Maidens of the Kaleidoscope

~Hakurei Shrine~ => Touhou Addict Recovery Center => Topic started by: 三重階乗 on November 07, 2010, 01:46:14 AM

Title: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: 三重階乗 on November 07, 2010, 01:46:14 AM
I've had time to kill over the past couple months, so I decided to look into the various things that lead to this theory in more detail.

Several people in the fandom, for various reasons, honestly believe Hong Meiling is a dragon, if not The Dragon God Him/Herself:

- Her BOSS theme, Shanghai Alice of Meiji 17 (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Embodiment_of_Scarlet_Devil:_Music), combines the creating "Team" of the series (Shanghai Alice) and the year the Hakurei Barrier was created (Meiji 17, or 1884). Sounds like a theme name a Creator would have, not some ordinary gatekeeper. Seemed like just a simple coincidence at the time, and the theme itself is generally overshadowed by her stage theme Shanghai Teahouse ~ Chinease Tea. But then things started to unfold over the years...

- I'm sure most of us recognise that the highest God (the aforementioned Creator) is The Dragon (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Perfect_Memento:_Dragon), and that the word "Dragon" shows up every now and then in Meiling's Spell Cards in Hisoutensoku. Seems like harmless God references at first, but she shouldn't have much reason to mention it 5 times though her cards (http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w25/triplefactorial/DragonMeiling.png) when almost everyone else does it no more than once or twice in the entire series. Qi Sign "Heaven and Earth Dragon Kick" says it twice in the same card! The only other person who does these things is Iku, who outdoes everyone else combined in using "Dragon" in spellcards thus far (16 (http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w25/triplefactorial/DragonUsage-Iku.png) to 11 (http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w25/triplefactorial/DragonUsage.png)) and can get away with it because she's the messanger of the Dragon Palace. In contrast, both MCs have only used it once each (Divine Arts "Omnidirectional Dragon Slaying Circle" and Star Sign "Dragon Meteor" [in Katakana] respectively). I can take one or two sayings of the word as coincidences, but once you get to 3, 4, and 5 times it begins to look more like a pattern.

- The Dragon also correlates with the rainbows that trail Him/Her, which happen to be Meiling's main motif. It's also the main motif of the Chinese Rainbow-Dragon also named Hong (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_(rainbow-dragon)) (but with a different character). In CoLA 18: Dragon's Camera (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Curiosities_of_Lotus_Asia:_Chapter_19) we learn that, according to Rinnosuke, "since dragons are made from the three perfect elements of the world, they leave in their way the seven colors of the rainbow, which can create everything in existence." In Double Spoiler Aya mentions that "A rainbow is apparently a type of dragon god," albeit on Kogasa's Rainbow Sign "Over The Rainbow." (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Double_Spoiler:_Level_3_Spell_Cards#Spell_Card_3_-_5) This makes Meiling's rainbow motif go from simply colorful to symbolic and almost telling if Rinnosuke is correct.

- She also has some card names with Color in them, but several of them are also associated with weather, a common Eastern Dragon motif. Colorful Signs "Colorful Rain," "Extreme Color Typhoon," and later "Vivid Color Downpour," and Colorful Flip "Fluttering Petals and Falling Leaves" all do so in some way. This started early too (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Embodiment_of_Scarlet_Devil:_Stage_3_Spell_Cards), but was easily overlooked by most.

- Meiling seems to use rainbows and martial arts to simulate her ability to control Qi, which was generally considered the flow of energy that sustains the living in Chinese and Japanese mythology. Being the Fantasy Kitchen Sink that Gensokyo is, this is most likely true there. If that's the case, then you can almost call Meiling's ability "Control of Life Energy (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LifeEnergy)." (WARNING: TV Tropes Will RUIN YOUR LIFE!)

Considering that the only Dragon Gensokyo knows about is The Highest God of Illusion, it would only be natural that she doesn't want others to know about her race. They'd probably assume her to BE the aforementioned Dragon God. Right or wrong, that would strike a major blow to the balance of Gensokyo.

It's a little easier when claiming she's simply A dragon, but what if one believes she's THE Dragon? Why would He/She hide in plain sight like this? A short explanation would be that The Dragon would have a divine monopoly, and that would make it difficult, if not impossible for other deities to take residence in His/Her domain while He/She can still watch over it to an extent. Believe what you want to believe, but anytime I see someone say that Meiling is "a normal person who just guards" the next thing to come to my mind is "DON'T YOU BELIEVE IT!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9U_C_q6WcU)
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 07, 2010, 01:56:01 AM
I always thought that the dragon imagery was to emphasize her Chinese-ness, not to necessarily imply that she was a dragon herself. This is the most comprehensive post I've seen on this theory though.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Unassuming Squid on November 07, 2010, 02:00:05 AM
I'm glad you went through the trouble to research all of this. It's always interesting to see detailed explanations of theories.

I don't agree with it myself, though. It just seems a bit weird to me.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Bias Bus on November 07, 2010, 02:14:44 PM
I always thought that the dragon imagery was to emphasize her Chinese-ness, not to necessarily imply that she was a dragon herself. This is the most comprehensive post I've seen on this theory though.
This pretty much sums up what I was going to say.

...Only in much more mild-mannered tone.

Quote
Right or wrong, that would strike a major blow to the balance of Gensokyo.
Which is exactly why I believe it isn't true. EoSD has been out for a while now, and after all this time, after all the stuff she's gone through (and for that matter, the junk we've seen of her go through), why would ZUN suddenly reveal her to be the Dragon of all things?

Honestly, I believe that, if Meiling truly was a Dragon she woudn't even exist now being ZUN would most likely save a character THAT powerful up until the last Touhou game or whatever. That said, she also wouldn't be a Stage 3 boss either...I mean really...a DRAGON...a Stage 3 boss?
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tamashii Kanjou on November 07, 2010, 02:51:22 PM
That is one very detailed post; a lot of research went into that, I can clearly see. When put that way, it's very easy to convince people to look at it the same way. Of course, I'm not sure sure whether to go with it or not, but it's certainly made me think more about it now.

However, I will say something about this...

Honestly, I believe that, if Meiling truly was a Dragon she woudn't even exist now being ZUN would most likely save a character THAT powerful up until the last Touhou game or whatever. That said, she also wouldn't be a Stage 3 boss either...I mean really...a DRAGON...a Stage 3 boss?

That's all well and good, but the argument doesn't work. Yuugi springs to mind instantly. If that was the case, how do you justify an oni being a stage 3 boss then? It doesn't matter what stage position they are; in fact, I'm sure I've seen ZUN say that himself at some point. Plus, for all we know, Meiling could be holding back because of the spell card rules themselves. Or, maybe she is just pretending to be some what lazy and seeing how everyone does in Gensokyo for reasons not known to us.

Like I said, I'm neither agreeing or dis-agreeing with this whole theory; but it's making me think things like this a lot more now.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 07, 2010, 02:57:23 PM
That's all well and good, but the argument doesn't work. Yuugi springs to mind instantly. If that was the case, how do you justify an oni being a stage 3 boss then? It doesn't matter what stage position they are; in fact, I'm sure I've seen ZUN say that himself at some point. Plus, for all we know, Meiling could be holding back because of the spell card rules themselves. Or, maybe she is just pretending to be some what lazy and seeing how everyone does in Gensokyo for reasons not known to us.

