Day 1:
pesco noted me lurking but he did tries to direct attention to Alice earlier on. His case on Alice was the same as Edible, not providing more info on that.
However, after the claim pesco continued to vote for Alice, which sorta clears him.
pesco was obvscum on day1, i can't believe i missed that with his awesome 1 liners with Rou
Nietz noted me lurking and Alice lurking and further elaborates on it but mostly it was based on lurking.
Nietz passes on Alice but dislikes Kanako's claim, but he still votes for SP.
seeing he is just playing with town as of now.
Edible is poking at everyone and anyone without citing reasoning
Affinity targeting Kanako with a prod out of nowhere and votes out of nowhere to, but he gives me a clear due to the fact that i provide reasoning (horrible) but it was better than Kanako
UK notes that if SP was town, vote Alice... we'll see
Alice hits me for lurking and inconsistent posting but is inconsistent when talking about Edible.
Post 177 talks about my lack of reasoning about Edible when i was citing his tunnel vision and lack of input on the other guys
Post 179 cites the same thing about Edible that i have mentioned only he calls it odd
Day 1 claim was merely a Townie Doc but we've been through this be4
umu is lurking but he comes to quote Affinity's points on Kanako.... but he did note pesco was scummier and he sticks to the point throughout.
I note umu's sudden activity at Night 1... uncharacteristic.
yea i'm having bad memories of the time i screwed up at work and etc during that day 1.
Thou i did get a laugh at the Kanako role claim and the chaos that followed
--
Analysis of day 1: Crap happens, we killed a Doc.
Very convenient how Alice protected himself and got confirmation on im being protected.
Still, as no one counter claim i'm happy with it.
Pesco was attacking Alice very very very earlier on for nothing, I'm surprised i didn't see him as scum then, + points to Alice
same with Nietz but he did play more town by voting for Kanako, still it was obvious he wasn't tt happy with his vote but it being more policy.
Affinity is somewhere and everywhere, I can't get a rid of it as his posts are probably less than 10, like me.
umu has consistency probs, he is here and there and everywhere.
but i like his case on pesco so.. he's more townie than scum
General things, Alice is more or less cleared from day 1 onwards... if he turns out scum i congratulate you for the job well done in advance.
--
Day 2:
Alice claims to be Limited Doc and defends it well and plays quite well, linking Donut's action to his failed day 1 case.
pesco tries to cover up for his point on Alice earlier same with Nietz in an earlier post. but he is following Affinity's lead so i'm quite unsettled by that.
pesco makes Alice seem less scummier by still jacking up the notion that Alice could be mafia doc, although it is the same point as me, he is scum. so yea
Nietz shows unease for Donut but he totally dropped the Kanako case from day1 and focus on me and Donut.. and later prods Alice and UK for more cases on me.
Nietz, if you are reading this, I hate you too <3
Also, if scum has a Hitman, which is very likely if Alice and KY are indeed town, they might be keeping it for LYLO or for when the Hitman is in danger of Lynch. Goes without saying, but I'd very wary of pseudo-LYLO in this game.
This from Nietz is hard to fathom, any1 make anything of it? Feels like there is hidden message here but i can't fathom it
Affinity sounds town but has limited input when it matters so meh.
UK comments on that sayin he preferred scum to not know Alice had limited protects, a townie comment but it could go either way...
Affinity posted on Edible with same reasoning as me, but later jumped on Donut for his lack of reasoning on rou, which i appreciate and find valid.
There is a flaw i noticed thou
on 330, page 12, he says the Mafia Doc is acceptable as there are night vigs but he later says there is no night-vigs when there is obviously one.
SP: Sanae Kotiya, Night-vig Doc. Sounds like Darkwing Duck~ or NightWing. LOL
however he is clearing Alice's role so it's a nulltell.
His posts on donut is more of one liners but.. i dunno. seems odd a little and his posts a little waffling, pointing out little details that was pointed out from the other posts. I don't see a strong case in his posts.
umu sounds okay from the start till the end, if only a little tunnel-vision vibes from his posts but he is playing pro-town, going after both Nietz and pesco with the right conviction.
if there is any1 who deserves MVP, umu is a candidate along with Kiro.
apologies Rou, you're too emotional =P
my thoughts on day 2 remind me why i will never play mafia again.
my points are never put across sufficiently and it never bring forward what i feel suspicious to anyone.
I'm officially quitting mafia after this.
and final thoughts after day 2?
Analysis takes wayyy too much time.
--
Current stance:
Alice: Townie
umu: confirmed townie, unless by sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer planning, mafia's strategy was to let umu be pro town and be able to sway votes at lylyo. WAYY Too complex, so confirmed Town.
affinity: it's just... it doesn't stack up. I'd vote you, in all of honesty.
--
Going off now, day 3 onwards will come when i get back
--
Hi affinity!!