> "Whatever. The point is that someone that actually believes what they're doing is right and puts the amount of forethought into it that you apparently have, they'd realize the potential practical dangers. Like with this case, where I just pointed out the idea of harvesting sparks from any exchange. When that matter was first discussed, you said, and I quote, 'Just as the beauty of the exchange violates the idea of equivalency, it creates a spark, so to speak. A kind of friction is made with each exchange, each time the paradox grows a little deeper. And I harvest it.' There was nothing in there to say that you can only harvest sparks through your own exchanges, and in fact it is sufficiently ambiguous that it sounds very much to the otherwise uninformed listener like you're harvesting it whenever it happens, not just whenever it happens to you. That seems a rather large oversight for one that has put in the forethought that you have and claims to be doing this for the greater good like you are."