and more importantly, wrong.
Fine, let's review your defense.
NNR's case is a fairly blatant misrep because he cherry picks from my posts, deliberately highlights things out of context, and selectively ignores what I did do.
I 'cherrypicked' quotes past the first 90 posts (I stop reading the first 90 after ED1), finding your
direct mentions of CF7 (or most of them, I'm not perfect), because you seemed like you were refusing to look at CF7 as a case at all. The quotes I find (and what you pull up) mostly put the nail in the head.
I didn't pull up quotes where you mentioned people voting CF7 for :reasons: because those aren't direct mentions and have nothing to do with your actual read on CF7, except for stupid assumptions like
King voted CF7 so for this story to make any sense at all, CF7 is probably town, and Shadoweh/Serela are probably also town.
(which is pure speculation)
All your opinions on CF7 are wishy-washy, which is strange when it was the leading wagon all day. IMO you are scum who didn't want to associate with it by pushing someone else, hoping that town would eventually get tired of it and jump on something else. By distancing you make sure that people can't directly link you with CF7 as your scumbuddy, without outright defending him.
NNR's actual case against me is misrep:
"Meanwhile, he, of course, votes Kingault, mostly known as The Easiest Player To Vote In The Universe, basically decrying the evils of a newbie who really needs to just switch out from the game if he can't find the will to play. "
No, CF7 was the easiest player to vote in the Universe. I could have done so without trouble and put CF7 at L-1, thus earning myself an easy slice of town cred had I voted for CF7 earlier in the day. CF7 was probably going to be lynched so there was no reason for scum!Sky to avoid that wagon.
But this isn't true. Kingault is much easier to vote, simply because he isn't doing anything. CF7 was a more scum-motivated player, but he was 'trying' and he originated as an ED1 case. It's easy to just blow that thing off. But Kingault was apathetic and his vote was pathetically jumpy. Easy case, easy vote.
CF7 was probably going to be lynched so there was no reason for scum!Sky to avoid that wagon.
This was never a guarantee at any point. I stated myself that I could have jumped off the wagon at some point if CF7 just actually fucking tried. But he didn't, and he got lynched.
It's a misrep because NNR presents a fake situation (that Kingault was the easiest vote) and that my vote was because Kingault is apparently a newbie. I stated consistently that Kingault's vote was scummy and it was, in fact, the easiest vote in the Universe. It's doubly misrep because NNR made this point out to be bigger than it really is.
It's not misrep. You were voting Kingault for easy reasons without taking a single glance into his motivations or his intent. You simply voted him for doing it.
The wagon on CF7 was based on what is more believably scum-motivated intentions, which became more clear and obvious as the day dragged on and CF7 refused to do anything, eventually culinating in him refusing to claim and basically admitting he was scum via defeatism and lack of town cooperation.
I stated the reasons for my Serela vote switch was because I was suspicious of the Hikari/Kingault interaction. It's relevant because he is painting a picture of me hopping on to a wagon for no reason, intending to discredit my vote even more. When I highlight this to NNR (that he completely ignored what I had done and why I had done it) he ignored what I had to say. It's confirmation bias.
Bullshit and backpedaling. Your jump was scummy and let you get off your weird Kingault stance for awhile. I've already gone over why your entire case on Sacchi is also bullshit and why you're wrong for pushing him.
It would have been easier and strategically more sound for scum!Sky to have bussed CF7, so this point doesn't hold water.
But it makes sense, and Scum Bussing does not always mean instant town cred. You probably have a buddy who DID bus, even, just so you both wouldn't be caught as one or the other.
I voted in my second post for Kingault because he made a bad vote (which most players agree with); I had no way of knowing that King was going to apathy out the rest of the day, so this is an invalid argument.
So why didn't you switch off when he went apathy-mode and continued to push it?
Anyway, I just can't see how you can wrap your head to say "Sky's vote on Kingault was to save a scumbuddy" but won't consider "Kingault's bad vote was bussing a scum buddy."
Glorious scuicidal bastard etc etc. Also insert all the stuff about Sacchi.
I never said it was a gambit. NNR misquoted me for profit.
Let me type that phrase in a different way.