Well, first off, onis are sort of commonplace creatures in Gensokyo. The Dragon God is a unique being. Not having a power-level discussion here, but I think that's an important distinction. Also, there's a whole lot of maybes in this post here. Maybe she's pretending. Maybe she's lazy. But we have no evidence to support that. Saying "maybe such and such" isn't evidence. You could just as easily say "maybe Reimu's the Dragon". The OP here at least drew together comparative symbolism to build a case. 
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Reddyne on November 07, 2010, 06:42:54 PM
Oh, come on. So much thought invested into exploring the origin and power of Meiling, a stage 3 boss?

I LOVE it! I'll buy 20!
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: orinrin on November 07, 2010, 07:44:12 PM
Meiling is a panda.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Cadmas on November 07, 2010, 08:15:33 PM
I'm more convinced that the loli dragon god of Gensokyo lives at the Dragon Palace in Heaven with Iku and Tenshi, but I'd like to be surprised.
Meiling has a hazy background that's for sure.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: KrackoCloud on November 07, 2010, 08:48:18 PM
Even if Meiling were a dragon, the chances of her being the Gensokyo dragon, or somehow connected to him, would be very unlikely. It would be nuts hard for Dragon to do what he wants to do if he's gotta keep guard over a mansion 24/7.
If anything, Meiling would be a Chinese dragon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_%28rainbow-dragon%29), not a Japanese one.

I'd like to believe Meiling is just following a Chinese motif with the whole dragon/rainbow thing. Considering ZUN gives us a lot of information on characters, even when it's pointless or not connected to the games at all, it's hard to believe he'd make Meiling a secret dragon without telling the fans.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Ghaleon on November 07, 2010, 09:16:29 PM
Don't use power levels as an argument to either theory please.
That being said, I hope she is just so that remi owns even more =p.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Esoterica on November 07, 2010, 09:46:07 PM
Kogasa is the real dragon.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 07, 2010, 09:52:59 PM
Don't use power levels as an argument to either theory please.
That being said, I hope she is just so that remi owns even more =p.

I really didn't see that as a power levels remark. It's just a simple acknowledgement that the things the Dragon has to do and the things that Hong Meiling has to do would result in some, uh, scheduling conflicts.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Smok, destroyer of thoughts on November 07, 2010, 10:06:41 PM
I wanna have ZUN logged on here and tell us the truth =D
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Suikama on November 08, 2010, 04:02:46 AM
Meiling is a panda.
And not just any Panda (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X21mJh6j9i4)

No one is safe (danbooru) (http://danbooru.donmai.us/post/show/731311/77gl-bat_wings-bed-blue_hair-figure-flower-hat-hol)
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 08, 2010, 06:24:54 AM
Me personally, I think Hong might be a (or THE) dragon but just doesn't realize it.  It's possible she does though.  Not much evidence either way (if she really is a or the dragon)

I also lean towards the belief that all the jokes about Mei Ling being so weak and Dragon being so strong is done on purpose (IE, a "Surprise!  The character everyone is making fun of is THE dragon!"

Again, just speculation.

At any rate, something to remember is that in Gensokyo, dreams are serious business.  I shouldn't really have to explain why.  In Mei Ling's Hisoutenko ending,
She dreams of a youkai even stronger than the catfish that's so strong that everyone needs to come together to beat it, and she'll be at the front lines.  This part of Hong Meiling's ending is actually not particularly treated as a joke, and given the importance of dreams in Gensokyo, it makes me wonder if a true "awakened" Dragon Mei Ling will need to defeat this youkai, or alternatively, that this super strong youkai is THE dragon Hong Mei Ling, herself, considering how rage-tastic the dragon went long ago.

Oh, that's right.  The reason why I think Hong is a dragon but doesn't realize it yet is because of her ending in Hisoutenko. 
It's from her perspective, after all, so you'd think it'd be more serious if Hong Meiling herself were really that devious and smart underneath.  So I think that, if she is THE dragon, she probably just... forgot.  Alternatively, she's another dragon that's more... mentally immature.  Or alternatively alternatively, she's an unappreciated genius because that catfish is real and dangit, everyone had better listen to her and take her dreams seriously because she's THE dragon!

...but yea.  There's no hard proof that she's a dragon and it's possible that all that stuff is meant to just symbolize her as Chinese dragon themed since she's so... Chinese in general, but... personally, I lean towards the theory that she really is one.  It was ZUN's decision to make THE Dragon also be so Chinese themed in the first place, after all.  ...I think.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Ghaleon on November 08, 2010, 04:05:29 PM
I really didn't see that as a power levels remark. It's just a simple acknowledgement that the things the Dragon has to do and the things that Hong Meiling has to do would result in some, uh, scheduling conflicts.

The "that" you are referring to is unknown to me, I was talking more about stuff such as "too powerful to be a stage 3 boss" among other things. I'm not saying people were having power debates, I just think it was kinda sorta making a roundabout way in that direction =p.

Anyway, for some reason I personally don't care... Because I just don't really care about meiling. I don't hate her, she's just... I can't explain it, she just doesn't interest me at all. As a character, there is nothing wrong with her but, *shrugs*. I'm a sdm nut too!
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Euoia on November 08, 2010, 05:00:42 PM
Well.. I can definitely buy that she is A dragon... I could even buy that she could be A dragon with massive memory loss... Wasn't there something about martial artists that go bad in a bad way also being known as poisoned dragons? Honestly, I think the real line that needs to be looked at is not the actual dragon-kin thing for Meiling, but what actually is being defined for her as a dragon.

Part of me thinks that this is actually a massive play on words where both and neither are true at the same time...
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 08, 2010, 09:20:30 PM
Doesn't her first name mean "Rainbow Dragon"? Or something like that? I think that would make it obvious that Meiling is totally a dragon. Just like Satori, whose first name is also the name of her species.

Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Ghaleon on November 08, 2010, 09:29:43 PM
I'm not a big martial arts buff, I find fighting to be pretty boring actually. But isn't it common for stuff to be named "dragon" in Japanese martial arts?
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Smok, destroyer of thoughts on November 08, 2010, 10:06:54 PM
in Japanese martial arts

Meiling's a Chinese (or chinese-ish) name. Also her style is Chinese. If we would go by names like that then other characters would be different then they already are.
Dragons are a more popular theme in China then Japan. Thus Associating Meiling to China makes her associated with dragons. I doubt sh has a dragon form cannon-wise.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: 三重階乗 on November 08, 2010, 10:15:23 PM
Doesn't her first name mean "Rainbow Dragon"? Or something like that? I think that would make it obvious that Meiling is totally a dragon. Just like Satori, whose first name is also the name of her species.

They're the same romanized, but their characters are different (Meiling's first name is 紅, the rainbow dragon is 虹).
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Furienify on November 08, 2010, 10:34:49 PM
She probably astral projects as the Dragon while she sleeps. Which is most of the time.
 :X
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Bias Bus on November 09, 2010, 06:36:19 AM
Doesn't her first name mean "Rainbow Dragon"? Or something like that? I think that would make it obvious that Meiling is totally a dragon. Just like Satori, whose first name is also the name of her species.
That's...not exactly a good reason to assume she's actually a dragon, you know...
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Kyaksa on November 13, 2010, 05:27:40 PM
>3> I've always had a belief that's she's Dragon-related, if not A dragon in herself. But by no means would she be THE dragon, that... would be to predictable and somewhat make Hong Mailing lose her charm.

