I'd respond, Huh What, but I have a wordcount to think of, and things to say directly related to the matter.
Dan. You didn't respond to anything that was said until Day 2. When it was made on Day 1. No, you cannot claim that "you never explained why you voted me" because I have. Numerous times. The reason I am admitting I am scum is because there is no getting through to you.
And B) is because I thought Shadoweh was scum. Honestly, what answer do you expect? "Because I'm scum and thought Shadoweh an easy wagon to hop onto! :V" I mean, pygmalion comes into play
right here, where my vote on UK is apparently a "scumslip" because I didn't think it interesting that UK declared you town. (UK does this in any game she plays about any player she likes best at the time, subject to her whims) From that time, no matter what I did, you've done nothing but construe it as, "ScumBard does this because", rather than wonder whether it could maybe, possibly! be that your case on Bard is bad and that's why no one else is giving you the time of day.
Until Omba comes into play, with the beautiful gem that "I protected Kiro, no one died, Bard attacks Kiro, ergo Bard is scum" until that finally evolves into, "But everything you do makes sense as scum - it could make sense as town but I choose to assume that you aren't". The entire thing about "brains" is objectively silly - making a case on someone you think is scum and truly believing it isn't necessarily stupid. It only becomes that when people rebut your points and you blindly keep insisting it.
The support that "[Bard] is scum" rests solely in a deep-rooted case of the pygmalion-effect, where y supports that x is true, on the basis that y must support x if x is true. My actions are scummy, but only on the basis that I am scum - Omba himself already said he could reason the actions as town, but thought it "too stupid" to possibly be town-motivated. Ergo, I must be scum, and therefore my actions are scummy.
I'd say why I dislike the Sect train but no words left! Someone post.