First of all I'm sure everyone knows how I act submissive, second, no one wants everyone to gang up on them, I'm just trying to apply basic common sense
First point doesn't matter.
Second point we have two issues with.
1. Bandwagoning is in it's very nature "Ganging up on somebody." Adding a vote to gang up on somebody, and then subtracting your vote because you don't want to be ganged up upon is hypocritical.
2. In generaly, Scum have more to lose than Townies do when one of them is lynched. It's always a bad idea to back off when pushed, because it looks like you're worried about saving your ass.
Surprise 3. Common newbie scum mistake is getting into the mindset that you can lynch either your friends or people you know to be town. Townies however can only vote for enemies because they don't know for certain anyone's alignment. Therefore, Townies are much more likely to get into the mindset that they are right, as oppose to scum who think they always have to be wrong. Pulling out of the Pesco bandwagon like that makes it seem like you think you're wrong.
Which is why I'm unvoting you. This reeks of noob mistake
We do not like how you can easily ignore this situation.
Edible is still scum, so ##Vote:Edible?
Nor do we like how you ignore it to make another jokevote.
It's like how I decided KGH was probably noobtown last game.
How did you decide KGH was probably town last game? Besides guessing. In fact, if I remember correctly, you had to be told to reread him before you found him town (Or was that someone else?).
I have no reason to believe he's scum.
You have no reason to believe he's town. Although you've said that in the same sentence. We do not blame you for not voting him, as the main issue is that you ignore a current discussion topic and then choose not to bring anything else up. You are choosing to provide nothing.
##Unvote, ##Vote: UncertainKitten For these reasons.
VgameT looks like he is fooling around as well. His point may well be a good one, but we do not enjoy watching him backtrack on the subject by calling it a joke. We have low tolerance for jokes that do not make people laugh on instinct, as it could then be called into question if you did mean it as a joke.