Scarlet Devil doujin series, makes me thing Hong Meiling holds back only in the interest of entertaining Remilia... But honestly I think she's actaully much older than Remilia, but I have no proof... but I think she's more like a born servant... etc etc... I won't even bother getting into my belief of that, but I think she lives to entertain her Master depending on WHO they are... Remilia is a picky person, who was in a mansion for many years, Patchouli is around a 100 years but we don't per-say know how lonmg she's lives with the SDM...

I'd like to belief she raised Sakuya... but it is unsure whether Sakuya is from another world, maybe the Other world is the Outside world?

The fact that she holds back on Sakuya shows she's something... but whaqtever...

But other than anything Thoeries are based on fandomness as well... ^^;; I'm a full supporter of Dragon Meiling but not a God per-say....

But this theory will fall the moment ZUN tells her species.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 15, 2010, 10:49:00 AM
But this theory will fall the moment ZUN tells her species.

Bad news, aniki. (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Hong_Meiling)
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: KennyMan666 on November 15, 2010, 12:43:03 PM
I can definitely buy that she's a Chinese dragon. Definitely not THE Dragon, though.

But even so, I'd believe she's a (comparatively) young dragon, much younger than Remilia and Flandre. My guess would be that she's at most around Patchy's age.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Gpop on November 15, 2010, 02:13:56 PM
I wanna have ZUN logged on here and tell us the truth =D

I find that quite funny because of your avatar :3

Anyways, Tengu summed up my thoughts already:
I always thought that the dragon imagery was to emphasize her Chinese-ness, not to necessarily imply that she was a dragon herself.

Since some martial arts tend to like to refer to themselves as some sort of animal to represent their style of fighting and such, normally a dragon would be one of those high up there, and since she's probably the best in martial arts, training in such, I think she likes to refer her attacks as such.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Romantique Tp on November 15, 2010, 03:25:08 PM
Bad news, aniki. (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Hong_Meiling)

Maybe ZUN considers dragons to be a kind of youkai.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 15, 2010, 03:31:35 PM
And maybe ZUN is a dragon himself!

Without any evidence, this theory is nothing more than a fun thought exercise. Which is totally, utterly fine, no doubt about it. It's just going to be reeeally hard to make any headway beyond "I think Hong Meiling is The Dragon because that's what I want to believe" when there's not really anything accounting for that that can't be explained with "dragon imagery underlines her Chinese-ness".
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 15, 2010, 05:26:19 PM
Well, Satori is a satori, so I'm gonna stand on saying that Hong is a hong.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Gpop on November 15, 2010, 06:20:21 PM
Well, Satori is a satori, so I'm gonna stand on saying that Hong is a hong.

Or a Kong :V
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Stuffman on November 15, 2010, 07:06:03 PM
Yeah, it is explicitly stated that Meiling is a youkai, and dragons aren't classified as youkai. It's just an aesthetic.

Even stories specifically from Meiling's perspective (12.3) display her to be a moron, that's not an act.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 15, 2010, 07:10:32 PM
Even stories specifically from Meiling's perspective (12.3) display her to be a moron, that's not an act.

I resent that.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Stuffman on November 15, 2010, 07:19:37 PM
Meiling is canonically stupid dude, that's an instance of the fanon getting it right :V

Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 15, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Meiling is canonically stupid dude, that's an instance of the fanon getting it right :V

I haven't really seen any instances of this.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Stuffman on November 15, 2010, 07:52:33 PM
In EoSD, she tries to flee from Reimu, but since she runs back to the gate she just winds up leading Reimu there. She also forgets who Marisa is, minutes after seeing her. In EoSD she was dumber than Cirno until fanon turned it around.

She is not (completely) incompetent but she certainly isn't smart.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Ryuu on November 15, 2010, 08:21:38 PM
Maybe ZUN considers dragons to be a kind of youkai.

well the definition of youkai is pretty much "supernatural creature" so yeah
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 15, 2010, 08:22:05 PM
In EoSD, she tries to flee from Reimu, but since she runs back to the gate she just winds up leading Reimu there. She also forgets who Marisa is, minutes after seeing her. In EoSD she was dumber than Cirno until fanon turned it around.

She is not (completely) incompetent but she certainly isn't smart.

Your first point doesn't mean she is stupid. Meiling fled and Reimu simply followed her. Plus, it's her job to guard the gate; she can't very well leave her post.

Can't say much about her forgetting about Marisa.

Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: 8lue Wizard on November 15, 2010, 10:21:40 PM
She also forgets who Marisa is, minutes after seeing her.

Really? Seems more like the standard rediculous banter to me. Let's take a look:

Quote
Meiling: Ah, thanks back there.
Marisa: It's been a while.
Meiling: ...Hey, wait a minute, when did we become acquaintances~

The line Marisa uses here, "Oyasashiburi", is specifically used as a greeting among friends who haven't seen each other for a while. Meiling's line, therefore, is not a lack of recognition, but rather a reaction to the absurdidty of a non-sequitur; a standard tsukkomi. Continuing:

Quote
Marisa: Just now?
Meiling: Oh yeah, I ran into some weirdo then.

Feigning ignorance to deliver an offhanded slight? Yeah, like that doesn't happen every other stage. From there, they move on to another subject entirely, so I'm really not seeing what's supposed to be so boneheaded here.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Stuffman on November 16, 2010, 10:19:50 AM
Hmm, for some reason I remembered that translation being different. Yeah okay I guess she's not stupid. :ohdear:

But she's still not a dragon >:|

It makes no sense for such a minor character to be an incredibly powerful and important thing like a dragon. A dragon being around in Gensokyo is a HUGE DEAL. Meiling has been pretty much irrelevant to the plot development that's gone on in Gensokyo since EoSD, there's no way a skilled writer like ZUN would pull out a stupid deus ex machina later on with Meiling going "oh hey guys I was a dragon all along".

Meiling is a youkai, and the singular dragon that has appeared in Gensokyo is classified as a god (assuming dragon is not an entire classification to itself), and Iku's story (the current best source on canonical dragon info) suggests that other dragons live in some kind of realm beyond the clouds and that they have authority over celestials, which is the exact opposite of youkai, who find celestials to be anathema. If you try to make the argument that she's a dragon youkai, that makes no sense because youkai are stronger that the things they're youkai of. That would make Meiling the ultimate creator of the universe or something, I don't think she would be spending her time tending Remi's front lawn.

To make it as simple as possible:
Meiling is a youkai -> dragons are not youkai -> Meiling is not a dragon.

There are a hundred better theories you could make as to why Meiling is so big on the dragon aesthetic. Maybe she once witnessed a dragon in battle and was so inspired she based her danmaku on it. Maybe she was an ascetic who trained under a dragon master. Maybe she did something awesome and she was welcomed to the dragon palace and given a tiny bit of power as gratitude! The simplest explanation is to say that she just likes dragons :V

But making the leap to say she's an actual dragon given the current information is almost as large a leap as saying that Sagat is actually a tiger.

~

Also, this isn't a big deal, but just for fun - while the character "Hong" is indeed associated with a kind of dragon, the "Long" written on her hat is probably closer to the creature she's trying to emulate. "Hong" means red, likely a play on both her hair color and her servitude to the scarlet devil; the "Hong" dragon is an inauspicious one, and since Meiling considers herself a fighter for TRUTH and JUSTICE, it seems inappropriate for it to refer to the dragon rather than the color in that context.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 16, 2010, 04:39:46 PM
To make it as simple as possible:
Meiling is a youkai -> dragons are not youkai -> Meiling is not a dragon.

