured he was scum during the confirmation phase, and just saw this when I got back.

##vote Dorian

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #44 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:50:17 AM »

##Unvote
##Vote: Affinity
Maybe my comment toward LLD was harsh but everything I've said has been in a context that puts somebody on the spot for a response rather than browbeating them. Reads like you're voting on what's happened and the not intent behind it.

@Dan: Not only can I not read Raikaria's post as anything more than a joke based on past-game (elaborate pls), but why didn't you explain this when you made the initial vote? Most people don't make serious votes based on confirmation posts (except skypaladin apparently) so this isn't something you'd expect everyone to pick up on. Wasn't really fond of your reaction to a potential policy in the first place either since I would have expected more than "no please don't

" from town!Dan.

LLD probs town but seriously get a working gut or at least wait and see if I don't get NKed, thanks. Dorian is silly but is likely posting uninhibited.

Sky_Paladin · « **Reply #45 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:54:58 AM »

Prims, it seems like you're just voting Affinity because they are voting for you. Do you have something more to it?

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #46 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:58:37 AM »

Quote from: Prims on September 05, 2014, 03:50:17 AM

Maybe my comment toward LLD was harsh but everything I've said has been in a context that puts somebody on the spot for a response rather than browbeating them. Reads like you're voting on what's happened and the not intent behind it.

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #47 on:** September 05, 2014, 03:59:54 AM »

"Affinity is looking for something to vote rather than scum intent, because he is scum." this is what the implication

Affinity · « **Reply #48 on:** September 05, 2014, 04:05:07 AM »

woah woah chill man

Affinity · « **Reply #49 on:** September 05, 2014, 04:10:38 AM »

Quote

Prims, it seems like you're just voting Affinity because they are voting for you. Do you have something more to it?

weird interpretation; his vote is the more fleshed out. why not question me on content instead?

##Unvote
##Vote: Sky_Paladin

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #50 on:** September 05, 2014, 04:12:03 AM »

@Affinity: if you're moving your vote off me, can you at least explain why "cyberbullying" alone was enough to make me scum to you in the first place

Affinity · « **Reply #51 on:** September 05, 2014, 04:20:34 AM »

unexplained votes need no explanation. i claim RVS

Sky_Paladin · « **Reply #52 on:** September 05, 2014, 04:30:30 AM »

Affinity

Quote

why not question me on content instead?

Because I agreed with this.

Quote

cyberbullying is bad.

Prims

Quote

"Affinity is looking for something to vote rather than scum intent, because he is scum." this is what the implication

I am satisfied with this.

Affinity · « **Reply #53 on:** September 05, 2014, 04:45:10 AM »

man circular arguments lead to mutual understanding. world would be a better place if only.

##Unvote

now what.

Sky_Paladin · « **Reply #54 on:** September 05, 2014, 05:09:15 AM »

I'm highly interested in your thoughts about Dorian.

Affinity · « **Reply #55 on:** September 05, 2014, 05:18:24 AM »

##Vote: huhwhat
##Vote: Prims

Logical stuff. Well, more tone than anything, but if reasons needed, then some of the questioning feels pretending. Like his conclusion on Dorian.

Quote

Dorian, disagreeing with me isn't scummy but your posts have been very wishy-washy, like "why did you post this" wishy-washy. Was hoping your answers would be more transparent; as is though I'm leaning town with weak footing.

too finely shaded two pages in.

Affinity · « **Reply #56 on:** September 05, 2014, 05:22:36 AM »

@Paladin; well I disagree with the case you put out. reluctance to policy lynch someone until later is a perfectly valid opinion. other points in your 'case' feels stretchy, pop psychology in B-grade mafia games. you seem earnest enough though.

CF7 · « **Reply #57 on:** September 05, 2014, 05:33:36 AM »

Vote Sky_Paladin
He looks like some sort of youkai. And they are evil. By default.

CF7 · « **Reply #58 on:** September 05, 2014, 05:52:23 AM »

Also that whole case kind of bothers me. Dorian is scummy based on a confirmation vote?
The so called fence sitting is non indicative of alignment at least at this stage of the game.
And overall it looks like Sky is just throwing shit around to see if it sticks.

Bardiche · « **Reply #59 on:** September 05, 2014, 06:27:05 AM »

Vote: Prims
Policy lynch or threat on Dan seems like legit reasoning for Scum to mislynch. Vote on Affinity masks empty unvote, why abandon policy proposal already? Suspect LLD may be on to something, Prims is fishy for putting down serious vote asap, regurgitating a lot of words in RVS (trying for brownie points?) and I disagree with his rhetoric on AD seeming Town-minded. Lynch Scum, not slackers (unless slackers are scummy).

Dorian is scummy for fencesitting on the AD policy nonsense, Affinity should not RVS vote amid serious business.

Dan scumreading based on confirmation posts is uh. Is that serious or RVS? Hard to tell with #motktown