so, where to start here? I guess with my vote.
I feel like
CF7 could redeem himself if he just output a little more energy into his posts. They feel really apathetic to me and the way he votes Rawr and tries to give reasoning for it just feels like he's stumbling around. I'd like to see his opinion now that there's a lot more content to go on, especially with regards to Dr.Rawr. I def don't think he's scummy to the point of being irredeemable at this point.
At the same time he's getting wagoned, I don't feel good about his defense either.
SB gave him what I feel like is a bit too easy of a pass, using the excuse he's inexperienced and a newbie.
I think CF7 is a townie who posted carelessly and got wagoned for it, tbh
I think the careless posting is exactly why I feel he's scummy, since he generally seems uncaring he has a wagon on him, which I feel is something scum would be more apt to do. His criticism of the wagon is that CF7 is voting based on rawr's playstyle, which doesn't really hold true if you look at the reasoning. As Bard also mentions, he apparently thinks that anti-RVS measures are scummy. Which is wrong. Would switch if he had more recent content.
Zak's post seem pretty alright to me. His CF7 vote isn't too weak and he pushes it a bit while not being hyperagressive, which feels like town intent. His rolespec is at acceptable levels as he's basically arguing more game mechanics then actual "what's the role?" games. Not quite sure why exactly his posts deserve votes. Maybe I'm discounting them too much?
Serela mostly boils down to "Where is the scumhunting?". His posts feel stuck back in RVS and he has no notable content so far. Would lynch.
Kingault screams typical noob. Which he should, since this is his second game. He really does need to look past CF7 though.
I need to soak up this content wave that apparently hit as soon as I woke up, so I'll have opinions on more recent people as soon as I can form them.
Not quite sure if I should move my vote yet, honestly.