The definition of a youkai would fit into what a dragon is: a magical being.

Also, who says dragons have to be GREAT, POWERFUL BEASTS OF FLAMES? Sure the mention of a dragon is supposed to strike fear into the hearts of men, but not all are as such.

Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 16, 2010, 05:27:01 PM
Mei Ling is not plot relevant now, perhaps.  However, it's POSSIBLE that she's been foreshadowed to be plot relevant (her Touhou Hisoutenko ending).  In that regards, her secretly being a dragon but ZUN finally revealing it when she's moved to the forefront is a possibility

(note:  It's a possibility, not a PROBability.  Big difference, but in this case, this entire thread is just about possibilities so that should be enough)

Also, dragons are youkai.  They're in Perfect Memento's Encyclopedia, after all.  The whole point of Perfect Memento is to document youkai...


In regards to intelligence, Mei Ling for the most part seems to be portrayed as "Mediocre" or "average" (perhaps slightly below average).  She's easily fooled and often accidentally makes mistakes (Inaba of Moon and Earth, Strange and Bright Nature Deity, etc), but she doesn't go around making ridiculous leaps of logic like Cirno and Utsuho seem to do (her conversation with Marisa in EoSD is more because MARISA is the insane one, which would confuse anyone, really).  She's probably meant to represent your average Joe (Jane?) in most respects.  Of course, considering that the rest of the Scarlet Devil Mansion are geniuses in most regards when you really study them, this does make her look bad, but only relatively.

Her mistaking that giant robot in Hisoutenko to be a god of destruction was in part on purpose (Her profile says she might have exaggerated it just a little cause she wanted some excitement)

Of course, it still doesn't seem to be in the league that you'd expect a dragon to be when it comes to brains.  Admittingly, I'm not sure if it was ever stated that dragons are smart, but still...   well, that's why my own theory is that Mei Ling's been hit with a serious case of amnesia or so.  Or maybe she's just immature (IE, a baby dragon, metaphorically speaking)
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 16, 2010, 05:40:27 PM
Honestly, I can't remember Meiling showing any signs of being clumsy or such.

But as Tiamat says, maybe Meiling is on a different level.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 05:41:29 PM
Also, dragons are youkai.  They're in Perfect Memento's Encyclopedia, after all.  The whole point of Perfect Memento is to document youkai...

OK this is getting ridiculous.

Look at any other youkai in the entire canon of Touhou who are an identifiable type of youkai. What is their race listed as? Werehakutaku, karakasa, tsurube-otoshi and so on.

Now look at Hong Meiling's race. It's just "youkai". Not "dragon" or "Dragon". Youkai. Period.

There, now you can end this ludicrous semantic head-bashing over this one word, and continue with the groundless "But what if ..." speculations.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 16, 2010, 05:47:19 PM
There, now you can end this ludicrous semantic head-bashing over this one word, and continue with the groundless "But what if ..." speculations.

First off, youkai is a widely general topic. It's like saying "mammal" or "fish". Also, this is the main bearing of the topic, speculating on the "dragon-ness", so to speak, of Meiling.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 05:47:58 PM
First off, youkai is a widely general topic. It's like saying "mammal" or "fish".

Look at any other youkai in the entire canon of Touhou who are an identifiable type of youkai. What is their race listed as? Werehakutaku, karakasa, tsurube-otoshi and so on.

Now look at Hong Meiling's race. It's just "youkai". Not "dragon" or "Dragon". Youkai. Period.

My point is is that it is meaningless to focus on this word "youkai" because it tells us literally nothing about Hong Meiling. What we do know, however, is that anyone else in the canon who IS a specific type of youkai is listed as such. Hong is not. Beating the "youkai" drum proves absolutely nothing about her dragon-ness.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 16, 2010, 05:58:12 PM
My point is is that it is meaningless to focus on this word "youkai" because it tells us literally nothing about Hong Meiling. What we do know, however, is that anyone else in the canon who IS a specific type of youkai is listed as such. Hong is not. Beating the "youkai" drum proves absolutely nothing about her dragon-ness.

Uh..I think you're missing the point of this topic. It's just a fun debate.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Gpop on November 16, 2010, 06:16:54 PM
I always thought that the term "youkai" was used by humans in Gensokyo for any human-like species that exists. Those classified as just simply "Youkai" are undetermined in terms of their actual species, while others like Night Sparrow or Karakasa or Satori are all still considered "Youkai", but with a determinate species that they fall under/relate to.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 16, 2010, 06:17:12 PM
My point is is that it is meaningless to focus on this word "youkai" because it tells us literally nothing about Hong Meiling. What we do know, however, is that anyone else in the canon who IS a specific type of youkai is listed as such. Hong is not. Beating the "youkai" drum proves absolutely nothing about her dragon-ness.

Akyu specifically states in the foreword that she dumped anything that she HERSELF could not figure out how to classify into the youkai section.  Of course, if even Mei Ling herself didn't realize she's a dragon, why on earth would Akyu?

My response about the dragon being a youkai was in regards to someone earlier saying that a dragon is not a youkai.  This is false.  A dragon, just like nearly everything else that isn't human or non-youkai animal/plant, is a youkai.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 06:39:27 PM
Uh..I think you're missing the point of this topic. It's just a fun debate.

"Debate" implies that there's some kind of factual evidence you can hold up for scrutiny. What I was doing was clarifying a semantics issue with the word "youkai" and how it is used canonically. As Tiamat says, anything that cannot be classified and is not human is called "youkai". Hong Meiling is classified as "youkai". This means that no one, not even Hong herself, believes her to be a dragon.

In other words, using her classification as "youkai" as evidence for her being a dragon/the Dragon is off-base, as she's just as likely to be any other type of youkai in Gensokyo.

I don't see how using basic logic should get in your way of having fun.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 16, 2010, 06:48:10 PM
"Debate" implies that there's some kind of factual evidence you can hold up for scrutiny. What I was doing was clarifying a semantics issue with the word "youkai" and how it is used canonically. As Tiamat says, anything that cannot be classified and is not human is called "youkai". Hong Meiling is classified as "youkai". This means that no one, not even Hong herself, believes her to be a dragon.

In other words, using her classification as "youkai" as evidence for her being a dragon/the Dragon is off-base, as she's just as likely to be any other type of youkai in Gensokyo.

I don't see how using basic logic should get in your way of having fun.

*facepalm* It's just speculation. Geez....it's not the logic that's getting in the way, it's your disavowal. As was stated, there could exist unidentifiable species of youkai. Maybe it hasn't been confirmed. Maybe Meiling doesn't want to reveal such a fact. Who knows? No one knows. Various evidence goes for it and against it, so who's to say?
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Smok, destroyer of thoughts on November 16, 2010, 06:49:31 PM
OR MAYBE ZUN himself (!!) Doesn't realize Meiling is a dragon!


>.>
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 06:55:03 PM
*facepalm* It's just speculation. Geez....it's not the logic that's getting in the way, it's your disavowal. As was stated, there could exist unidentifiable species of youkai. Maybe it hasn't been confirmed. Maybe Meiling doesn't want to reveal such a fact. Who knows? No one knows. Various evidence goes for it and against it, so who's to say?

That's funny, because I've been seeing "youkai = maybe a dragon!" being used for the past page or so here. If you want a debate, is not part of a debate people who disagree with you? Or is this the "let's all agree Hong is a dragon" thread? If so, I'll be happy to stay out of it. But if it really is a debate, as you say, well, expect people to disagree and don't take it so bad.

