I'll start with the (comparatively) solid reads and muse about the grey areas later. (SB/Raitaki/Refa) (Dan is lurk)
##Unvote Raitaki
##Vote NNRI think NNR's inability to produce stuff
is a scumtell and that his observations are surface-level. His argument against me is easy to pick up (and kinda wrong, since I did directly refer to a post from Rai vs SB/Vhaltz), his comments on Raikaria/SB a day ago didn't strike me as insightful, and his comment today on how he felt he had something going with said comments makes me think he's just... sad he can't find content, rather than he had a train of thought and lost it. I have... things, at the very least, to say about Raikaria vs SB after reading it, so that's where "inability to produce stuff" comes in - he probably would have more substantial things to say about it as town, instead of what we got at post #93.
As for Raikaria: I more or less had the same perspective as SB during the wallfest, mostly because the logic was agreeable and Raikaria is like a hammer to my scum radar in that I get alarm bells from, like, half of what he says as either alignment. I had a swift 180 deg. change after
Rai's #74, though, and Vhaltz's comment on internal logic. #74 just made me click with Rai's perspective too (good post!) and made me look at his posts in a really good light. The things I'd probably point at as distinctive are: he has no problems tearing SB apart with stuff like "get a grip and drop your obviously bad case and do something else" [citation needed] and "wow, how can you not understand my case" [citation needed], and stuff like his concern about lurkers and getting cold feet about SB don't exactly scream "scum-like" to me.
Vhaltz himself has been on the ball with things and has generally led discussion in a way that makes me think he's town. Want more words? Too bad. I'm pretty content with not lynching him today at least.