Omba #578: That interpretation is... absolutely forced, much like most of the dirt you have on me. That post wasn't even waffling. I maintain that I was just PLAYING THE GAME. Reactions and explanations help me read people.
It's pretty hilarious that Omba keeps harping on people for going after Bob today when a majority of his D1 was just focused on BT and Bob. His only other scumread toward the end of the day was on Chaore, which he never bothered to actually support and just kind of dropped after he said he needed to re-read Chaore.
Basically, Omba has to be a total ditz to be town at this point, as his day-to-day thoughts do not match up at all (Dan and Dorian are town -> unexplained Dan vote, Bob is probably lurkscum -> people parking on Bob are scum with no further analysis of Bob, Chaore looks a little scummy -> ..., BT is scum -> no comment until people are attacking others for dropping D1 reads, etc). Reading his posts in isolation shows very little consistency in his thoughts on any players other than the one he's currently tunneling on, and even his tunnelcases are pretty bad - it's rather apparent that they originate from him assuming scum first then just twisting everything his target says into being scummy without reading posts objectively, a reasonable way for scum to compensate for the inability to read posts from a neutral point of view. His #578 is a pretty solid example of him doing this.
Note that he also spent most of early D2 responding to my attacks but not Affinity's, which is quite ridiculous when Affinity and I did not have the exact same cases. Has he even responded to Affinity's specific points yet? I can't find any instances of him doing so.