OR MAYBE ZUN himself (!!) Doesn't realize Meiling is a dragon!


>.>

NOW we're getting somewhere!
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 16, 2010, 07:11:06 PM
That's funny, because I've been seeing "youkai = maybe a dragon!" being used for the past page or so here. If you want a debate, is not part of a debate people who disagree with you? Or is this the "let's all agree Hong is a dragon" thread? If so, I'll be happy to stay out of it. But if it really is a debate, as you say, well, expect people to disagree and don't take it so bad.

Well, the term youkai is pretty widespread. At least to me. It goes into species like vampires and ghosts, so why not dragons?
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 07:33:59 PM
Clearly, she's a tsurube-otoshi. Her bucket is being borrowed by her younger sister, Kisume.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 16, 2010, 07:39:13 PM
JAOOOO!
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 16, 2010, 07:43:55 PM
That's funny, because I've been seeing "youkai = maybe a dragon!" being used for the past page or so here.

You need to go back and re-read the previous page and this one more closely, then.  It's not "youkai = maybe a dragon!".   It's some OTHER person saying "youkai = definately NOT a dragon" and people countering with "youkai = doesn't necessarily mean NOT a dragon"
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 08:36:01 PM
You need to go back and re-read the previous page and this one more closely, then.  It's not "youkai = maybe a dragon!".   It's some OTHER person saying "youkai = definately NOT a dragon" and people countering with "youkai = doesn't necessarily mean NOT a dragon"

See now, I tried to let this drop with some humor. And you had to come charging back with this.

The definition of a youkai would fit into what a dragon is: a magical being.

Also, dragons are youkai.  They're in Perfect Memento's Encyclopedia, after all.  The whole point of Perfect Memento is to document youkai...

youkai is a widely general topic. It's like saying "mammal" or "fish". Also, this is the main bearing of the topic, speculating on the "dragon-ness", so to speak, of Meiling.

And so forth.

I'll say it one last time: I was clearing up a semantical error, and if you lot don't like someone coming into a speculation thread and disagreeing with you, then go make a "let's all agree Hong's a dragon" thread.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 16, 2010, 08:41:20 PM
....at this point, I'm not even sure what on earth your actual point is, anymore.  You seem to be disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing, now.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 08:44:25 PM
....at this point, I'm not even sure what on earth your actual point is, anymore.  You seem to be disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing, now.

Oh, OK. Why didn't you say so? Here, let me explain it another way:

I am classified as a human being. Policemen are also human beings. Does this mean I'm a policeman? No, not really. We need more evidence. Me being a human being doesn't tell us anything about my state of policeness. My species, in other words, is not evidence one way or the other of my being a policeman. It gives us zero information towards my state of police-itude.

Hope that helps!
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 16, 2010, 08:46:32 PM
Oh, OK. Why didn't you say so? Here, let me explain it another way:

I am classified as a human being. Policemen are also human beings. Does this mean I'm a policeman? No, not really. We need more evidence. Me being a human being doesn't tell us anything about my state of policeness. My species, in other words, is not evidence one way or the other of my being a policeman.

Hope that helps!

See, you're arguing about something no one was ever arguing about in the first place.

You need to go back and re-read the previous pages more closely so you can get the CONTEXT of what's being discussed here.  Everyone isn't saying "human = maybe a policeman!".   It's about some OTHER person saying "human = definately NOT a policeman" and people countering with "human = doesn't necessarily mean NOT a policeman"
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 16, 2010, 08:52:22 PM
Now that is simply not true - this argument was being made, as I've already shown, in the form of "well, she's a youkai, so that doesn't mean she's NOT a dragon!" Saying that "youkai = doesn't necessarily mean NOT a dragon" is irrelevant to the subject of Hong's dragon-ness. That's the point. Her being a youkai tells us nothing. It has no bearing whatsoever on the subject at hand, and it needed pointing out.

You corrected Stuffman on the subject of youkai, and congratulations for that and all, but the argument that "youkai = doesn't necessarily mean NOT a dragon" says absolutely nothing. I thought that pointing this out might be helpful, and that people wouldn't get all pouty and defensive, and might actually want to have a discussion. Silly me.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 16, 2010, 09:01:52 PM
Now that is simply not true - this argument was being made, as I've already shown, in the form of "well, she's a youkai, so that doesn't mean she's NOT a dragon!" Saying that "youkai = doesn't necessarily mean NOT a dragon" is irrelevant to the subject of Hong's dragon-ness. That's the point. Her being a youkai tells us nothing. It has no bearing whatsoever on the subject at hand, and it needed pointing out.

You corrected Stuffman on the subject of youkai, and congratulations for that and all, but the argument that "youkai = doesn't necessarily mean NOT a dragon" says absolutely nothing. I thought that pointing this out might be helpful, and that people wouldn't get all pouty and defensive, and might actually want to have a discussion. Silly me.

It's not SUPPOSED to mean anything, nor did anyone who said it ever meant it to mean anything beyond correcting Stuffman.  It' s merely supposed to correct Stuffman, which it did and accomplished that purpose.  You're trying to blow this out of proportion into something that needs correction, when the only reason it existed in the first place was to correct someone else, which it DID.  Why you insist on trying to say this correction means nothing when this correction was never meant to mean anything, but merely meant to correct someone else (which it did) is beyond me.  Again, at this point, you're basically disagreeing just for the sake of disagreeing, because there never was any point to the correction of "Youkai = doesn' tnecessarily mean NOT a dragon" EXCEPT to correct the guy who said "Youkai = Not a dragon!", which it did, therefore there's no reason for you to point out that there's no point to it, because WE ALL ALREADY KNOW THAT AND DIDN'T MEAN FOR IT TO HAVE A POINT beyond correcting Stuffman
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Drake on November 16, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
You're both right. Tiamat argued one thing, Ammy started on that thing and then moved onto something else with Savory, which coincided with what Tiamat was saying. And then somehow both of you decided you were still arguing against each other and you've pretty much been throwing around words because you both think you're actually arguing some point. You're agreeing. The label "Youkai" means nothing. Her being a youkai has nothing to do with her possibly being a dragon as Ammy said, but being a youkai does not go against her being a dragon, as Tiamat said. The end.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Gpop on November 16, 2010, 09:52:00 PM
You're both right. Tiamat argued one thing, Ammy started on that thing and then moved onto something else with Savory, which coincided with what Tiamat was saying. And then somehow both of you decided you were still arguing against each other and you've pretty much been throwing around words because you both think you're actually arguing some point. You're agreeing. The label "Youkai" means nothing. Her being a youkai has nothing to do with her possibly being a dragon as Ammy said, but being a youkai does not go against her being a dragon, as Tiamat said. The end.

That's pretty much what I thought

Therefore:
I always thought that the term "youkai" was used by humans in Gensokyo for any human-like species that exists. Those classified as just simply "Youkai" are undetermined in terms of their actual species, while others like Night Sparrow or Karakasa or Satori are all still considered "Youkai", but with a determinate species that they fall under/relate to.

