I can't produce a case because I'm useless! Excusing yourself through the newbie defense doesn't work, Sakana.
Aren't you the same person who said this in regards to Sakana earlier? :V
Also GJ jumping on the new guy for making new guy mistakes. T_T
Another thing about Sakana: WHY would you use Governor to prevent anything but a Pesco lynch on D2? That seems more like you're having a tantrum because the guy you wanted lynched didn't get lynched. If he had gotten ignored in favor of somebody who was obviously town I could see why, but that seems rather selfish.
Anyway, assuming Sodium intends to "take care" of Sakana and I don't need to talk about him anymore, here's some stuff on Jam:
It really feels like Jam hasn't been doing anything at all throughout the game. A lot of her D1 posts were jumping on bandwagons (#70) or doing nothing at all (#125, #165) until #173, where after evicting Edible and saying very little about anything else that was going on, she unevicts (over an incredibly iffy roleclaim that Edible had not yet proved at the time, no less), leaving her with no evict or kingvote at the end of the day, and as a result she leaves no opinion on who she actually wants lynched or kinged and essentially hasn't really done anything by the ending of the day. #175 and #177 are just her repeated what she said in her previous posts without adding anything new again. Then later, there's 280:
It was basically just to prevent his number of evicts from getting "too" high [in the case just a majority I suppose since they aren't official votes] so that we could hear out his proof. [or rather you guys could since I wasn't around]
This makes no sense at all. While evict votes do obviously have an effect on who gets lynched, unless everybody decided to hammer in a King before Edible expanded on his roleclaim (which would be incredibly rash), there was nothing about one more evict on Edible that would prevent him from expanding on his roleclaim, since the day wasn't even that close to the end. In fact, this could even be considered counter-productive, since less votes = less pressure. At the end she jumps on the Zak wagon with little apparent reason, much like she did with Edible earlier.
#303:
Zak's stating that it looks like I'm his scumbuddy seems as if he's trying to get himself off the hook if I turn up scum [which I won't] for pointing it out...
This arguably looks more suspicious than Zak's actual post saying Jam is trying to link herself to him as a potential scumbuddy. Saying that Zakeri is doing something in case she turns out scum makes no sense. Think about it:
Case 1 - Zak is scum, Jam is townZak KNOWS Jam is town, so he would not bother trying to set up something that requires Jam to flip scum, because that would be stupid since he knows she won't.
Case 2 - Zak is town, Jam is scumIn this case, Jam would know Zak is town, which... she actually seems to know based on that post. Note that even though she believes Zakeri is scum based on her evict, her post acts as if she thinks he is town hence the "if I turn up scum" (if Zakeri was scum, this wouldn't be valid, since as I previously mentioned, he would know that she is town). But wait, there's a contradiction! She thinks Zakeri wants to do this to get off the hook, which means Zakeri would have to be scum or really really selfish town (seems unlikely). The most likely scenario seems to be that Jam is scum trying to paint Zakeri as scum but acts as if he's town at the same time to make herself look like she doesn't know his alignment.
Case 3 - Both are scumImplies Jam really, really wants to bus Zakeri and not let him get off the hook if she dies and flips scum. Why? If a scumbuddy has a chance to get off the hook, why would you want to stop them? Seems pointless.
Case 4 - Both are townSecond most likely, but considering everything Jam has done up until now I'm pretty sure it isn't, and her #361 is just stating the obvious.
So yeah. ##Unvote
##Vote Jam
