Alright, that's cool.
##Unvote##Vote CF7This vote is not random.
CF7 is scum trying to look like he's creating a valid case and therefore encouraging the end of the random voting stage.
"But isn't trying to end the random voting stage a good thing for town and a bad thing for scum? How could that make someone scummy?"
Easy. Because the random voting stage will inevitably end at some point.
Scum might as well try to make what they can of it.
"But how can you tell if it's coming from scum or town since they both have their own motivations for trying to end the random voting stage?"
Well, I can only hazard a guess, but I think that CF7's motivations come from a scum agenda.
"Why is that?"
Well, let's look at CF7's posts.
His
first post is a randomly placed vote on Bardiche with no real significant meaning to it.
However CF7's
second post, the one where he votes for me, is much more interesting.
Firstly, he defends Raitaki for no real reason.
I do not understand why he CF7 would do this when he complains in his
next post about the random voting stage.
Was Bardiche voting Raitaki not a point of interest which you could have, at the very least, attempted to investigate further if you truly wanted the random voting stage to end?
Why then do you try to absolve Raitaki of any guilt while not making any sort of judgement on Bardiche?
The fact that you did neither of these makes me think that your complaint about the random voting stage is insincere.
Couple this with the fact that your complaint was made less than 12 hours into the game and this makes me think that you were simply complaining about the random voting stage in order to make it appear as though you wanted the random voting stage to end when, in reality, you were more than content to let the random voting stage drag on.
This is further supported by the second half of your
second post wherein you vote for myself.
So, tell me, why is it that you defend Raitaki for voting for confirmed town and simultaneously attempt to paint me as scummy for voting myself. (Confirmed town to me)
You claim that it is to fish for reactions which should, in turn, help to end the random voting stage but that's really just a facade, isn't it?
With no strong opinions of your own, you just want to look like you're contributing whilst not actually committing yourself to anything.
I mean, just look at CF7's
latest post.
All I asked of you was to decide on whether or not me voting for myself was scummy and yet he comes up with the excuse that there are not enough player interactions to determine this.
What possible player interactions could he require when the only possible person involved in the action that you might or might not find scummy is me?
But, I suppose I have to cut you some slack.
After all, if you were to commit yourself to thinking that I were scummy, then that would make it pretty awkward for you later if an opportunity to jump onto an easy wagon arrives, wouldn't it?