Meiling is just an undetermined youkai species that could be anything atm.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Unassuming Squid on November 16, 2010, 09:58:24 PM
Meiling is a nue. Discuss.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: VIVItheFujoshi on November 16, 2010, 10:58:49 PM
I believed who all the thing about Meiling and dragons is relative to the legend about who all the chinese people are descendients of a dragon,and she, how is a chinese youkai, have something of that power.
Some years ago heared about Kaguya like the dragon, because one of her spellcards have a dragon in it, and because she and Mokou (the phoenix) are in eternal fight. Even believed who the "dragon" of Gensokyo is Rinnosuke, but he was "sealed" for Yukari...and the pact with the dragons...was a simple transaccion about odds and ends. He live in the forest, some dragons can create forests; his name means long rain spell, dragon can MAKE rain and create storms (even in one CoLA chapter he believed who obtained the power of make rain thanks to the Kusanagi sword) and dragons are treasure guardians (antiques and even junk are treasures for other people XD) and even his apparence, white hair and golden eyes, remind a dragon. well, but this is all weird teories,forget all!  :derp:
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: OkashiiKisei on November 17, 2010, 12:20:58 AM
Meiling is a red panda. Discuss.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Stuffman on November 17, 2010, 10:02:53 AM
Alright, fine.

Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed fandom, I have one final thing I want you to consider.

(http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/883/th06patchouliportrait.jpg)

Ladies and gentlemen, this is Patchouli Knowledge. Patchouli is a magician youkai from the Magic Library Voile. But Patchouli lives in the Scarlet Devil Mansion. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

Why would a magician, a purple beansprout magician, want to live in the Scarlet Devil Mansion, with a bunch of bratty vampires? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this debate?

Nothing.

Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this debate! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a YuugenMagan eye wearing a fedora defending Meiling's status as a generic youkai, and I'm talkin' about Patchouli! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in front of your computer thinkin' and linkin' the Touhou Wiki, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed fandom, it does not make sense! If Patchouli lives in the Scarlet Devil Mansion, Hong Meiling is not a dragon! The defense rests.

~~~

Okay seriously now!

There are two meanings for the term "youkai". There's the conversational generic use which refers to pretty much every non-human species, this is what you're usually talking about when you talk about youkai in Gensokyo. However, when you're talking about what specific species a specific character is, that designation becomes much less broad and it's not appropriate to refer to just anything supernatural as a youkai.

I can prove it! Have a look at the table of contents in Perfect Memento (http://touhou.wikia.com/wiki/Perfect_Memento_in_Strict_Sense). While Akyu calls it a "Youkai Encyclopedia", she is using the term youkai in the generic sense, because there are some things listed here that are very obviously not youkai, particularly celestials. This is why it is not correct to say that if Meiling is listed as a proper traditional youkai as her specific species, she can still be anything in the generic youkai umbrella.

But you know what, let's just set that aside because Akyu's failure to be clear about this stuff is whole 'nother bag of potatoes and I don't need it to argue beyond a reasonable doubt that Meiling is not a dragon.

Looking at Factorial's first post, all we have is the (admittedly generous) list of ways in which Meiling makes use of dragon aesthetics. However, this doesn't say anything by itself. For the sake of simplicity, let's just list two possibilities we can draw from this:
A) Meiling is an ordinary youkai with dragon aesthetics
B) Meiling is a dragon!

What evidence is there that supports Meiling being more than just a regular youkai? All the information we have on her is very cut-and-dry. No question marks have been raised, she is plainly stated to be an ordinary youkai who works as Remilia's gate guard and groundskeeper. If any of her bio entries either in the games or in Perfect Memento said something like "she has a mysterious past" or "nobody knows what kind of youkai she really is" then we would have a reason to wonder about it and maybe arrive at the conclusion that she could be a dragon.

Let's compare her to Sakuya. I don't like the "Sakuya is a Lunarian" theory either, but the difference is that it's actually grounded in canon facts: it's unknown how Sakuya came to serve Remilia, Sakuya isn't her real name, there are many rumors about her being from outside Gensokyo, and for some ridiculous reason Eirin knew who she was.

Meiling doesn't have any of these mysteries. They're not unanswered in canon, they're just undiscussed. There's no reason to think that you couldn't just walk up to Meiling, ask away, and have her tell you about herself like you could with any other character.

If you start considering the possibility of Meiling being a dragon, a huge number of problems and questions are raised, like "why isn't she smarter/stronger", "why is she working for Remilia", "why is this issue never ever hinted at in the plot", "why doesn't anyone know that there's a dragon in Gensokyo", etc etc. While you can propose answers to these questions, there is no evidence to support those answers, and when you compare the amount of hoops you have to jump through to validate this theory to the stark simplicity of "she's just a youkai who likes dragons", it becomes clear which is the better explanation.

In fact, I don't know why I didn't think to look this up sooner, but have a look at Meiling's bio in EoSD:
Quote
Chinese Girl
Hong Meiling

Ability: Control of Chi

Stage 3 boss. A Chinese-looking youkai.

Her clothing is colorful and somewhat traditional. She is the gatekeeper of the Scarlet Devil Mansion, and prevents intruders from beyond the lake from reaching the mansion. She is by no means a special character, but she is the first character that has something to do with the main story. Even if that something happens to be merely mentioning the Mistress.
Quote
She is by no means a special character

There you go. Word of God. Apart from ZUN directly saying that she's not a dragon, I'm not sure how much clearer it can possibly get that Meiling is an ordinary, run-of-the-mill youkai. In fact, she likely would have been a throwaway character like many of the early touhou girls if we fans didn't decide that we wub her very much, so I strongly doubt that she's being set up for such an important revelation (at an unbelievably slow pace, at that).

I mean geez if she was a dragon they could've at least had Iku talk to her or something to throw that up in the air, geez
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 17, 2010, 10:19:39 AM
You had me with the Chewbacca Defense (known hereafter as the Patchoulli Defense).
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Drake on November 17, 2010, 02:32:46 PM
ilu stuff
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 17, 2010, 03:58:39 PM
Apart from ZUN directly saying that she's not a dragon...

Well I'm out. I was no aware of that tidbit.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Seian Verian on November 23, 2010, 05:40:16 PM
There you go. Word of God. Apart from ZUN directly saying that she's not a dragon, I'm not sure how much clearer it can possibly get that Meiling is an ordinary, run-of-the-mill youkai. In fact, she likely would have been a throwaway character like many of the early touhou girls if we fans didn't decide that we wub her very much, so I strongly doubt that she's being set up for such an important revelation (at an unbelievably slow pace, at that).

I have no opinion whatsoever as to what sort of Youkai Meiling is, but I WOULD like to point something out. No, Meiling was not intended to be an important character at the time of EoSD. However, that was years ago. In all that time, there is a definite possibility that ZUN has developed other intentions regarding her, especially given the fact that she actually has made return appearances.

Naturally, this does NOT change the nature of anything in the debate. There is always a POSSIBILITY but unless ZUN specifically states that she IS a dragon, then everything will be speculation. And personally, what I think? It will, with almost complete certainty, always be up in the air. More likely than not, Meiling will not have any real importance to the plot of Touhou at any point. If she IS a dragon, it will probably never be stated by ZUN, and there will never be more than hints and symbolism. If she isn't? That probably won't be stated either.

So basically, there's always the POSSIBILITY of being either one. There's always the POSSIBILITY of anything being true as long as it doesn't directly contradict canon. But that possibility is nothing to get hopes up about, or start getting mad over. Just like any ideas of Shinki being Alice's mother, I sincerely doubt that it will become canon. Ever. Does that mean that no one should EVER use the idea? No. It's actually a pretty interesting idea, which I'm sure has the possibility of being implemented well. But it is just that: An idea. A possibility which may or not turn out to be true.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 23, 2010, 05:48:13 PM
See, that's an example of "false equivalence". In the Not A Dragon column, we have: the game creator's own words about this character. In the A Dragon column, you've added: the fact that she's appeared in games. These two pieces of evidence are not equivalent.

I appreciate what you're saying about speculation and all, but I really don't think this matter is "up in the air". This implies there is compelling evidence on both sides. There isn't. Fun thought it may be.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Seian Verian on November 23, 2010, 05:57:45 PM
I wasn't trying to say that there is "compelling evidence" on either side. I'm not even supporting her being a dragon, because I don't really HAVE an opinion. I was more pointing out the possibility of changed intentions over time, and something that is different from what would APPEAR to have been an original intention. I'm not precisely trying to claim them as equivalent. You can draw whatever conclusion you want from it, it's always possible that it's true, or not true, regardless of the actual odds of it. We don't know what goes on in ZUN's mind, so can we say what he intends? No.

Basically I'm saying that you can draw whatever conclusions you want, but you shouldn't take them as absolute fact. You want to imagine what it's like with anything that can happen? Sure, go ahead. It won't be a concrete fact to be used in arguments. There are fun ideas, but I really don't think that there will be anything absolutely concrete beyond a shadow of a doubt.

(Maybe I just shouldn't have posted at all ever <_< Didn't precisely add much... Bit late to take it back now though, so I get to explain what I meant)
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 23, 2010, 07:55:06 PM
That's it. From this point on, canon doesn't make any difference. Let's just have fun speculating.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Unassuming Squid on November 23, 2010, 08:53:03 PM
the plot of Touhou

...does Touhou actually have any sort of grand, overarching plot aside from "incidents happen and get solved?" The closest thing I've seen to the plots of the games actually being connected in some way is that they all take place in the same world and the plots of Mountain of Faith, Subterranean Animism, Undefined Fantastic Object, and Hisoutensoku are all directly influenced by each other. It's certainly not to the extent of Final Fantasy, where the games have almost nothing to do with each other and don't even take place in the same world, but I wouldn't say Touhou has much of a primary plot aside from the last few games.

I'm not trying to say you're wrong, it's just something I thought of when I read that.

That's it. From this point on, canon doesn't make any difference. Let's just have fun speculating.

Um. Maybe it's just me, but I don't see the point in that. I could say Reimu and Marisa are the same person, and disregarding canon entirely, that would be perfectly fine. In my opinion, speculating is really only fun when you take canon and put some thought into coming up with theories that have a base in the evidence given. Like, for example, why Sakuya and Eirin seemed to know each other in Imperishable Night. Maybe Sakuya is a Lunarian? But ZUN has directly stated that she's human. So maybe Eirin made the Luna Dial and gave it to Sakuya for whatever reason? Well, there isn't any evidence to contradict that theory, so it's viable.

Otherwise I'll just say "Yukari is Azathoth" and nobody could say I'm wrong because canon is completely disregarded.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Savory on November 23, 2010, 09:36:06 PM
Um. Maybe it's just me, but I don't see the point in that. I could say Reimu and Marisa are the same person, and disregarding canon entirely, that would be perfectly fine. In my opinion, speculating is really only fun when you take canon and put some thought into coming up with theories that have a base in the evidence given. Like, for example, why Sakuya and Eirin seemed to know each other in Imperishable Night. Maybe Sakuya is a Lunarian? But ZUN has directly stated that she's human. So maybe Eirin made the Luna Dial and gave it to Sakuya for whatever reason? Well, there isn't any evidence to contradict that theory, so it's viable.

Otherwise I'll just say "Yukari is Azathoth" and nobody could say I'm wrong because canon is completely disregarded.

I'm just saying that the main point of this topic is to have fun speculating on whether or not Meiling is a dragon. Either way, it won't disrupt how we perceive the character, so there's no reason to go out of your way to prove someone wrong. What happened to the fun in it?
Title: Hong Meiling
Post by: Tengukami on November 23, 2010, 11:23:14 PM
I think what Squid means is that the fun of speculations, for him, comes from trying to fold a theory into canon instead of pulling it out of thin air.

Also, why do you find it not fun that people are debating? Where is the fun of everyone agreeing with each other? I don't know how many speculation threads you've seen, but good ones generate a lively discussion, with agreement and disagreement. It comes with the turf, and I think it's kinda weird to imply that people disagreeing with a fan theory are ruining the fun.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: orinrin on November 23, 2010, 11:36:11 PM
