Ok... so Serp died 4 hours after deadline? So we can probably assume at least 72 hours for each Scum kill given the Nightless setup. However, with the untimed extension having taken place, and about 8 hours passing before the hammer, we can assume Scum have the chance to kill again 8 hours before this next Day is over? So our Day is technically 64 hours now for us to lynch before Scum strike.
Question to Mods: If the Day had actually ended with No Lynch, what would have happened? The lack of a deadline for the Extension is a rather unusual game mechanic with a potentially different result from having the Day just end with No Lynch.
On to Day 2 approaches:
The wrathie case kind of went nowhere since he decided to drop the Stuffman case for one Day which I feel reflects better on him. The case to Xan looks like a null tell since everyone went for Xan, who didn't even get off a last word. It's essentially back to him being non-contributive, but he had thoughts about him and seemingly on Edible now. Who would your second choice be though?
Consequently, I think Edible pinged higher for me due to all this. Edible's case on wrathie deals with a lot of actions that he says are scummy. But I don't think it's a super conclusively scummy deal. wrathie floundering around with his early statements seems to be your main gripe, but the later stuff is passable for me. Also, your #166 about wrathie jumping onto you doesn't make sense to me as reinforcement for his scumminess. Looks more like a quick footnote that is rather unsubstantiated and it jumped out at me. Finally, who's your second choice of Scum?
Also, since the case on Xan is gone and negative, let's see what Zakeri thinks now. Since it can't be only wrathie, who is his second choice?
As for Nietz,
Except that I didn't lay any bait and in fact I was surprised that anyone would take a very early joke vote seriously. And it is definitely very different to simply make a policy remark about self-votes and to call someone on the reasons for doing so when I could as well just remain silent or dismissive and let wrathie take the biggest heat from it like he was.
So it irks you that I applied the same standard for everyone? I bet that if I had accused only you, you would be calling me "selective" now.
If it was only me, I probably would have ignored it because your statement would have been warranted due to my vote. The fact you wanted to finger Roukan as well is what triggered my attack on you, because I felt it was a lazy man's approach and a possible scumtell. So yes, in a way, it irks me that you applied the same standard to "everyone who commented about your jokevote" because the only person to really take it seriously enough to vote you was me. You had no direct reason to go after Rou and you've never provided one. You should also note that while I was not happy with wrathie's self vote either (I prioritized him over you in #38), it's not like I was doing any hard pushing against either of you then. It was only after your #51 that I went pretty heavy on you. Once again, you're ignoring the reason WHY I think you're scummy.
Also, that's a curious way of twisting my words, since my point was that I didn't like people trying to look like making an effort without really doing so.
"your little ploy" is also a curious choice of words, as apparently you decided to imply that from the first post I had a scum masterplan to publicly mislynch pro-town players, though I can only wonder about how effective or useful that would be for scum.
So now you're saying you want to lynch me not for being scummy, but for not agreeing with you?
"Your little ploy" is personal bias kicking in and a poor choice of words on my part. I wouldn't call it a master plan to mislynch, but just to draw suspicion upon those pro-town players unnecessarily. Sure, you can have a personal opinion that someone is trying too hard, but you seem to make this statement too early for it to mean anything, just churning the waters.
And to clarify my own views, I still think I read Nietz' statement as a scumtell and he's my first. Otherwise, I'm a bit conflicted between Edible (who had the quick jump onto wrathie both days) and wrathie. The fact that wrathie highlighted that Edible is going off all his early stuff and less on his more recent contributions is a decent observation.
##Vote NietzCut by Affinity: So... no mod confirmation on the kill. If that kill were strictly due to just the Extension, then where's the actual Scum kill? Unless it happens soon, I'd peg it as just their kill according to the proper time elapsing.
The dungeons are a dangerous place, people die all the time. Yeah flavour is just flavour. You should be able to tell who got killed and who got lynched.
