I've skimmed, going through for my own sanity post-by-post anyway
W starts with a vote on the PGO that claimed one post ago. Pretty sure that's just the newb-ness flying though
There's at least one scum in DiEnd, Kiva-la, and Kick Hopper because of their "random" voting, no joke. They conformed to a pattern of voting based on who the last poster was after kabuto's precedent, i.e. not random. Scum vote non-randomly, ergo there is a scum in there. I know that's feels almost like a Dormio p.2 argument, but It's actually pretty strong.
And kiva-la's vote change in #37 immediately makes me think it's her.
Den-O's #34 is just as bad. regardless of not reading the rules, it's a lot of words saying absolutely nothing. also vote where?
OOO's #42 no vote. also bad.
Den-O still no vote in #44.
#46 is a town post by Kick Hopper.
combo of #45 and #47 is scummy by sasasasword. 'I'll vote when I have something to go on' ---> *town post* ----> 'I'll vote now for unexplained reason"
#49 is a town post by W.
I'm taking #50 as an admission that Sasword's vote in #47 was supposed to only be a RVS/ED1/flavor vote. the contradiction between 45 and 47 stands.
I don't get OOO's vote's reasoning on kick hopper in #51
#59
#61 is good:posting
in #62 sasword forgets he was accused of a reactionary vote after he was voted beforehand for other reasons and trys to compare apples to oranges.
#64 why no vote? cool, you throw us a question to OOO, but lacks any kind of clarification on
arly D1 reactions, and reactionary actions seems like town or scum hunting for something to build a case on.
No specifics here of any kind.
Sasword's #66: You realize you didn't take the time to say this in any coherent fashion beforehand.
Kick Hopper was looking for a reason to start a lynch mob with nothing to actually go on. Especially since ED1 staying your vote instead of just randomly throwing it about is sensible.
and in #50 it pretty damn sure seems like the 'reactionary vote' in question that you are referring to is your own since you are borrowing Kick hopper's language when he described your subsequent vote on him (the one made in your #47).
Secondly,
The fact he made such a big deal of a ED1 reactionary vote, especially when one had been made before, gives the impression he's out for blood quickly. Although it's no indication of if he's town or scum, like you yourself said, it's possibly something to note.
You're voting him. you vote for people you think are scum if you are town. Is this not the case here?
#68: is there a reason you would expect kick hopper to defend punch hopper?
#69 cool ^
#79 still questions, still no vote, still no real anything
#84 is town posting.
ok...
well I'm glossing over saswords later posts and maybe he might just be super clueless after all.
Also OOO's explaination for the wierdness is face-palm worthy.
town reads
Kick hopper
Punch hopper
W
Diend
notsureaboutthisguy:
Kabuto
scummy? but newb-ness is so apparent I need to prolly think more about it.
Sasword
OOO
probscum:
Den-O
kiva-la
Pretty sure my vote's in the right place.