Also, why do you find it not fun that people are debating? Where is the fun of everyone agreeing with each other? I don't know how many speculation threads you've seen, but good ones generate a lively discussion, with agreement and disagreement. It comes with the turf, and I think it's kinda weird to imply that people disagreeing with a fan theory are ruining the fun.
Different people think differently.  News at eleven.

I agree that most of the fun comes from discussion and debating though.  If everyone just simply agreed, it would get pretty dull after a few hours.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling
Post by: Unassuming Squid on November 23, 2010, 11:58:43 PM
I think what Squid means is that the fun of speculations, for him, comes from trying to fold a theory into canon instead of pulling it out of thin air.

Yeah, that's what I meant. Sorry if it didn't come out clearly enough.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Phlegeth on November 24, 2010, 01:04:50 AM
Meiling's obviously a dragon.  Otherwise my avatar and name don't work.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 24, 2010, 04:49:37 AM
Is there anyone here who's a native speaker of Japanese?  I'm not going to put much weight into "Hong Meiling is by no means a special character" until I've actually made certain what the CONTEXT of that line is in the original Japanese.  "not a special character" can mean something completely different in its native language compared to what an English speaker reading a second-hand translation might be interpreting it as.  For all we know, maybe ZUN just simply meant that she wasn't particularly important to EoSD's plot itself (something that the rest of the sentence "but she is the first one that mentions the mistress" seems to imply), not that she wouldn't have a bigger role in the future.  It's not wise to try to read into it too much until we know for sure what the actual context of the sentence is in the original Japanese.

Quote
...does Touhou actually have any sort of grand, overarching plot aside from "incidents happen and get solved?"

Kinda going off topic here, but Touhou does have some fore-casted plots.  I'm not sure if you'd call it "overarching", but that's irrelevant.

For example, a HUGE point of celestials being in Perfect Memento was to foreshadow Tenshi (and Yukari's rage at the heavens).  The same goes for Hermits being in Perfect Memento forecasting Ibara.

It thus stands to reason that SOMEDAY, Zun probably plans to do a plot with a/the dragon, considering that he bothered putting it in Perfect Memento in the first place.


(of course, ZUN often uses/used Perfect Memento to throw people for a loop, too.  For example, Perfect Memento says that Heaven is full, then Yukari discovers in Scarlet Weather Rhapsody that it's a lie and Tenshi turns out to be a complete spoiled brat.  Perfect Memento also describes hermits as old geezers, then ZUN gives us Ibara, with Reimu saying "Aren't hermits supposed to be old geezers?" etc etc.  Presumably, when ZUN finally does use the Dragon for an actual plot, he'll probably throw in some twist to go with it, just like he did with hermits and celestials)

It should also be noted that Scarlet Weather Rhapsody had an explicitly stated and unresolved cliffhanger, too (what did/is Yukari planning for the Hakurei Shrine) and possibly Touhou Hisoutenko as well (Mei Ling's ending)

And of course, ZUN's forecasted that there are four devas of the mountain, which Ibara seems to be leaning more and more to (Horned Hermit volume 2's ending making it even more obvious).
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 24, 2010, 10:55:28 AM
Is there anyone here who's a native speaker of Japanese?  I'm not going to put much weight into "Hong Meiling is by no means a special character" until I've actually made certain what the CONTEXT of that line is in the original Japanese.  "not a special character" can mean something completely different in its native language compared to what an English speaker reading a second-hand translation might be interpreting it as.  For all we know, maybe ZUN just simply meant that she wasn't particularly important to EoSD's plot itself (something that the rest of the sentence "but she is the first one that mentions the mistress" seems to imply), not that she wouldn't have a bigger role in the future.  It's not wise to try to read into it too much until we know for sure what the actual context of the sentence is in the original Japanese.

It's funny that you would say we shouldn't read too much into the game creator himself saying this character "is by no means a special character", but that we can read into his absolute silence on her "bigger role" to possibly mean that she is, in fact, special.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Drake on November 24, 2010, 02:59:03 PM
...Yet pointing it out like that obviously isn't ironic because we clearly haven't spent the last two pages also arguing around single quotes that probably don't mean anything either.

It really does just mean she's "nothing special". There isn't any awkward context in it at all, it's just "She's not really a special character". You don't need to be a native speaker to get something like that.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: OkashiiKisei on November 24, 2010, 03:38:47 PM
What mainly bothers me with this thread is that people imply there is more than one dragon, despite the fact the Perfect Memento article only refers to the Dragon. Singular, not plural. All other race articles refer to their race in plural. It's even called the highest order of god, not gods, in Perfect Memento. It pretty much sounds like the article is talking about a single being, not several.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling
Post by: Savory on November 24, 2010, 04:28:05 PM
Also, why do you find it not fun that people are debating? Where is the fun of everyone agreeing with each other? I don't know how many speculation threads you've seen, but good ones generate a lively discussion, with agreement and disagreement. It comes with the turf, and I think it's kinda weird to imply that people disagreeing with a fan theory are ruining the fun.

I'm not saying debating isn't fun. It's just that it looks like things are turning into "NO! YOU'RE WRONG!" as far as the said debating goes. Nothing wrong with a fun deliberation in general.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling
Post by: Tengukami on November 24, 2010, 04:59:48 PM
I'm not saying debating isn't fun. It's just that it looks like things are turning into "NO! YOU'RE WRONG!" as far as the said debating goes. Nothing wrong with a fun deliberation in general.

I'm really not reading it that way, but alright.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling
Post by: Savory on November 24, 2010, 05:16:02 PM
I'm really not reading it that way, but alright.

D'oh nevermind xD
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: 三重階乗 on November 24, 2010, 05:26:51 PM
What mainly bothers me with this thread is that people imply there is more than one dragon, despite the fact the Perfect Memento article only refers to the Dragon. Singular, not plural. All other race articles refer to their race in plural. It's even called the highest order of god, not gods, in Perfect Memento. It pretty much sounds like the article is talking about a single being, not several.

I'm sure most can agree that Meiling isn't a native-born Gensokyan, or at least makes herself out that way. This would probably remove Meiling from that mix being a foreigner who probably moved in well after the Hakurei Barrier was put up. At the same time it'd be difficult for characters in-universe to suspect a foreigner of being something besides just that, much less their own highest God. I think I can safely say if Meiling is The Dragon and just acting this, (s)he is doing a damn good job at it unlike the "Hermit" Kasen Ibara.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tiamat on November 25, 2010, 05:58:50 AM
It's funny that you would say we shouldn't read too much into the game creator himself saying this character "is by no means a special character", but that we can read into his absolute silence on her "bigger role" to possibly mean that she is, in fact, special.

Once again, you insist on taking things out of context and claiming that people said something when they never did.

Where in this thread did ANYONE ever say that ZUN's "absolute silence on her "bigger role" possibly meant that she is, in fact, special?"  Stop pretending that people said something just so you can prove you're right while this make-believe straw person who doesn't actually exist is wrong.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: Tengukami on November 25, 2010, 08:53:45 AM
Once again, you insist on taking things out of context and claiming that people said something when they never did.

Where in this thread did ANYONE ever say that ZUN's "absolute silence on her "bigger role" possibly meant that she is, in fact, special?"  Stop pretending that people said something just so you can prove you're right while this make-believe straw person who doesn't actually exist is wrong.

OK, first of all, I think you really need to dial it down a notch and stop getting so defensive.

Second of all, here, let me show you:

You said:

Is there anyone here who's a native speaker of Japanese?  I'm not going to put much weight into "Hong Meiling is by no means a special character" until I've actually made certain what the CONTEXT of that line is in the original Japanese.  "not a special character" can mean something completely different in its native language compared to what an English speaker reading a second-hand translation might be interpreting it as.  For all we know, maybe ZUN just simply meant that she wasn't particularly important to EoSD's plot itself (something that the rest of the sentence "but she is the first one that mentions the mistress" seems to imply), not that she wouldn't have a bigger role in the future.  It's not wise to try to read into it too much until we know for sure what the actual context of the sentence is in the original Japanese.

Here, you very clearly say "it's not wise to read too much into" ZUN saying that "Hong Meiling is by no means a special character". At the same time, you also say "For all we know, maybe ZUN just simply meant that she wasn't particularly important to EoSD's plot itself ... not that she wouldn't have a bigger role in the future" - when ZUN has never said she does or would have a bigger role in the future. He has been absolutely silent on the subject, in other words, and yet you say that we can consider her "bigger role" a possibility.

Is that clearer now? You are saying we shouldn't make too much out of what he did say, while at the same time we should totally consider a possibility which he has never so much as hinted at. I'm honestly surprised you don't see this yourself.

I also don't understand why you need to fly off the handle and accuse people of strawmanning just because your notions are being challenged. Especially you, considering you made that awesome Yukari/Maribel thread. You know I've used that thread as an example of what I love about TARC? It was the first thread I bookmarked here. You have proven in the past that you're totally capable of delving into speculation and hashing out the flaws and holes in your position, revising your theories along the way. Why you're reacting like this now confuses me, because I know for a fact that you're capable of being better than this.

In any event, I hope there are no hard feelings here.
Title: Re: Hong Meiling is A/The Dragon: A closer look at a semi-common theory
Post by: KrackoCloud on November 25, 2010, 06:39:35 PM
I'm sure someone's already pointed out Meiling's character profile.
A "Chinese-looking youkai." Sure, one could say she's still a dragon, but the fact that the adjective "Chinese-looking" is there implies that is best (or at least a very good) description, leaving little room for any addition.

"By no means a special character." You could say it only means she's not special within the EoSD plot, but I think that's stretching things a little.
Building off that, you could also argue ZUN never explicitly states she's not a dragon.
But this is about as explicit as it will ever get, unless he says something in an interview. If Meiling isn't a dragon, do you really think he would go out of his way to say "she's not a dragon" in a profile?


Personally, I don't think ZUN's "silence" has much value.
Look at some various character profiles. ZUN lists hobbies, personality, relationships, backstories, and roles with surprisingly great detail. ZUN shouldn't keep something like dragon-Meiling to himself. Saying that makes him out to be some guy who tries to be sneaky and clever with his fans. If he wants us to know, he'd tell us. If he hides it, that's... Probably because it was never true.

And if you insist the evidence still leaves some room for the dragon-Meiling theory... You're right. But for me, the possibility is, at least currently, just too low.
Hoping these arguments haven't already been pointed out countless times.