Wtb Avatar
@Shalako: I'm not sure how familiar you are with this game, so here is a small hint: you are supposed to vote someone by now.
When I was a young child my parents were murdered in front of me in a dark ally by a RVS Band Wagon. Since then I've sworn revenge on all RVS. Like Uncle Benihana used to say before he was cut down in the prime of his life in a totally avoidable Wagon
"With Great Votes comes some Respectability."
(I'm familiar with the game of Mafia)
I know I thought I'd finally gotten the SK role I'd always wanted.
SK is hands down my fave role, it's all the fun of being Town with all the Murder of being Mafia!
I find the whole "I thought I was non-town because of Oranges" rather ridiculous what with the Sample Role being Orange.
So Mafia know Town are Orange so why argue that someone is more town for leaking Role info everybody knows?
The argument about Mafia doing it to seem town also falls apart for the same reasons. Why would Mafia expect to get Townie points for saying things people who aren't color-blind know?
Conq adequately clarified that: Scum is generally red, Town is green, ITP can be anything. Thinking you're Scum based on an Orange role PM is more suspicious than thinking you're ITP because of the same.
ITP?
Nothing is too terrible for ending RVS.
Agreed as someone who hates VS
Even with that aside, 'gut' is a poor and lazy excuse to vote someone
Disagree. Even more so with it being day one and the...rather poor interactions so far.
Assuming you hold no hostile intentions against captain Selery, your attempt to damage their reputation would have been unnecessary. Therefore, this ship postulates that you hold unexplained hostile intentions against captain Selery.
:wat:
So why do you vote Murren instead of Selery?
Aren't you just attempting to damage their reputation by your own logic?
Do you need your Ships A.I. recalibrated?
unecessarily complicated roleplay fluff to fake effort.
I'd love to hear why his enjoyable roleplay is overly complicated.
Also, please, formatting;First one didn't happen. Bardiche was citing Conq's words, and attacking Conq with them. Your inferring that wrongly, hence, strawman.
Why do you think he lied about events that happened to attack a strawman argument instead of simply being wrong with his interpretation of events that happened?
> This ship wonders, then, why captain Bardiche cited those sentiments in response to captain Shalako's query on why captain SB was a Federation agent for reacting to their own ship assignment but captain Selery wasn't, and even worded his response as "Conq adequately[/i] clarified that". As a troubleshooting step, this ship requests you explain the meaning of the adverb "adequately" to it.
Agreed.
> This ship is most disturbed by captain Darkninjaabc's repeated attempts to discredit it, using buzzwords such as "rhetoric", "misrep" and "strawman", without even earnestly attempting to comprehend this ship's explanations. This ship hereby accuses captain Darkninjaabc of the same crimes he had accused this ship of.
Disagree.
Some Mafia players always assume the worst, the Other mafia players die.
And for my own standards for myself, doing something suspicious or allowing someone to convince others I did something suspicious is not good play, because it can cause a mislynch. And I take mafia games (too) seriously most of the time, so I want to play really really well. So since I perceived your post as implying that I'm suspicious, I attacked it pretty much as hard as possible.
Oh, I'm the only one here with a Meta on you Murren? Maybe I shouldn't feed you signals about what your townie tells are, it'll come bite me in the long run :V
Because of reasons.
I know your reasons, But I thought Selery and Serela were different people so consider it a moot point.
And considering some of the messier things Raitaki had handled last game, and how I find some of his town insights to be actually very poignant, this sudden drop in the quality of his posts comes along as very out of the left field, hence, vote.
Even with that aside, 'gut' is a poor and lazy excuse to vote someone
Red Flag.