I'm Kitten4u, a town-aligned tracker. I targeted the real K4U n1 because I thought her behaviour late D1 was suspicious (I think we've gone over this already. Turns out she went after Rou. That doesn't make me feel too much better about her, but I'm curious if she's behind Rou's weak watcher thing somehow. Last night I targeted NeoSerela since at the time I was planning to push for a Rat lynch some more today (especially after Alice's flip) but still didn't feel very good about Serela. Results say he targeted Rat, meaning he is obviously lying about being a vanilla townie. <_<
##Vote NeoSerela
I already stated my suspicions against Serela in #257, but I'll restate+reword my points here for convenience:
* Bandwagon jump on Zakeri for no good reason (and a majority of his explanation which came later was justifying the vote based on something Zakeri did after he voted). This is the main root of my suspicions, it feels as if he just saw an easy lynch and decided to go with it
* Made up pointless slander regarding two now confirmed townies, claiming they were scum partners which is really just filling up his post to make it look like he's contributing when he's not
* Aside from his garbage about Kilga and Zak, he never mentioned anybody other than the two people who had bandwagons. Don't think he tried to scumhunt at all.
There's also a number of things that popped up after my vote. Soon after I posted, he voted Chaore for terrible reasons which Chaore already defended himself against, and Serela just gave up and unvoted immediatly afterwards. He also never gave a proper explanation for his vote on Zak. #300 does not explain his reasons for voting beyond "lol gut". His vote on Zent was bad, and he even claimed he's starting to think Zent is dumb town but then votes Zent anyway. It felt like an OMGUS, really, and he even admitted it was in #366, where he unvotes.
After Serela unvoted, he never actually bothered to vote again, meaning he had no input by the and of the day. Note that he criticized Chaore for not voting anybody after voting Alice, making his lack of vote by the end of D2 blatant hypocrisy. Except Chaore actually voted eventually, so what Serela did is actually worse. #439 seems odd to me. Why is he helping to clarify one of the points of the Alice case even though he never even claimed to be for an Alice lynch? Could possibly be really minor cheerleading.
And of course, like I said, he targeted Rat last night, which pretty much confirms he's scum. No complaints with a Serela lynch at all.