" Dormio (4) - Cheez8, NekoNekoRex, BigBangMeteor, Serela
I thought there was a chance there was a scum in there. When I saw this:
Quote
Dormio (6) - Cheez8, NekoNekoRex, BigBangMeteor, Serela, SB, Darkninjaabc
I'm DEFINITELY sure there's a scum in there. At the moment DNA is my leading candidate since he's the last one to do it and switched his vote from himself >.>; "
The difference is your vote and DNA's. I said I was suspecting DNA at the moment but I wanted to wait a few hours (read: have a shower and get some sleep) before voting. I expected the Dormio wagon to fragment. I wanted to see where the pieces went.
Then you replied to the thread and you even linked my previous post, even though it was actually the most previous post before yours.
Then I said this:
"I'm voting for you because I said those two people were suspicious and you IMMEDIATELY switched your vote. That's a lot more suspicious to me than DNA. But if you flip red, DNA's next on my list."
And DNA said this;
[serious]want replacement[/serious]
I said your vote was convenient because: I'm the person who specifically mentioned the last two people in that list. And one of them suddenly wants a replacement. The other one is voting for me.
If I was scum, would I want to make it obvious that I was flailing under the pressure of a single person who hadn't even voted for me?
If you were scum, wouldn't you want to put pressure on the guy who was suspecting you (and/or your buddy)?
And that's all for now. Goodnight.