This post is MetaTastic(TM) and clears people for reasons that I think are inadequate. It moves on to a case on you that lacks any actual justification beyond "oh hey you're not being obvtown so you're scum", which is certainly enough to
suspect someone, but is it really enough to ##Vote them?
This post votes Zakeri while never actually saying why any of the points raised against him
actually make him scummy.Then we run into his latest posts, such as
this one, where I really do have to wonder: how does scum!me act different from town!me in the aspects you've raised? All you've ever done is clear or attack people based off of meta, there does not appear to be any actual reasoning behind anything you've ever said or done.
So yeah...I'm voting him for what is essentially an indiscriminate use of meta combined with the fact that he hasn't actually done any scumhunting whatsoever.
@Rou: last Nietz game was 11 people with 3 scum and 3 town-aligned powers. I wouldn't be so hyper-keen to lynch Affinity at a point where if he is actually telling the truth, he could garner more useful information
or pull a hilarious gambit wherein he claims to track his scumbuddy and gets townie cred for it for later use and therefore confirm himself.
This is why playing the setup on D2 is, quite honestly, a horrible idea imho.