Dark:Everyone else (yay!) has explained why me fullclaiming is neither necessary nor is my lack of doing so scummy. This makes me happy :D
Even with meta wild guessing aside, the major point I have always made on you is how you have lurked through a major portion of d1, and just spontaneously came to life in d2 once arguments have been made on you, which is pretty damning evidence considering how carefree after lynch and that your intial attitude with either wagons being quite emotionally invested, or such that you would want us to believe.
As I said several times before, I went to sleep, woke up with a very small amount of time before I had to leave for work and didn't remember I should check on mafia first. When my shift ended the day was already over. You can choose not to believe this (I certainly have no proof and could be making it up), but the thing is- I don't know what kind of scum motivation there'd really be for lurking through the end of the day when I didn't disagree with a Raikaria lynch at any point (before I went to bed I said my gut was going for it) and could have easily just hopped on him like literally almost everyone else did.
tl;dr it would have been trivially easy for me to make good posts at that point, is it that hard to believe I actually forgot about mafia in the 15-ish free minutes I had between waking up and going to work? Normally I wouldn't even argue about accidentally lurking (because normally there's no way to defend yourself for it) but in this case it's pretty hard to imagine why I would do it as scum. It would have been -so easy- to jump on Raikaria with everyone else, whereas lurking through the whole end day is guaranteed to make people mad at me.
Worse still, you have never explained the crumbs for your lurk in d1,
huh ??? What are you talking about?
detailing your thoughts at the time, which is a thing I have asked you to tell us since in literally almost every single goddamn post I made.
Wait what you have? ??? Seriously, I haven't ever seen you do this. >_> Maybe I'm being stupid but I'm drawing a big blank here.
The rest of Darkie's post is just rehashing what he's already said (mostly seems to be mad I haven't fullclaimed but that's already addressed) and that I've never made good detailed cases.
I have two rebuttals to that.
1.Cases don't have to be big or detailed to adequately explain why someone is scum
2.My stuff on actiondan doesn't count as a case? Everyone else is pretty satisfied to vote him with a short comment of explanation why (And that's honestly okay because it's pretty transparent) but I'm actually the person going around yelling at people who disagree he's worth lynching and giving good, concise explanations why he's scummy.
Also the fact that now it's been almost 2 days since ActionDan has posted, uhhhhhhh, people waiting on him to post should probably just admit he's scum who gave up.