IHNN has no content since content misrepping the game doesn't count and can die whenever.
This bugs me, because I was saying I might have been misinterpreting-and even if what I'm saying isn't based on what happened (but it is based on what I thought happened from what I read), it doesn't mean I never said -anything- at all.
The same post says Dormio was bad for the stream of consciousness without explaining how or why.
It's very hard to make cases on people when literally all you can say is either "I think this person is scummy" or "Yeah they're saying things but not really relevant things".
I shouldn't have to have 92 cases since I had fos on cheez and then one on Raikaria as the day ended. You empty unvoting and trying to start a last minute wagon that did literally fuckall then getting mad because I don't want to play the same way you did (bad) is ridiculous.
Again though, this bugs me. The "case" on Cheez? Let's go quote that.
The Serela post was bad. But it's negligible because it's RVS. You can read that outloud and laugh it off because it's all conspiracy theoristy.
Why you're defending it is another story. Half of the game myself included could have your case on BBM attached to them. What makes him so special?
...Looking through, BBM's stuff here is mostly just logic and correcting people rather than actually forming opinions.
Wouldn't that have been a reason for BBM over anyone else in particular? Something would have to bring the person to your attention in the first place, and i think that's why Cheez did. (Also, calling an ED1 case/FoS on someone a solid case as the day ends is lol).
Anyway, Raikaria "case".
Raikaria's case about how he has to be experienced for such a mistake to be damnable is goofy. Like. He could be getting coached and could pull this as scum. But to say that only an experienced player could receive flak for that is a nono. Like you can't meta someone who you have little/to no experience playing with so I don't know why he gets a new pass anyways.
(what Raikaria unvoted Sky for, I think?)
My vote for SB was totally OMGUS.
...
Also nobody is agreeing with my logic. I can hardly argue that everybody must be scum. Therefore I must be wrong.
People make mistakes regardless of alignment, though. Going and acknowledging that mistake? Null. Sky had done other things in that time that could also have helped Raikaria's opinion. However, the part I italicized rubs me the wrong way-I can't pinpoint exactly why, but it doesn't =feel= town motivated.
Either way: Schezo, when criticized, said he shouldn't have to have "92 cases" and that he had 2 at the end of D1. One was ED1 and literally voting for playstyle (which he blames NNR's vote on him for), and the other was very weak...and also for playstyle to decide from one townie over the other (his opinion, going off of "the lynch regardless of who flips is garbage" paraphrase) at the end of D1. Since it's such a bad reason, why did he really choose Raikaria? Well, possibly to keep a buddy from being lynched.
Sky offering his claim information so readily is odd. I think it's a scummy action because why would anyone want to reveal that they have a power role so early in the game, making them a likely scum target? This borders on bad play=scummy play which obviously isn't true but it just doesn't strike me as town motivated.
tl;dr: Trying to put into words why I think Schezo is scum with a few things as to why Sky is leaning scummy for me. Now I just have to figure out why I think Zakeri is scummy beyond 'gut'.
